Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Florida sees no evidence of the 2018 vote fraud Trump asserted

Florida election officials

Election officials in Palm Beach pore over ballots during one of the 2018 recounts.

Saul Martinez/Getty Images

Florida's top criminal investigators have found "no evidence of fraudulent intent" by the Democrats after a year-long probe into allegations of mail-in-vote tampering during the last election.

The conclusion by the Department of Law Enforcement prompted the state's top prosecutor to declare Wednesday that a "lack of sufficient evidence to support prosecution" brings to a close one of the most prominent election corruption disputes in years in the state's biggest purple state.

It also punctures a major talking point from President Trump as he's ratcheted up his campaign against expanding absentee voting this year in response to the coronavirus crisis. He has claimed there was fraud in the 2018 Florida election, where the margins in both top races were so thin as to require statewide recounts.


Republicans ended up winning both contests, Ron DeSantis becoming governor and Rick Scott joining the Senate.

Investigators found three people associated with the Florida Democratic Party had changed the deadline dates on an election form used to fix signature problems on mailed-in ballots.

When reviewing mailed-in ballots, election officials compare the signature on the envelope with the voters' signature on file. If they do not look like a match, the ballot is not counted unless the voter completes a document verifying the document's authenticity

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Democrats had complained about the number of ballots rejected, saying there were no standards or training for people to make fair signature match determinations. Democrats have raised the same issue in lawsuits filed across the country hoping to end handwriting analysis disputes in closely contested states in November.

The investigation determined people were preparing the altered forms in anticipation of a favorable court ruling in a lawsuit filed by Democrats challenging votes rejected for perceived signature flaws — and had no intent to circulate them until after the ruling.

When vote totals, especially in the Democratic strongholds of Palm Beach and Broward counties, started reducing GOP margins as mail-in votes were tallied two years ago, Trump tweeted that "Law Enforcement is looking into another big corruption scandal having to do with Election Fraud" and that, while Democrats had dispatched "their best Election stealing lawyer" to the state, "Don't worry, Florida - I am sending much better lawyers to expose the FRAUD!"

While such claims of voter fraud are increasingly frequent from the GOP, actual prosecutions are rare. One happened in Philadelphia on Thursday, however: A former elections judge pleaded guilty to taking bribes in return for secretly entering voting booths and running up the totals for local candidates from 2014 to 2016 to add votes for three Democratic judicial candidates. Domenick DeMuro faces 15 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less