Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Was Trump elected due to sexism, misogyny and racism?

Donald Trump at a podium
Howard Schnapp/Newsday RM via Getty Images

As should be expected, the Democratic Party and its supporters are casting blame for the results of the 2024 presidential election. Many are looking inside the party and its ideology, policies, candidates and messaging, as they should. But some are trying to blame sexism (even misogyny) and racism for the failure of a woman of color to win the election.

As Americans, we should all disavow sexism, misogyny and racism, while acknowledging that these views still exist in some human hearts. But blaming the content of American hearts broadly is wrong, further divides us and is counterproductive to the goal of building a majority in the future.


I personally did not vote for Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris (nor Joe Biden) and it had nothing to do with race or gender. It had everything to do with ideology and policy. I have also never voted for Donald Trump, originally due to a lack of understanding of his ideology and likely policy prescriptions, but also because I was concerned about his behavior.

Let me also say that I do not believe Trump will be a dictator, that he is a modern-day Hitler in disguise, nor that he will destroy democracy. I hope that he finds success in addressing immigration problems, improving the economy and in other areas. If he did so in a calm and conciliatory manner and avoided retribution for whatever perceived slights and attacks he has suffered over the past nine years, he would burnish his legacy and likely ensure a continuation of his agenda for years beyond his four-year term. Democratic Party leaders no doubt recognize this and understandably are crafting their resistance.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The underlying reasons for the failure of the Harris campaign are beyond the scope of my essay. I am here to argue against the tropes of sexism, misogyny and racism. To do so, I invite you to participate in a double-sided thought experiment.

Let’s assume that in 2022, for whatever reason, Trump decided not to run again and also chose to allow the Republican Party to select a nominee without his input (and yes, I realize that last bit is a stretch). Let’s also assume that after a long, hard-fought and drawn-out primary season, the Republican Party picked Nikki Haley as its nominee. To keep the 2024 general election a contest between a white man and a woman of color, let’s also assume that Biden did not participate in an early debate that called into question his abilities and remained the Democratic nominee.

Are sexism, misogyny and racism so prevalent in the Republican Party and other Americans that it would have prevented Haley from winning against Biden? And on the other side of this thought experiment, would a significant portion of Harris voters instead have voted for Haley in our hypothetical contest, simply because she is a woman of color? I believe the answer in both cases is a resounding “no.”

We all know that America has a tainted history on the issues of race and gender, especially when that history is evaluated in modern terms. We also know that we still have work to do in both of these areas and there are still small numbers in our society who are sexist, misogynist and racist. But there are more women and non-whites in positions of power and influence in this country than ever before and that trend will continue.

We elected a Black man as president 16 years ago and re-elected him four years later. In the near future, I believe we will elect a woman (and a woman of color) to be president. This will happen when such candidates have the ideology and policy proposals that resonate with the American people at that time. And the ability to communicate. Like Vice President Harris, that candidate’s vote totals will likely benefit from attributes such as gender and race far more than they will be held back by these attributes.

In my opinion, gender and race did not have a material negative impact on the \election results. I also believe those who suggest otherwise are supporting division in the American populace. Hopefully, most of us ignore their diatribes and someday soon gender and race will be irrelevant in our political considerations.

Butler is a husband, father, grandfather, business executive, entrepreneur and political observer.

Read More

Woman holding a sign that reads "This is a time to roll up our sleeves."

A protestor holds up a sign with a quote from Vice President Kamala Harris at the Women's March rally outside the Heritage Foundation on Nov. 9.

Shannon Finney/Getty Images

Dems blame everything but themselves for losing

It’s tough sledding for Democrats, as they try to wrap their heads around Donald Trump’s improbable-but-also-foreseeable sweep of all seven swing states and winning the popular vote.

This wasn’t supposed to happen, after all. Democrats genuinely believed — as they did in 2016 — that Trump’s many odious qualities would be enough to keep him far away from the White House again.

And if for some reason that wasn’t enough for most Americans, they had in Vice President Kamala Harris a woman of color who, apparently, by virtue of her identity alone, would help seal the deal among those voting demographics.

Keep ReadingShow less
People eating Thanksgiving dinner
The Good Brigade/Getty Images

Thanksgiving dinner at the grown-ups’ table

Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."

With our national elections the first week and Thanksgiving the last week, November is a banner month for Americans. On Nov. 5 we voted, electing Donald J. Trump to become our 47th president and arguably the most powerful person on the planet. Now we look forward to Thanksgiving.

Somewhere in each of our past Thanksgivings, there likely came a time when we were invited to join the adults at the grown-ups’ table. The most important qualification demonstrating we had earned this “promotion” was our behavior: We were expected to act like a grown-up. Maybe returning from college did it, or getting married. Perhaps we were bumped up earlier. Whenever it occurred, we understood we were being accorded a privilege. We had arrived.

Keep ReadingShow less
People working in a vote counting center

Election workers tabulate results of early voting and absentee ballots in Gwinnett County, Ga., on Nov. 5.

Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images

Officials ran a smooth election, silencing the false narrative around voter fraud

Originally published by The 19th.

Election officials across the country administered a relatively smooth 2024 general election, despite reports of bomb threats, technical issues and a polarizing online ecosystem that at times challenged the integrity of counting ballots.

The predominately women-led workforce went into Election Day having readied for potential disruptions and a disinformation campaign that had swelled in the final weeks of the presidential race between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris. But by early Wednesday, their processes for receiving and counting ballots — and a large enough vote margin in key battleground states — enabled major news outlets to project the former president’s win over the vice president shortly after midnight, days faster than in 2020.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump speaking at a podium

President-elect Donald Trump speaks to at an election night gathering in West Palm Beach, Fla.

Brendan Gutenschwager/Anadolu via Getty Images

Voters want a president who takes care of their most basic needs

Schmidt is a columnist and editorial board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

This election was not about our national identity or a reflection of who we are as a collection of people. Rather, it centered on whether our most essential requirements as citizens were being served by our government.

A resounding number of voters told Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party that the answer to that question was “No.”

Keep ReadingShow less