Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Goldman’s Safe Bets Reveal an Uneasy U.S. Economy

Opinion

Goldman’s Safe Bets Reveal an Uneasy U.S. Economy
a close up of a one dollar bill
Photo by Adam Nir on Unsplash

Goldman Sachs’s September conviction list does not look like a cheer for American innovation. It reads more like a survival kit. On paper, the U.S. economy still looks vigorous. Second-quarter GDP rose at a 3.8 percent annualized rate, powered by consumer spending. Personal consumption was revised up to 2.5 percent. August retail sales outpaced forecasts, climbing 0.6 percent instead of the expected 0.2. Inflation, measured by the Fed’s preferred gauge, is running at 2.7 percent - close enough to its target to support optimism.

Scratch below the surface, though, and the story darkens. The U.S. added just 22,000 jobs in August, the weakest monthly gain in years outside recessions. Unemployment ticked up to 4.3 percent, its highest since mid-2021. Real wages rose only 1.1 percent over the past year, barely matching inflation. Families are saving less - just 4.6 percent of disposable income, down from pandemic highs. Prices remain stubborn: the consumer price index rose 2.9 percent in August, hotter than the month before. Consumers are still spending, but increasingly on borrowed time and borrowed money. Credit card balances are climbing, and delinquency rates are spreading fastest among lower-income households.


Against that backdrop, Goldman’s picks make sense. Walmart draws in shoppers looking for bargains and bulk deals when wallets shrink. McDonald’s is the affordable comfort food option when eating out feels like indulgence. Valero, the country’s largest independent refiner, produces gasoline and diesel that Americans need regardless of economic conditions. Only Cadence Design Systems reflects a growth story - the ongoing demand for semiconductors in artificial intelligence. The rest are defensive anchors.

This shift is notable. Goldman’s earlier lists leaned heavily on Silicon Valley giants and media disruptors - bets on tomorrow’s breakthroughs. Now the focus is what survives when growth slows. History offers parallels: in 2008, as the financial system unraveled, Walmart’s revenue climbed while rivals suffered. McDonald’s reported a five percent increase in same-store sales that year, defying the downturn. Today, consumer surveys show similar behavior: fewer splurges, more bargain-hunting.

The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, is still trying to land the plane gently. On September 17, it cut interest rates by a quarter point, the second reduction this year, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.00–4.25 percent. Officials point to core inflation at 2.9 percent as evidence the economy can cool without freezing. Their projections suggest two more cuts before year’s end. Chair Jerome Powell insists hiring and spending remain healthy, but even he concedes risks are rising.

At the White House, the Trump administration prefers triumphalism. Officials hailed the GDP revision as “explosive growth,” crediting deregulation and tax cuts. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promoted “Trump Accounts,” set to launch in 2026 as savings vehicles for young Americans, as proof of long-term prosperity. But storm clouds gather. Average tariffs on key trading partners now hover near 20 percent, threatening to raise costs from factory floors to grocery shelves. Looming threats of a government shutdown at the end of October only add more uncertainty.

Markets are less convinced by the celebratory tone. The yield curve, a traditional signal of economic direction, steepened for the first time in two years. Ten-year Treasury yields now stand at 4.14 percent, compared to 3.57 percent on the two-year - an indication investors expect more cuts. Equities, though, are treading water. The S&P 500 has stalled as tariff risks and weakening business sentiment take hold. Investors are not flocking to Goldman’s picks for excitement, but for protection.

The deeper question is what this defensive mood says about the future. Consumers drive two-thirds of GDP, but their buffer is shrinking. Debt service now claims 12 percent of disposable income, the highest share in decades. With wage growth lagging, there is little room to absorb new shocks. If tariffs push up prices or job growth slows further, the tilt toward staples will accelerate, draining energy from cyclical sectors like autos, housing, and apparel.

Goldman’s list is more than an investment note. It is a signal of how Wall Street views the gap between Washington’s optimism and Main Street’s reality. The headline numbers - strong GDP, steady consumer spending - are masking stress fractures. Investors see them and are bracing for rougher waters, even if policymakers are reluctant to admit it.

That disconnect carries risks. Rate cuts may soften the blow, but they cannot resolve structural issues. Tariffs, fiscal brinkmanship, and stagnant wages weigh heavily on households. For ordinary Americans, already cutting back on discretionary spending, the message is clear: the era of easy growth is ending, and prudence is the smart path.

Goldman sees it. Markets see it. The open question is how long it will take politicians, and the public, to recognize the same.

Imran Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst, and freelance writer.


Read More

Team Trump had to start a war to learn how the global economy works

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Air Force One at Palm Beach International Airport on Monday, March 23, 2026, in West Palm Beach, Fla.

(Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images/TNS)

Team Trump had to start a war to learn how the global economy works

Early Monday morning of March 23, financial markets surged when President Donald Trump claimed there had been productive talks with Iran about ending the war. Therefore he backed off a vow to bomb Iranian power plants if the Strait of Hormuz wasn’t reopened by Monday evening. Iran denies any such talks actually took place.

This is a rare moment in which reasonable people can be torn about which government is more believable.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Tax-Season Trap: When Refunds Become a Child Care Safety Net

Man receives a tax refund check from the government; Indoor background

Getty Images

The Tax-Season Trap: When Refunds Become a Child Care Safety Net

Most parents are more than happy to receive a tax refund. That money can help pay bills, fund a long-overdue vacation, or simply offer breathing room. But for too many families, especially Black families, that refund is not extra. It too often becomes a temporary relief from a child care gap created by school systems that are no longer designed around the realities of working families.

Schools are supposed to be structured in a child’s best interest. In practice, hardships are built into an antiquated design. Seventy percent of Black parents work service-essential nine-to-five roles, yet schools dismiss in the early afternoon. Parents are left scrambling to find and pay for before- and after-school care, babysitters for holidays, teacher workdays, and full-time summer camps. Those gap hours and summer care costs average to about $400 to $500 per week. For many households, that equals an entire paycheck.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding a phone and bills.

Economic anxiety among millennials and younger Americans is reshaping the American Dream. Explore how rising housing costs, wage stagnation, and inequality are driving political change and weakening trust in institutions.

Getty Images, Natalia Lebedinskaia

The Economic Squeeze on Young Americans: Why It Matters for Democracy

As a parent of millennials, I can see firsthand the reality described in a recent Barron’s commentary by Randall W. Forsyth: the financial anxiety many younger Americans feel is not misplaced pessimism. It is a rational response to an economy that increasingly feels stacked against them. The traditional markers of stability, especially homeownership, have moved further out of reach. What was once the cornerstone of the American Dream, an affordable house, now feels almost unattainable for many young Americans. The consequences are not only economic. They are political too.

For much of the postwar era, American democracy relied on a powerful assumption: each generation would do better than the last. Economic growth did not eliminate inequality, but it reinforced a broader belief that the system ultimately rewarded effort. Work, education, and saving were expected to lead gradually toward stability and the attainment of the American Dream. Homeownership. Family formation. Modest wealth built over time.

Keep ReadingShow less