Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Goldman’s Safe Bets Reveal an Uneasy U.S. Economy

Opinion

Goldman’s Safe Bets Reveal an Uneasy U.S. Economy
a close up of a one dollar bill
Photo by Adam Nir on Unsplash

Goldman Sachs’s September conviction list does not look like a cheer for American innovation. It reads more like a survival kit. On paper, the U.S. economy still looks vigorous. Second-quarter GDP rose at a 3.8 percent annualized rate, powered by consumer spending. Personal consumption was revised up to 2.5 percent. August retail sales outpaced forecasts, climbing 0.6 percent instead of the expected 0.2. Inflation, measured by the Fed’s preferred gauge, is running at 2.7 percent - close enough to its target to support optimism.

Scratch below the surface, though, and the story darkens. The U.S. added just 22,000 jobs in August, the weakest monthly gain in years outside recessions. Unemployment ticked up to 4.3 percent, its highest since mid-2021. Real wages rose only 1.1 percent over the past year, barely matching inflation. Families are saving less - just 4.6 percent of disposable income, down from pandemic highs. Prices remain stubborn: the consumer price index rose 2.9 percent in August, hotter than the month before. Consumers are still spending, but increasingly on borrowed time and borrowed money. Credit card balances are climbing, and delinquency rates are spreading fastest among lower-income households.


Against that backdrop, Goldman’s picks make sense. Walmart draws in shoppers looking for bargains and bulk deals when wallets shrink. McDonald’s is the affordable comfort food option when eating out feels like indulgence. Valero, the country’s largest independent refiner, produces gasoline and diesel that Americans need regardless of economic conditions. Only Cadence Design Systems reflects a growth story - the ongoing demand for semiconductors in artificial intelligence. The rest are defensive anchors.

This shift is notable. Goldman’s earlier lists leaned heavily on Silicon Valley giants and media disruptors - bets on tomorrow’s breakthroughs. Now the focus is what survives when growth slows. History offers parallels: in 2008, as the financial system unraveled, Walmart’s revenue climbed while rivals suffered. McDonald’s reported a five percent increase in same-store sales that year, defying the downturn. Today, consumer surveys show similar behavior: fewer splurges, more bargain-hunting.

The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, is still trying to land the plane gently. On September 17, it cut interest rates by a quarter point, the second reduction this year, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.00–4.25 percent. Officials point to core inflation at 2.9 percent as evidence the economy can cool without freezing. Their projections suggest two more cuts before year’s end. Chair Jerome Powell insists hiring and spending remain healthy, but even he concedes risks are rising.

At the White House, the Trump administration prefers triumphalism. Officials hailed the GDP revision as “explosive growth,” crediting deregulation and tax cuts. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promoted “Trump Accounts,” set to launch in 2026 as savings vehicles for young Americans, as proof of long-term prosperity. But storm clouds gather. Average tariffs on key trading partners now hover near 20 percent, threatening to raise costs from factory floors to grocery shelves. Looming threats of a government shutdown at the end of October only add more uncertainty.

Markets are less convinced by the celebratory tone. The yield curve, a traditional signal of economic direction, steepened for the first time in two years. Ten-year Treasury yields now stand at 4.14 percent, compared to 3.57 percent on the two-year - an indication investors expect more cuts. Equities, though, are treading water. The S&P 500 has stalled as tariff risks and weakening business sentiment take hold. Investors are not flocking to Goldman’s picks for excitement, but for protection.

The deeper question is what this defensive mood says about the future. Consumers drive two-thirds of GDP, but their buffer is shrinking. Debt service now claims 12 percent of disposable income, the highest share in decades. With wage growth lagging, there is little room to absorb new shocks. If tariffs push up prices or job growth slows further, the tilt toward staples will accelerate, draining energy from cyclical sectors like autos, housing, and apparel.

Goldman’s list is more than an investment note. It is a signal of how Wall Street views the gap between Washington’s optimism and Main Street’s reality. The headline numbers - strong GDP, steady consumer spending - are masking stress fractures. Investors see them and are bracing for rougher waters, even if policymakers are reluctant to admit it.

That disconnect carries risks. Rate cuts may soften the blow, but they cannot resolve structural issues. Tariffs, fiscal brinkmanship, and stagnant wages weigh heavily on households. For ordinary Americans, already cutting back on discretionary spending, the message is clear: the era of easy growth is ending, and prudence is the smart path.

Goldman sees it. Markets see it. The open question is how long it will take politicians, and the public, to recognize the same.

Imran Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst, and freelance writer.


Read More

House key on calculator with wooden table background copy space.

95% of Americans see an affordability crisis, and most distrust government to fix it. An argument for tracking real outcomes, not just GDP growth.

Pla2na/Getty Images

America’s Affordability Crisis Is a Democracy Crisis

Affordability dominates the national conversation because it dominates people’s lives. Ninety-five percent of Americans say the country is facing an affordability crisis, yet two-thirds don’t believe the federal government will successfully address it.

This is more than an economic problem – it’s a crisis for democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large dollar sign surrounded by code, number sequences in green ink.

As Congress weighs AI risk after researcher Jacob Coxon's viral warning, an opinion piece argues fear of 'losing control' can entrench Big Tech's power.

Anton Petrus/Getty Images

The Business Value of Losing Control of AI

A warning that artificial intelligence may escape human control can make its developers look more important, not less. For companies trying to establish AI as the defining technology of the century, even the possibility of catastrophe can increase the perceived significance of what they are building.

That possibility is now moving rapidly from Silicon Valley into Washington. On Sept. 16, senators were scheduled to gather for a private bipartisan briefing organized by Sen. Bernie Sanders on what he called the “extraordinary dangers” of advanced AI. The meeting followed the resignation of Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, whose warning that people building frontier AI genuinely believe the technology could kill humanity drew more than 100 million views. Coxon had spent three years working on pretraining at OpenAI and Anthropic.

Keep ReadingShow less
house with red door
Cozy house with red door under a blue sky

Massive Racial Wealth Gap for Massachusetts Latino Families

BOSTON — A comprehensive statewide report released by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston has exposed a staggering racial wealth gap in Massachusetts, revealing that Latino families hold a median net wealth of just $1,200.

The landmark study, titled “Family Wealth in Massachusetts,” indicates that despite the Commonwealth ranking near the top of national measures for median income, economic security remains profoundly stratified along racial lines. The findings show that the median net wealth of White families in the state stands at $549,200—an amount 458 times greater than that of typical Latino households.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Tax Word on Wooden Block With Calculator and Tax Form

Tax Word on Wooden Block With Calculator and Tax Form

Getty Images

$40 Trillion U.S. National Debt & Role of ATR Taxpayer Protection Pledge Shell Game

The Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) Taxpayer Protection Pledge amounts to a "Shell Game" centered on a conflict between revenue restriction and total federal spending. Signers who vote for massive spending packages—such as high defense spending, Great Recession bailouts, pandemic relief expenditures, and national debt Interest —while simultaneously pledging never to raise taxes are engaging in a contradictory fiscal strategy that simply shifts the true cost of government to the deficit, ultimately resulting in our $40 trillion national debt.

This critique is articulated across the specified pillars:

Keep ReadingShow less