Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump Slams Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians Over Name Changes

Comments on Team Names Prompt Swift Backlash from Native American Leaders

News

Trump Slams Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians Over Name Changes

President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he departs the White House in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Washington, D.C. — President Donald Trump has reignited controversy surrounding the Washington Commanders football team, demanding the franchise revert to its former name, the “Redskins,” a term widely condemned as a racial slur against Native Americans.

In a series of posts on Truth Social this past weekend, Trump declared, “The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team.” He went further, threatening to block the team’s $3.7 billion stadium deal in Washington, D.C., unless the name change is reversed.


The Commanders, formerly known as the Redskins until 2020, adopted their current name in 2022 following years of public pressure, corporate backlash, and advocacy from Native American groups. The original name was dropped amid a national reckoning over racial injustice, with major sponsors like FedEx and Nike urging the team to rebrand.

Trump’s latest remarks come as the team prepares to relocate from its current home in Landover, Maryland, to a new stadium at the site of the former RFK Stadium in Washington, D.C., projected to open in 2030. The president suggested he would use his influence to halt the deal, stating, “I won’t make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington” unless the name is changed back.

“The president was serious,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters when asked about Trump’s new warning to block a proposed stadium.

The Commanders’ ownership has responded cautiously. Managing partner Josh Harris previously stated, “For obvious reasons the old name can’t come back,” but emphasized efforts to honor the team’s heritage through throwback uniforms and branding.

Trump also called on Major League Baseball’s Cleveland Guardians to revert to their former name, the Cleveland Indians—another move that has reignited a long-standing debate over Native American imagery in sports.

The Cleveland franchise officially adopted the Guardians name in 2021 following years of criticism from Native American groups and activists who viewed the “Indians” name and the “Chief Wahoo” mascot as culturally insensitive. The rebranding was part of a broader assesment in American sports, spurred by the social justice movements that followed the death of George Floyd.

Guardians president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti responded calmly to Trump’s remarks, saying the team is focused on building its brand and is “excited about the future”.

Trump’s post on Truth Social claimed there is “a big clamoring” for the team to restore its original name, asserting that “our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen” and that their “heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away”.

Harmful Stereotypes in Play

Native American organizations swiftly condemned Trump’s comments. The Native American Rights Fund called the remarks “a distraction from the real harm this administration continues to inflict on Native Peoples,” adding that such mascots “reduce us to caricatures”.

Despite Trump’s claims, recent studies and statements from tribal leaders suggest otherwise. A 2020 survey found that at least half of Native Americans polled were offended by the Washington Commanders' former name.

Native-themed mascots often rely on caricatured imagery: feathered headdresses, exaggerated war cries, and stylized depictions of tribal warriors. These portrayals distort reality and reduce diverse Indigenous cultures to monolithic, outdated tropes.

Many team names and logos were created during eras with little regard for Indigenous sovereignty or representation. This historical context matters — using Native identities without consent perpetuates the power imbalance established during colonization.

"Native Americans are not mascots, nor should our cultures be misappropriated as such. Race or ethnic-themed mascots or school nicknames perpetuate the stereotypes and racism that harm Native and non-Native students," Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, statement to Guilford Public Schools.

“It’s very difficult to live in a world that thinks you don’t exist except in the context of these mascots," said Madison Eagle, a specialist of Cherokee heritage with the Multicultural Center’s Native American and Indigenous Student Initiatives.

As the debate intensifies, the Commanders and Guardians remain firm in their current identity.

Critics accuse Trump's flurry of wide-ranging posts on his social media of trying to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein files controversy.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.

SUGGESTION:

MAGA Tension Over Why Hasn’t Trump Released the Epstein Files

U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House, Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less