Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Tired of the Two-Party Gridlock? Independents Offer a Way Out

In races from Tennessee to Idaho, independents are rewriting the rules—and aim to reshape Congress

Opinion

Republican, Democratic and independent checkboxes, with the third one checked
Independents will decide the election. What do we know about them?
zimmytws/Getty Images

Something feels wrong. American Democracy is supposed to be the beacon of hope that leads the free world. But for far too many, it feels like our votes do not elect leaders who truly represent what is best for our families and our communities.

Affordability of basic necessities is out of reach, and issues that have over 70% support from the public rarely get a second glance from those who are supposed to represent us. And at this point, our representatives are too busy fighting to maintain power than they are fixing the issues that we as Americans face.


For too long, American democracy has been filtered through two entrenched parties that act more like rival corporations, owned by the same investment bank, than representatives of the people. And we are fed up.

Politicians should actually have to earn your support at the ballot box, instead of assuming your loyalty. The parties want us to believe they are the only choice. But the truth is, more Americans self-identify as independents than with either political party. We are better at democracy because we refuse to play the parties’ game. Instead, we’re changing the rules so that democracy once again works for the people.

Independents aren’t beholden to only considering an idea as red or blue. We don’t have to agree to a strict political ideology or litmus test.

Across the country, independents are stepping forward with fresh ideas, collaborative mindsets, and a commitment to putting people over party. In upcoming elections, candidates like Jon Thorp in Tennessee’s 7th District, Dan Osborn in Nebraska, David Clayton in North Carolina, and Todd Achilles in Idaho are all part of a growing movement that challenges the status quo. These leaders aren’t asking for blind loyalty. Instead, they’re inviting voters to imagine a Congress where no party holds all the cards and every vote matters. When independents win, they can help restore balance, encourage negotiation, and bring merit-based solutions back to the legislative process. The future of American democracy may very well depend on voters willing to break with tradition and embrace representatives who aren't owned by either side.

When you head to the ballot box, consider casting your vote for an independent candidate. Because maybe it’s time we try something different.

I get asked a lot why I’m an Independent. The truth is simple: because Independents are better at democracy.

We don’t need party bosses telling us what to think, how to vote, or who to support. We can look at a person and judge them on their merit. We can look at a bill and judge it on its value. We can decide what matters to us—jobs, schools, healthcare, freedom—without waiting for someone in Washington to hand us a party-approved script. That’s not weakness. That’s democracy the way it was supposed to work.

Meanwhile, the two parties have turned democracy into a game of control. They thrive on division, gridlock, and loyalty tests. They tell us that stepping outside party lines makes us powerless. But the truth is the opposite: stepping outside the parties makes us powerful. It makes us the difference. And that difference could reshape Congress itself.

On December 2, 2025, voters in Tennessee’s 7th District will have a chance to prove it. Jon Thorp isn’t running to serve a party—he’s running to serve people. If he wins, it will be a signal heard across the country: independents can win, and when they do, they can change everything.

Because here’s the part the two parties don’t want you to think about: if independents hold just a handful of seats in 2026, neither party gets an automatic majority. Suddenly, they can’t ignore us. Suddenly, they have to negotiate, compromise, and put ideas ahead of ideology. For once, the balance of power would rest with the people, not the parties.

That’s the fight we’re in. Them versus us. The parties versus the people. And every independent victory brings us closer to a democracy that actually works.

We don’t need permission to take it back. We just need the courage to vote for it.

Austen Campbell is the founder of the Independent National Coalition, Austen has been focused on building infrastructure to support Independent candidates all over the country. He was the former Deputy Finance Director for Dan Osborn's Senate campaign in Nebraska and is now the Campaign Manager for Jon Thorp. Austen sees independent candidates as a solution to the current dysfunction in Congress and has a goal of supporting enough independent candidates to deny both political parties a majority in the 2026 Midterms.


Read More

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

Fight For Today For A Better Tomorrow sign

Canva

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

En español

Operation Midway Blitz outraged much of the Chicagoland community last September when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided neighborhoods, arrested thousands of individuals, and fatally shot Mexican immigrant Silverio Villegas González.

Witnessing these injustices across the country and in Chicago, two local coalitions came together last year to form Allies United, a Chicago-based coalition initially focused on responding to immigration raids, and now prioritizing protecting civil rights and building long-term cross‑community solidarity.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose
white red and blue textile

A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose

As the United States approaches both a consequential election cycle and the 250th anniversary of its founding, Americans stand at a crossroads the framers anticipated but hoped we would never reach: a moment when citizens must decide whether to allow the Republic to erode or restore it through vigilance. This is not about left or right. It is about whether we still share a common vision of the country we want to be — and whether we still believe in the same Republic.

The Founders never imagined “the land of the free” as a place dependent on benevolent leaders. They built a system in which the people — not the government — were the safeguards against overreach. James Madison warned that “the accumulation of all powers…in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” a reminder that freedom depends on restraint, not trust in any single individual. George Washington pledged that the Constitution would remain “the guide which I will never abandon,” signaling that loyalty to the Republic must always outweigh loyalty to any leader. These were not ceremonial lines. They were instructions — a blueprint for preventing institutional strain, polarization, and distrust we see today.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on April 25, 2026, after the cancellation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

For the third time in three years, Donald Trump has come under threat by an attacker. Many facts remain unclear after a gunman stormed the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026, during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

As the investigation into the shooting continues, Alfonso Serrano, The Conversation’s politics and society editor, spoke with James Piazza, a political violence scholar at Penn State, about what is driving the rise of political violence in the U.S. and what can be done about it.

Keep ReadingShow less