Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Goldman’s Safe Bets Reveal an Uneasy U.S. Economy

Opinion

Goldman’s Safe Bets Reveal an Uneasy U.S. Economy
a close up of a one dollar bill
Photo by Adam Nir on Unsplash

Goldman Sachs’s September conviction list does not look like a cheer for American innovation. It reads more like a survival kit. On paper, the U.S. economy still looks vigorous. Second-quarter GDP rose at a 3.8 percent annualized rate, powered by consumer spending. Personal consumption was revised up to 2.5 percent. August retail sales outpaced forecasts, climbing 0.6 percent instead of the expected 0.2. Inflation, measured by the Fed’s preferred gauge, is running at 2.7 percent - close enough to its target to support optimism.

Scratch below the surface, though, and the story darkens. The U.S. added just 22,000 jobs in August, the weakest monthly gain in years outside recessions. Unemployment ticked up to 4.3 percent, its highest since mid-2021. Real wages rose only 1.1 percent over the past year, barely matching inflation. Families are saving less - just 4.6 percent of disposable income, down from pandemic highs. Prices remain stubborn: the consumer price index rose 2.9 percent in August, hotter than the month before. Consumers are still spending, but increasingly on borrowed time and borrowed money. Credit card balances are climbing, and delinquency rates are spreading fastest among lower-income households.


Against that backdrop, Goldman’s picks make sense. Walmart draws in shoppers looking for bargains and bulk deals when wallets shrink. McDonald’s is the affordable comfort food option when eating out feels like indulgence. Valero, the country’s largest independent refiner, produces gasoline and diesel that Americans need regardless of economic conditions. Only Cadence Design Systems reflects a growth story - the ongoing demand for semiconductors in artificial intelligence. The rest are defensive anchors.

This shift is notable. Goldman’s earlier lists leaned heavily on Silicon Valley giants and media disruptors - bets on tomorrow’s breakthroughs. Now the focus is what survives when growth slows. History offers parallels: in 2008, as the financial system unraveled, Walmart’s revenue climbed while rivals suffered. McDonald’s reported a five percent increase in same-store sales that year, defying the downturn. Today, consumer surveys show similar behavior: fewer splurges, more bargain-hunting.

The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, is still trying to land the plane gently. On September 17, it cut interest rates by a quarter point, the second reduction this year, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.00–4.25 percent. Officials point to core inflation at 2.9 percent as evidence the economy can cool without freezing. Their projections suggest two more cuts before year’s end. Chair Jerome Powell insists hiring and spending remain healthy, but even he concedes risks are rising.

At the White House, the Trump administration prefers triumphalism. Officials hailed the GDP revision as “explosive growth,” crediting deregulation and tax cuts. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promoted “Trump Accounts,” set to launch in 2026 as savings vehicles for young Americans, as proof of long-term prosperity. But storm clouds gather. Average tariffs on key trading partners now hover near 20 percent, threatening to raise costs from factory floors to grocery shelves. Looming threats of a government shutdown at the end of October only add more uncertainty.

Markets are less convinced by the celebratory tone. The yield curve, a traditional signal of economic direction, steepened for the first time in two years. Ten-year Treasury yields now stand at 4.14 percent, compared to 3.57 percent on the two-year - an indication investors expect more cuts. Equities, though, are treading water. The S&P 500 has stalled as tariff risks and weakening business sentiment take hold. Investors are not flocking to Goldman’s picks for excitement, but for protection.

The deeper question is what this defensive mood says about the future. Consumers drive two-thirds of GDP, but their buffer is shrinking. Debt service now claims 12 percent of disposable income, the highest share in decades. With wage growth lagging, there is little room to absorb new shocks. If tariffs push up prices or job growth slows further, the tilt toward staples will accelerate, draining energy from cyclical sectors like autos, housing, and apparel.

Goldman’s list is more than an investment note. It is a signal of how Wall Street views the gap between Washington’s optimism and Main Street’s reality. The headline numbers - strong GDP, steady consumer spending - are masking stress fractures. Investors see them and are bracing for rougher waters, even if policymakers are reluctant to admit it.

That disconnect carries risks. Rate cuts may soften the blow, but they cannot resolve structural issues. Tariffs, fiscal brinkmanship, and stagnant wages weigh heavily on households. For ordinary Americans, already cutting back on discretionary spending, the message is clear: the era of easy growth is ending, and prudence is the smart path.

