Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Standoff Between National Guard and L.A. Protesters

News

Just the Facts: Standoff Between National Guard and L.A. Protesters

Protesters stand off with National Guard soldiers and police outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC on June 08, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.

Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

LOS ANGELES, CA - California National Guard troops began to arrive in Los Angeles Sunday on the orders of President Donald Trump despite the state's governor's objections, where protests led to clashes between immigration authorities and demonstrators.

Governor Gavin Newsom sharply criticized the move as inflammatory and unnecessary. "The federal government is sowing chaos so they can have an excuse to escalate. That is not the way any civilized country behaves.


Newsom urged protesters to remain calm. "Don’t give Trump what he wants," Newsom wrote on social media.

“We’ll send whatever we need to make sure there’s law and order,” Trump said about sending troops to Los Angeles. “Last night (Saturday) in Los Angeles, we watched it very closely; there was a lot of violence there, and it could have got much worse.”

The unrest began on Friday when law enforcement officials in full riot gear arrived in Los Angeles to detain day laborers at a building supply shop. This operation was part of a broader enforcement initiative by the Trump administration aimed at addressing issues related to undocumented immigration.

So, when can a president deploy the National Guard? Here is the answer and more in the latest edition of Just the Facts:

The President can deploy the National Guard directly under the Insurrection Act, but only in specified situations.

The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the President to federalize the National Guard and deploy it on US soil when:

  • The US is invaded or in danger of invasion
  • There is a rebellion or danger of rebellion against the US government
  • The President is unable to execute the laws of the United States with regular forces.

Did Trump invoke the Insurrection Act?

In response to the outbreak of protests in Los Angeles, President Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act but instead referenced a specific provision of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which allows for the federal command of National Guard troops in the event of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority" of the United States.

However, the law also stipulates that such orders should be issued through the governors of the states, raising questions about Trump's legal authority to bypass Governor Newsom.

Examples of National Guard deployments by presidents

  • 1965: President Lyndon B. Johnson deployed the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators.
  • 1968: The Martin Luther King Jr. Assassination Riots prompted the federalization of the National Guard in several cities.
  • 1970: The New York Postal Strike led to the deployment of the National Guard to assist with postal operations.
  • 1992: President George H.W. Bush deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles after riots following the acquittal of police officers in the Rodney King beating case.
  • 2020: In the wake of protests following the killing of George Floyd, National Guard troops were deployed in some states.

Calls for reform

In 2022, the Brennan Center for Justice submitted a proposal to the House committee investigating the January 6 Capitol attack, advocating for reforms to the Insurrection Act. The aim of these reforms is to clarify ambiguous language and update the Act to address contemporary issues.

The Brennan Center identified specific sections that require clarification, including the criteria under which the President can invoke the Act, which states that "any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" is acceptable grounds.

The Center contends that this language is overly broad and could be interpreted in a way that allows the President to use the Act to respond to various forms of conspiracy, including protests or minor criminal acts, with active-duty military forces.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network and an accredited Solutions Journalism and Complicating the Narratives trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.



Read More

A close up of a person's hands typing on a laptop.

As AI reshapes the labor market, workers must think like entrepreneurs. Explore skills gaps, apprenticeships, and policy reforms shaping the future of work.

Getty Images, Maria Korneeva

We’re All Entrepreneurs Now: Learning, Pivoting, and Thriving the Age of AI

What do a recent grad, a disenchanted employee, and a parent returning to the workforce all have in common? They’re each trying to determine which skills are in demand and how they can convince employers that they are competent in those fields. This is easier said than done.

Recent grads point to transcripts lined with As to persuade firms that they can add value. Firms, well aware of grade inflation, may scoff.

Keep ReadingShow less
How to Break the ‘Rage Bait’ Cycle and Restore Trust in U.S. Democracy
Young woman talking on phone at laptop desk.
Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash

How to Break the ‘Rage Bait’ Cycle and Restore Trust in U.S. Democracy

Recently, Oxford University Press chose its word of the year for 2025: “rage bait.” For those who don’t know, it’s defined as “online content deliberately designed to elicit anger or outrage by being frustrating, provocative, or offensive.” Rage bait is also the driving force behind one of the most powerful industries in the United States: social media. It has become a debasement of the American media establishment, though a key piece of federal law could help alleviate the issue.

First, the prevalence and scale of rage bait should be established. Though rage bait lacks a precise definition, by combining anecdotally available information about its popularity with social media algorithms that reward such popularity, it can be inferred that there is quite a lot of rage bait out there. Numerous studies, including research from Yale and the University of Chicago, among others, have found that posts that provoke anger and outrage are more likely to be interacted with (i.e., liked, commented on, replied to, etc.) and to remain visible for longer periods, leading social media algorithms to increasingly recommend this content. This creates an environment for the creator that equates rage bait with success; for them, the more outrageous the content, the more likes, shares, and follows it gets, which encourages even more outrageous content. In addition, creators themselves can profit from rage bait if they gain enough of a following. This is how politics is becoming increasingly polarized, especially in teenagers' minds, whose brains are malleable and are exposed to the most rage bait. Social media companies also reap the benefits of uncontrolled online rage; it keeps people on the platforms longer and more often, creating more opportunities for advertisement, which naturally means more cash flowing into the coffers. Once the mainstream media discovered that rage bait created larger profits, they seized the opportunity. Researchers in New Zealand have found that the number of headlines that induce anger, disgust, fear, and sadness has increased in recent years, while joyful or neutral headlines have been steadily decreasing. Teenagers especially have borne the brunt of the negative impacts of social media, with rates of depression and anxiety skyrocketing, according to a study in the Journal of Adolescent Health. The result of all of this is both simple and depressing: Americans generally feel worse about themselves, those around them, and their government.

Keep ReadingShow less
Avoiding Top 2 Primary Lockouts, Promoting Our Vote, Timely Links
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

Avoiding Top 2 Primary Lockouts, Promoting Our Vote, Timely Links

Welcome to the latest edition of The Expand Democracy 3, written this week by Rob Richie with the support of Eveline Dowling and Nivea Krishnan. Every two weeks, we highlight promising pro-democracy ideas and local, national, and global news.

#1. Deep Dive - How California Democrats Could Avoid Top Two Primary Lockouts

The last 5 California governor polls show 2 Republicans ahead. Source: NY Times

Keep ReadingShow less
Trust in Elections Starts at the County Office
person holding white and blue round plastic container
Photo by Manny Becerra on Unsplash

Trust in Elections Starts at the County Office

Two people have been killed in Minneapolis during a confrontation tied to federal immigration enforcement. The state government is resisting the federal government. Citizens are in the streets. Friends of mine who grew up in countries that experienced civil conflict have started texting me, pointing out patterns they recognize.

I don't know how Minnesota will resolve. But I know what it represents: a growing number of Americans do not trust that our disputes can be settled through legitimate institutions. When that trust disappears, force fills the vacuum. This is the context in which we must think about the 2026 elections.

Keep ReadingShow less