Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Cost of Fear: What Immigration Enforcement Is Doing to Our Clinics

Opinion

The Cost of Fear: What Immigration Enforcement Is Doing to Our Clinics

Hands holding a heart

Picture provided by Latino News Network

He was supposed to come in three months ago. When he finally returned to the clinic, it was not for routine follow-up. Instead, it was because he could no longer feel his feet, and his vision had begun to blur. He told us he had missed his appointments out of fear. Immigration enforcement activity in his neighborhood and rumors of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) near clinics made him afraid to be seen entering a healthcare space. So he stayed home. He rationed his insulin until it ran out. Now he sat before us with uncontrolled diabetes, worsening nerve damage, and worsening vision concerning diabetic retinopathy.

Stories like this are becoming increasingly common. In Minneapolis, recent ICE raids have sent shockwaves through immigrant communities, with reports of enforcement agents present in or near healthcare settings, including exam rooms. Families describe being too afraid to leave their homes, even to see a doctor, or choosing the most ill child to bring to urgent care because bringing multiple children would be too risky. Clinics meant to serve as places of healing are being transformed into sites of fear.


What is unfolding in Minneapolis mirrors what we are witnessing in Chicago, one of the largest academic medical center hubs in the nation. As medical students training here and volunteering in free clinics such as the Community Health Clinic, we see the consequences firsthand. Patients delay care not because they do not value their health, but because the perceived legal and personal risks of seeking care feel too high. People arrive later and sicker, carrying advanced disease alongside the psychological trauma of living under constant threat.

It is proven that fear and perceived risk not only suppress health-care utilization but also worsen health outcomes. Studies have identified that the threat of immigration enforcement is associated with reduced access to health services among immigrant populations, regardless of health insurance status3 . Clinicians who work with immigrant communities have reported significant disruptions in the care and management of their patient population, which has been directly attributable to fear of deportation. Decades of health services research clearly demonstrate that any avoidance or delay in care, due to barriers related to fear, is directly associated with worsened disease presentation. At the end, the avoidance of care due to fear leads to more costly and emergency treatments with worsened clinical outcomes. Fear from immigration enforcement is no different than fear from other barriers, as poor outcomes are always inevitable.

National immigration enforcement policies have reshaped healthcare spaces, driving delayed care, worse outcomes, and increased emergency department utilization5,6. At our clinics, patients present with complications that could have been prevented or better managed. These are not failures of individual responsibility. They are predictable consequences of policies that push patients away from care.

As future physicians, we are already inheriting the clinical fallout of today’s immigration policies: diseases diagnosed too late, trust eroded before a patient ever enters the exam room, and preventable harm shaped by fear rather than biology. Our responsibility is not only to treat illness, but to recognize how policy becomes pathology. Ethical commitments to justice and nonmaleficence demand that immigration status never determine access to medically necessary care7.

A healthcare system cannot function if patients are afraid to walk through the door. When immigration enforcement creates conditions under which patients avoid preventive services, delay urgent care, or forgo treatment altogether, the result is preventable harm. No amount of clinical excellence can compensate for a system in which trust has eroded so profoundly that seeking care feels dangerous.

Physicians and future physicians must also speak up. We must practice trauma-informed, culturally responsive care, advocate within our institutions, and name what we are witnessing in our clinics. However, the responsibility cannot rest solely on individual clinicians. Chicago is home to some of the most influential health systems, not just in the Midwest but in the entire country, and dozens of national medical organizations whose voices shape health outcomes. When these institutions remain silent or issue vague, noncommittal statements, they allow fear to flourish. Hospitals are not just sites of care; they are consequential actors with the power to affirm that healthcare spaces are safe for everyone. Institutional silence, like individual silence, carries consequences and undermines the very mission of medicine. Silence is not neutrality; it is complicity.

Change is still possible. The 2026 midterm elections offer an important opportunity for the public to treat immigration policy as a referendum. The people must decide whether we tolerate a system in which fear-driven enforcement undermines public health or we, the people, demand policies that allow people to seek care without risk. The election might seem far away at the end of the year, but both physicians and future physicians must begin advocating for healthier communities now.

If we want healthier communities, we must begin with a simple truth: patients cannot heal in systems where they do not feel safe. Healthcare must remain a place of refuge, not fear – for the patient who rationed his insulin, for the parent afraid to bring their child to an appointment, and for the communities watching clinics become extensions of enforcement rather than care.

