Donate
News. Debate. Community. Levers for a better democracy.
Check out our Election Dissection blog:
Our panel of experts will be analyzing voting controversies until the 2020 winners are clear.
MOST READ
Balance of Power
True
Mandel Ngan/Getty Images

Three ways a conservative finds Trump overstepping his bounds amid pandemic

Griffith is a research fellow specializing in financial regulations at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.
Keep reading... Show less
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Good-government groups protest military force against protesters.

Laws limit military role in quelling election unrest

As a momentous election draws closer, government leaders and law enforcement agencies are preparing for a contested election and ensuing civil unrest. The FBI and Department of Justice are getting ready for election-related violence. And National Guard leaders have assembled rapid-response forces in two states to deal with potential disruptions.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley has been unequivocal that the military should play "no role" in a U.S. election. "Zero," he said. In fact, it is a federal crime to deploy troops to polling places. But what if there are protests, including when voters have already cast their ballots but the final results remain uncertain?

To be clear, if there is any election unrest, the federal government should not be the one handling it. Elections are run at the local and state levels, so those law enforcement agencies should respond. Yet there's concern the president and his allies may try to interfere with election outcomes by deploying — or threatening to deploy — military forces and turn American streets into "battle spaces."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep reading... Show less
Big Picture
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Twitter is taking further steps to stop the spread of disinformation, taking on its most powerful user.

Twitter joins new push to curb election chaos online, by Trump and regular folk

Twitter is taking on its No. 1 agitator in the name of protecting electoral democracy by combating both domestic and foreign disinformation.

But the changes announced Friday will also contain the sort of robust and rapid-fire political discourse at the heart of Twitter's identity, not only by politicians but by millions of everyday users.

New warnings will be attached to the lies of candidates, at least through Election Day. The site will reject any posts calling for voter intimidation or violence connected to the presidential or congressional elections. And no one will be permitted to declare victory before races have been called by major news organizations — a mirror of what Facebook announced a day earlier.

Keep reading... Show less
Wikimedia Commons

A policy change by Attorney General William Barr's Justice Department "is concerning, coming on top of a number of irresponsible assertions that voting is likely to be infected with fraud," writers Huefner.

DOJ policy reversal more likely to disrupt election than build confidence

The Department of Justice has abandoned its longstanding policy of waiting until an election is over to investigate allegations of election fraud, according to press reports. Yet it is eminently sensible to delay investigations because it avoids actions that erode confidence in the election.

The policy itself includes this set of justifications: "Such overt investigative steps may chill legitimate voting activities. They are also likely to be perceived by voters and candidates as an intrusion into the election. Indeed, the fact of a federal criminal investigation may itself become an issue in the election."

Keep reading... Show less
© Issue One. All rights reserved.