Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Looking for truth when lies become too easy to embrace

JD Vance speaking in front of a campaign banner

Vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance.

Joel Angel Juarez for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Page is an American journalist, syndicated columnist and senior member of the Chicago Tribune editorial board.

Sometimes amid the hoopla and hogwash of political events, I find myself jerked alert by an accidental truth that manages to break through.

Such appeared to be the case when Sen. J.D. Vance, the Republican nominee for vice president, urged Democrats to “tone down their rhetoric,” while not doing much to tone down his own.


In a live interview with CNN’s Dana Bash, Vance was trying to justify spreading what, even in polite terms, can only be called lies about Haitians eating pets in Springfield, Ohio.

“If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do.”

Vance offered no names or other details about these unnamed witnesses or their accounts.

Instead, state and local officials denied the “first-hand accounts,” which are better described as debunked rumors.

What else do you call an alarming statement without witnesses or other tangible facts to back it up?

Defending the statement, Vance offered that, “It comes from first-hand accounts of my constituents.”

The lies really began to fly after former President Donald Trump stoked debunked rumors during his debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent. Trump declared that migrants were hunting and eating their neighbors’ dogs and cats in Springfield, an industrial town of about 60,000 an hour drive west of the state capital, Columbus.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Soon right-wing social media personalities were descending on the town to question wary local residents about the veracity of the claims. Bomb threats were made against local schools and other public buildings, causing many parents to keep their children at home.

Investigations led to a local resident Erika Lee, who had posted a fateful note on Facebook for which she has since apologized, according to the New York Times.

She had heard that a neighbor’s cat had gone missing, she told the Times, and she posted on Facebook a rumor that a Haitian neighbor may have kidnapped it. Yet when she later went back to check the story with her neighbor, she learned that the cat in question hadn’t been missing after all.

“And at that point, we are playing the game of telephone,” Lee told the Times.

Rumors of pet killing and eating turns out to have a long history as a slander against immigrants and other minority populations, especially in places where they can be singled out as posing a threat to local jobs and ethnic communities.

Republican Gov. Mike DeWine, who still supports Trump and Vance, said in an open letter to the New York Times: “I am saddened by how they and others continue to repeat claims that lack evidence and disparage the legal migrants living in Springfield….

“The Springfield I know is not the one you hear about in social media rumors. It is a city made up of good, decent, welcoming people. They are hard workers — both those who were born in this country and those who settled here because, back in their birthplace, Haiti, innocent people can be killed just for cheering on the wrong team in a soccer match.”

As a former Ohioan, born in Dayton and raised in Middletown, which later became Vance’s hometown, I sympathize with DeWine and others who have been working diligently against some negative economic and social changes since the heyday of the state’s industrial growth a half-century ago.

Ironically, the latest round of migrants are legally present in the country and came, mostly from Haiti, in response to active outreach efforts to relieve a local worker shortage in an industrial area that was a lot more robust when I was growing up there.

Vance surely knows that as well as I do. So does Trump, if he’s paying attention. But the drive to win votes in a tight election drives people to, let us say, exaggerate a bit.

“If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people then that’s what I’m going to do.”

My fellow former Middletonian urged Democrats to tone down their rhetoric. He should do something similar with his own. So should the former president.

Read More

Woman holding a sign that reads "This is a time to roll up our sleeves."

A protestor holds up a sign with a quote from Vice President Kamala Harris at the Women's March rally outside the Heritage Foundation on Nov. 9.

Shannon Finney/Getty Images

Dems blame everything but themselves for losing

It’s tough sledding for Democrats, as they try to wrap their heads around Donald Trump’s improbable-but-also-foreseeable sweep of all seven swing states and winning the popular vote.

This wasn’t supposed to happen, after all. Democrats genuinely believed — as they did in 2016 — that Trump’s many odious qualities would be enough to keep him far away from the White House again.

And if for some reason that wasn’t enough for most Americans, they had in Vice President Kamala Harris a woman of color who, apparently, by virtue of her identity alone, would help seal the deal among those voting demographics.

Keep ReadingShow less
People eating Thanksgiving dinner
The Good Brigade/Getty Images

Thanksgiving dinner at the grown-ups’ table

Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."

With our national elections the first week and Thanksgiving the last week, November is a banner month for Americans. On Nov. 5 we voted, electing Donald J. Trump to become our 47th president and arguably the most powerful person on the planet. Now we look forward to Thanksgiving.

Somewhere in each of our past Thanksgivings, there likely came a time when we were invited to join the adults at the grown-ups’ table. The most important qualification demonstrating we had earned this “promotion” was our behavior: We were expected to act like a grown-up. Maybe returning from college did it, or getting married. Perhaps we were bumped up earlier. Whenever it occurred, we understood we were being accorded a privilege. We had arrived.

Keep ReadingShow less
People working in a vote counting center

Election workers tabulate results of early voting and absentee ballots in Gwinnett County, Ga., on Nov. 5.

Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images

Officials ran a smooth election, silencing the false narrative around voter fraud

Originally published by The 19th.

Election officials across the country administered a relatively smooth 2024 general election, despite reports of bomb threats, technical issues and a polarizing online ecosystem that at times challenged the integrity of counting ballots.

The predominately women-led workforce went into Election Day having readied for potential disruptions and a disinformation campaign that had swelled in the final weeks of the presidential race between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris. But by early Wednesday, their processes for receiving and counting ballots — and a large enough vote margin in key battleground states — enabled major news outlets to project the former president’s win over the vice president shortly after midnight, days faster than in 2020.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump speaking at a podium

President-elect Donald Trump speaks to at an election night gathering in West Palm Beach, Fla.

Brendan Gutenschwager/Anadolu via Getty Images

Voters want a president who takes care of their most basic needs

Schmidt is a columnist and editorial board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

This election was not about our national identity or a reflection of who we are as a collection of people. Rather, it centered on whether our most essential requirements as citizens were being served by our government.

A resounding number of voters told Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party that the answer to that question was “No.”

Keep ReadingShow less