Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Is progress to gender parity in elected office ​stagnating?

Lamendola is director of research at RepresentWomen. Follow her on X @Lamendola_. Scaglia is the research manager at RepresentWomen.

This week, RepresentWomen published our 11th annual Gender Parity Index, a comprehensive measure of women’s representation at the national, state, and local levels of government. Our findings show progress toward gender balance is slow and possibly even stagnating.


The Gender Parity Index, launched in 2013, awards each of the 50 states a score (0-100), letter grade (A-F), and ranking (1-50) based on that state’s proximity to parity. A perfect score is 50/100. Eleven years ago, 40 states earned “D” grades (<25.0 points) or “F” grades (<10.0 points), and the remaining 10 states were split evenly between “C” grades (<33.0) and “B” grades (<50.0). No state earned an “A” until New Hampshire got one in 2015-2018, and then again in 2020. This year, Oregon and Maine received “A” grades for the second time, but the case of New Hampshire shows the importance of tracking representation over time.

Graphic: How the GPI Map Has Changed Over Time

Despite Oregon and Maine’s success, the majority of states earned “D” grades, and the remaining 22 states earned “B” and “C” grades. For the first time ever, no state received a failing grade. Louisiana, the only state to receive an “F” for eight years straight (2016-2023), made major gains, electing its first woman attorney general, Liz Murril, and second woman secretary of state, Nancy Landry.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Earlier this year, RepresentWomen analyzed the composition of the U.S. House of Representatives (Party Composition by Gender 2013-2024). We found that although less than 30 percent of all House members are women, almost half (43 percent) of Democratic Representatives are women, while 28 percent of Republican Representatives are women. Unless (a) more Democratic women are elected than men, or (b) more Republican women are elected — which we know is unlikely this cycle — progress to parity will likely slow.

Graphic: Gender representation by party in the House, 1971-present

Additional research from the Center for American Women in Progress supports this: The number of major-party women candidates in 2024 has fallen by 20 percent for the U.S. House and 26 percent for the U.S. Senate. This decline is seen in both major parties, emphasizing that without intentional action, progress is not self-sustaining.

Rhetoric touting record-breaking wins for women’s representation often overshadows the reality of stagnation in the number of women running for office at the national, state and local levels. Women remain underrepresented at every level of government in the U.S., comprising over 50 percent of the population but holding just under one-third of all elected positions. Incremental score changes by one or two points do not necessarily reflect broad, system-wide movements to elect women to all levels of government.

The 2024 index reflects our complex political landscape, suggesting progress in women’s political representation may stagnate or even backslide. This index shows the most movement for women at the state and local levels: Louisiana elected two new woman as state executives, and Indiana elected nine new women to local offices. To make lasting progress in women’s representation, we must take a systems-level approach that creates opportunities for women to enter the political sphere and supports the women already in office. This year’s index finds:

  1. The U.S. remains over halfway to parity, with an average Parity Score of 27. However, in contrast to 2023, fewer states have passed the halfway mark: Only 24 of the 50 states earned above 25 points.
  2. For the first time in the index's history, no state earns an “F” grade. After eight consecutive years of scoring under 10 points, Louisiana earned its first “D” grade and moved up to 45th place. This shows just how consequential a single election cycle can be, especially with open seats.
  3. To sustain progress, we need solutions that support women in office. The decline in incumbent women running for Congress this cycle suggests that progress will likely plateau or regress if we do not ensure a modern and safe work environment.
  4. Progress must occur across levels of government.Vermont's case shows that gains at one level can be counterbalanced by losses at another, ultimately decreasing the overall score.

Our research specifies the barriers women face when running, winning and serving. These include funding and support disparities from political parties and other major donors, media bias, unfair voting systems, imbalanced caregiving responsibilities, and lack of mentorship networks. However, our research also shows that actionable solutions exist and have shown success. Systems change — such as supporting women within the party establishment, implementing ranked-choice voting and instating fair legislative practices — are all viable methods for getting women to run, win and serve effectively in political office.

