Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Expanding Deportations: Trump’s Hardline Agenda May Cost the GOP

Expanding Deportations: Trump’s Hardline Agenda May Cost the GOP

artistic animated picture of Donald Trump

As the legal battle over President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles continues today in a federal appeals court in San Francisco. And a weekend that saw millions of people turn out in cities nationwide for the 'No Kings' protest, including many immigrant rights supporters, Trump is doubling down on expanding deportations.

In a post on Truth Social on Sunday, Trump called on federal agencies, "ICE Officers are herewith ordered, by notice of this TRUTH, to do all in their power to achieve the very important goal of delivering the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History.


And which states did the president target in his tirade? Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York - sanctuary cities he called, "the core of the Democrat Power Center, where they use Illegal Aliens to expand their Voter Base, cheat in Elections, and grow the Welfare State, robbing good paying Jobs and Benefits from Hardworking American Citizens," he rants."These Radical Left Democrats are sick of mind, hate our Country, and..." I'll spare you the rest, but it's nothing we haven't heard before. Trump has been playing that tune since coming down the elevator at Trump Tower in New York City in 2015.

What does the "largest Mass Deportation Program in History" look like? According to Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff and main architect of Trump's immigration policies, it is at least 3,000 arrests a day, up from about 650 a day during the first five months of Trump's second term.

So, it's about meeting quotas, and not about targeting violent criminals.

Trump has called himself "the president of law and order." Which, as I understand it, he enforces the laws of the land. Ensures that the rules and regulations established by the government are obeyed and followed by all. Right?

But it was just last week that Trump posted on Truth Social that he heard from the hotel, agriculture, and leisure industries that his “very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long-time workers away from them” and promised that changes would be made.

CNN reports that Tatum King, an official with ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations unit, wrote to regional leaders that same day, telling them to halt investigations of the agriculture industry, including meatpackers, as well as of restaurants and hotels.

The president is juggling a highly combustible combination of political pressures and policy problems, as the White House’s efforts to ramp up deportations spark anger from GOP allies, farmers, and ranchers in the nation’s agricultural areas, which overwhelmingly voted for Trump and yet heavily rely on foreign workers for their food supply, reports Politico.

So, Trump is "the president of law and order" on illegal immigration when it is in his political interest, which is, of course, why he's targeting sanctuary cities, and toning it down in rural areas.

California Governor Gavin Newsom responded to Trump's threats to send federal immigration agents to sanctuary cities via X: "His plan is clear: Incite violence and chaos in blue states, have an excuse to militarize our cities, demonize his opponents, keep breaking the law and consolidate power. It's illegal and we will not let it stand."

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker called the idea “ill-conceived.” NBC Chicago reports Pritzker said, “We do know ICE is coming once again in force to cities across the country, so we expect to see them in Chicago. I don’t know exactly how big the force will be, but I do know he has used other law enforcement along with ICE to carry out his ill-conceived mission to go after people who frankly are paying taxes and they’re law-abiding and they’ve been here for many, many years."

Despite assertions from the Trump administration, enforcement actions haven't primarily targeted individuals with criminal backgrounds. Data from NBC News reveals that among the over 51,000 migrants in ICE detention, fewer than 30% have criminal convictions. In February, nearly half of those deported by the U.S. had no criminal charges or convictions, and more than half of the individuals currently held in the U.S. are also without any charges or convictions.

Being in the United States without legal status is a civil infraction, not a criminal one, according to the American Immigration Council.

Trump's approval rating on immigration is plunging, polling shows. Newsweek reports that pollster G Elliott Morris' tracker shows that Trump's net approval rating on immigration has fallen by almost 7 points since June 8, when it stood at +5.4 points. It now stands at -1.3 points. This represents the fastest decline in his rating since the dip after press coverage of Kilmar Abrego Garcia peaked in April.

The president credits his return to the White House mainly to his promises to curb illegal immigration. However, internal tensions between business-oriented Republicans and immigration hardliners, who aim to target all undocumented immigrants, could jeopardize his position and the GOP's chances in the midterm elections.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

The Supreme Court Ruling in the Skrmetti Case Should Have Taken Sex Discrimination Into Account: 5 Things To Know

Supreme Court.

Equality Now

The Supreme Court Ruling in the Skrmetti Case Should Have Taken Sex Discrimination Into Account: 5 Things To Know

A quick recap:

  • The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s gender-affirming care ban, weakening equal protections.
  • Tennessee’s law denies care based on sex assigned at birth, despite claims it doesn’t.
  • The Supreme Court decision and Tenessee’s law violates international human rights standards on health and non-discrimination.
  • To reach a decision, the Court revived harmful legal reasoning.
  • Without stronger protections, discrimination can be hidden in neutral language.

On June 18, 2025, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Skrmetti, upholding Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors. The Court held that Tennessee’s law does not rely on a sex-based classification and therefore does not warrant heightened judicial scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution. The decision sidestepped the central role sex plays in the Tennessee law, effectively signaling that states may target gender-affirming care for transgender youth without triggering the constitutional protections typically afforded in such cases.

The Court accepted Tennessee’s claim that the law at issue merely regulates “based on age” and “medical use,” not on sex or transgender status. But this framing misrepresents how the law functions in practice: access to treatment is determined entirely by a patient’s sex assigned at birth. It’s not the treatment itself that is restricted, but who is seeking it and for what purpose.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats: From Programs to Policy – a New Vision for Families

"...The overreliance on programmatic solutions has left Democrats without a coherent policy framework to meet the needs of today’s families," writes Capita CEO/Co-Founder Joe Waters.

Getty Images, The Good Brigade

Democrats: From Programs to Policy – a New Vision for Families

As the Democratic Party reassesses its direction after last year’s electoral losses, it's encouraging to see new initiatives like Project 2029—a proposed, albeit late, answer to Project 2025—taking shape. But as Democrats rethink their policy, narrative, and electoral strategies, they risk repeating a familiar mistake in domestic social policy: substituting programs for policy.

By “programs,” I mean the specific interventions—like subsidies, grants, and services—designed to address particular social problems. Useful tools, yes, but too often, they are treated as ends in themselves. By “policy,” I mean the broader vision and principles that guide and integrate those tools toward a coherent national goal.

Keep ReadingShow less
census forms

Howard Gorrell outlines the need to include all American citizens who live overseas in the apportionment counts for congressional seats in the 2030 census.

Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

Counting All Americans Living Abroad in the 2030 Census for Congressional Apportionment

On Census Day 2020, April 1, two Americans from the three-member Expedition 62 crew—NASA Flight Engineers Jessica Meir and Andrew Morgan—aboard the spacecraft were counted in the 2020 Census for congressional apportionment.

On the same Census Day, I, then a resident of Delaware, was unexpectedly "stranded” in Rijeka, Croatia, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, I was not counted in the 2020 Census.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stitching & Sustainability: Refugee Artisan Initiative

ruler, measuring tape, working hands

Stitching & Sustainability: Refugee Artisan Initiative

Since Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, there has been an increase in anxiety around citizenship for immigrants and refugees in the United States.

By the end of his first day, Trump signed 10 executive orders relating to immigration. This included an order to halt refugee admissions, including tens of thousands of refugees who had already been cleared to come to the U.S. by the Biden administration. The order, “REALIGNING THE United States REFUGEE ADMISSIONS PROGRAM,” largely targets the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program.

Keep ReadingShow less