Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Open primaries legislation breaks through in New Mexico

Open primaries legislation breaks through in New Mexico
Manuel Augusto Moreno/Getty Images

Bob Perls, a former NM State Representative, is the Founder/President of NMOE, and Sila Avcil is the organization’s Executive Director.

In a historic move, the New Mexico Senate has just passed a semi-open primary elections bill, which allows registered independents and minor party affiliates to participate in primary elections without having to change their voter registration. The legislation passed with a vote of 27-10, with support from both Democrats and Republicans, and is seen as a significant step towards increasing voter participation in primary elections. Though 41 states have some form of open primaries, nearly all have a legislative bypass through the ability of citizens to change laws through ballot initiative. New Mexico does not allow citizen referenda and getting any legislature in the U.S. to open up primaries has been next to impossible.


New Mexico Open Elections (formerly NM Open Primaries) led the effort to pass this bill through the New Mexico Senate. We have been working tirelessly on a semi-open primaries bill, as well as other voter rights efforts since 2015. That effort has required significant foundation building over years, including organizing a coalition in support, clearing legal objections, educating lawmakers, thought leaders and the public, and raising awareness in the media.

A big shout-out to Jeremy Gruber with Open Primaries. He told us late last year that we must pass a semi-open primaries bill in New Mexico before we could even think of passing non-partisan primaries and/or ranked choice voting. If not for Jeremy, we might have skipped this step after seven years of frustration only to have missed a window of opportunity to take a small but important step for election reform that will open the door for more reforms to follow.

Under the current closed primary system in New Mexico, only registered party members are allowed to vote in primary elections, which we have criticized for disenfranchising a large portion of the electorate and causing issues for county clerks. Since 41 states have some level of open primaries and with the mobility of voters in America, most newcomers to this sunbelt state assume they can vote in all elections. They show up on primary election day and get angry at the election officials, like the county clerk. Then, they leave and don’t vote. With the passage of this bill, registered independents and minor party affiliates will be able to vote in either the Democratic or Republican primary elections.

The semi-open primary elections bill now heads to the House of Representatives. With the Senate vote signaling strong bipartisan support, we remain optimistic that it will ultimately be signed into law. The Secretary of State of New Mexico and many county clerks have expressed full support of this bill and many locals are showing up for public testimonies. The Governor, Michelle Lujan-Grisham, is on record during her last re-election campaign supporting a bill that allows independents to vote in primary elections.

The passage of the semi-open primary elections bill is a significant development for New Mexico, which has struggled with low voter turnout in recent years. By giving more voters a voice in the primary elections, the state is taking an important step towards increasing participation and ensuring that its elections are more democratic and representative of the people.

Just this year, NMOE gathered donations to reach and mobilize the 7,000 voters who changed their registration on primary election day to vote in the 2022 June primary election. We onboarded a Volunteer Coordinator and hired a lobbyist, previous State Representative Kelly Fajardo. With all boots on the ground, we have been able to manage the success of this bill as it made it through the Senate. With more organization and funding, we could help the state of New Mexico make history.

Efforts will continue as the bill moves through the House and NMOE will continue to need all the support we can get. Please visit our website to learn more and get involved.


Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less