Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Goldman’s Safe Bets Reveal an Uneasy U.S. Economy

Opinion

Goldman’s Safe Bets Reveal an Uneasy U.S. Economy
a close up of a one dollar bill
Photo by Adam Nir on Unsplash

Goldman Sachs’s September conviction list does not look like a cheer for American innovation. It reads more like a survival kit. On paper, the U.S. economy still looks vigorous. Second-quarter GDP rose at a 3.8 percent annualized rate, powered by consumer spending. Personal consumption was revised up to 2.5 percent. August retail sales outpaced forecasts, climbing 0.6 percent instead of the expected 0.2. Inflation, measured by the Fed’s preferred gauge, is running at 2.7 percent - close enough to its target to support optimism.

Scratch below the surface, though, and the story darkens. The U.S. added just 22,000 jobs in August, the weakest monthly gain in years outside recessions. Unemployment ticked up to 4.3 percent, its highest since mid-2021. Real wages rose only 1.1 percent over the past year, barely matching inflation. Families are saving less - just 4.6 percent of disposable income, down from pandemic highs. Prices remain stubborn: the consumer price index rose 2.9 percent in August, hotter than the month before. Consumers are still spending, but increasingly on borrowed time and borrowed money. Credit card balances are climbing, and delinquency rates are spreading fastest among lower-income households.


Against that backdrop, Goldman’s picks make sense. Walmart draws in shoppers looking for bargains and bulk deals when wallets shrink. McDonald’s is the affordable comfort food option when eating out feels like indulgence. Valero, the country’s largest independent refiner, produces gasoline and diesel that Americans need regardless of economic conditions. Only Cadence Design Systems reflects a growth story - the ongoing demand for semiconductors in artificial intelligence. The rest are defensive anchors.

This shift is notable. Goldman’s earlier lists leaned heavily on Silicon Valley giants and media disruptors - bets on tomorrow’s breakthroughs. Now the focus is what survives when growth slows. History offers parallels: in 2008, as the financial system unraveled, Walmart’s revenue climbed while rivals suffered. McDonald’s reported a five percent increase in same-store sales that year, defying the downturn. Today, consumer surveys show similar behavior: fewer splurges, more bargain-hunting.

The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, is still trying to land the plane gently. On September 17, it cut interest rates by a quarter point, the second reduction this year, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.00–4.25 percent. Officials point to core inflation at 2.9 percent as evidence the economy can cool without freezing. Their projections suggest two more cuts before year’s end. Chair Jerome Powell insists hiring and spending remain healthy, but even he concedes risks are rising.

At the White House, the Trump administration prefers triumphalism. Officials hailed the GDP revision as “explosive growth,” crediting deregulation and tax cuts. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promoted “Trump Accounts,” set to launch in 2026 as savings vehicles for young Americans, as proof of long-term prosperity. But storm clouds gather. Average tariffs on key trading partners now hover near 20 percent, threatening to raise costs from factory floors to grocery shelves. Looming threats of a government shutdown at the end of October only add more uncertainty.

Markets are less convinced by the celebratory tone. The yield curve, a traditional signal of economic direction, steepened for the first time in two years. Ten-year Treasury yields now stand at 4.14 percent, compared to 3.57 percent on the two-year - an indication investors expect more cuts. Equities, though, are treading water. The S&P 500 has stalled as tariff risks and weakening business sentiment take hold. Investors are not flocking to Goldman’s picks for excitement, but for protection.

The deeper question is what this defensive mood says about the future. Consumers drive two-thirds of GDP, but their buffer is shrinking. Debt service now claims 12 percent of disposable income, the highest share in decades. With wage growth lagging, there is little room to absorb new shocks. If tariffs push up prices or job growth slows further, the tilt toward staples will accelerate, draining energy from cyclical sectors like autos, housing, and apparel.

Goldman’s list is more than an investment note. It is a signal of how Wall Street views the gap between Washington’s optimism and Main Street’s reality. The headline numbers - strong GDP, steady consumer spending - are masking stress fractures. Investors see them and are bracing for rougher waters, even if policymakers are reluctant to admit it.

That disconnect carries risks. Rate cuts may soften the blow, but they cannot resolve structural issues. Tariffs, fiscal brinkmanship, and stagnant wages weigh heavily on households. For ordinary Americans, already cutting back on discretionary spending, the message is clear: the era of easy growth is ending, and prudence is the smart path.