Goldman sees it. Markets see it. The open question is how long it will take politicians, and the public, to recognize the same.

Imran Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst, and freelance writer.

Read More

Cryptocurrency: Debunking Myths, Understanding Realities, and Exploring Economic and Social Impacts
a pile of gold and silver bitcoins
Photo by Traxer on Unsplash

Cryptocurrency: Debunking Myths, Understanding Realities, and Exploring Economic and Social Impacts

“In 2020 and 2021, there was a big crypto bubble. You couldn’t turn a corner without seeing another celebrity crypto endorsement," said Mark Hays, the Associate Director for Cryptocurrency and Financial Technology with AFR/AFREF and with Demand Progress during the NFRPP’s October 25th, 2025, panel discussion. Hilary J. Allen, a Professor of Law at the American University Washington College of Law, joined Hays. The discussion was moderated by Peter Coy, a freelance journalist covering economics, business, and finance.

Celebrities like Kevin Hart, Gwyneth Paltrow, Madonna, Justin Bieber, Serena Williams, Paris Hilton, and Snoop Dogg jumped to endorse crypto-related companies. The record of these endorsements has been poor (Bloomberg), and some are calling for people who endorse these products without doing due diligence to face legal repercussions (Boston College Law Review). The message from the NFRPP’s panel discussion was one of intense skepticism towards cryptocurrencies in general, with Professor Allen going so far as to call them a “failure as a technology.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the Tri-Merge System is Vital for Fair Homeownership
white house under maple trees
Photo by Scott Webb on Unsplash

Why the Tri-Merge System is Vital for Fair Homeownership

For generations, home ownership has been part of the very definition of capturing the American dream. First-time buyers face a process that can be both exciting and daunting—the right home, in the right community, and with the right financing.

As housing costs continue to rise and first-time home purchases are being delayed more than ever, securing a mortgage at a competitive rate for a homebuyer is vital to making home ownership possible, which underscores the need for an accurate and comprehensive way to analyze borrowers’ creditworthiness.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Welfare Queen Myth: How Racist Stereotypes Still Shape America’s War on Poverty

A powerful look at how the “welfare queen” myth—from Linda Taylor to modern AI deepfakes—racializes poverty, masks systemic corruption, and fuels political scapegoating.

Getty Images, jetcityimage

The Welfare Queen Myth: How Racist Stereotypes Still Shape America’s War on Poverty

In 1974, Linda Taylor, a 47-year-old woman in Chicago, was indicted on 31 counts of fraud involving welfare, medical assistance, food stamps, and Social Security benefits. Though few knew her name, many came to know her as the “welfare queen”—a label first coined in a Rochester, New York newspaper and later amplified by Ronald Reagan on the campaign trail in 1976. Without naming her, Reagan described a woman who used 80 aliases to collect government benefits, claiming she earned $150,000 tax-free annually. The crowd gasped. Taylor became the symbol of a racialized myth: that Black women were exploiting government handouts.

Reagan never mentioned Taylor’s race, but he didn’t need to. As Bryce Covert of The New Republic explains, the image of a fur-wearing woman in a Cadillac was unmistakably Black to many White Americans. Though 60% of AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) recipients were non-Black, media portrayals had racialized poverty. Taylor became a proxy for resentment toward Black Americans and public assistance. The stereotype mirrored that of affirmative action: the idea that Black people were gaming the system, prompting policies that harmed all poor families.

Keep ReadingShow less
Immigrant Workers Keep the U.S. Economy Running Even as Policy Turns Against Them

Electrician Gabriel Farías carries tools before starting work in San Diego, California.

Credit: Alex Segura

Immigrant Workers Keep the U.S. Economy Running Even as Policy Turns Against Them

On a cool November morning, electrician Gabriel Farías loads his tools into the back of a white van parked outside a housing complex under construction east of San Diego. He takes a sip of coffee and shakes his head. “Everywhere I work, there are immigrants,” he says. “They do the jobs no one else wants. For me, they’re essential.”

Farías came to California several years ago and now works legally for a local company. He says the construction sector, already stretched thin, would collapse without immigrant labor. But lately, something has changed. “Around midyear, you could already notice it,” he tells The Fulcrum. “Before, immigrants used to show up looking for work every day. That’s dropped a lot. Many are afraid of raids or being deported.”

Keep ReadingShow less