Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

It’s time to let all voters vote in Florida

Opinion

It’s time to let all voters vote in Florida

"There's a storm brewing in Florida in 2020 — it's not Republicans versus Democrats for the presidency," argues Jeffrey Solomon.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Solomon is a chiropractor, a former Miami-Dade Democratic Party organizer and an unsuccessful state legislative candidate in 2018.

I recently joined the 30 percent of Florida voters who declare themselves independents. I did it for the same reasons as most ex-partisan voters: I had reached my limit. I was sick and tired of inter-party political hypocrisy and deceptive leadership. Unlike many independents, though, I witnessed the partisan rot from the inside. For over a decade, I was a Democratic Party activist.

Last year, I was the party's nominee for an open seat in the Florida Legislature in a historically Republican district. My party wrote my race off and didn't invest a dime in my election. No Democrat had come close to winning the seat in a generation. I lost by just 290 votes, less than half of 1 percent of the total votes cast.


I challenged the political "wisdom" of my party by focusing my outreach on homes with an independent non-party voter. Open primaries were at the top of my platform. I saw them as a way of being more inclusive and reducing the horrific partisan divide in our state.

I knocked on thousands of doors and spoke to thousands of Floridians. Independents expressed to me, with both skepticism and hope, their feelings about partisan politics and voting rights. They repeatedly said the status quo was destroying the America they knew and loved. My experience easily validated a poll of Florida voters where over 90 percent (regardless of party) said they wanted to vote for their favorite candidates — not their favorite party. They didn't believe either party had a patent on wisdom.

That's why independents are the fastest growing group of voters in Florida. People are exiting political parties faster than they can be signed up. Today, 37 percent are registered Democrats, down from 54 percent in 1990. Republican voter registration has also slid to 35 percent, from 41 percent two decades ago. More and more voters don't party identify and they refuse to be labeled as something they scorn.

There are now 3.7 million independent voters in the state. Younger people, including young voters of color, have the highest rates of political independence — 50 percent identify as independents. Their turnout has nearly doubled since 2014 and for the first time they cast more votes than baby boomers in the 2018 midterms. They're registered, they're ready to vote but they don't want to join a party. We are witnessing a historic shift in voter affiliation in Florida and across the country.

Yet they are shut out of voting in taxpayer-funded, closed party primaries. It's the largest act of voter disenfranchisement in our state.

That matters more and more, because less than 10 percent of voters are deciding who represents their legislative district in Florida. Virtually all candidates run with party labels that define their behavior after they win. With closed primaries that means our leaders are forced to play to narrow party bases — the liberal and conservative fringes — that actually represent the few.

As a result, voters are now asking the secretary of state to make the parties pay for the primaries if they want to control who gets to participate. If the elections are private, then they should be privately funded. You can join the chorus demanding action on our website.

Independents are the deciding factor in every Florida election, but since neither party reaches out until just before the vote, they swing back and forth between the two. So, the opportunities to build bridges are endless.

This winter I worked with fellow Miami-Dade Democratic executive committee members and won 80 percent support for opening the party primary to non-party voters. Several other important groups on the state party backed us. A poll found the vast majority of Florida Democrats (as well as Republicans and independents) support open primaries.

That's when state Democratic Party Chairwoman Terrie Rizzo intervened and got our proposal quietly disposed of at our party convention a few weeks later. There was no debate and no transparency, despite the fact that a clear majority of the party supported it. That's when I decided to leave the Democratic Party and register as an independent.

There's a growing divide between the leadership of both parties and the majority of voters. Voters in our state are demanding a greater ownership stake in our politics and that starts with our elections. Witness the overwhelming support from across the political spectrum for the successful effort to enfranchise former felons. And yet, the leader of that movement, Desmond Meade, still can't vote in Florida's primary. He's an independent.

The Florida Democratic and Republican parties agree on very little, but they are united and organized on one issue — declaring war on independents. Both parties have filed legal briefs against the All Voters Vote campaign for a top-two nonpartisan open primary ballot initiative. All Voters Vote would let every registered voter in every state primary vote for any candidate they wish — with the top two moving on to the general election. As All Voters Vote campaign Chairman Glenn Burhan's explained, "Where taxpayer monies are involved, all registered voters should be allowed to cast a ballot in elections that matter."

