Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Fulcrum Roundtable: June Rewind

Opinion

Fulcrum Roundtable: June Rewind
stainless steel road sign
Photo by Miko Guziuk on Unsplash

Welcome to the Fulcrum Roundtable, formerly known as Democracy in Action, where you will find insights and discussions with Fulcrum's collaborators on some of the most talked-about topics.

Consistent with the Fulcrum's mission, this program aims to share diverse perspectives to broaden our readers' viewpoints.


I spoke with these Fulcrum columnists about their June writings:

Megan Thiele Strong, a Sociology professor at San José State University and a Public Voices Fellow at The OpEd Project and a member of the Scholars Strategy Network.

Faustina M. DuCros, a Sociology associate professor and scholar of race, migration, and inequality at San José State University and a Public Voices Fellow at The OpEd Project.

Elisabet Avalos is a leader in housing justice, developing programs for survivors of violence experiencing homelessness, and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project on Domestic Violence and Economic Security.

- YouTube youtu.be

Last month, Megan and Faustina co-authored, along with Susana Gallardo, the column: Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong. They write:

Immigration policies are built on colonialism and white supremacy. The hypocrisy is stark: a nation founded by colonizers who pillaged, kidnapped, and displaced indigenous populations and trafficked enslaved people is aggressively, yet selectively, anti-immigrant.

Megan spoke about access to information, "While in graduate school I was exposed to a lot of information that I didn't have. I didn't understand about wait times in our immigration system. So, when I heard people talking about 'well people should just get documented' I understood I had this insight that some people didn't have."

Faustina talked about the need to look back in order to understand what's happening right now, "Our immigration policies that we see today have historical precedent. Our country was founded in such a way that we have always had these kind of anti-immigrant sentiments. It's been embedded in our culture and then it gets embedded in our policy."

Elisabet wrote the column, Dear Latino Voter, where she shared her experience growing up in a Mexican and Nicaraguan family:

Even though Latinos voted in record numbers in 2024, millions of eligible Latino voters sat out an election whose outcome greatly impacts them.

Democrats and Republicans have mixed reputations in the Latino Community. For example, Reagan promoted himself as a compassionate conservative who sought out middle-of-the-road approaches to immigration reform. The same Reagan who also funded the Contras in Nicaragua, who were embattled with the Sandinista government.

Growing up in a Mexican and Nicaraguan family, there were those in my family who loved Reagan for his amnesty policies and others who despised him for fueling the devastating war in Nicaragua.

"Now, there's this cognitive dissonance of where do we fit in the political landscape? Because I have members of my family, mostly are Republican, very few Democrats.There's a bit of identity that's wrapped in it and a desire to assimilate to be grateful that we're living in this country now," she said. However, she sees things differently, "I see what the US has aspired to be in its ideals and where it falls short in terms of injustices and inequalities."

Check out Democracy in Action: May Retrospective

- YouTube youtu.be


Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network


Read More

How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values

FrameWorks Institute

How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values: How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change, produced by the FrameWorks Institute, explores how widely shared yet politically contested values can be used to strengthen public support for systemic reform. Values are central to how advocates communicate the importance of their work, and they can motivate collective action toward big, structural changes. This has become especially urgent in a climate where executive orders are targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and some nonprofits are being labeled as threats based on their stated missions. Many civil society organizations are now grappling with how to communicate their values effectively and safely.

The report focuses on Fairness, Stability, and Freedom because they resonate across the U.S. public and are used by communicators across the political spectrum. Unlike values more closely associated with one ideological camp — such as Tradition on the right or Solidarity on the left — these three values are broadly recognizable but highly contested. Each contains multiple variants, and their impact depends on how clearly advocates define them and how they are paired with specific issues.

Keep ReadingShow less
Barbershops Are Helping Black Boys See Themselves as Readers

One of the barbershops participating in the Barbershop Books program.

Photo courtesy of Alvin Irby

Barbershops Are Helping Black Boys See Themselves as Readers

Barbershop Books, an organization whose award‑winning literacy programs celebrate, amplify, and affirm the interests of Black boys while inspiring kids to read for fun, has spent more than a decade transforming everyday community spaces into joyful reading hubs. That mission was on full display this Martin Luther King Jr. Day, when the organization partnered with a neighborhood barbershop in the Bronx—Flava In Ya Hair—to offer free haircuts and free children’s books to local families.

As families examined stacks of Dog Man, Fly Guy, Captain Underpants, and Diary of a Wimpy Kid, barbershop owner Patrick shared that growing up, reading was associated with negative school experiences and used as a punishment at home. “Go in your room and read!” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

When Hegseth ordered all top brass to assemble in Quantico in September, he declared women could either meet male standards for combat roles or get cut. Strong message, except the military was already doing that, so Hegseth was either oblivious or ignoring decades of history. Confusion aside, it reaffirmed a goal Hegseth has made clear since his Fox News days, when he said, “I'm straight up saying we should not have women in combat roles.” Now, as of January 6th, the Pentagon is planning a six-month review of women in ground combat jobs. It may come as no surprise, but this thinly veiled anti-woman agenda has no tactical security advantage.

When integrating women into combat roles was brought to Congress in 1993, a summary of findings submitted that, “although logical, such a policy would [erode] the civilizing notion that men should protect . . . women.” Archaic notions of the patriarchy almost outweighed logic; instead, luckily, as combat roles have become available to them, more and more women are now serving, increasing military readiness. As it turns out, women are highly effective in combat. Khris Fuhr, a West Point graduate who worked on gender integration at Army Forces Command, calls this new review "a solution for a problem that doesn't exist." She says an Army study between 2018 to 2023 showed women didn’t just perform well in ground combat units but sometimes scored even better than their male counterparts.

Keep ReadingShow less