Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Reagan’s handshake has become a chokehold under Trump

Opinion

Reagan’s handshake has become a chokehold under Trump

WASHINGTON, DC- MAY 06: U.S. President Donald Trump (R) meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (C), alongside Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of Canada Dominic LeBlanc in the Oval Office at the White House on May 6, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Getty Images)

VANCOUVER, British Columbia — As the Los Angeles Dodgers face off against Canada’s Toronto Blue Jays for the World Series, the first couple of games featured an advertisement that shot around the world. All because when U.S. President Donald Trump noticed it, he reacted like an on-again/off-again girlfriend had just keyed his car.

“The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs,” Trump wrote online, announcing the termination of “all trade negotiations with Canada.”


Well, I guess you could say that it’s “fake” in the sense that the late President Reagan isn’t currently in a position to comment directly on the tariffs that Trump is throwing up all over the place to protect the US market from America’s allies. Or as Trump calls it: “national security.”

What the Canadian province of Ontario did was use an unedited voiceover of Reagan from 1987 in which he denounces mass tariffs as detrimental to the American economy and job market.

At the time, Reagan was laying the groundwork for the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA), spearheaded by the Gipper himself, and ultimately implemented in 1989. The multi-million-dollar ad buy targets Republican states. Reagan’s unedited voice from his original address accompanies visuals of American life, labor and landscapes, before concluding with Reagan filling the screen as he wraps up.

Republican viewers might ask whether such a departure from Saint Ronald’s policies is wise. The Reagan Foundation, focusing on tenuous fair use claims and alleging misuse, seems less concerned with defending the principles Reagan articulated, which speaks volumes.

What is this — a personality cult where even a deceased icon of the Republican Party still valued by many Trump supporters has to show unfailing allegiance to Dear Leader?

Canadians are drawing another lesson from this fiasco. Under Reagan’s free trade policy, Canada initially feared losing its sovereignty through greater economic integration with the U.S. But decades of globalization, guided by neoconservative visions of an American-led economic order, successfully convinced allies that their fates were inseparable from U.S. policy. Trump has revealed the fragility of this arrangement, as his tariffs transform supply chains into leashes.

Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney is now scrambling to find other trading partners to fill his dance card, notably in Asia and Europe. Finally. Some of us have only been screaming for years about this need to diversify trade with less conventional partners.

Which would explain why suddenly Canada is turning down the volume on its “foreign interference” beefs with India and China in favor of trade pragmatism. Or “re-engaging,” as Carney put it last week on his first trip to Asia.

But first, he’s going to have to unscrew the work of his predecessor Justin Trudeau’s attempts to curry favor with establishment Washington when he slapped duties on Chinese exports last year, resulting in Chinese tariffs earlier this year that have slammed Canadian beef and canola farmers and fishermen.

Carney has also been crisscrossing Europe, cutting deals to replace the EU’s lost Russian resources — like critical minerals and gas — with Canadian sources.

Trump had bragged about cutting off Germany from its Russian gas supply by sanctioning their joint Nord Stream pipeline project — before it was mysteriously blown up altogether under Biden. More recently, in sanctioning Russian oil giants Lukoil and Rosneft under the pretext of helping Ukraine, the Trump administration has left Germany scrambling for an exemption to maintain operations of the German state’s joint projects with these companies.

It’s the second blow to German industry in less than a week. Trump’s sanctioning of Chinese semiconductor maker WingTech Technologies led to the Netherlands trying to seize control of the company’s local subsidiary, Nexperia, to guarantee Dutch supply. But the chips overwhelmingly come from China. Whoops! The attempted grab resulted in China cutting off exports of those chips to Europe altogether.

Now, some German auto industry analysts estimate a potential implosion of the sector that relies on those chips within a month.

And yet, like an ex who can’t quite stay away, European and Canadian leaders keep returning to Trump’s orbit — even as Canadians and Europeans are divorcing themselves from American imports in favor of domestic alternatives.

