Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Fulcrum Roundtable: June Rewind

Opinion

Fulcrum Roundtable: June Rewind
stainless steel road sign
Photo by Miko Guziuk on Unsplash

Welcome to the Fulcrum Roundtable, formerly known as Democracy in Action, where you will find insights and discussions with Fulcrum's collaborators on some of the most talked-about topics.

Consistent with the Fulcrum's mission, this program aims to share diverse perspectives to broaden our readers' viewpoints.


I spoke with these Fulcrum columnists about their June writings:

Megan Thiele Strong, a Sociology professor at San José State University and a Public Voices Fellow at The OpEd Project and a member of the Scholars Strategy Network.

Faustina M. DuCros, a Sociology associate professor and scholar of race, migration, and inequality at San José State University and a Public Voices Fellow at The OpEd Project.

Elisabet Avalos is a leader in housing justice, developing programs for survivors of violence experiencing homelessness, and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project on Domestic Violence and Economic Security.

- YouTube youtu.be

Last month, Megan and Faustina co-authored, along with Susana Gallardo, the column: Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong. They write:

Immigration policies are built on colonialism and white supremacy. The hypocrisy is stark: a nation founded by colonizers who pillaged, kidnapped, and displaced indigenous populations and trafficked enslaved people is aggressively, yet selectively, anti-immigrant.

Megan spoke about access to information, "While in graduate school I was exposed to a lot of information that I didn't have. I didn't understand about wait times in our immigration system. So, when I heard people talking about 'well people should just get documented' I understood I had this insight that some people didn't have."

Faustina talked about the need to look back in order to understand what's happening right now, "Our immigration policies that we see today have historical precedent. Our country was founded in such a way that we have always had these kind of anti-immigrant sentiments. It's been embedded in our culture and then it gets embedded in our policy."

Elisabet wrote the column, Dear Latino Voter, where she shared her experience growing up in a Mexican and Nicaraguan family:

Even though Latinos voted in record numbers in 2024, millions of eligible Latino voters sat out an election whose outcome greatly impacts them.

Democrats and Republicans have mixed reputations in the Latino Community. For example, Reagan promoted himself as a compassionate conservative who sought out middle-of-the-road approaches to immigration reform. The same Reagan who also funded the Contras in Nicaragua, who were embattled with the Sandinista government.

Growing up in a Mexican and Nicaraguan family, there were those in my family who loved Reagan for his amnesty policies and others who despised him for fueling the devastating war in Nicaragua.

"Now, there's this cognitive dissonance of where do we fit in the political landscape? Because I have members of my family, mostly are Republican, very few Democrats.There's a bit of identity that's wrapped in it and a desire to assimilate to be grateful that we're living in this country now," she said. However, she sees things differently, "I see what the US has aspired to be in its ideals and where it falls short in terms of injustices and inequalities."

Check out Democracy in Action: May Retrospective

- YouTube youtu.be


Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network

Read More

Understanding Minority Rights and Inclusion in Democracies: U.S. and Abroad
text
Photo by Amy Elting on Unsplash

Understanding Minority Rights and Inclusion in Democracies: U.S. and Abroad

From the civil rights marches in the U.S. to Indigenous representation in Bolivia, minority groups have been a catalyst for democratic revolution and a reminder of representation’s value to society. Their struggles and contributions have not only tested the boundaries of democratic ideals but also redefined them. Minority inclusion erodes the constraints placed on democratic systems and expands their legitimacy, resilience, and meaning, though not without controversy and resistance.

What Does “Minority” Mean?

Keep ReadingShow less
When Senator Schmitt Says “America Belongs to Us,” Who Is “Us”?

Eric Schmitt speaks to supporters in Hall Pavilion at Englar Park on July 31, 2022, in Farmington, Missouri. S.

(Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

When Senator Schmitt Says “America Belongs to Us,” Who Is “Us”?

When Missouri Senator Eric Schmitt stood before the National Conservatism Conference earlier this month and declared, “America doesn’t belong to them—it belongs to us. We can no longer apologize for who we are," he wasn’t just making a rhetorical flourish. He was drawing a line—a line between who gets to belong and who gets erased.

Schmitt’s speech, titled “What Is an American,” celebrated the legacy of European colonizers, claiming they “repelled wave after wave of Indian war band attacks” and “tamed the continent” to build civilization. He described Americans as “the sons and daughters of the Christian pilgrims who poured out onto the ocean’s shores,” and closed with: “We’re not sorry. Why would we be sorry? America is the proudest and most magnificent heritage ever known to man”.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meacham: Political Violence in America Linked to Deep Questions of Identity and Inclusion

"Who is an American? Who deserves to be included in ‘We the people" - Jon Meacham

AI generated illustration

Meacham: Political Violence in America Linked to Deep Questions of Identity and Inclusion

In a sobering segment aired on CBS Sunday Morning, Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Jon Meacham addressed the escalating wave of political violence in the United States and its implications for the future of American democracy. Speaking with journalist Robert Costa, Meacham reflected on the recent assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk and a string of violent incidents targeting political figures and institutions.

"We do not want to be in a place where, because you disagree with someone, you pick up a gun. That is not what the country can be. And if it is, then it's something different. It's not the America we want," he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Promise in the Making: Thirty-Five Years of the ADA

Americans with Disabilities Act ADA and glasses.

Getty Images

A Promise in the Making: Thirty-Five Years of the ADA

One July morning in 1990, a crowd gathered on the White House lawn, some in wheelchairs, others holding signs, many with tears in their eyes. President George H.W. Bush lifted his pen and signed his name to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)—the most sweeping civil rights law for people with disabilities in the nation's history. It was a moment three decades in the making: a rare convergence of activism, outrage, and legislative will. The ADA's promise was simple—no longer would disability mean exclusion from public life—but its implications were anything but.

Thirty-five years later, the ADA remains a landmark, a legal bulwark against discrimination, and a symbol of hard-won visibility for a community that has been too often relegated to the margins. Yet, like every civil rights law, the ADA's story is more complex than a single signature or a morning in Washington. Its passage and its legacy have always been about more than ramps and regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less