Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Agribusiness and Hospitality Sectors, Threatened by Deportations, Poured Millions Into Republican Victories

News

Agribusiness and Hospitality Sectors, Threatened by Deportations, Poured Millions Into Republican Victories

Farm workers weed a bell pepper field in southern California.

Photo by Etienne Laurent/AFP via Getty Images

President Donald Trump’s messaging about deporting undocumented farm, food and hospitality workers has shifted multiple times in recent days, with his latest comments indicating he may be open to a middle-ground solution.

Despite appeals from affected industries and Trump’s comments in support of leniency in such sectors, ICE agents resumed deportation-related work last week, edging the Trump administration nearer to its goal of 3,000 arrests every day. This reversal comes as congressional Republicans continue their work on the “Big Beautiful Bill,” Trump’s wide-ranging policy initiative that would add $75 billion to the ICE budget over the next five.


The short pause on deportations in two industries that collectively employ more than 1.2 million undocumented workers was an attempt to partially address fears that the national food supply chain and the leisure industry would be upended by the raids.

Trump even issued a rare concession on social media on June 12: “Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.”

Just days later, Trump rescinded that stay – but later told reporters there might be another way to help “reputable” farmers who take responsibility for undocumented workers. The industry, which depends heavily on an undocumented workforce, has long been a reliable supporter of Republican politics.

The agribusiness sector funneled hundreds of millions to Republicans and conservative groups in 2024. Individuals and political action committees affiliated with the sector donated $107 million to candidates and political parties during the most recent election cycle, with 66 percent going to Republicans. That continues a decades-long trend of primarily supporting GOP candidates.

The sector spent $50.9 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2025, a little ahead of the 2024 pace ($179.8 million total). Some of the top spenders include Archer Daniels Midland, which funneled $2 million into lobbying in Q1 of 2025 (compared to $870,000 in Q1 the year prior), as well as PepsiCo Inc, which spent $1.6 million on lobbying since the start of the year.

Reyes Holdings, one of the largest players in the food sector, funneled the most of any industry titan to conservative groups. The company’s employees and PACs gave $2.1 million to Republican candidates and parties. Brothers Christopher and Jude Reyes, who co-lead the company, donated another $19 million to a pair of super PACs: $10 million to the Senate Leadership Fund, which works to keep a Republican majority in the Senate, as well as $9 million to the Congressional Leadership Fund, which is focused on House Republicans. Their only Democratic contribution was a $75,000 donation to California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s 2022 campaign.

The second largest political contributor in the agribusiness sector in the 2024 cycle, Mountaire Corp., also focused on the conservative candidates and causes. Employees and PACs gave $2.7 million to Republican candidates and parties, while company chairman Ronald Cameron funneled $16.6 million to other groups, including $4.5 million to each of three super PACs: Americans for Prosperity Action, the Congressional Leadership Fund and the Senate Leadership Fund.

The other leading contributors in the sector, such as British American Tobacco, Rai Services Co and Altria Client Services, each directed all or nearly all of their political contributions to conservative groups.

The national farm labor force is propped up by undocumented farm workers, who make up 42 percent of all farm employees. As a result, many of the largest farms in the country continue to lobby for and support Democratic organizations despite the industry trending towards support for predominantly Republican causes.

Gwendolyn Sontheim of Cargill Inc., a global food company that owns some farms, donated $1 million to the Democratic-supporting House Majority PAC, almost $576,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and $68,000 to Kamala Harris in 2024.

United Farm Workers, a labor union that works to protect farm workers and ensure fair wages, spent relatively little on lobbying and political contributions in relation to the agribusiness titans. Employees and members of the union funneled all their donations to Democrats: $9,000 to Harris in 2024, along with a host of other Democrats in numbers ranging from tens of dollars to a few thousand. The union spent just $70,000 on lobbying in 2024 and only $10,000 in the first quarter of 2025. Other farm unions demonstrated similar patterns of political spending.

On June 10, the UFW released a statement noting, “Any federal actions designed to terrorize and separate farm worker communities is an attack on Californians and a dangerous waste of resources. … We also say not just to farm workers, but to all working people in California: we are in this together.”

