Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Democracy in Action: May Retrospective

Opinion

Democracy in Action: May Retrospective
woman holding signboard
Photo by Fred Moon on Unsplash

Welcome to Democracy in Action, where you will find insights and a discussion with the Fulcrum's collaborators about some of the most talked-about topics.

Consistent with the Fulcrum's mission, this program strives to share many perspectives to widen our readers' viewpoints.


I spoke with these Fulcrum columnists:

Beau Breslin, the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair in Government at Skidmore College.

Vanessa Castro, a Public Voices fellow of the OpEd Project, the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice, and the Every Page Foundation.

Reverend Wesley Bridges, the CEO of Clergy For Prison Reform.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Beau spoke about a new series he's leading in the Fulcrum called “Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-generational Understanding through Constitution-making.” "Thomas Jefferson thought that constitutions should be rewritten every generation," said Beau. "Which for him meant every 19 years, we ought to metaphorically go back to Philadelphia and rewrite the Constitution."

"For Jefferson, generations represented important markers. And they were distinct," writes Beau in his introductory column. "Let each present people shape the national destiny in their own image, he (Jefferson) argued."

Each month, starting in June, the series will contrast a different element or component of seven constitutions, utilizing ChatGPT, each reflecting the priorities, beliefs, values, positions, and actions of a distinct generation.

In the column, Eliminating HIV Prevention Is a Public Health Crisis,” Vanessa wrote that the Trump administration is planning to eliminate the CDC Division of HIV Prevention, and what the collapse of HIV prevention will mean to thousands of people in the U.S. who will acquire HIV in the next five years.

"HIV isn't an isolated issue. It's something that impacts all of us," she said. We have 1.2 million people in the US living with HIV currently, and with the elimination of the HIV Prevention Division, we're going to see the ramifications in a variety of areas."

Vanessa also said that HIV is still an epidemic, and that the communities most disproportionately impacted are Black and Latin/a LGBTQ communities.

In Democracy on the Edge: Take Action Now To Maintain the Constitution,” Reverend Wesley Bridges wrote: Democracy is in danger. Voter suppression efforts are once again on the rise, most recently embodied in the reintroduction of the “SAVE Act.”

"Democracy is yet again under attack, "Reverend Bridges said. "There's no accountability when it comes to seeking absolute power. And that's what this bill is about."

The bill calls for the elimination of the use of driver’s licenses and state IDs and requires birth certificates instead.

Check out the April round table discussion:

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network and an accredited Solutions Journalism and Complicating the Narratives trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.


Read More

An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democratic Party Suicide
a piece of paper cut out of the shape of a donkey
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

Democratic Party Suicide

A recent New York Times article, "Moderate Democrats Prepare for 'War' Against an Ascendant Left," describes a disturbing perspective among mainstream, moderate, centrist Democrats. It is disturbing for many reasons.

First, there is the practical impact. If indeed mainstream Democrats attack socialist Democrats in a sustained, organized manner, there is only one possible result: the defeat of the Party in 2026 and the renewed vigor of Trump and his MAGA allies. Especially when combined with the all-out effort that AIPAC will mostly take to support Republican candidates running against Democratic candidates who are socialists. (See my article, "The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC.")

Keep ReadingShow less