Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Bordering on Despair: The True Cost of the American Dream

News

People waiting in line
A U.S. Border Patrol agent checks immigrants' identification as they wait to be processed by the U.S. Border Patrol after crossing the border from Mexico.
Qian Weizhong/VCG via Getty Images

On TikTok, migrants post themselves wading through the Rio Grande or crowding into shelters at the southern border. Families also share clips of green card approvals and swearing-in ceremonies, cheering as loved ones become citizens or can finally be reunited with loved ones from their home countries. These images highlight a contradiction: the United States exposes migrants to dangerous uncertainty, yet it remains the world’s top destination for people seeking new lives.

The U.S. foreign-born population reached 53.3 million in January 2025 before dipping to 51.9 million in June, still one of the highest levels ever recorded, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of Census data. Immigrants now comprise approximately 15% of the U.S. population, a share that has steadily increased over the past two decades.


Migrants take extraordinary risks to get here. Customs and Border Protection reported more than 2 million encounters at U.S. borders in fiscal year 2023, underscoring the number of people who attempted the journey despite the dangers. CBP also logged hundreds of deaths along the border, ranging from drownings to desert exposure, and thousands of rescues of migrants in distress. The U.S.-Mexico border is considered the deadliest land migration route in the world.

Amanda Aguilar is a Staff Attorney at American Gateways, a legal advocacy group for immigrant survivors, in San Antonio, Texas. She has heard firsthand what her clients who are seeking asylum have fled from when coming to the U.S.

“What most of my clients now are fleeing is some sort of political persecution in Venezuela or Cuba,” she said. “You have to make it to this side of the border to ask for asylum, and for a lot of people who are being persecuted, that is the only form of relief they would qualify for.”

Angeles Ponpa reporting

Venezuelans and Cubans stand out in asylum data. In fiscal year 2023, Venezuelans filed nearly 100,000 affirmative asylum applications, while Cubans filed about 78,600, according to USCIS Annual Statistical Report for 2023. Together, those two groups made up almost 40 percent of all new applications.

Decades of political instability, economic collapse, and government crackdowns have driven millions from Venezuela. Cubans, meanwhile, face limited legal pathways to leave the island, prompting many to attempt the journey through Central America or by sea.

Mohaimina “Mina” Haque, from The Law Office of Mohaimina Haque, PLLC in Washington, is an attorney who works with immigrant families and workers, and explained how asylum works depending on how people enter the country.

“Asylums are two types. One is affirmative asylum, those are for people who come properly through proper inspection, properly means proper inspection through the airport, and then they want to seek asylum within one year of their arrival in the United States,” said Attorney Haque.

“People who are crossing the border and coming here, what they’re seeking is defensive, they are defending themselves. When they’re detained… they have a reasonable basis of fear that if they return to their home country, they may face persecution for many protected grounds,” she continued.

U.S. law requires migrants to be physically present in the country to request asylum, which forces those fleeing persecution to cross the border before they can apply for asylum. That rule left thousands of families stranded in Mexico when the Trump administration canceled the CBP One scheduling system in January 2025. Advocates say the cancellations, along with cartel control of border crossings, put migrants at greater risk.

Even when migrants make it into the United States, they often face years in court or detention. The TRAC system reported more than 3 million pending immigration court cases in 2025, the largest backlog on record.

“I have had clients who have been detained for two years, fighting it, losing it, appealing it, winning appeal,” said Attorney Aguilar, who has seen clients spend years in detention fighting their cases.

“And then we’re going to the same judge and then maybe ultimately getting denied again, but they’re willing to sacrifice two years of their life just to not go back to their home country.,” she said.

Those long delays take a toll. Detention facilities, many run by private companies, keep migrants away from families and lawyers. Documents tell of widespread anxiety and depression as cases drag on. Policy shifts between administrations add to the uncertainty, leaving migrants unsure whether new rules will benefit or harm their chances.

Migrants often encounter threats long before they reach a U.S. courtroom. Criminal groups in Central America and Mexico target families waiting along the border.

Attorney Aguilar described one case that stood out to her.

“I had a client who was kidnapped in the Darien Forest, which is the forest between Colombia and Panama, and forced to do free labor for extended periods of time,” she said. “I had clients who have been kidnapped several times in Mexico, like more than one time in Mexico, and that’s really unfortunate because a lot of those people were waiting for CBP One appointments.”

Beyond asylum, other migrants pursue legal pathways such as family or employment-based petitions, which carry their own challenges.

“There are immigrants who come under the family-based petition. There are immigrants who come for employment-based petitions, those are the most common, and then there are people who are special immigrants who went through some war-torn country,” said Attorney Haque, describing the country’s layered legal framework.

Attorney Haque added that the U.S. legal structure often overwhelms new arrivals.

“The law of the U.S. can be a bit complicated for a new immigrant because we have state laws, we have local laws, we have federal laws,” she said.

Migrants continue to pursue these avenues because they want to reunite with families and secure stability.

“What happens afterwards if people cannot come here? Where are they going to go?” warned Attorney Haque about how restrictive policies risk driving talent away.

“And we have seen no one single country remain the superpower forever. It is policies like that that push out talents, and then they go and then they create, you know, and contribute in some other parts of the world. And those talents are well received there,” she continued.

The risks have also grown under shifting enforcement priorities.

In early 2025, the Trump administration expanded deportation operations, increasing the likelihood that migrants without legal status would be detained and removed. Despite those crackdowns, families continue to come, weighing the possibility of deportation against the dangers they face if they stay behind.

That determination explains why migrants continue to risk their lives at the border while others post videos of jubilant citizenship ceremonies. Both sets of images tell the same story: people accept extraordinary sacrifices because the possibility of belonging in the U.S. still outweighs the dangers of getting there.


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less