Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

One day and 28 minutes

A Republic, if we can keep it: Part XXVI

Joe Biden being interviewed by Lester Holt

The day after calling on people to “lower the temperature in our politics,” President Biden resort to traditionally divisive language in an interview with NBC's Lester Holt.

YouTube screenshot

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.”

This is the latest in “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

One day.

One single day. That’s how long it took for President Joe Biden to abandon his call to “lower the temperature in our politics” following the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. “I believe politics ought to be an arena for peaceful debate,” he implored. Not messages tinged with violent language and caustic oratory. Peaceful, dignified, respectful language.


That was on Sunday evening, July 14. And yet by Monday evening — one day later — he was back on primetime television, this time with Lester Holt, and his tone had changed. Within three minutes of the start of the interview, Biden returned to the language of division. “Look,” he exclaimed, “I’m not the guy that said, ‘I want to be a dictator on day one.’ I’m not the guy that refused to accept the outcome of the election. I’m not the guy who said that [he] wouldn’t accept the outcome of this election automatically.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Twenty-eight Minutes.

Less than a half hour. That’s how long it took for former President Trump to abandon his call for unity. The setting was the Republican National Convention, and the occasion was Trump’s official nomination for president. His speech started promisingly. “The discord and division in our society must be healed,” he announced. “We must heal it quickly. As Americans, we are bound together by a single fate and a shared destiny. We rise together. Or we fall apart.”

But within the span of a standard sitcom (with ads), Americans were treated to a jarring return to the vitriol and dissension that has characterized this entire election. The scorn and fury of the Donald Trump show was back: “[T]o achieve [a conservative] future,” he railed, “we must first rescue our nation from failed and even incompetent leadership. We have totally incompetent leadership! Under the current administration, we are indeed a nation in decline.”

Enough! How manysurveys do we need to conduct for the leaders of both parties to realize Americans are fed up? How many opinion pieces do we need to write asking for more civility in our political dialogue? How many more American citizens have to say they are angry, frustrated, disillusioned and despondent? How many of us pang for the good old days when Barack Obama and Mitt Romney squared off?

The news that Biden will “stand down” and not seek reelection is an opportunity for a reset, a chance to correct the deeply divisive tone that has stained this election. Trump’s claim that Biden is “the single worst president by far in the history of our country,” as he predictably declared only minutes after the Democratic president stepped away from the campaign, is the usual Trump hyperbole. The only difference is that now it is a moot point. Whether the Democratic nominee is Vice President Kamala Harris or one of the half-dozen other capable and electable contenders, this moment offers a unique opening. A fresh start is rare in American politics. Both candidates must take it.

I fully understand that candidate displays of righteous anger often amount to a winning electoral strategy. Elections are the ultimate in-group contest. Americans like to feel solidarity with similarly inclined partisans and, inevitably, the best resin for one’s group is a common disdain for another. Time and again in this and previous election cycles we’ve seen parties and presidents energize their followers not by efforts at conciliation, but by demonstrations of division. It’s pervasive on both sides of the aisle.

And then there are the distressing corollaries that spawn from relentless divisiveness. I’m thinking of political narcissism. To this point in the election, both major party candidates have touted that only they can “save America.” Trump is explicit: “I can stop wars with a phone call,” he boasted during his acceptance speech. This follows a chorus of moments where he has claimed, “I alone can fix [America].”

Biden was more subtle. But even he resorted to narcissistic messaging before dropping out of the race. The president retorted that only he could beat Trump when allies were calling for his stage exit. He would later soften that stance, admitting others could beat the former president. But even then, the message turned to, “I” am best positioned to hold on to the White House. Even Trump, the standard bearer for the personal credit claim, used “we” pronouns more frequently than his rival from Delaware.

What has been missing in this presidential campaign (until Biden’s selfless act) was any trace of humility. Let’s hope we can unearth some more in the weeks and months ahead. Perhaps the way to jumpstart a more authentic, more humble campaign is to appeal to the words of a great American president, Abraham Lincoln, and to remind all political candidates that modesty and decorum can also deliver memorable moments.

After only six sentences of the magnificent Gettysburg Address — only 90 seconds into his speech — Lincoln confessed to his own triviality. “[I]n a larger sense,” he acknowledged, “we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate — we cannot hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.”

More solemn and soaring words have rarely been uttered. Today’s political rhetoric bears no resemblance.

Read More

Donald Trump
Brandon Bell/Getty Images

How to approach Donald Trump's second presidency

The resistance to Donald Trump has failed. He has now shaped American politics for nearly a decade, with four more years — at least — to go. A hard truth his opponents must accept: Trump is the most dominant American politician since Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

This dominance unsettles and destabilizes American democracy. Trump is a would-be authoritarian with a single overriding impulse — to help himself above all else.

Yet somehow he keeps winning.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump and his family on stage

President-elect Donald Trump claimed a mandate on Nov. 6.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Elections don’t tell leaders what voters want. 2024 was no exception.

Interpreting the meaning of any election is no easy task. In a democracy, the results never speak for themselves. That is as true of the 2024 presidential election as it has been for any other.

This year, as is the case every four years, the battle to say what the results mean and what lessons the winning candidate should learn began as soon as the voters were counted. But, alas, elections don’t speak for themselves.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young people cheering

Supporters cheer during a campaign event with Vice President Kamala Harris at Temple University in Philadelphia on Aug. 6.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The youth have spoken in favor of Harris, but it was close

For many young voters, the 2024 presidential election was the moment they had been waiting for. Months of protests and demonstrations and two political conventions had all led to this — the opportunity to exercise their democratic rights and have a say in their future.

While Donald Trump won the election, Kamala Harris won among young voters. But even though 18- to 29-year-olds provided the strongest support for Harris, President Joe Biden did better with that cohort four years ago.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand-drawn Pilgrim hat with the words "Happy Thanksgiving"
mushroomstore/Getty Images

This Thanksgiving, it's not only OK but necessary to talk politics

This Thanksgiving, do not follow the old maxim that we should never discuss politics at the dinner table.

Many people's emotions are running high right now. Elections often bring out a wide range of feelings, whether pride and optimism for those who are pleased with the results or disappointment and frustration from those who aren’t. After a long and grueling election season, we need to connect with and not avoid one another.

Keep ReadingShow less