Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Bordering on Despair: The True Cost of the American Dream

News

People waiting in line
A U.S. Border Patrol agent checks immigrants' identification as they wait to be processed by the U.S. Border Patrol after crossing the border from Mexico.
Qian Weizhong/VCG via Getty Images

On TikTok, migrants post themselves wading through the Rio Grande or crowding into shelters at the southern border. Families also share clips of green card approvals and swearing-in ceremonies, cheering as loved ones become citizens or can finally be reunited with loved ones from their home countries. These images highlight a contradiction: the United States exposes migrants to dangerous uncertainty, yet it remains the world’s top destination for people seeking new lives.

The U.S. foreign-born population reached 53.3 million in January 2025 before dipping to 51.9 million in June, still one of the highest levels ever recorded, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of Census data. Immigrants now comprise approximately 15% of the U.S. population, a share that has steadily increased over the past two decades.


Migrants take extraordinary risks to get here. Customs and Border Protection reported more than 2 million encounters at U.S. borders in fiscal year 2023, underscoring the number of people who attempted the journey despite the dangers. CBP also logged hundreds of deaths along the border, ranging from drownings to desert exposure, and thousands of rescues of migrants in distress. The U.S.-Mexico border is considered the deadliest land migration route in the world.

Amanda Aguilar is a Staff Attorney at American Gateways, a legal advocacy group for immigrant survivors, in San Antonio, Texas. She has heard firsthand what her clients who are seeking asylum have fled from when coming to the U.S.

“What most of my clients now are fleeing is some sort of political persecution in Venezuela or Cuba,” she said. “You have to make it to this side of the border to ask for asylum, and for a lot of people who are being persecuted, that is the only form of relief they would qualify for.”

Angeles Ponpa reporting

Venezuelans and Cubans stand out in asylum data. In fiscal year 2023, Venezuelans filed nearly 100,000 affirmative asylum applications, while Cubans filed about 78,600, according to USCIS Annual Statistical Report for 2023. Together, those two groups made up almost 40 percent of all new applications.

Decades of political instability, economic collapse, and government crackdowns have driven millions from Venezuela. Cubans, meanwhile, face limited legal pathways to leave the island, prompting many to attempt the journey through Central America or by sea.

Mohaimina “Mina” Haque, from The Law Office of Mohaimina Haque, PLLC in Washington, is an attorney who works with immigrant families and workers, and explained how asylum works depending on how people enter the country.

“Asylums are two types. One is affirmative asylum, those are for people who come properly through proper inspection, properly means proper inspection through the airport, and then they want to seek asylum within one year of their arrival in the United States,” said Attorney Haque.

“People who are crossing the border and coming here, what they’re seeking is defensive, they are defending themselves. When they’re detained… they have a reasonable basis of fear that if they return to their home country, they may face persecution for many protected grounds,” she continued.

U.S. law requires migrants to be physically present in the country to request asylum, which forces those fleeing persecution to cross the border before they can apply for asylum. That rule left thousands of families stranded in Mexico when the Trump administration canceled the CBP One scheduling system in January 2025. Advocates say the cancellations, along with cartel control of border crossings, put migrants at greater risk.

Even when migrants make it into the United States, they often face years in court or detention. The TRAC system reported more than 3 million pending immigration court cases in 2025, the largest backlog on record.

“I have had clients who have been detained for two years, fighting it, losing it, appealing it, winning appeal,” said Attorney Aguilar, who has seen clients spend years in detention fighting their cases.

“And then we’re going to the same judge and then maybe ultimately getting denied again, but they’re willing to sacrifice two years of their life just to not go back to their home country.,” she said.

Those long delays take a toll. Detention facilities, many run by private companies, keep migrants away from families and lawyers. Documents tell of widespread anxiety and depression as cases drag on. Policy shifts between administrations add to the uncertainty, leaving migrants unsure whether new rules will benefit or harm their chances.

Migrants often encounter threats long before they reach a U.S. courtroom. Criminal groups in Central America and Mexico target families waiting along the border.

Attorney Aguilar described one case that stood out to her.

“I had a client who was kidnapped in the Darien Forest, which is the forest between Colombia and Panama, and forced to do free labor for extended periods of time,” she said. “I had clients who have been kidnapped several times in Mexico, like more than one time in Mexico, and that’s really unfortunate because a lot of those people were waiting for CBP One appointments.”

Beyond asylum, other migrants pursue legal pathways such as family or employment-based petitions, which carry their own challenges.

“There are immigrants who come under the family-based petition. There are immigrants who come for employment-based petitions, those are the most common, and then there are people who are special immigrants who went through some war-torn country,” said Attorney Haque, describing the country’s layered legal framework.

Attorney Haque added that the U.S. legal structure often overwhelms new arrivals.

“The law of the U.S. can be a bit complicated for a new immigrant because we have state laws, we have local laws, we have federal laws,” she said.

Migrants continue to pursue these avenues because they want to reunite with families and secure stability.

“What happens afterwards if people cannot come here? Where are they going to go?” warned Attorney Haque about how restrictive policies risk driving talent away.

“And we have seen no one single country remain the superpower forever. It is policies like that that push out talents, and then they go and then they create, you know, and contribute in some other parts of the world. And those talents are well received there,” she continued.

The risks have also grown under shifting enforcement priorities.

In early 2025, the Trump administration expanded deportation operations, increasing the likelihood that migrants without legal status would be detained and removed. Despite those crackdowns, families continue to come, weighing the possibility of deportation against the dangers they face if they stay behind.

That determination explains why migrants continue to risk their lives at the border while others post videos of jubilant citizenship ceremonies. Both sets of images tell the same story: people accept extraordinary sacrifices because the possibility of belonging in the U.S. still outweighs the dangers of getting there.


Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less