Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

News

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

"Just the Facts" on the new $100,000 H-1B visa fee, its impact on tech firms, startups, and healthcare, plus legal challenges and alternatives for skilled workers.

Getty Images, Popartic

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What Is the $100,000 Visa Fee?

This is a new one-time $100,000 application fee for employers seeking to sponsor foreign workers under the H-1B visa program. The visa is designed for highly skilled professionals in fields like tech, medicine, and engineering.


Who does it apply to, and when does it take effect?

It applies only to new H-1B petitions (not renewals or current visa holders). It takes effect in the next annual lottery cycle (the system used to allocate the 85,000 annual H-1B slots). Employers must submit proof of payment before filing the petition, and petitions will be restricted for 12 months if payment isn’t made.

Why Was It Introduced?

President Trump framed the fee as a way to:

  • Protect American jobs by discouraging companies from hiring cheaper foreign labor.
  • Curb abuse of the H-1B system, especially by outsourcing firms that flood the lottery with low-wage applications.
  • Raise revenue—the administration estimates it could generate over $100 billion to fund tax cuts and reduce national debt.

Who’s Affected?

  • Tech giants like Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, and Google—which collectively sponsor tens of thousands of H-1B workers—are expected to be hit hardest.
  • Startups and small businesses may struggle to afford the fee, potentially losing access to global talent.
  • Universities and hospitals that rely on H-1B workers for research and healthcare roles are also concerned.

Are There Any Exceptions?

This is not 100% certain, but the administration has stated:

  • Medical professionals (e.g., physicians and residents) may be exempt.
  • National interest waivers can be granted by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
  • Current visa holders are not subject to the fee when reentering the U.S.

What Is the H-1B Visa?

The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows U.S. companies to temporarily employ foreign workers in specialty occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise.

Key Features:

  • Fields covered: IT, engineering, finance, medicine, architecture, and more.
  • Education requirement: Typically a bachelor’s degree or higher in a relevant field.
  • Duration: Initially granted for three years, extendable to a maximum of six years.
  • Annual cap: 85,000 visas per year (65,000 regular + 20,000 for U.S. master’s degree holders).

Who Uses It?

  • Major tech firms (Google, Amazon, Microsoft)
  • Universities and research institutions
  • Hospitals and medical centers, startups, and consulting firms

Are there any related programs?

Trump also introduced the “Trump Gold Card.” For $1 million, individuals can obtain permanent residency and a path to citizenship, and for $2 million, companies can sponsor a foreign worker under a corporate version of the Gold Card. A “Platinum Card” is also in development, offering tax exemptions for wealthy foreigners spending up to 270 days in the U.S.

Legal and Industry Reactions:

  • Immigration attorneys are preparing lawsuits, citing a lack of public comment and potential overreach of executive authority.
  • Tech companies have issued travel warnings to H-1B employees abroad.
  • India’s government has expressed concern over the humanitarian and economic impact.

Do Merit Requirements Still Exist?

Even with the new fee, the core H-1B eligibility criteria remain unchanged:

  • The job must be in a specialty occupation requiring a bachelor’s degree or higher.
  • The applicant must have relevant education and experience.
  • Employers must pay the prevailing wage, matching what similar U.S. workers earn.

You can’t just pay $100,000 and get a visa if you don’t meet the qualifications.

But the $100,000 Fee Adds a Major Barrier:

This new fee applies only to new H-1B applications, and it’s paid by the employer, not the worker. However, it disincentivizes companies from sponsoring foreign talent unless they’re absolutely essential. It favors wealthier firms that can afford the fee, potentially sidelining startups and nonprofits. However, it does not replace the lottery system as applicants still go through the random selection process, but only if the fee is paid.

No Merit-Based Waivers (Yet):

Unlike some other visa categories, there’s no clear path for merit-based exemptions from the fee. The only known exceptions are medical professionals in underserved areas and national interest waivers, which are vague and not well-defined yet.

