Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Florida sees no evidence of the 2018 vote fraud Trump asserted

Florida election officials

Election officials in Palm Beach pore over ballots during one of the 2018 recounts.

Saul Martinez/Getty Images

Florida's top criminal investigators have found "no evidence of fraudulent intent" by the Democrats after a year-long probe into allegations of mail-in-vote tampering during the last election.

The conclusion by the Department of Law Enforcement prompted the state's top prosecutor to declare Wednesday that a "lack of sufficient evidence to support prosecution" brings to a close one of the most prominent election corruption disputes in years in the state's biggest purple state.

It also punctures a major talking point from President Trump as he's ratcheted up his campaign against expanding absentee voting this year in response to the coronavirus crisis. He has claimed there was fraud in the 2018 Florida election, where the margins in both top races were so thin as to require statewide recounts.


Republicans ended up winning both contests, Ron DeSantis becoming governor and Rick Scott joining the Senate.

Investigators found three people associated with the Florida Democratic Party had changed the deadline dates on an election form used to fix signature problems on mailed-in ballots.

When reviewing mailed-in ballots, election officials compare the signature on the envelope with the voters' signature on file. If they do not look like a match, the ballot is not counted unless the voter completes a document verifying the document's authenticity

Democrats had complained about the number of ballots rejected, saying there were no standards or training for people to make fair signature match determinations. Democrats have raised the same issue in lawsuits filed across the country hoping to end handwriting analysis disputes in closely contested states in November.

The investigation determined people were preparing the altered forms in anticipation of a favorable court ruling in a lawsuit filed by Democrats challenging votes rejected for perceived signature flaws — and had no intent to circulate them until after the ruling.

When vote totals, especially in the Democratic strongholds of Palm Beach and Broward counties, started reducing GOP margins as mail-in votes were tallied two years ago, Trump tweeted that "Law Enforcement is looking into another big corruption scandal having to do with Election Fraud" and that, while Democrats had dispatched "their best Election stealing lawyer" to the state, "Don't worry, Florida - I am sending much better lawyers to expose the FRAUD!"

While such claims of voter fraud are increasingly frequent from the GOP, actual prosecutions are rare. One happened in Philadelphia on Thursday, however: A former elections judge pleaded guilty to taking bribes in return for secretly entering voting booths and running up the totals for local candidates from 2014 to 2016 to add votes for three Democratic judicial candidates. Domenick DeMuro faces 15 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.


Read More

multiethnic American voters participating in the US election, showcasing the concept of choice in a democracy

Presidents who lost the popular vote often faced economic turmoil. See the pattern from Harrison to Trump and how a 50-state strategy could change it.

Alan Mazzocco/Getty Images

Path Forward from Economic Consequences of Non-Popular Vote Presidents

While losing the popular vote does not inherently cause economic ruin, the structural political weakness of entering office without a democratic majority mandate often compounded the economic challenges their administrations faced. These terms were marked by distinct economic hardships, structural imbalances, or severe financial crises.

Destabilizing Partisan Protectionism

Keep ReadingShow less
people filling out their ballots at voting booths and submitting their vote.

Independent voters may hand Democrats control of Congress this fall — but as history shows, they'll get nothing in return. Here's how to change that.

Pressmaster/Getty Images

Swinging Outcomes Is Not Enough

The midterms are six weeks away, and polls predict that independent voters, who broke for Donald Trump in 2024, are planning on voting for Democrats by wide margins. Among Latinos, the numbers are staggering, to the point that the Republican gerrymanders in Florida and Texas may actually result in Democratic victories.

If the Democrats take control of Congress, it will be because of independents. And what do independents get in return?

Keep ReadingShow less
Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep ReadingShow less
A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

How 9/11’s Memory Continues to Shape American Citizenship

Twenty‑five years after September 11th, the burden of that day continues to affect us in ways that are difficult to express. It was a moment of profound loss, but also one that revealed both the vulnerability and resilience of our national fabric. The memories remain vivid for many of us: where we were, what we felt, and how the world appeared to change in an instant. Even now, a quarter century later, the impact of that morning continues to shape how we understand our country, our responsibilities, and our relationships with one another.

To help us all reflect on that day, I invited four contributors to the Fulcrum to share reflections not to revisit the tragedy, but to commemorate the ways it has persisted in our consciousness twenty-five years later.

Keep ReadingShow less