Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Reagan’s handshake has become a chokehold under Trump

Opinion

Reagan’s handshake has become a chokehold under Trump

WASHINGTON, DC- MAY 06: U.S. President Donald Trump (R) meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (C), alongside Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of Canada Dominic LeBlanc in the Oval Office at the White House on May 6, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Getty Images)

VANCOUVER, British Columbia — As the Los Angeles Dodgers face off against Canada’s Toronto Blue Jays for the World Series, the first couple of games featured an advertisement that shot around the world. All because when U.S. President Donald Trump noticed it, he reacted like an on-again/off-again girlfriend had just keyed his car.

“The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs,” Trump wrote online, announcing the termination of “all trade negotiations with Canada.”


Well, I guess you could say that it’s “fake” in the sense that the late President Reagan isn’t currently in a position to comment directly on the tariffs that Trump is throwing up all over the place to protect the US market from America’s allies. Or as Trump calls it: “national security.”

What the Canadian province of Ontario did was use an unedited voiceover of Reagan from 1987 in which he denounces mass tariffs as detrimental to the American economy and job market.

At the time, Reagan was laying the groundwork for the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA), spearheaded by the Gipper himself, and ultimately implemented in 1989. The multi-million-dollar ad buy targets Republican states. Reagan’s unedited voice from his original address accompanies visuals of American life, labor and landscapes, before concluding with Reagan filling the screen as he wraps up.

Republican viewers might ask whether such a departure from Saint Ronald’s policies is wise. The Reagan Foundation, focusing on tenuous fair use claims and alleging misuse, seems less concerned with defending the principles Reagan articulated, which speaks volumes.

What is this — a personality cult where even a deceased icon of the Republican Party still valued by many Trump supporters has to show unfailing allegiance to Dear Leader?

Canadians are drawing another lesson from this fiasco. Under Reagan’s free trade policy, Canada initially feared losing its sovereignty through greater economic integration with the U.S. But decades of globalization, guided by neoconservative visions of an American-led economic order, successfully convinced allies that their fates were inseparable from U.S. policy. Trump has revealed the fragility of this arrangement, as his tariffs transform supply chains into leashes.

Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney is now scrambling to find other trading partners to fill his dance card, notably in Asia and Europe. Finally. Some of us have only been screaming for years about this need to diversify trade with less conventional partners.

Which would explain why suddenly Canada is turning down the volume on its “foreign interference” beefs with India and China in favor of trade pragmatism. Or “re-engaging,” as Carney put it last week on his first trip to Asia.

But first, he’s going to have to unscrew the work of his predecessor Justin Trudeau’s attempts to curry favor with establishment Washington when he slapped duties on Chinese exports last year, resulting in Chinese tariffs earlier this year that have slammed Canadian beef and canola farmers and fishermen.

Carney has also been crisscrossing Europe, cutting deals to replace the EU’s lost Russian resources — like critical minerals and gas — with Canadian sources.

Trump had bragged about cutting off Germany from its Russian gas supply by sanctioning their joint Nord Stream pipeline project — before it was mysteriously blown up altogether under Biden. More recently, in sanctioning Russian oil giants Lukoil and Rosneft under the pretext of helping Ukraine, the Trump administration has left Germany scrambling for an exemption to maintain operations of the German state’s joint projects with these companies.

It’s the second blow to German industry in less than a week. Trump’s sanctioning of Chinese semiconductor maker WingTech Technologies led to the Netherlands trying to seize control of the company’s local subsidiary, Nexperia, to guarantee Dutch supply. But the chips overwhelmingly come from China. Whoops! The attempted grab resulted in China cutting off exports of those chips to Europe altogether.

Now, some German auto industry analysts estimate a potential implosion of the sector that relies on those chips within a month.

And yet, like an ex who can’t quite stay away, European and Canadian leaders keep returning to Trump’s orbit — even as Canadians and Europeans are divorcing themselves from American imports in favor of domestic alternatives.

Canadians used to fret about becoming America’s 51st state. Now they’re discovering that even without Trump’s threats of annexation, he can still make their globalist leaders dance like a reluctant prom date — and that Europeans can still be dragged along on the dance floor, too.

Somewhere, the Gipper must be polishing his cowboy boots and wondering how his trade deal has ultimately given rise to a chaotic international square dance, led by a guy who steps on everyone’s feet, but somehow still manages to keep them all circling back.

