Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Tired of the Two-Party Gridlock? Independents Offer a Way Out

In races from Tennessee to Idaho, independents are rewriting the rules—and aim to reshape Congress

Opinion

Republican, Democratic and independent checkboxes, with the third one checked
Independents will decide the election. What do we know about them?
zimmytws/Getty Images

Something feels wrong. American Democracy is supposed to be the beacon of hope that leads the free world. But for far too many, it feels like our votes do not elect leaders who truly represent what is best for our families and our communities.

Affordability of basic necessities is out of reach, and issues that have over 70% support from the public rarely get a second glance from those who are supposed to represent us. And at this point, our representatives are too busy fighting to maintain power than they are fixing the issues that we as Americans face.


For too long, American democracy has been filtered through two entrenched parties that act more like rival corporations, owned by the same investment bank, than representatives of the people. And we are fed up.

Politicians should actually have to earn your support at the ballot box, instead of assuming your loyalty. The parties want us to believe they are the only choice. But the truth is, more Americans self-identify as independents than with either political party. We are better at democracy because we refuse to play the parties’ game. Instead, we’re changing the rules so that democracy once again works for the people.

Independents aren’t beholden to only considering an idea as red or blue. We don’t have to agree to a strict political ideology or litmus test.

Across the country, independents are stepping forward with fresh ideas, collaborative mindsets, and a commitment to putting people over party. In upcoming elections, candidates like Jon Thorp in Tennessee’s 7th District, Dan Osborn in Nebraska, David Clayton in North Carolina, and Todd Achilles in Idaho are all part of a growing movement that challenges the status quo. These leaders aren’t asking for blind loyalty. Instead, they’re inviting voters to imagine a Congress where no party holds all the cards and every vote matters. When independents win, they can help restore balance, encourage negotiation, and bring merit-based solutions back to the legislative process. The future of American democracy may very well depend on voters willing to break with tradition and embrace representatives who aren't owned by either side.

When you head to the ballot box, consider casting your vote for an independent candidate. Because maybe it’s time we try something different.

I get asked a lot why I’m an Independent. The truth is simple: because Independents are better at democracy.

We don’t need party bosses telling us what to think, how to vote, or who to support. We can look at a person and judge them on their merit. We can look at a bill and judge it on its value. We can decide what matters to us—jobs, schools, healthcare, freedom—without waiting for someone in Washington to hand us a party-approved script. That’s not weakness. That’s democracy the way it was supposed to work.

Meanwhile, the two parties have turned democracy into a game of control. They thrive on division, gridlock, and loyalty tests. They tell us that stepping outside party lines makes us powerless. But the truth is the opposite: stepping outside the parties makes us powerful. It makes us the difference. And that difference could reshape Congress itself.

On December 2, 2025, voters in Tennessee’s 7th District will have a chance to prove it. Jon Thorp isn’t running to serve a party—he’s running to serve people. If he wins, it will be a signal heard across the country: independents can win, and when they do, they can change everything.

Because here’s the part the two parties don’t want you to think about: if independents hold just a handful of seats in 2026, neither party gets an automatic majority. Suddenly, they can’t ignore us. Suddenly, they have to negotiate, compromise, and put ideas ahead of ideology. For once, the balance of power would rest with the people, not the parties.

That’s the fight we’re in. Them versus us. The parties versus the people. And every independent victory brings us closer to a democracy that actually works.

We don’t need permission to take it back. We just need the courage to vote for it.

Austen Campbell is the founder of the Independent National Coalition, Austen has been focused on building infrastructure to support Independent candidates all over the country. He was the former Deputy Finance Director for Dan Osborn's Senate campaign in Nebraska and is now the Campaign Manager for Jon Thorp. Austen sees independent candidates as a solution to the current dysfunction in Congress and has a goal of supporting enough independent candidates to deny both political parties a majority in the 2026 Midterms.


Read More

Protestors standing in front of government military tanks.

