Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just the Facts: The Deficit

money in politics

The total U.S. federal budget deficit for the 2024 fiscal year was $1.83 trillion.

SOPA Images/Getty Images

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

The size of the United States deficit and the potential dangers to the United States economy is widely debated in Congress. This writing presents our readers with just the facts on the deficit.


All data and information were obtained from Copilot, an AI-powered chatbot owned and operated by Microsoft Corporation.

What was the total United States deficit in 2024 and what is 1% of that in dollars?

The total U.S. federal budget deficit for the 2024 fiscal year was $1.83 trillion. Thus, 1% of 1.83 trillion is 18.3 billion dollars and one-tenth of 1% is 18 Billion dollars.

What percent of the U.S. deficit accounts for entitlement programs?

In the 2024 fiscal year, entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid accounted for about 50% of the total federal budget. This means that roughly half of the federal spending was dedicated to these major entitlement programs.

What percent of the U.S. deficit is the Department of Defense?

Defense-related spending accounts for a significant portion of the U.S. federal budget. In the 2024 fiscal year, defense spending was approximately 13.3% of the entire federal budget. However, when considering the U.S. deficit, defense spending is a major contributor but not the largest portion, compared to entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Thus, entitlements and defense added together account for roughly 63% of the total federal budget.

What percent of the U.S. deficit is Foreign Aid?

Foreign aid represents a very small portion of the U.S. federal budget. In the 2023 fiscal year, foreign aid was about 1.2% of the total federal budget. When considering the U.S. deficit, foreign aid is an even smaller fraction.

What percent of the U.S. deficit is Veteran Benefits and Services?

Veterans' benefits and services account for approximately 4.7% of the total federal budget.

What percent of the U.S. deficit is net interest payments?

Net interest payments on the U.S. national debt are a significant portion of the federal budget. In 2023, net interest payments totaled $658 billion, which was about 2.4% of the U.S. GDP. For the fiscal year 2024, interest payments reached roughly $1.2 trillion, making it the third-largest spending category behind Social Security and Medicare. Every 1% increase in the interest rate paid on the deficit increases the deficit by roughly 120 billion dollars.

How does the U.S. deficit compare as a percentage of GDP now versus the last 20 years?

The U.S. federal budget deficit as a percentage of GDP has fluctuated over the past 20 years. Here's a brief overview:

  • Early 2000s: The deficit was relatively low, around 2-3% of GDP.
  • 2008-2009: The deficit spiked due to the financial crisis and stimulus spending, reaching around 10% of GDP.
  • 2010s: The deficit gradually decreased as the economy recovered, hovering around 4-5% of GDP.
  • 2020-2021: The COVID-19 pandemic caused another spike, with the deficit reaching around 15% of GDP due to emergency spending and economic relief measures.
  • 2022-2023: The deficit began to decrease again but remained higher than pre-pandemic levels, around 6-7% of GDP.
  • 2024: The deficit is projected to be around 6.2% of GDP.

Comparing the current deficit to the last 20 years, it's clear that the pandemic had a significant impact, causing a sharp increase in the deficit. However, recent projections indicate that the deficit is expected to remain relatively high compared to the historical average.

How does the U.S. deficit as a percentage of GDP compare to other European nations, Russia, and China?

The U.S. deficit as a percentage of GDP is currently around 6.28%. This means the U.S. government is spending more than it earns.

Comparatively, here's how some other nations stack up to European nations and to Russia and China:

  • European Union: 3.5%
  • Italy: 7.4%
  • France: 5.6%
  • Spain: 4.8%
  • Russia: 1.4%
  • China: 3.9%

Who holds our debt?

As of the end of 2023, about 70% of the U.S. national debt is held by domestic entities, which include American individuals, institutions, and the Federal Reserve.

The remaining 30% is held by foreign governments and investors. The top three foreign creditors are:

  1. Japan: Holds about 15% of the U.S. debt.
  2. China: Holds about 5% of the U.S. debt.
  3. Other foreign investors: Including countries like Ireland, Luxembourg, and Belgium, collectively hold about 4% of the U.S. debt.

How much would be cut from the deficit if the tax rate for the top 50% of wage earners went up by 5%?

