Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just the Facts: The Deficit

money in politics

The total U.S. federal budget deficit for the 2024 fiscal year was $1.83 trillion.

SOPA Images/Getty Images

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

The size of the United States deficit and the potential dangers to the United States economy is widely debated in Congress. This writing presents our readers with just the facts on the deficit.


All data and information were obtained from Copilot, an AI-powered chatbot owned and operated by Microsoft Corporation.

What was the total United States deficit in 2024 and what is 1% of that in dollars?

The total U.S. federal budget deficit for the 2024 fiscal year was $1.83 trillion. Thus, 1% of 1.83 trillion is 18.3 billion dollars and one-tenth of 1% is 18 Billion dollars.

What percent of the U.S. deficit accounts for entitlement programs?

In the 2024 fiscal year, entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid accounted for about 50% of the total federal budget. This means that roughly half of the federal spending was dedicated to these major entitlement programs.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

What percent of the U.S. deficit is the Department of Defense?

Defense-related spending accounts for a significant portion of the U.S. federal budget. In the 2024 fiscal year, defense spending was approximately 13.3% of the entire federal budget. However, when considering the U.S. deficit, defense spending is a major contributor but not the largest portion, compared to entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Thus, entitlements and defense added together account for roughly 63% of the total federal budget.

What percent of the U.S. deficit is Foreign Aid?

Foreign aid represents a very small portion of the U.S. federal budget. In the 2023 fiscal year, foreign aid was about 1.2% of the total federal budget. When considering the U.S. deficit, foreign aid is an even smaller fraction.

What percent of the U.S. deficit is Veteran Benefits and Services?

Veterans' benefits and services account for approximately 4.7% of the total federal budget.

What percent of the U.S. deficit is net interest payments?

Net interest payments on the U.S. national debt are a significant portion of the federal budget. In 2023, net interest payments totaled $658 billion, which was about 2.4% of the U.S. GDP. For the fiscal year 2024, interest payments reached roughly $1.2 trillion, making it the third-largest spending category behind Social Security and Medicare. Every 1% increase in the interest rate paid on the deficit increases the deficit by roughly 120 billion dollars.

How does the U.S. deficit compare as a percentage of GDP now versus the last 20 years?

The U.S. federal budget deficit as a percentage of GDP has fluctuated over the past 20 years. Here's a brief overview:

  • Early 2000s: The deficit was relatively low, around 2-3% of GDP.
  • 2008-2009: The deficit spiked due to the financial crisis and stimulus spending, reaching around 10% of GDP.
  • 2010s: The deficit gradually decreased as the economy recovered, hovering around 4-5% of GDP.
  • 2020-2021: The COVID-19 pandemic caused another spike, with the deficit reaching around 15% of GDP due to emergency spending and economic relief measures.
  • 2022-2023: The deficit began to decrease again but remained higher than pre-pandemic levels, around 6-7% of GDP.
  • 2024: The deficit is projected to be around 6.2% of GDP.

Comparing the current deficit to the last 20 years, it's clear that the pandemic had a significant impact, causing a sharp increase in the deficit. However, recent projections indicate that the deficit is expected to remain relatively high compared to the historical average.

How does the U.S. deficit as a percentage of GDP compare to other European nations, Russia, and China?

The U.S. deficit as a percentage of GDP is currently around 6.28%. This means the U.S. government is spending more than it earns.

Comparatively, here's how some other nations stack up to European nations and to Russia and China:

  • European Union: 3.5%
  • Italy: 7.4%
  • France: 5.6%
  • Spain: 4.8%
  • Russia: 1.4%
  • China: 3.9%

Who holds our debt?

As of the end of 2023, about 70% of the U.S. national debt is held by domestic entities, which include American individuals, institutions, and the Federal Reserve.

The remaining 30% is held by foreign governments and investors. The top three foreign creditors are:

  1. Japan: Holds about 15% of the U.S. debt.
  2. China: Holds about 5% of the U.S. debt.
  3. Other foreign investors: Including countries like Ireland, Luxembourg, and Belgium, collectively hold about 4% of the U.S. debt.

How much would be cut from the deficit if the tax rate for the top 50% of wage earners went up by 5%?

