Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just the Facts: Standoff Between National Guard and L.A. Protesters

News

Just the Facts: Standoff Between National Guard and L.A. Protesters

Protesters stand off with National Guard soldiers and police outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC on June 08, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.

Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

LOS ANGELES, CA - California National Guard troops began to arrive in Los Angeles Sunday on the orders of President Donald Trump despite the state's governor's objections, where protests led to clashes between immigration authorities and demonstrators.

Governor Gavin Newsom sharply criticized the move as inflammatory and unnecessary. "The federal government is sowing chaos so they can have an excuse to escalate. That is not the way any civilized country behaves.


Newsom urged protesters to remain calm. "Don’t give Trump what he wants," Newsom wrote on social media.

“We’ll send whatever we need to make sure there’s law and order,” Trump said about sending troops to Los Angeles. “Last night (Saturday) in Los Angeles, we watched it very closely; there was a lot of violence there, and it could have got much worse.”

The unrest began on Friday when law enforcement officials in full riot gear arrived in Los Angeles to detain day laborers at a building supply shop. This operation was part of a broader enforcement initiative by the Trump administration aimed at addressing issues related to undocumented immigration.

So, when can a president deploy the National Guard? Here is the answer and more in the latest edition of Just the Facts:

The President can deploy the National Guard directly under the Insurrection Act, but only in specified situations.

The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the President to federalize the National Guard and deploy it on US soil when:

  • The US is invaded or in danger of invasion
  • There is a rebellion or danger of rebellion against the US government
  • The President is unable to execute the laws of the United States with regular forces.

Did Trump invoke the Insurrection Act?

In response to the outbreak of protests in Los Angeles, President Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act but instead referenced a specific provision of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which allows for the federal command of National Guard troops in the event of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority" of the United States.

However, the law also stipulates that such orders should be issued through the governors of the states, raising questions about Trump's legal authority to bypass Governor Newsom.

Examples of National Guard deployments by presidents

  • 1965: President Lyndon B. Johnson deployed the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators.
  • 1968: The Martin Luther King Jr. Assassination Riots prompted the federalization of the National Guard in several cities.
  • 1970: The New York Postal Strike led to the deployment of the National Guard to assist with postal operations.
  • 1992: President George H.W. Bush deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles after riots following the acquittal of police officers in the Rodney King beating case.
  • 2020: In the wake of protests following the killing of George Floyd, National Guard troops were deployed in some states.

Calls for reform

In 2022, the Brennan Center for Justice submitted a proposal to the House committee investigating the January 6 Capitol attack, advocating for reforms to the Insurrection Act. The aim of these reforms is to clarify ambiguous language and update the Act to address contemporary issues.

The Brennan Center identified specific sections that require clarification, including the criteria under which the President can invoke the Act, which states that "any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" is acceptable grounds.

The Center contends that this language is overly broad and could be interpreted in a way that allows the President to use the Act to respond to various forms of conspiracy, including protests or minor criminal acts, with active-duty military forces.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network and an accredited Solutions Journalism and Complicating the Narratives trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.



Read More

A male senior stands in the shadow of a Social Security card with bite missing.

Social Security faces automatic cuts in 2032 and Medicare in 2033. New polling suggests that gives Democrats a powerful election issue. Here’s the case.

DNY59 / Getty Images

Will the Debt Crisis Engineered by Republicans Succeed in Cutting Social Security and Medicare?

Overview

The Republican Party’s long game to reduce administrative state entitlement spending centers on creating a debt crisis to provide an excuse for limiting such spending. It may soon pay off. That strategy involved a quarter-century of engineered tax cuts responsible for the stunning rise in sovereign U.S. debt, threatening an eventual economic crisis.

Social Security benefits are projected under current law to be automatically cut in 2032. And Medicare benefits are projected to be automatically cut in 2033. Congressional Republicans intend for those automatic cuts to occur, opposing new taxes to prevent cuts. And they are using the ballooning national debt as an excuse to also oppose new general revenue spending to prevent benefit cuts.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner at the White House.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner in the East Room of the White House on September 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

When Leaders Disagree, Ceremony Plays an Important Role

When Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived at the White House on 24 September, the U.S. welcomed him with an elaborate display of ceremony. The Army Herald Trumpets sounded a fanfare, the Chinese and American national anthems were played, and the Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps performed. A military review was followed by a flyover involving a B-2 bomber and four F-22 fighter jets, according to the White House. It was an extraordinary production for two countries that still disagree on some of the most important issues in international politics.

Talks between President Donald Trump and Xi touched on trade, artificial intelligence and Taiwan. The visit was marked by warm words and some signs of cooperation, but it did not erase the fundamental competition between the United States and China. So why was all this ceremony staged? It is tempting to dismiss political pomp as mere window dressing: an expensive historical relic surrounding the serious business taking place behind closed doors. As a music historian, however, I think this misunderstands what ceremony does. Ceremony can become particularly valuable when words alone are not enough.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans Voting in an Election

Americans Voting in an Election

Getty Images

Voting Is Not Just a Privilege It Is Every Citizens’ Responsibility

Despite the consistent determinations that US elections are secure across the country and there is virtually no evidence of non-citizens voting, in reports released as recently as September 2026; President Trump has doubled down on his claims that voter fraud is a major problem in America and on October 20th, he announced a new $25 Million Fraud Whistleblower program to be administered by the Department of Justice.

This announcement achieves a variety of the president’s goals: (i) It intentionally perpetuates the misinformation, that voter fraud is a serious problem in the United States; (ii) it undermines the trust in the voting systems, as well as in the states administering the elections; (iii) it fosters distrust amongst neighbors, who are more likely to suspect people of color and report them for a reward. This has the concomitant benefit of (iv) intimidating people who are in fear of going to the polls and (v) It gives the illusion that the federal government is prepared to give away more free money (along with the Tariff rebate checks, the Trump Accounts, the DOGE dividend, the direct payments for healthcare and the $5,000 for supporting GOP midterm candidates.)

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building with American flag behind it

Political Polarization and Extremism

Getty Images

Both Parties Have Forgotten How to Lose: It’s Time for Guardrails

On November 3 Americans vote in the midterm elections, and the most important question may be whether the losers accept the result. A Pew survey this summer found that just 55 percent of Americans are confident the midterms will be run fairly and accurately, down from 64 percent in 2022. The partisan detail is more revealing. Since 2024, Republican confidence has risen and Democratic confidence has fallen from 77 percent to 58 percent. Trust in the referee now depends on who holds power.

Democracy rests on a kind of sportsmanship agreement. The theologian Reinhold Niebuhr put it well: man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but his inclination to injustice makes it necessary. B. R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s constitution, called democracy a method of bringing revolutionary change without bloodshed. Both understood that the system works only if the losing side agrees to try again next time instead of burning down the field. Americans in both parties are forgetting how to do that.

Keep ReadingShow less