The 2024 presidential race demonstrates such change, with Kamala Harris well-positioned to win the Democratic party nomination and become the first Black woman and first Asian American person to do so. Harris’ candidacy would undoubtedly advance the conversation of women’s viability to hold political leadership positions, including in the down-ballot races that will shape changes in the 2025 Gender Parity Index.

Achieving gender-balanced governance is not a one-time goal. Sustaining women’s representation requires enacting changes that equalize the playing field for women in the long term. We need to view our lack of political gender balance with a sense of urgency if we are to build a system that achieves gender balance within our lifetimes.

Read More

Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debating

Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris debate on Sept. 10.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The state of our nation: Polling Americans’ priorities for election 2024

Originally published by The 19th.

This is the third annual poll from The 19th and SurveyMonkey, designed to shed light on what women, particularly women of color, and LGBTQ+ people think about the issues animating our politics. It comes as Americans face another critical election, one that could make Democrat Kamala Harris the first woman to hold the country’s highest office or give Republican Donald Trump a second term. Here’s what we learned about how Americans view the candidates, as well as opinions on abortion and on reproductive care more broadly, the ability to access gender-affirming care and more.

Keep ReadingShow less
Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift made another call for peopleto register to vote at the Video Music Awards on Thursday.

Christopher Polk/Billboard via Getty Images

What will Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris mean?

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

On Sep 11, we reported in The Fulcrum thatTaylor Swift had entered the political fray by endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for president of the United States. I ended the article by stating that “the full extent of her impact remains to be seen.”

Now only a few days later, some data is already suggesting the impact could be significant. The day after Swift endorsed Harris there was a significant surge of visitors to Vote.gov, the U.S. government website that helps citizens understand how they can register to vote. According to a spokesperson for the Government Services Administration, Swift’s endorsement on Instagram led directly to 337,826 people visiting the site.

Keep ReadingShow less
I Voted stickers
BackyardProduction/Getty Images

Voters cast ballots based on personal perceptions, not policy stances

The Fulcrum and the data analytics firm Fidelum Partners have just completed a nationally representative study assessing the voting intentions of U.S adults and their perceptions toward 18 well-known celebrities and politicians.

Fidelum conducted similar celebrity and politician election studies just prior to the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. Each of these found that perceptions of warmth, competence and admiration regarding the candidates are highly predictive of voting intentions and election outcomes. Given this, The Fulcrum and Fidelum decided to partner on a 2024 celebrity and politician election study to build upon the findings of prior research.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino attendees of the Democratic National Convention

People cheer for the Harris-Walz ticket at the Democratic National Convention.

Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Harris’ nomination ‘hit a reset button’ for Latinas supporting Democrats

As the presidential race entered the summer months, President Joe Biden’s level of support among Latinx voters couldn’t match the winning coalition he had built in 2020. Among Latinas, a critical group of voters who tend to back Democrats at higher levels than Latinos, lagging support had begun to worry Stephanie Valencia, who studies voting patterns among Latinx voters across the country for Equis Research, a data analytics and research firm.

Then the big shake-up happened: Biden stepped down and Vice President Kamala Harris took his place at the top of the Democratic ticket fewer than 100 days before the election.

Valencia’s team quickly jumped to action. The goal was to figure out how the move was sitting with Latinx voters in battleground states that will play an outsized role in deciding the election. After surveying more than 2,000 Latinx voters in late July and early August, Equis found a significant jump in support for the Democratic ticket, a shift that the team is referring to as “the Latino Reset.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Abortion rights protestors

Arizona residents rally for abortion rights in April, on the heels of the state Supreme Court decision enacting an 1864 law banning abortion.

Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

In swing states, R's and D's oppose criminalizing abortion before fetal viability

While policymakers argue over whether abortion should be a right or a crime, the public has a clear policy stance on the matter. A new survey in the six swing states finds that majorities of Republicans and Democrats oppose criminalizing abortion before fetal viability.

Furthermore, bipartisan majorities favor reducing unintended pregnancies and abortions through policies ensuring access to birth control.

Keep ReadingShow less