The Cost of Fear: What Immigration Enforcement Is Doing to Our Clinics was first published by the Latino News Network and was republished with permission.

Jessica Toledo is the daughter of Mexican American immigrants and a rising third year medical student in Chicago. She grew up witnessing health disparities in her family and community, which fueled her passion for health equity and advocacy; she now volunteers at one of Chicago’s largest free clinics serving underserved populations.

Joshua Samaniego is a second-year medical student in Chicago who grew up in Southern California in a household of Ecuadorian immigrants. He is interested in pursuing a career in orthopedic surgery while also working to address health disparities.

Dr. Susan Lopez is a first-generation, Mexican American hospital medicine physician at an academic medical center in Chicago. She also works with medical students at one of the largest student-run free clinics in Chicago.

Dr. Octavio Vega is a Mexican American primary care physician practicing at an academic medical center in Chicago.


Read More

A person grabbing a gallon of milk from an aisle.

New U.S. dietary guidelines from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brooke Rollins promote more milk in schools—but widespread Lactose Intolerance raises questions about equity and nutrition policy.

Getty Images, Theerawit Jirattawevut

Lactose Intolerant? You’re Not Alone

Last month, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins announced new dietary guidelines for Americans that were a major reset of federal nutrition policy. Among the new recommendations: drink more milk, eat more yogurt and cheese. While nutritionists continue to debate the scientific basis of the recommendations, changes in federal meal programs, including school meals, are already in the works.

Any school that participates in federal meal programs must offer milk with every meal, and new guidelines support whole milk in addition to 2% and skim milk already available in schools. While there is debate about the level of saturated fats in whole milk, there’s a deeper problem with the dairy recommendation for school lunches: the widespread prevalence of lactose intolerance. The vast majority of people on this planet, approximately 70%, are lactose intolerant. While it is estimated that only about 35% of the US population is lactose intolerant, that number is much higher depending on your ancestral history: 75% of African Americans; 90% of Asian Americans; 50% of Latinos; 50% of Ashkenazi Jews; and 70-90% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. For school districts with large populations of descendant groups, the recommendation to just drink more milk doesn’t work for millions of kids.

Keep Reading Show less
I Watched the State of the Union Address: Everyone is “Winning” Except Child Care

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers the State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber at the Capitol on February 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

I Watched the State of the Union Address: Everyone is “Winning” Except Child Care

During Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, we heard repeatedly that America is “winning.” The message was clear and consistent. But when it came to child care, there was only a single mention, briefly noted during a guest recognition for a woman in the audience who balances work and family responsibilities.

That was it.

Keep Reading Show less
Why ICE's Aggressive Tactics are a Public Health Crisis

Following killings in Minneapolis, ICE operations reignite concerns over overpolicing, racial profiling, and the mental health toll on Black communities nationwide.

Getty Images, David Berding

Why ICE's Aggressive Tactics are a Public Health Crisis

Following the recent killings of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents continue to conduct operations across the country. In recent weeks, under-the-radar sweeps have been reported in communities from California to North Carolina.

ICE’s use of targeted policing, harassment, and excessive force has pushed the issue of overpolicing to the forefront again. For many in Black communities across the U.S., these patterns feel painfully familiar, especially considering the agents are charged with infiltrating communities of color to detain “illegal immigrants.” And while some cases of aggressive policing make headlines, there are countless others that never make the news. Nevertheless, the harm is real, affecting the collective mental health of communities of color and others as well.

Keep Reading Show less
Native Americans Are Dying From Pregnancy. They Want a Voice To Stop the Trend.

Native Americans have been working with state and federal officials to boost tribal participation and leadership in maternal mortality review committees to better track and address pregnancy-related deaths. (Oona Zenda/KFF Health News)

Oona Zenda/KFF Health News

Native Americans Are Dying From Pregnancy. They Want a Voice To Stop the Trend.

Just hours after Rhonda Swaney left a prenatal appointment for her first pregnancy, she felt severe pain in her stomach and started vomiting.

Then 25 years old and six months pregnant, she drove herself to the emergency room in Ronan, Montana, on the Flathead Indian Reservation, where an ambulance transferred her to a larger hospital 60 miles away in Missoula. Once she arrived, the staff couldn’t detect her baby’s heartbeat. Swaney began to bleed heavily. She delivered a stillborn baby and was hospitalized for several days. At one point, doctors told her to call her family. They didn’t expect her to survive.

Keep Reading Show less