GAO recommends new tracking of political appointees
Congress should consider legislation compelling presidents to provide "comprehensive and timely" information on the number of political appointees serving in their administrations, the government's watchdog agency recommends.
"The public has an interest in knowing the political appointees serving and this information would facilitate congressional oversight and hold leaders accountable," the Government Accountability Office says in a report out this week. "No agency in the federal government is required to publicly report comprehensive and timely data on political appointees."
The GAO studied the systems for monitoring political appointees, and their compliance with government ethics and financial disclosure rules, at the Interior and Health and Human Services departments and Small Business Administration. It said all could use some improvement.
Neal is federal government affairs manager at R Street Institute, a nonpartisan and pro-free-market public policy research organization.
The term "democratic norms" has become a misnomer over the last year. America's governing institutions are undermined by elected officials who dishonor their offices and each other. Standards of behavior and "normal" processes of governance seem to be relics of a simpler time. Our democracy has survived thus far, but the wounds are many.
Free speech and free press have been the White House's two consistent whipping posts. Comments such as "I think it is embarrassing for the country to allow protestors" and constant attacks on press credibility showcase President Trump's disdain for the pillars of democracy. Traditional interactions between the administration and the press are no longer taken for granted. Demeaning, toxic criticisms have become so common that they're being ignored. As the administration revokes critics' press passes and daily briefings are canceled, normalcy in this arena is sorely missed.
Having had remarkable success at signing people up to vote in Texas last year, an Austin group of activists is expanding its pilot program into a full-blown national effort to overcome the sometimes ignored first hurdle for people in the voting process — registration.
"There are millions of voters who are registered who don't get out to vote," said Christopher Jasinski, director of partnerships for Register2Vote. "But the unmeasured part of the pie is the actual number of unregistered voters."