To estimate how much would be cut from the deficit if the tax rate for the top 50% of wage earners went up by 5%, we need to consider a few factors:

  1. Current Deficit: The U.S. deficit for the fiscal year 2024 was approximately $1.83 trillion.
  2. Current Tax Rate: The top 50% of wage earners are currently taxed at an average rate of 14.9%.
  3. Revenue Increase: A 5% increase in the tax rate would mean the new tax rate would be 19.9%.

Assuming the top 50% of wage earners contribute nearly 98% of federal income taxes, we can estimate the additional revenue generated:

  • Current Revenue: Let's assume the top 50% of wage earners currently contribute $2.2 trillion in taxes (based on IRS data).
  • Additional Revenue: A 5% increase of $2.2 trillion would generate $110 billion in additional revenue.

So, increasing the tax rate for the top 50% of wage earners by 5% could potentially reduce the deficit by $110 billion annually or only .32% of the total annual debt.

SUGGESTION:

Just the Facts: Trade Deficits

Just the Facts: DEI

David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Blank Checks and Empty Promises: The Collapse of Congressional Fiscal Power

A politician counting money in front of the US Capitol Building.

Getty Images, fStop Images - Antenna

Blank Checks and Empty Promises: The Collapse of Congressional Fiscal Power

From Governing to Grandstanding

There was a time—believe it or not—when Congress actually passed budgets the old-fashioned way: through debate, compromise, and the occasional all-night session, not theatrics designed to appeal to cable news and social media. The process, while messy, followed a structure: hearings, markups, votes, and compromises. That structure—known as regular order—wasn’t just congressional tradition. It was the scaffolding of democratic accountability. It has also been steadily torn down.

Deadlines and dysfunction better define today’s Congress. Instead of the back-and-forth of healthy deliberation, Congress relies on continuing resolutions and last-minute omnibus bills. Budget gimmicks that were once used only during fiscal emergencies—backloaded cuts, timing shifts, reconciliation sleight-of-hand—are now the rule, not the exception. Congress has shifted from prioritizing policy to prioritizing the message and crafting political narratives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Outside Money, Inside Influence: How National Donors Shaped the 2024 Congressional Elections

An individual voting with money.

Getty Images, Orbon Alija

Outside Money, Inside Influence: How National Donors Shaped the 2024 Congressional Elections

In 2024, campaign fundraising in federal elections was more nationalized than ever. Candidates for both the House and Senate continued a decades-long trend of relying less on donations from the voters they represent and more on contributions from donors across the country. The nationalization of campaign contributions, once a concern among elections experts, is now a defining feature of congressional campaigns.

An analysis of 2024 House and Senate campaign data reveals just how deeply this transformation has taken hold. From candidates in small states with limited donor bases to top congressional leaders with national profiles — and especially in competitive races in battleground states — non-local campaign contributions were ubiquitous.

Keep ReadingShow less
Who Really Pays for Congress? Local Donors All but Disappear in 2024

Hundred dollar bills.

Giorgio Trovato on Unsplash

Who Really Pays for Congress? Local Donors All but Disappear in 2024

WASHINGTON, D.C. - There is an old saying: All politics is local. However, many voters may get the impression this is becoming less and less a reality -- particularly in US House and Senate elections where candidates are elected to represent specific districts or states, but campaign to a national audience.

This is because local influence in the most contested races is dying out -- a statement not contrived from opinion, but fact.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money in politics
Super PACs tied to major parties misled voters, complaint alleges
erhui1979/Getty Images

Is It Possible To Reverse Course on the Corruptive Influence of Money in American Politics?

A $288 Billion Dollar Proto-Presidency?

The 2024 presidential election saw Elon Musk spend over a quarter of a billion to elect President Trump, which is exactly $288 million according to The  Washington Post report of the final tally of campaign spending on January 31, 2025. Did that staggering campaign contribution buy the billionaire the right to attend cabinet meetings and stand beside the President in the Oval Office and at other events? Did those millions buy a Proto-Presidency, complete with the opportunity to run a department aggressively dismantling government and radically changing what government does for ordinary Americans while personally benefiting from government contracts? Professor Lawrence Lessig argues that ‘Musk is the clearest example of the corrupting influence of money in politics.’ According to a recent PEW study, 72% of Americans agree that money is the number one corrupting influence in politics. So, what can be done? Are we too far down this road to make meaningful change, or are there options?

Keep ReadingShow less