People attend a pro-government rally on January 12, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. Tens of thousands of demonstrators gathered in Tehran's Enqelab Square on Monday, as Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of the Iranian parliament, made a speech denouncing western intervention in Iran, following ongoing anti-government protests.

Getty Images

Changing Iran: With Help from Political Geographers on the Ground

INTRODUCTION

This article suggests a different path out of the present excursionist war. This would be a diplomatic effort with ample incentives to MAGA-Israel and the Conservative Shia Theocratic Khamenei Regime (CSTKR) to stop the war. In exchange for the U.S. and Israel stopping the bombing in Iran, this effort would allow the CSTKR to survive and thrive. They could keep and promote their belief that the return of the Muhammad al-Mahdi, the 12th Imam, who disappeared in 874 CE, is key to bringing on the end times to establish peace and justice on earth. While most people would endorse the attainment of peace and justice on earth, they would strongly object to its connection to try to actualize it through violent struggle.

This effort would assist Iran to thrive via the removal of sanctions, substantial technical and economic assistance, help in developing its civilian nuclear program, and letting them keep and maintain a mine-cleared Strait of Hormuz and charge tolls, similar to what Egypt levies for the Suez Canal. Charging tolls provides a strong incentive to keep that waterway open, maintained, and safe. It becomes an additional opportunity cost to keep it closed. The CSTKR and its proxy militias, in turn, must stop their bombing and terror campaigns and, in addition, the CSTKR must let the Strait of Hormuz be quickly opened, give up materials that can be used to build nuclear weapons, and accept the political reconfiguration of Iran as outlined here.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kristi Noem facing away with her hand up to be sworn in as she testifies.

U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem is sworn in as she testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on March 03, 2026 in Washington, DC. The Department of Homeland Security has faced criticism over it's handling of immigration enforcement leaving the department unfunded.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Kristi Noem is a Criminal. They Fired Her Because She’s a Woman

Kristi Noem deserved to get axed. After ignoring thousands of stories of officers detaining American citizens in violent, indiscriminate, unconstitutional roundups, posing for a gleeful photo-op at a hellacious El Salvadoran prison, labeling American protesters as domestic terrorists, and lying under oath multiple times, Democrats and even many Republicans lauded her exodus. Still, in what was a brief, volatile tenure as Secretary of Homeland Security, Noem transformed the agency charged with the protection of the American people into a theater for performative cruelty. Now, as the door hits Noem on the way out, it is important to note that her ouster was not a triumph of ethics or the law or even a sudden recollection of what competence looks like. Despite no lack of legitimate grounds for dismissal, most sources say the final straw was a $220 million ad blitz, possibly complicated by an alleged affair with her adviser. But who among Trump’s inner circle doesn’t come with a laundry list of wasteful spending and personal embarrassments? The rest of the Cabinet is chock full of unqualified Trump-loyalists demonstrating incompetence so regularly that in any other era they would have all resigned or been canned long ago. Given the purported reasons Noem was ultimately fired, and where the conversation has lingered since, to the untrained eye, it seems like Noem may have been the first to get the boot, at least in part because she’s not a man.

There’s nothing Noem did that another member of the cabinet or Trump himself couldn’t top. Consider the shameful tenure of our Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, who engaged in intimate business deals with Epstein years after Epstein’s first conviction, and even planned family vacations to his private island. While Noem is fired for a $220 million ad buy, Lutnick remains the face of American business, despite once being in business with a convicted sex trafficker and lying about it. And our wannabe-fraternity-pledgemaster Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is, if possible, an even greater liability. Hegseth breached security protocol in his second month on the job and oversaw a record $93 billion of spending in a single month, $9 million going to king crab and lobster tails, and $15 million to ribeye steaks. More gravely, in his zeal to project “lethality," Hegseth gutted civilian harm mitigation programs by 90 percent; shortly thereafter, on his watch, in what is the most devastating single military error in modern history, the U.S. fired a Tomahawk missile into a school full of children, killing at least 168 children and 14 teachers. Noem may have turned federal agents against American civilians (which is not why she was fired), but Hegseth is committing war crimes around the globe.

Keep ReadingShow less