To estimate how much would be cut from the deficit if the tax rate for the top 50% of wage earners went up by 5%, we need to consider a few factors:

  1. Current Deficit: The U.S. deficit for the fiscal year 2024 was approximately $1.83 trillion.
  2. Current Tax Rate: The top 50% of wage earners are currently taxed at an average rate of 14.9%.
  3. Revenue Increase: A 5% increase in the tax rate would mean the new tax rate would be 19.9%.

Assuming the top 50% of wage earners contribute nearly 98% of federal income taxes, we can estimate the additional revenue generated:

  • Current Revenue: Let's assume the top 50% of wage earners currently contribute $2.2 trillion in taxes (based on IRS data).
  • Additional Revenue: A 5% increase of $2.2 trillion would generate $110 billion in additional revenue.

So, increasing the tax rate for the top 50% of wage earners by 5% could potentially reduce the deficit by $110 billion annually or only .32% of the total annual debt.

SUGGESTION:

Just the Facts: Trade Deficits

Just the Facts: DEI

David Nevins is co-publisher ofThe Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of theBridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Project 2025: Trump strikes at the Federal Reserve and financial protection
1 U.S.A dollar banknotes

Project 2025: Trump strikes at the Federal Reserve and financial protection

Last spring and summer, The Fulcrum published a 30-part series on Project 2025. Now that Donald Trump’s second term The Fulcrum has started Part 2 of the series has commenced.

Project 2025, the 800-page right-wing policy blueprint for the Trump administration, proposed a menu of controversial policies designed to bring numerous independent federal agencies under the thumb of President Donald Trump. In mid-February, the White House issued a series of controversial – and possibly illegal – executive orders designed to implement the Project 2025 agenda. One targeted agency with the potential for extensive economic damage is the Federal Reserve Board and its affiliated branches.

Keep ReadingShow less
15 Years After Citizens United, Seattle Can Show the Way Forward

Rolled up American bills against a yellow background.

Getty Images, Mensent Photography

15 Years After Citizens United, Seattle Can Show the Way Forward

January 21, 2025 marked the 15th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, a decision that opened the floodgates for unlimited corporate spending in elections. Since that ruling, super PACs and outside spending have skyrocketed and the voices of everyday voters have been drowned out by wealthy donors and corporate interests. The impact of Citizens United is clear: the political system is increasingly controlled by the rich, while ordinary voters are left behind.

According to recent data from OpenSecrets, the numbers are striking. In 2008, outside spending in U.S. elections totaled $574 million. By 2012, that number had more than doubled to nearly $1.3 billion, and by 2024, outside spending exceeded $4.5 billion, much of it spent by super PACs and outside groups. In 2008, the top 100 individual donors contributed just $80.9 million, a small fraction (1.5%) of the overall $5.3 billion spent on federal elections. By 2024, that share had ballooned, with the top 10 donors alone contributing at least $42.3 million each—led by Elon Musk’s record-breaking $280 million.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money Makes the World Go Round Roundtable

The Committee on House Administration meets on the 15th anniversary of the SCOTUS decision on Citizens United v. FEC.

Medill News Service / Samanta Habashy

Money Makes the World Go Round Roundtable

WASHINGTON – On the 15th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and one day after President Trump’s inauguration, House Democrats made one thing certain: money determines politics, not the other way around.

“One of the terrible things about Citizens United is people feel that they're powerless, that they have no hope,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Ma.).

Keep ReadingShow less
American flag and money
Javier Ghersi/Getty Images

Thwarting conflict profiteers to save the republic

Over several decades, fringe ideas have grown in popularity to reach the crescendo of noise we have today. Truth and facts are routinely dismissed by half the country (progressive and conservative!) and societal trust is very low. We may be witnessing the decline of the American Empire, or on a more optimistic note it could be the clearing we need for the United States to live into the promise of the founders — a multiracial, pluralistic democratic republic.

At the heart of the matter there lies a disjointed group of savvy marketing people who have created a highly profitable business by dividing society against itself. This “business of breaking” was perfectly timed to take advantage of many societal-changing innovations like the internet, email, social media and most recently artificial intelligence. Ironically It is the democratization of information where discerning truth from lies became more difficult.

Keep ReadingShow less