Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Standoff Between National Guard and L.A. Protesters

News

Just the Facts: Standoff Between National Guard and L.A. Protesters

Protesters stand off with National Guard soldiers and police outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC on June 08, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.

Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

LOS ANGELES, CA - California National Guard troops began to arrive in Los Angeles Sunday on the orders of President Donald Trump despite the state's governor's objections, where protests led to clashes between immigration authorities and demonstrators.

Governor Gavin Newsom sharply criticized the move as inflammatory and unnecessary. "The federal government is sowing chaos so they can have an excuse to escalate. That is not the way any civilized country behaves.


Newsom urged protesters to remain calm. "Don’t give Trump what he wants," Newsom wrote on social media.

“We’ll send whatever we need to make sure there’s law and order,” Trump said about sending troops to Los Angeles. “Last night (Saturday) in Los Angeles, we watched it very closely; there was a lot of violence there, and it could have got much worse.”

The unrest began on Friday when law enforcement officials in full riot gear arrived in Los Angeles to detain day laborers at a building supply shop. This operation was part of a broader enforcement initiative by the Trump administration aimed at addressing issues related to undocumented immigration.

So, when can a president deploy the National Guard? Here is the answer and more in the latest edition of Just the Facts:

The President can deploy the National Guard directly under the Insurrection Act, but only in specified situations.

The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the President to federalize the National Guard and deploy it on US soil when:

  • The US is invaded or in danger of invasion
  • There is a rebellion or danger of rebellion against the US government
  • The President is unable to execute the laws of the United States with regular forces.

Did Trump invoke the Insurrection Act?

In response to the outbreak of protests in Los Angeles, President Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act but instead referenced a specific provision of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which allows for the federal command of National Guard troops in the event of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority" of the United States.

However, the law also stipulates that such orders should be issued through the governors of the states, raising questions about Trump's legal authority to bypass Governor Newsom.

Examples of National Guard deployments by presidents

  • 1965: President Lyndon B. Johnson deployed the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators.
  • 1968: The Martin Luther King Jr. Assassination Riots prompted the federalization of the National Guard in several cities.
  • 1970: The New York Postal Strike led to the deployment of the National Guard to assist with postal operations.
  • 1992: President George H.W. Bush deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles after riots following the acquittal of police officers in the Rodney King beating case.
  • 2020: In the wake of protests following the killing of George Floyd, National Guard troops were deployed in some states.

Calls for reform

In 2022, the Brennan Center for Justice submitted a proposal to the House committee investigating the January 6 Capitol attack, advocating for reforms to the Insurrection Act. The aim of these reforms is to clarify ambiguous language and update the Act to address contemporary issues.

The Brennan Center identified specific sections that require clarification, including the criteria under which the President can invoke the Act, which states that "any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" is acceptable grounds.

The Center contends that this language is overly broad and could be interpreted in a way that allows the President to use the Act to respond to various forms of conspiracy, including protests or minor criminal acts, with active-duty military forces.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network and an accredited Solutions Journalism and Complicating the Narratives trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.



Read More

A close up of U.S. Senator Cory Booker speaking.

U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) speaks while Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, not pictured, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on oversight of the Department, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on March 3, 2026.

Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images/TNS

Cory Booker Should Be Ashamed of Himself

I wish “Meet the Press” host Kristen Welker had asked Sen. Cory Booker if he’s qualified to represent New Jersey given that nearly 9 out of 10 of his constituents are not Black.

I should probably back up.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Election-Litigation Complex
person holding white and red box

The Election-Litigation Complex

Since Bush v. Gore in 2000, election litigation has become a routine feature of American democracy. A few months ago, the Supreme Court made our litigious habit easier to indulge.

In Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, the Court expanded who could sue to challenge election procedures (candidates no longer had to demonstrate individualized harm to bring a case). This ruling, likely to stoke litigation, lands in a country already losing faith in its electoral system and amid increasing pressure on the judiciary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Liquid Governance is Casting a Shadow on the American Presidency

President Donald Trump at the White House on Oct. 14, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images/TNS)

Liquid Governance is Casting a Shadow on the American Presidency

To understand the current state of the American executive, one must look past the daily headlines and toward a deeper, more structural transformation. We are witnessing a presidency that has moved beyond the traditional "team of rivals" or even the "team of loyalists." Instead, the second Trump administration has become an exercise in "liquid governance," where the formal structures of the state are being hollowed out in favor of a highly personalized, informal power center.

The numbers alone are staggering. So far, the revolving door of the Cabinet has claimed high-profile figures with a frequency that would destabilize a mid-sized corporation, let alone a global superpower. The removal of Attorney General Pam Bondi, the exit of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and the recent resignation of Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer represent more than just standard political turnover. They signal a fundamental rejection of the idea that a Cabinet secretary is an institution's steward. In this White House, a Cabinet post is a temporary lease, subject to immediate termination if the occupant’s personal loyalty or public performance deviates even slightly from the president’s internal barometer.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why We Can’t Cut Earth Science to Fund the Next Earthrise Shot
Sun, Global warming, Global boiling from the climate crisis and the catastrophic heatwave, Climate change, the sun and burning Heatwave hot sun
Getty Images/Stock Photo

Why We Can’t Cut Earth Science to Fund the Next Earthrise Shot

We love space, but not as an abstraction. For my twin sons, it is a tradition. Their birthday themes have evolved from “Two the Moon” for their second birthday, featured on NASA.gov, to “From Space to the Farm,” with the boys in those iconic orange astronaut suits, standing in a cornfield. In the year of Inspiration4, we went all in with a full SpaceX mission dress-up. Not long after, one of them picked up the Pioneers and Innovators: Women of Color brochure from NASA Science that I brought home from a meeting at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center. He pointed at the brochure and exclaimed, “Mommy!” He truly thought I was in it. With that certainty, he told his friends that his mom had been to Mars. A reasonable conclusion for a four-year-old, considering the NASA swag at home, the launch party watching, and that brochure in his hands, it was a perfect conclusion.

The stunning new photos released after the Artemis voyage have refocused the public’s awe on our journey to the Moon. Yet, this year, I didn't watch Artemis live.

Keep ReadingShow less