Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Tired of the Two-Party Gridlock? Independents Offer a Way Out

In races from Tennessee to Idaho, independents are rewriting the rules—and aim to reshape Congress

Opinion

Republican, Democratic and independent checkboxes, with the third one checked
Independents will decide the election. What do we know about them?
zimmytws/Getty Images

Something feels wrong. American Democracy is supposed to be the beacon of hope that leads the free world. But for far too many, it feels like our votes do not elect leaders who truly represent what is best for our families and our communities.

Affordability of basic necessities is out of reach, and issues that have over 70% support from the public rarely get a second glance from those who are supposed to represent us. And at this point, our representatives are too busy fighting to maintain power than they are fixing the issues that we as Americans face.


For too long, American democracy has been filtered through two entrenched parties that act more like rival corporations, owned by the same investment bank, than representatives of the people. And we are fed up.

Politicians should actually have to earn your support at the ballot box, instead of assuming your loyalty. The parties want us to believe they are the only choice. But the truth is, more Americans self-identify as independents than with either political party. We are better at democracy because we refuse to play the parties’ game. Instead, we’re changing the rules so that democracy once again works for the people.

Independents aren’t beholden to only considering an idea as red or blue. We don’t have to agree to a strict political ideology or litmus test.

Across the country, independents are stepping forward with fresh ideas, collaborative mindsets, and a commitment to putting people over party. In upcoming elections, candidates like Jon Thorp in Tennessee’s 7th District, Dan Osborn in Nebraska, David Clayton in North Carolina, and Todd Achilles in Idaho are all part of a growing movement that challenges the status quo. These leaders aren’t asking for blind loyalty. Instead, they’re inviting voters to imagine a Congress where no party holds all the cards and every vote matters. When independents win, they can help restore balance, encourage negotiation, and bring merit-based solutions back to the legislative process. The future of American democracy may very well depend on voters willing to break with tradition and embrace representatives who aren't owned by either side.

When you head to the ballot box, consider casting your vote for an independent candidate. Because maybe it’s time we try something different.

I get asked a lot why I’m an Independent. The truth is simple: because Independents are better at democracy.

We don’t need party bosses telling us what to think, how to vote, or who to support. We can look at a person and judge them on their merit. We can look at a bill and judge it on its value. We can decide what matters to us—jobs, schools, healthcare, freedom—without waiting for someone in Washington to hand us a party-approved script. That’s not weakness. That’s democracy the way it was supposed to work.

Meanwhile, the two parties have turned democracy into a game of control. They thrive on division, gridlock, and loyalty tests. They tell us that stepping outside party lines makes us powerless. But the truth is the opposite: stepping outside the parties makes us powerful. It makes us the difference. And that difference could reshape Congress itself.

On December 2, 2025, voters in Tennessee’s 7th District will have a chance to prove it. Jon Thorp isn’t running to serve a party—he’s running to serve people. If he wins, it will be a signal heard across the country: independents can win, and when they do, they can change everything.

Because here’s the part the two parties don’t want you to think about: if independents hold just a handful of seats in 2026, neither party gets an automatic majority. Suddenly, they can’t ignore us. Suddenly, they have to negotiate, compromise, and put ideas ahead of ideology. For once, the balance of power would rest with the people, not the parties.

That’s the fight we’re in. Them versus us. The parties versus the people. And every independent victory brings us closer to a democracy that actually works.

We don’t need permission to take it back. We just need the courage to vote for it.

Austen Campbell is the founder of the Independent National Coalition, Austen has been focused on building infrastructure to support Independent candidates all over the country. He was the former Deputy Finance Director for Dan Osborn's Senate campaign in Nebraska and is now the Campaign Manager for Jon Thorp. Austen sees independent candidates as a solution to the current dysfunction in Congress and has a goal of supporting enough independent candidates to deny both political parties a majority in the 2026 Midterms.


Read More

The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Dr. Shaniqua Williams, assistant professor of political science

The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems—spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Below is an interview with Dr. Shaniqua Williams, Assistant Professor at West Virginia University. Her research focuses on state politics, race and ethnicity, Black political behavior, Black women’s descriptive and substantive representation, and election administration. She is also a Research Fellow with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, where her work focuses on election administration, workforce development, infrastructure, and policy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democracy Isn’t Eroding. It’s Evolving. The Question Is: Toward What?
a group of flags

Democracy Isn’t Eroding. It’s Evolving. The Question Is: Toward What?

I fell in love with democracy before I fully understood it.

In high school civics classes in the 1990s, I learned about a system that was imperfect in its origins but evolving toward something better. I believed in that evolution. I believed that democracy, if nurtured, could become more inclusive than the one it started as.

Keep ReadingShow less
Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

Engraving of three witches around a bubbling cauldron in a cave summoning an apparition of a rising demon in the background recalling a scene from Shakespeare's Macbeth..Image found in an 1881 book: "Zig Zag Journeys in the Orient" Published by John Wilson & Son, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Getty Images, KenWiedemann

Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

“Something wicked this way comes…” chant the three witches in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, hailing the former general, now the new king of Scotland.

And indeed, something wicked this way has come to us, in the threat that we are facing to our democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors standing in front of government military tanks.

People attend a pro-government rally on January 12, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. Tens of thousands of demonstrators gathered in Tehran's Enqelab Square on Monday, as Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of the Iranian parliament, made a speech denouncing western intervention in Iran, following ongoing anti-government protests.

Getty Images

Changing Iran: With Help from Political Geographers on the Ground

INTRODUCTION

This article suggests a different path out of the present excursionist war. This would be a diplomatic effort with ample incentives to MAGA-Israel and the Conservative Shia Theocratic Khamenei Regime (CSTKR) to stop the war. In exchange for the U.S. and Israel stopping the bombing in Iran, this effort would allow the CSTKR to survive and thrive. They could keep and promote their belief that the return of the Muhammad al-Mahdi, the 12th Imam, who disappeared in 874 CE, is key to bringing on the end times to establish peace and justice on earth. While most people would endorse the attainment of peace and justice on earth, they would strongly object to its connection to try to actualize it through violent struggle.

This effort would assist Iran to thrive via the removal of sanctions, substantial technical and economic assistance, help in developing its civilian nuclear program, and letting them keep and maintain a mine-cleared Strait of Hormuz and charge tolls, similar to what Egypt levies for the Suez Canal. Charging tolls provides a strong incentive to keep that waterway open, maintained, and safe. It becomes an additional opportunity cost to keep it closed. The CSTKR and its proxy militias, in turn, must stop their bombing and terror campaigns and, in addition, the CSTKR must let the Strait of Hormuz be quickly opened, give up materials that can be used to build nuclear weapons, and accept the political reconfiguration of Iran as outlined here.

Keep ReadingShow less