Canadians used to fret about becoming America’s 51st state. Now they’re discovering that even without Trump’s threats of annexation, he can still make their globalist leaders dance like a reluctant prom date — and that Europeans can still be dragged along on the dance floor, too.

Somewhere, the Gipper must be polishing his cowboy boots and wondering how his trade deal has ultimately given rise to a chaotic international square dance, led by a guy who steps on everyone’s feet, but somehow still manages to keep them all circling back.

Rachel Marsden is a columnist, political strategist, and host of independently produced talk shows in French and English. Her website can be found at http://www.rachelmarsden.com.)

Read More

Crisis Not Averted: How Government Shutdown Exposes America’s Food Insecurity

Young volunteers assembling grocery bags filled with food donations, providing essential support to individuals facing hunger and hardship

Getty Images/Fillipo Bacci

Crisis Not Averted: How Government Shutdown Exposes America’s Food Insecurity

As the longest government shutdown in history continues, the Trump administration informed U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of Rhode Island that it would pay out 50% of the SNAP benefits in November to the 42 million Americans who rely on food stamps.

This announcement comes just days after McConnell ruled that the administration could not halt the SNAP program.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Mamdani and Sliwa Appeared Twice on the New York City Ballot

Person voting

Chris Graythen/Getty Images

Why Mamdani and Sliwa Appeared Twice on the New York City Ballot

As New Yorkers headed to vote for their next mayor and other local officials, those unfamiliar with New York elections found a surprise: Zohran Mamdani, Curtis Sliwa, and several other candidates were listed twice. The mayor-elect appeared as a Democratic Party candidate and as a Working Families Party (WFP) candidate; Sliwa appeared as a Republican candidate and, as the owner of multiple cats, as the candidate for the Protect Animals party.

Soon enough, questions and rumors started circulating online about this double-listing. Some people were just confused. Why were candidates listed twice? Would a vote for Mamdani on the WFP count for the Democrats? But others, like Elon Musk, said it was a scam, hinting that it might be a fraudulent ploy to help Democrats cheat their way to victory.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump's Quiet Coup Over the Budget

U.S. President Donald Trump, October 29, 2025.

(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Trump's Quiet Coup Over the Budget

In “The Real Shutdown,” I argued that Congress’s reliance on stopgap spending bills has weakened its power of the purse, giving Trump greater say over how federal funds are used. The latest move in that long retreat is H.R. 1180, a bill introduced in February 2025 by Representative Andrew Clyde (R-GA). The one-sentence bill would repeal the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 in its entirety—no amendments, no replacement, no oversight mechanism. If continuing resolutions handed the White House a blank check, repealing the ICA would make it permanent, stripping Congress of its last protection against executive overreach in federal spending and accelerating the quiet transfer of budgetary power to the presidency.

The Impoundment Control Act (ICA) was a congressional response to an earlier constitutional crisis. After Richard Nixon refused to spend funds Congress had appropriated, lawmakers across party lines reasserted their authority. The ICA required the president to notify Congress of any intent to withhold or cancel funds and barred them from doing so without legislative approval. It was designed to prevent precisely the kind of unilateral power that Nixon had claimed and that Trump now seeks to reclaim.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s anti-Venezuela actions lack strategy, justifiable targets and legal authorization
Screenshot from a video moments before US forces struck a boat in international waters off Venezuela, September 2.
Screenshot from a video moments before US forces struck a boat in international waters off Venezuela, September 2.

Trump’s anti-Venezuela actions lack strategy, justifiable targets and legal authorization

“I think we’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. OK? We’re going to kill them. You know, they’re going to be, like, dead,” President Donald Trump said in late October 2025 of U.S. military strikes on boats in the Caribbean Sea north of Venezuela.

The Trump administration asserted without providing any evidence that the boats were carrying illegal drugs. Fourteen boats that the administration alleged were being operated by drug traffickers have been struck, killing 43 people.

Keep ReadingShow less