Rachel Marsden is a columnist, political strategist, and host of independently produced talk shows in French and English. Her website can be found at http://www.rachelmarsden.com.)

Read More

Pro-Trump protestors
Trump supporters who attempted to overturn the 2020 election results are now seeking influential election oversight roles in battleground states.
Andrew Lichtenstein/Getty Images

Loving Someone Who Thinks the Election Was Stolen

He’s the kind of man you’d want as a neighbor in a storm.

Big guy. Strong hands. The person you’d call if your car slid into a ditch. He lives rural, works hard, supports a wife and young son, and helps care for his aging mom. Life has not been easy, but he shows up anyway.

Keep ReadingShow less
Project 2025 Drives Trump’s State Dept Overhaul

U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on December 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Project 2025 Drives Trump’s State Dept Overhaul

In May 2025, I wrote about the Trump administration’s early State Department reforms aligned with Project 2025, including calls for budget cuts, mission closures, and policy realignments. At the time, the most controversial move was an executive order targeting the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shutting it down and freezing all federal foreign aid. This decision reflected Project 2025’s recommendation to scale back and "deradicalize" USAID by eliminating programs deemed overly politicized or inconsistent with conservative values. The report specifically criticized USAID for funding progressive initiatives, such as policies addressing systemic racism and central economic planning, arguing that U.S. foreign aid had become a "massive and open-ended global entitlement program" benefiting left-leaning organizations. The process connecting the report’s ideological critiques to this executive action involved a strategic alignment between key administration officials and Project 2025 architects, who lobbied for immediate policy adjustments. This coalition effectively linked the critique to policy by framing it as a necessary step toward realigning foreign aid with national interests and conservative principles.

Back then, I predicted even more sweeping changes to the State Department. Since May, several major developments have indeed reshaped the department:

Keep ReadingShow less
SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.
apples and bananas in brown cardboard box
Photo by Maria Lin Kim on Unsplash

SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.

Millions of families just survived the longest shutdown in U.S. history. Now they’re bracing again as politicians turn food assistance into a bargaining chip.

Food assistance should not be subject to politics, yet the Trump administration is now requiring over 20 Democratic-led states to share sensitive SNAP recipient data—including Social Security and immigration details—or risk losing funding. Officials call it "program integrity," but the effect is clear: millions of low-income families may once again have their access to food threatened by political disputes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections
us a flag on white concrete building

Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections

Earlier this year, I reported on Democrats’ redistricting wins in 2025, highlighting gains in states like California and North Carolina. As of December 18, the landscape has shifted again, with new maps finalized, ongoing court battles, and looming implications for the 2026 midterms.

Here are some key developments since mid‑2025:

  • California: Voters approved Proposition 50 in November, allowing legislature‑drawn maps that eliminated three safe Republican seats and made two more competitive. Democrats in vulnerable districts were redrawn into friendlier territory.
  • Virginia: On December 15, Democrats in the House of Delegates pushed a constitutional amendment on redistricting during a special session. Republicans denounced the move as unconstitutional, setting up a legal and political fight ahead of the 2026 elections.
  • Other states in play:
    • Ohio, Texas, Utah, Missouri, North Carolina: New maps are already in effect, reshaping battlegrounds.
    • Florida and Maryland: Legislatures have begun steps toward redistricting, though maps are not yet finalized.
    • New York: Court challenges may force changes to existing maps before 2026.
    • National picture: According to VoteHub’s tracker, the current district breakdown stands at 189 Democratic‑leaning, 205 Republican‑leaning, and 41 highly competitive seats.

Implications for 2026

  • Democrats’ wins in California and North Carolina strengthen their position, but legal challenges in Virginia and New York could blunt momentum.
  • Republicans remain favored in Texas and Ohio, where maps were redrawn to secure GOP advantages.
  • The unusually high number of mid‑decade redistricting efforts — not seen at this scale since the 1800s — underscores how both parties are aggressively shaping the battlefield for 2026.
So, here's the BIG PICTURE: The December snapshot shows Democrats still benefiting from redistricting in key states, but the fight is far from settled. With courts weighing in and legislatures maneuvering, the balance of power heading into the 2026 House elections remains fluid. What began as clear Democratic wins earlier in 2025 has evolved into a multi‑front contest over maps, legality, and political control.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network