Isn't that the very definition of democracy? Of voting rights? Both parties in Florida are claiming more democracy takes away choice. Which begs the inevitable question: Whose choice are they talking about?

The Democratic and Republican parties' increasingly public position against independent voters can only mean one thing — they're worried. They should be.

As in many states around the country, the explosion of independent voters is putting considerable strain on a system that wasn't designed to include them. All Voters Vote is closing in on the signatures needed to get on the 2020 ballot. Once they clear the inevitable legal challenges that face every real reform, it will be up to Florida voters to decide.

There's a storm brewing in Florida in 2020 — it's not Republicans versus Democrats for the presidency. It's a battle between political insiders and ordinary Floridians and it's going to be one hell of a fight. I'm joining millions of Floridians who are standing up and saying let all voters vote.


Read More

Person voting in a voting booth.

Why are so many American elections uncontested? Richard Neal’s long tenure in Congress highlights a broader problem involving money, ballot access, parties and candidate recruitment.

Hill Street Studios/Getty Images

America Has an Uncontested Elections Problem

Richard Neal, the congressman representing Massachusetts’ 1st district, is concluding his 19th congressional term this year. In many ways, Neal is a typical long-tenured congressperson. However, Congressman Neal is distinguished by having been elected to Congress uncontested more times than anyone in post-civil rights American history.

Neal owes his long tenure in part to the uncompetitive elections in western Massachusetts where so-called “silent elections” are common. Some would be challengers may be put off by the fact that he has won seven of his eight contested congressional races by more than 20 points. More often than not, Neal has been uncontested in the Democratic primary as well, however, this year he has competition in both the primary and general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Clerk Matthew Sandbar, 34, demonstrates part of the ballot-sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center used to process the ballots of the 2022 US midterm elections, in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022.

Photo by Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Tallying the results of Washington, DC’s first ranked-choice election in June took about 10 days—longer than many voters are used to. In an age when artificial intelligence can generate an answer in seconds, waiting days for election results can feel old-fashioned, inefficient, even suspicious. And it is about to matter far more widely. This November, 17 states, cities, and counties will use ranked-choice voting, including Maine and Alaska statewide, in races that could help decide control of Congress. More voters than ever will watch results take days to resolve, and more will be asked to trust a count they cannot see.

But that slowness may be one of its most democratic features.

Keep ReadingShow less
People waiting in a line outside as the sun sets.

Voters wait in line outside the Metropolitan Multi-Service Center to cast their ballots in Houston, Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. A recent state investigation confirmed that some registered voters flagged as potential noncitizens by a federal system had already provided proof of citizenship.

Brett Coomer/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

Texas Confirms Some Flagged As Potential Noncitizens on Voter Rolls Had Provided DPS Proof of Citizenship

Election officials across the state should immediately reinstate some voters who were incorrectly flagged as potential noncitizens through a federal program, the Texas Secretary of State’s Office told county officials Wednesday.

Christina Adkins, the state elections director, told county officials the state had reviewed Texas Department of Public Safety records confirming the citizenship of some of the 2,724 registered voters who were flagged as potential noncitizens, according to an audio recording of her comments obtained by Votebeat and The Texas Tribune, as well as election officials who heard them. The voters were flagged after the state checked its voter roll through a federal program called Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, used to verify the citizenship of people registered to vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
People walking down the steps of the U.S. capitol.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) (C), Democratic Conference Chair Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) (R), and House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-MA) (L) and other House Democrats arrive for a news conference on the House steps on November 12, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

DNC's Proposed RCV Ban Sparks Debate Over 2028 Presidential Primaries

Democratic National Committee insiders are poised to ban the use of ranked choice voting (RCV) in selecting their presidential nominee in 2028 – overriding presidential primary laws in Maine and Washington, D.C, and squashing great interest in this use of RCV among state legislators and the many state parties who run their own primaries.

Presidential primaries are among the most compelling use cases for RCV. They draw crowded fields of candidates that voters get to know and are eager to rank rather than be limited to one. Parties must unite their big tent of voters, and RCV rewards unifying candidates. The sequential nature of primaries is a problematic fit with early voting – in 2020, for example, more than three million Democratic voters cast a ballot for a candidate who had withdrawn before that vote was counted.

Keep ReadingShow less