Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Rethinking Drug Policy: From Punishment to Empowerment

Opinion

Rethinking Drug Policy: From Punishment to Empowerment
holding hands
Photo by Priscilla Du Preez 🇨🇦 on Unsplash

America’s drug policy is broken. For decades, we’ve focused primarily on the supply side—interdicting smugglers, prosecuting dealers, and escalating penalties while neglecting the demand side. Individuals who use drugs, more often than not, do so out of desperation, trauma, or addiction. This imbalance has cost lives, strained law enforcement, and failed to stem the tide of overdose deaths.

Fentanyl now kills an estimated 80,000 Americans annually. In response, some leaders have proposed extreme measures, including capital punishment for traffickers. But if we apply that logic consistently, what do we say about tobacco? Cigarette smoking and secondhand smoke kill nearly 480,000 Americans


each year. Should we execute tobacco farmers, CEOs, and distributors for the deaths caused by smoking? That would be absurd—but it reveals a deeper truth: our policies are driven more by emotion than by rational thinking.

We must shift our focus from punishment to empowerment. People make choices—sometimes harmful ones. I may choose to eat highly processed foods, drink excessively, or smoke. These decisions carry risks, but they are mine to make. The role of government should be to educate, not to intervene in one's personal choices. We all have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of that which makes us happy, as long as it does not put others in harms way.

One simple, life-saving reform would be to make fentanyl test strips freely available at every pharmacy, no questions asked. Users could test their drugs for lethal additives and receive pamphlets on where to find help, should they choose to seek it. This approach respects autonomy while reducing harm. It’s cost-effective, humane, and rooted in the same public health logic we apply to seatbelts, sunscreen, and flu shots.

We’ve seen this movie before. Prohibition turned alcohol into a black-market bloodbath. Today’s drug war echoes the same refrain, with similar results. We failed to learn from the past. It’s time we learn it now.

In Rhode Island, for instance, the state legalized supervised consumption sites in 2021. While controversial, early data suggests these programs reduce overdose deaths and connect users to treatment without increasing crime. These are not lawless zones—they are lifelines. They reflect a shift from moral panic to public health pragmatism.

I’ve seen how addiction quietly affects families in every ZIP code. My sister died from a drug overdosed in her bedroom, alone, ashamed, and unaware that help was available. My mother didn’t know where to turn for help. She feared judgment, legal consequences, and the stigma of acknowledging my sister's addition. We can and must do better for our love ones.

It’s time for lawmakers to stop posturing and start listening to public health experts, to families, and to the data. And it’s time for citizens to demand policies that reflect compassion, not just punishment. We need to treat addiction as a health issue, not a moral failure. We need to invest in education, prevention, and support not just law enforcement.

My book, Honesty and Integrity: The Pillars of a Meaningful Life, explores these themes and others—how principled leadership and informed choice can reshape our communities. I write not as a politician or pundit, but as an advocate who believes in reducing harm and saving lives through practical solutions.

Let’s stop fighting a war we can’t win and start building a system that saves lives.


Bruce Lowe is a homeowner advocate and community leader in Lubbock, Texas. He writes about civic integrity, public health, and principled reform. His book, "Honesty and Integrity: The Pillars of a Meaningful Life", explores how ethical leadership can strengthen families, uplift communities, and create a better life for all.

Read More

The baking isn’t done only by elected officials. It’s done by citizens​

a view of the capitol building

The baking isn’t done only by elected officials. It’s done by citizens​

In November, eight Senate Democrats voted with Republicans to end the longest government shutdown in history, with little to show for the 43-day closure.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), who was not one of the eight, told discouraged Democrats, “We need to remember the battle we’re in….[We need to continue the fight] to defend our country from Trump and MAGA. Two things coming up that are really important,” Whitehouse said, “1) In December, there will be a vote on extending the Affordable Care credits we fought for. That gives us…weeks to hammer the Republicans so hard that we actually get a good Affordable Care credits bill.

Keep ReadingShow less
The baking isn’t done only by elected officials. It’s done by citizens​

a view of the capitol building

The baking isn’t done only by elected officials. It’s done by citizens​

In November, eight Senate Democrats voted with Republicans to end the longest government shutdown in history, with little to show for the 43-day closure.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), who was not one of the eight, told discouraged Democrats, “We need to remember the battle we’re in….[We need to continue the fight] to defend our country from Trump and MAGA. Two things coming up that are really important,” Whitehouse said, “1) In December, there will be a vote on extending the Affordable Care credits we fought for. That gives us…weeks to hammer the Republicans so hard that we actually get a good Affordable Care credits bill.

Keep ReadingShow less
Is Politico's Gerrymandering Poll and Analysis Misleading?
Image generated by IVN staff.

Is Politico's Gerrymandering Poll and Analysis Misleading?

Politico published a story last week under the headline “Poll: Americans don’t just tolerate gerrymandering — they back it.”

Still, a close review of the data shows the poll does not support that conclusion. The poll shows that Americans overwhelmingly prefer either an independent redistricting process or a voter-approved process — not partisan map-drawing without voter approval. This is the exact opposite of the narrative Politico’s headline and article promoted. The numbers Politico relied on to justify its headline came only from a subset of partisans.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump's Deregulation Lure: A Wage Squeeze for the Global South
person using black laptop computer
Photo by Kanchanara on Unsplash

Trump's Deregulation Lure: A Wage Squeeze for the Global South

When Colm Kelleher, chairman of UBS, sat down with Scott Bessent in recent months to discuss uprooting the bank's headquarters from Zurich to New York, it was more than corporate maneuvering. It was a signal flare for the financial world under Donald Trump's second term. Bessent promised a regulatory bonfire that could slash compliance costs and open the floodgates for American finance. The reported talks underscore a broader shift: the United States is apparently positioning itself as the unassailable hub of global capital, drawing in institutions like UBS with tax breaks and lighter oversight. Yet this allure comes at a steep price for emerging markets, where wage growth is already fragile. What looks like a boom for American workers masks a quiet trap, one that could deepen the divide between rich nations and the rest.

Bessent's vision, laid out in private conversations and public hints, paints a picture of American exceptionalism reborn. He has warned of a "perfect storm" of inherited inflation and supply disruptions from the Biden years, now to be tamed by aggressive deregulation and targeted tariffs. In one recent interview, he blamed soaring beef prices on a mix of migrant-driven cattle issues and lingering policy failures, framing Trump's agenda as the corrective force. The rhetoric is folksy, but the policy is sharp: roll back rules that hobble banks, lure foreign firms stateside, and shield domestic industries with import duties. UBS's flirtation with relocation fits neatly here. Across the Atlantic, Trump offers relief: no more endless stress tests, faster mergers, and a friendlier tax code. If UBS moves, it could save hundreds of millions annually in regulatory overhead, funneling those gains into higher bonuses for its New York traders.

Keep ReadingShow less