Bottom Line:

Merit is still required to qualify for the H-1B visa, but the new policy puts a price tag on access. It’s not a “pay-to-play” system in the purest sense—you still need the skills—but it’s now a pay-to-compete system.

If you’re an employer who can’t afford the $100,000 H-1B visa fee or can’t justify it, there are still viable paths for skilled workers to work in the U.S. legally.

What Are the Visa Alternatives if Employers Can’t Afford the $100,000 Fee?

  • O-1 Visa: Extraordinary Ability: For individuals with exceptional achievements in science, education, business, arts, or athletics.
    • No lottery or cap—direct merit-based approval.
    • Requires proof of national/international recognition.
    • Faster processing and tailored to specific projects or roles.
    • Ideal for researchers, artists, and elite professionals.
  • EB-1A Visa: Permanent Residency for Top Talent: A green card option for those with extraordinary ability—no employer sponsorship required.
    • Self-petition allowed.
    • Leads to permanent residency.
    • No labor certification or H-1B-style restrictions.
    • Best for long-term career planning.
  • L-1 Visa: Intra-Company Transfers: For employees of multinational companies transferring to a U.S. office.
    • Must have worked abroad for the company for at least one year.
    • No annual cap.
    • Suitable for managers, executives, or specialized knowledge workers.
David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Is America Still Welcoming Global Talent?
Close up of american visa label in passport.
Getty Images/Alexander W. Helin

Is America Still Welcoming Global Talent?

A few weeks ago, when new proposals limiting J and F visa expansion were open for public comment, immigration quickly became a hot topic again at our research center, where more than half the scientists come from abroad. Some worried about their plan, others traded news and updates about the H1-B. A colleague asked if I was anxious too. To my own surprise, I wasn’t.

I used to be. But after weathering turbulent visa policies under different U.S. administrations, like many other international scholars, I have learned to stay flexible and mobile. My U.S. visa for a graduate program was delayed due to tensions between the U.S. and China several years ago. Up against a deadline for the program, I pivoted to Japan to continue the research training. What felt like a closed door became a new window: I fortunately joined a world-class team in tissue-engineering vascular medicine, broadened my view of clinical care and research, and began bridging my path as both practitioner and scientist. Committed to strengthening the “bench-to-bed” pipeline—learning real-world needs and translating research to meet them—I chose the United States again to carry this work forward.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of a train passing by quickly.

The proposed merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern could create America’s first coast-to-coast freight rail system.

Rail Merger Holds Promise for the Economy

Boosting domestic industry and manufacturing continues to be a key economic theme. A recently proposed merger between two major railroad companies could advance those goals—and it carries particular promise for underserved communities who are often on the front lines of America’s workforce.

The merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern would create the nation’s first transcontinental freight rail system, a vision pursued since 1869, when the “golden spike” famously connected the east and west.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ending taxes on home sales would benefit the wealthiest households most – part of a larger pattern in Trump tax plans

File:Homes-for-sale-Burrus-02.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Ending taxes on home sales would benefit the wealthiest households most – part of a larger pattern in Trump tax plans

Not long after U.S. housing prices reached a record high this summer – the median existing home went for US$435,000 in June – President Donald Trump said that he was considering a plan to make home sales tax-free.

Supporters of the idea, introduced by U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene as the No Tax on Home Sales Act in July, say it would benefit working families by eliminating all taxes on the sales of family homes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

Dave Anderson shares how the Fed’s rate cuts reveal misconceptions about fiscal vs. monetary policy and government intervention in U.S. free markets.

Getty Images, Royalty-free

Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

The Federal Reserve Board's move on Wednesday, Sept. 17, to lower the federal funds interest rate by one-quarter of a point signals that it is a good time to discuss a major misconception that most voters have about public policy.

It is typically assumed that Democrats stand for government intervention into free markets to counteract the inherent bias towards those who are more economically well off. It is also assumed that Republicans, in contrast, reject the idea of government intervention in free markets because it violates rights to property and the natural order of free markets, which promotes the greatest total welfare.

Keep ReadingShow less