In California, more than 75 percent of farm workers are undocumented migrants, making it one of the most hard-hit by immigration raids. Yet, California’s largest farm, Tejon Ranch, contributed over $152,000 to the Republican Party in 2024, compared to just $67 donated to Democrats.

Meanwhile, the lodging and tourism industry has primarily donated to Democrats over the past decade. In 2024, PACs and employees donated $18 million to candidates and party committees, with 65 percent going to Democrats.

But affiliates of the industry’s largest political contributor, TRT Holdings, funneled the lion’s share of their donations in 2024 to conservative groups: $501,000 to GOP parties and candidates, along with, totalling $3.6 million to conservative super PACs.

The largest hotel companies, such as Marriott International and Hilton Worldwide, slightly increased their lobbying spending in the first quarter of 2025, compared to previous years. Marriott International’s Q1 spending jumped from $540,000 in 2024 to $640,000 in 2025. Similarly, Q1 spending for Hilton Worldwide rose by $40,000 to $440,000 between 2024 and 2025.
Overall, the lodging and tourism industry spent $5.2 million on lobbying in the first of the year after spending $17.7 million last year.

Agribusiness and Hospitality Sectors, Threatened by Deportations, Poured Millions Into Republican Victories was originally published by Open Secrets.

Natalie Jonas is a freelance investigative journalist.

Read More

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

"Just the Facts" on the new $100,000 H-1B visa fee, its impact on tech firms, startups, and healthcare, plus legal challenges and alternatives for skilled workers.

Getty Images, Popartic

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What Is the $100,000 Visa Fee?

This is a new one-time $100,000 application fee for employers seeking to sponsor foreign workers under the H-1B visa program. The visa is designed for highly skilled professionals in fields like tech, medicine, and engineering.

Keep ReadingShow less
Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

Dave Anderson shares how the Fed’s rate cuts reveal misconceptions about fiscal vs. monetary policy and government intervention in U.S. free markets.

Getty Images, Royalty-free

Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

The Federal Reserve Board's move on Wednesday, Sept. 17, to lower the federal funds interest rate by one-quarter of a point signals that it is a good time to discuss a major misconception that most voters have about public policy.

It is typically assumed that Democrats stand for government intervention into free markets to counteract the inherent bias towards those who are more economically well off. It is also assumed that Republicans, in contrast, reject the idea of government intervention in free markets because it violates rights to property and the natural order of free markets, which promotes the greatest total welfare.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of a nurse's hand resting on the shoulder of an older man who's hand rests on top.

September is World Alzheimer’s Awareness Month. Dr. Dona Kim Murphey explains how systemic failures, Medicare privatization, and racial disparities are deepening the dementia care crisis.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

Profits Over Patients: Re-Examining Systems As Culprit in Dementia Care (or Lack Thereof)

September is World Alzheimer's Awareness Month. Alzheimer's is the most common kind of dementia, a disorder characterized by the progressive loss of brain cells and, in its final stages, complete dependence—the inability to remember, speak, move, or even eat or swallow unassisted. Many end up in nursing homes. Seven million people are impacted by dementia in the United States today, a number that will more than double in the next 25 years.

But awareness is not just about understanding the magnitude of the problem or content expertise on the choices we make as individuals to mitigate the enormous present and future challenges of this disease. It is about a consciousness of the role of systems, namely insurance and government, that are seriously undermining our ability to care.

Keep ReadingShow less
Government by Deadline: Why Shutdowns Are Killing Congressional Power

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) arrives for a news conference following a House GOP Conference Meeting at the U.S. Capitol on September 16, 2025 in Washington, DC. House Republican leadership faces a long week as they try to rally House Republicans behind a stopgap funding bill to avert a shutdown, while also navigating growing pressure to boost security for lawmakers in the wake of Charlie Kirk's killing.

Getty Images, Kent Nishimura

Government by Deadline: Why Shutdowns Are Killing Congressional Power

Every autumn brings its rituals: football, spectacular fall colors, and in Washington, the countdown to a government shutdown. Once a rare emergency, these funding standoffs have become as routine as pumpkin‑flavored beverages.

September 30 marks when federal funding will expire, a recurring cliff since the 1970s. Each year it looms larger, shaping the rhythm of Congress’s work. Lawmakers are again scrambling—not to solve problems, but merely to keep the lights on.

Keep ReadingShow less