Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Reagan’s handshake has become a chokehold under Trump

Opinion

Reagan’s handshake has become a chokehold under Trump

WASHINGTON, DC- MAY 06: U.S. President Donald Trump (R) meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (C), alongside Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of Canada Dominic LeBlanc in the Oval Office at the White House on May 6, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Getty Images)

VANCOUVER, British Columbia — As the Los Angeles Dodgers face off against Canada’s Toronto Blue Jays for the World Series, the first couple of games featured an advertisement that shot around the world. All because when U.S. President Donald Trump noticed it, he reacted like an on-again/off-again girlfriend had just keyed his car.

“The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs,” Trump wrote online, announcing the termination of “all trade negotiations with Canada.”


Well, I guess you could say that it’s “fake” in the sense that the late President Reagan isn’t currently in a position to comment directly on the tariffs that Trump is throwing up all over the place to protect the US market from America’s allies. Or as Trump calls it: “national security.”

What the Canadian province of Ontario did was use an unedited voiceover of Reagan from 1987 in which he denounces mass tariffs as detrimental to the American economy and job market.

At the time, Reagan was laying the groundwork for the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA), spearheaded by the Gipper himself, and ultimately implemented in 1989. The multi-million-dollar ad buy targets Republican states. Reagan’s unedited voice from his original address accompanies visuals of American life, labor and landscapes, before concluding with Reagan filling the screen as he wraps up.

Republican viewers might ask whether such a departure from Saint Ronald’s policies is wise. The Reagan Foundation, focusing on tenuous fair use claims and alleging misuse, seems less concerned with defending the principles Reagan articulated, which speaks volumes.

What is this — a personality cult where even a deceased icon of the Republican Party still valued by many Trump supporters has to show unfailing allegiance to Dear Leader?

Canadians are drawing another lesson from this fiasco. Under Reagan’s free trade policy, Canada initially feared losing its sovereignty through greater economic integration with the U.S. But decades of globalization, guided by neoconservative visions of an American-led economic order, successfully convinced allies that their fates were inseparable from U.S. policy. Trump has revealed the fragility of this arrangement, as his tariffs transform supply chains into leashes.

Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney is now scrambling to find other trading partners to fill his dance card, notably in Asia and Europe. Finally. Some of us have only been screaming for years about this need to diversify trade with less conventional partners.

Which would explain why suddenly Canada is turning down the volume on its “foreign interference” beefs with India and China in favor of trade pragmatism. Or “re-engaging,” as Carney put it last week on his first trip to Asia.

But first, he’s going to have to unscrew the work of his predecessor Justin Trudeau’s attempts to curry favor with establishment Washington when he slapped duties on Chinese exports last year, resulting in Chinese tariffs earlier this year that have slammed Canadian beef and canola farmers and fishermen.

Carney has also been crisscrossing Europe, cutting deals to replace the EU’s lost Russian resources — like critical minerals and gas — with Canadian sources.

Trump had bragged about cutting off Germany from its Russian gas supply by sanctioning their joint Nord Stream pipeline project — before it was mysteriously blown up altogether under Biden. More recently, in sanctioning Russian oil giants Lukoil and Rosneft under the pretext of helping Ukraine, the Trump administration has left Germany scrambling for an exemption to maintain operations of the German state’s joint projects with these companies.

It’s the second blow to German industry in less than a week. Trump’s sanctioning of Chinese semiconductor maker WingTech Technologies led to the Netherlands trying to seize control of the company’s local subsidiary, Nexperia, to guarantee Dutch supply. But the chips overwhelmingly come from China. Whoops! The attempted grab resulted in China cutting off exports of those chips to Europe altogether.

Now, some German auto industry analysts estimate a potential implosion of the sector that relies on those chips within a month.

And yet, like an ex who can’t quite stay away, European and Canadian leaders keep returning to Trump’s orbit — even as Canadians and Europeans are divorcing themselves from American imports in favor of domestic alternatives.

Canadians used to fret about becoming America’s 51st state. Now they’re discovering that even without Trump’s threats of annexation, he can still make their globalist leaders dance like a reluctant prom date — and that Europeans can still be dragged along on the dance floor, too.

Somewhere, the Gipper must be polishing his cowboy boots and wondering how his trade deal has ultimately given rise to a chaotic international square dance, led by a guy who steps on everyone’s feet, but somehow still manages to keep them all circling back.

Rachel Marsden is a columnist, political strategist, and host of independently produced talk shows in French and English. Her website can be found at http://www.rachelmarsden.com.)


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less