Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Misread intentions are not an excuse for racist statements

Opinion

Black women hearing racist comments

"Some of the commonly heard phrases with problematic intentions are: 'calm down,' 'breathe,' and 'you are overthinking,'" writes Sennet. "Such dismissive phrases can have a detrimental effect on well-being."

nicoletaionescu/Getty Images

Sennet is an associate dean of diversity, equity, and inclusion and an associate professor of piano at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She is a public voices fellow with The OpEd Project.

“But that wasn’t my intention.” “I am a good person.” “I am not racist.”

As a Black female classical pianist who also serves as a diversity, equity, inclusion, and access administrator in higher education, I frequently hear of people’s “good intentions” when they make overtly racist statements in both arenas.

As an educator for more than 15 years, I am still discouraged by how often people quickly leap to such a declaration – also a microaggression – as a means of avoiding responsibility. Rather than facing the truth of their words’ impact, they would rather minimize the experience, avoid confronting biases and instead question my credentials.


I am consistently on the receiving end of the specific phrase, “That wasn’t my intention,” within both higher education and arts circles. These encounters are what author Robin DiAngelo identifies in her 2021 book, “ Nice Racism: How Progressive White People Perpetuate Racist Harm.”

Despite being often overlooked, many women of color in academia are told to “let it go.” Some of the commonly heard phrases with problematic intentions are: “calm down,” “breathe,” and “you are overthinking.” Such dismissive phrases can have a detrimental effect on well-being.

My experience is as a Black female, but the transgressions I refer to apply to many forms of discrimination whether perpetrated against people because of their race, religion, gender, sexual identity or ethnicity. A survey by the Pew Research Center indicates the trends that can be seen with Black, Latinx and Asian people. Sadly, what is missing from this survey: discrimination against those who are Muslim, Jewish, LGBTQIA+ and women.

A new study by McKinsey reveals that “microaggressions have a large and lasting impact on women.” Fewer faculty of color are promoted, and less frequently, than white faculty in academia.

A 2023 Boston University study shows that Black women who perceive racism on a regular basis are 38 percent more likely to have a stroke.

Having to witness others’ defensiveness is frustrating and does not move the conversation forward. Whether or not someone is a “good person” or “not racist” is of little consequence during these moments. This makes it difficult for many faculty of color and artists to wonder when and if advocating for ourselves is the best course in every situation.

Historically, Black women are advised by family members, friends, mentors,and colleagues to be strong and refrain from showing emotions in the face of racism. Clinical psychologist Inger Burnett-Zeigler, a member of the Northwestern University faculty, highlights the many difficulties that Black women experience in her book, “ Nobody Knows the Trouble I’ve Seen: The Emotional Lives of Black Women,” and provides recommendations for healing and self-care.

Burnett-Zeigler also affirms that microaggressions, “everyday, subtle, intentional and sometimes unintentional interactions or behaviors that communicate racism and discrimination,” are among the many stressors.

Research shows the topic of intentions is philosophical and complex.

Stating one’s “good intentions” is a mere excuse that attempts to re-center the conversation from the injured party to the one responsible for injury. Claiming to be one of the “good white people” also tends to absolve people of listening to feedback and changing behavior.

As someone who frequently performs music by Black composers, it is troublesome when I am always expected to be “rapidly on call” to educate others, usually in passing before another person’s performance or talk.

It is equally hurtful when I respond to someone who notes whether I am smiling at a faculty meeting. I was once unjustly removed from a teaching duty – by email – without due process. Despite being reinstated years later, people’s “intentions” still led to me being excluded and unfairly treated. At the very least, these incidents have been demeaning and patronizing.

Statements of problematic intentions are the ultimate excuses, and many educators, students and artists of color suffer the negative impact.

In their 2015 book, “ Despite the Best Intentions: How Racial Inequality Thrives in Good Schools,” authors Amanda E. Lewis and John B. Diamond highlight the many concerns of inequality that arise in the K-12 school system despite attempts to change.

Similarly, Black artists continue to be underrepresented in orchestras — less than 2 percent of performers – despite increased awareness and the best intentions.

Both diverse arts programming and interdisciplinary collaboration in higher education are a start to building more awareness of equity and belonging.

However, simply boasting of including one Black composer on a concert program if the composer or their story remains unnamed or unrecognized has limited impact. University administrators also need to consider working towards fostering a sense of belonging in the classroom, faculty meetings and informal spaces.

Sure, we are all human beings. Misunderstandings can occur and making mistakes is a part of everyone’s human experience. However, simply defaulting to “intentions” as a defense mechanism prevents people from understanding the complicity of racism and sexism as well as working towards addressing and changing behavior.

To raise awareness of the many forms of racism, there must be ongoing awareness through personal or group reflection as well as checking in with colleagues and students. Recent research reveals the importance of acknowledging our true selves.

Meaningless intentions are hurtful. It is meaningful when people sit with the discomfort of being called out on harmful intentions before acting on trying to absolve themselves.

Yes, it can be very uncomfortable to be called out. Instead of defaulting to intention, it is better to take a step back and listen to what the other person is saying. The hope is that there is a willingness to address hurtful words or actions. Acknowledgement is a start, and it is one way in which trust can be restored.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less