Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

GOP Takes Charge, Faces Huge Fiscal Hurdles

Opinion

GOP Takes Charge, Faces Huge Fiscal Hurdles

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 03: U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks after winning the speakership for the 119th Congress at the US Capitol on January 3, 2025 in Washington, DC. Mike Johnson on January 3 won re-election for the U.S. House speaker in a slim Republican majority, after swaying two out of the three members of his party who had joined Democrats to block his bid.

(Photo by Sha Hanting/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

The GOP has a tough task ahead: dealing with a looming financial crunch in Washington next year. Key parts of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) will expire, adding to the national debt, which has already hit $36.1 trillion. Contributing to the problem, the spending ceiling under the Pay-As-You-Go Act will require $190 billion in cuts, and enforceable caps on discretionary spending will also end. If Congress doesn’t act, an additional $5 trillion could be added to the debt in the coming year, according to the Economic Policy Innovation Center.

Investors are growing increasingly concerned about the rising national debt. Despite the Federal Reserve cutting rates, economists are worried about climbing bond yields, while Treasury officials are concerned about weak bond sales this year. Meanwhile, new interest payments on the debt have leap-frogged over the defense budget as the fastest-growing item of the federal budget.


There is no easy fix. Congress must change its recent behavior and start acting responsibly. It must begin by weighing the long-term consequences of any decisions.

The TCJA has been credited with boosting economic growth and generating tax revenue. But, at the same it also helped to increase the national debt. As Congress reconsiders the law, it should keep the parts that spur investment and economic growth. For instance, the 20% tax deduction for pass-through businesses and the ability to write off capital investments immediately are keepers.

Despite the GOP’s insistence to the contrary, not every tax cut in the TCJA should be continued. GOP proposals like cutting the corporate tax rate even further would add billions to the deficit. Another in the must-to-avoid category is universal tariffs, which are likely to send the economy into a tailspin by increasing inflation, alienating trade partners, and, generally, harming American consumers’ finances.

As usual, Congress is focused on the wrong culprit. What truly drives our debt problem is non-discretionary spending. Social Security and Medicare are predicted to grow rapidly as more Americans retire. While, at the same time, interest payments on the debt will continue to expand. Taken together, these three parts of the budget will account for 77% of total spending growth over the next ten years.

The types of reforms advocated by Elon Musk and others, like ending telework for federal workers, might save some money, but by themselves will not fix the larger problem. Congress must be willing to address the primary drivers of the ballooning debt: entitlements and interest payments. However, it must fix these problem areas without at the same time imposing undue burdens on middle-class families.

One area where Congress can make a big impact is by closing tax loopholes. These special exclusions, deductions, and credits add up to $1.8 trillion a year in foregone revenue and mainly help high-income earners and businesses. Examples include tax breaks for employer-provided health insurance, capital gains from home sales, and municipal bonds.

Another budget buster is the well-intentioned $7,500 electric vehicle subsidy from Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. This government program could be adjusted to better target middle- and low-income Americans. The same reasoning applies to other tax benefits like the student loan interest deduction and housing credits, which should also focus on less affluent Americans.

The national debt is a complex problem that won’t be solved with glib rhetoric and fiscal band-aids. To get the country on the right track, Congress will need to do two things: responsibly reduce spending and improve the tax code to ensure everyone pays their fair share. Protecting critical programs like Social Security and Medicare must remain a priority. Still, reforms—like negotiating drug prices or lifting the income cap on payroll taxes—can help make these programs sustainable.

Besides closing loopholes that primarily help high-end taxpayers, reducing tax loopholes for special interests and big corporations, especially if they have used these benefits to their financial advantage in the past, should also be seriously considered.

The challenge will be balancing fiscal responsibility with the need to invest in healthcare, education, and infrastructure to support the economy long term.

The new GOP-led Congress has a tough road ahead. But with smart, fair decisions, lawmakers can help avoid a fiscal crisis while building a stronger foundation for future generations.

Robert Cropf is a professor of political science at Saint Louis University.


Read More

Chicago’s First Environmental Justice Ordinance Faces Uncertain Future in City Council

David Architectural Metals, Inc. is a longtime Chicago metal fabrication company for commercial and industrial construction. The company is situated in the same area as the other sites.

Chicago’s First Environmental Justice Ordinance Faces Uncertain Future in City Council

CHICAGO— Chicago’s first environmental justice ordinance sits dormant in the City Council’s Zoning Committee. Awaiting further action, some activists and alders have been pushing to get it passed, while others don’t want it passed at all.

At a Nov. 3 rare special committee meeting, Ald. Bennett Lawson (44th Ward), chair of the City Council’s Zoning Committee, said he would not call for a vote on the ordinance. His decision signaled the measure may lack enough support to advance, but its sponsors think there is enough community support to push it forward.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats' Affordability Campaign Should Focus on Frozen Wages
fan of 100 U.S. dollar banknotes

Democrats' Affordability Campaign Should Focus on Frozen Wages

Affordability has become a political issue because the cost of basic necessities - food, health and child care, transportation, and housing - for 43% of families today outruns their wages.

Inflation is one factor. But the affordability issue exists primarily because inflation-adjusted (real) wages for 80% of working- and middle-class men and women have been essentially frozen for the past 46 years.

Keep ReadingShow less
Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less