Goldman sees it. Markets see it. The open question is how long it will take politicians, and the public, to recognize the same.

Imran Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst, and freelance writer.


Read More

A gavel.

Analysis of President Donald Trump’s tariffs after a record $901.5B U.S. trade deficit in 2025. Explore the economic realities behind trade imbalances, the United States Supreme Court ruling on tariff authority, and the growing debate over executive power and trade policy.

Getty Images, Phanphen Kaewwannarat

What’s Next After the Court’s Tariffs Decision?

A Stubborn Imbalance

After a year of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs, sold as a reset of global trade, the promise was simple: the U.S. trade deficit would shrink. It did not. The Commerce Department instead reported a $70.3 billion deficit in December and a staggering $901.5 billion for all of 2025, one of the largest totals on record. The gap between imports and exports barely narrowed at all.

These figures matter because they undermine the central premise of the strategy: make imports more expensive, reduce foreign purchases, and bring production back to the United States. But that approach overlooks a key reality. Trade balances are not driven by tariffs alone. They reflect deeper forces such as consumer demand, domestic savings rates, the strength of the dollar, and global capital flows. Those forces do not yield easily to executive action.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

President Donald Trump delivered his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night.

(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)

Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump used the longest State of the Union address in U.S. history on Tuesday night to argue that Americans are already experiencing “a turnaround for the ages” thanks to his agenda. But moments of disruption inside the House chamber and reactions from lawmakers afterward suggested Democrats and even some Republicans dispute his claims.

Trump’s address offered a snapshot of how the White House is trying to frame the economy heading into an election year. The administration sought to present easing inflation, falling prices, and rising wages as settled facts.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol

A shrinking deficit doesn’t mean fiscal health. CBO projections show rising debt, Social Security insolvency, and trillions added under the 2025 tax law.

Getty Images, Dmitry Vinogradov

The Deficit Mirage

The False Comfort of a Good Headline

A mirage can look real from a distance. The closer you get, the less substance you find. That is increasingly how Washington talks about the federal deficit.

Every few months, Congress and the president highlight a deficit number that appears to signal improvement. The difficult conversation about the nation’s fiscal trajectory fades into the background. But a shrinking deficit is not necessarily a sign of fiscal health. It measures one year’s gap between revenue and spending. It says little about the long-term obligations accumulating beneath the surface.

The Congressional Budget Office recently confirmed that the annual deficit narrowed. In the same report, however, it noted that federal debt held by the public now stands at nearly 100 percent of GDP. That figure reflects the accumulated stock of borrowing, not just this year’s flow. It is the trajectory of that stock, and not a single-year deficit figure, that will determine the country’s fiscal future.

What the Deficit Doesn’t Show

The deficit is politically attractive because it is simple and headline-friendly. It appears manageable on paper. Both parties have invoked it selectively for decades, celebrating short-term improvements while downplaying long-term drift. But the deeper fiscal story lies elsewhere.

Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the debt now account for roughly half of federal outlays, and their share rises automatically each year. These commitments do not pause for election cycles. They grow with demographics, health costs, and compounding interest.

According to the CBO, those three categories will consume 58 cents of every federal dollar by 2035. Social Security’s trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2033, triggering an automatic benefit reduction of roughly 21 percent unless Congress intervenes. Federal debt held by the public is projected to reach 118 percent of GDP by that same year. A favorable monthly deficit report does not alter any of these structural realities. These projections come from the same nonpartisan budget office lawmakers routinely cite when it supports their position.

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

A take on permitting reform, deregulation, and DHS accountability—arguing for economic growth with guardrails that protect communities, health, and the environment.

Getty Images, Javier Ghersi

A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

For far too long, our national conversation has been framed around a false choice. On one side, Republicans frequently argue that the best way to strengthen the economy and improve the lives of everyday Americans is to give businesses maximum freedom by having fewer rules, fewer constraints and more incentives to grow. On the other side, Democrats have stressed the need for guardrails to protect our environment, our health, and our communities from the unintended effects of unchecked growth.

But this debate has always been too narrow. It assumes that we must choose between action and accountability, between getting things done and doing them responsibly.

Keep ReadingShow less