Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Voters want a president who takes care of their most basic needs

Donald Trump speaking at a podium

President-elect Donald Trump speaks to at an election night gathering in West Palm Beach, Fla.

Brendan Gutenschwager/Anadolu via Getty Images

Schmidt is a columnist and editorial board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

This election was not about our national identity or a reflection of who we are as a collection of people. Rather, it centered on whether our most essential requirements as citizens were being served by our government.

A resounding number of voters told Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party that the answer to that question was “No.”


In 1943 Abraham Maslow published his pyramidal "Hierarchy of Needs" model. He laid out a psychological motivational theory, which states there are five levels of human needs that dictate behavior: physiological, safety, love/belonging, esteem and self-actualization. Maslow also postulated that the lower-level needs like food, water and safety must be met first before higher needs can be fulfilled.

The 2024 election proved to be a hierarchy of needs election in which voters punished the current administration and its party for their shortcomings in this regard.

Right before the election, The Fulcrum’s David Nevins and I laid out our case for why we thought there was no moral equivalence between former President (and now President-elect) Donald Trump and Harris. Trump’s moral repugnancy was a disqualifying red line for us.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Many, including me, have spent years proclaiming that when it came to character and values, Trump did not represent who we are as a country. Since the election, many of Harris’ supporters have been making wide and sweeping accusations of their fellow Americans who voted for Trump and wondering, “What does this say about us that we would re-elect him?”

My assessment is quite different. When the election is viewed through the lens of this hierarchy of needs, it becomes clear why so many in the electorate would vote for Trump and other Republicans down ballot.

The lowest level on Maslow’s pyramid is physiological. These physiological needs are the biological requirements for human survival, e.g., air, food, drink, shelter, clothing, warmth and sleep.

Thus, looking at the election through the lens of human survival needs, it becomes clear how the dramatic increase in the cost of food, drink, shelter, clothing and warmth since 2021 impacted the election. Add to this fact that interest rates also went up so that affordable mortgages were out of reach for many, especially new home buyers. Plus, higher energy costs and one can clearly see how Maslow’s pyramid impacted the election.

The second lowest level in Maslow’s model is safety and security. At this level, humans desire order, predictability and control in their lives. The Biden-Harris track record in this arena has been abysmal.

The House Oversight and Accountability Committee, in conjunction with the House Homeland Security Committee, reported: “Under President Biden’s watch, there have been over 8 million migrant encounters nationwide, 6.7 million of which have been at the Southwest border. Worse yet, over 1.7 million known ‘gotaways’ — illegal immigrants who have evaded Border Patrol — are now living in the interior of the United States without documentation and without having undergone any vetting by immigration officials.”

While overall crime has decreased since the 1990s, current crime data and statistics paint an incomplete picture of where we are today. In April 2024, the Pew Research Center published a survey showing that a growing share of Americans said reducing crime should be a top priority for the president and Congress. Almost six in 10 U.S. adults (58 percent) held that view in April, which was up from 47 percent at the beginning of Biden’s presidency in 2021.

The disastrous and chaotic withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan in 2021 began Biden's political slide. A separate Pew poll found that while 54 percent of Americans say it was the right decision to pull troops from Afghanistan, only 27 percent rated Biden's handling of the situation as "excellent" or "good," while 29 percent rated it "only fair" and 42 percent rated it "poor."

Whether Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel — killing 1,200 and taking 254 people hostage, including 12 Americans — can be blamed on the Biden administration is certainly debatable, but the perception of chaos on the world stage likely impacted voters to cast their ballot for Trump.

In our writing two weeks ago, Nevins and I appealed to the higher level of self-esteem in our moral equivalency column. Maslow describes the elevation of self-esteem as confidence, achievement, respect for others and the need to be a unique individual.

But a majority of Americans placed a higher priority in those first two levels of needs, and so it is no wonder they voted to reinstate Trump, with the hope that maybe he and downballot Republicans could deliver those more basic necessities at a lower cost.

It is clear that Americans expect their government to help them achieve or sustain those lower-level needs. If an administration is unable to do that, they will likely find electoral defeat.

Read More

Silhouette of an American politician speakting , with the country's flag on the left
Andrea Nicolini/Getty Images

Coming to terms with elitism and intellectual arrogance

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.”

Over the past 11 months I have written more than 30 essays for The Fulcrum’s A Republic if we can keep it series. My charge was “to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year,” and to remind readers of the matchless quality of our unique experiment in democracy. The process of putting these constitutional thoughts on paper has been exceedingly rewarding, and I hope readers have learned a thing or two along the way.

Sadly, though, I now fear that I failed miserably in my one crucial task.

Keep ReadingShow less
Man wearing Trump hat watches Trump on TV

A man attends an election watch party in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., as Donald Trump declares victory early Wednesday.

Wu Xiaoling/Xinhua via Getty Images

We voted. Now what?

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

Whether your candidate won or lost, the campaign's intensity and the high stakes have likely left you feeling emotionally drained. It's natural to wonder what comes next and how to process the results in a way that promotes social cohesion and personal well-being.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half Harris, half Trump costume in New York City.

A person wearing a costume in the likes of presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump offers unity hugs in Times Square on Election Day.

Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images

Turning election anxiety into positive action

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 election has come and gone, leaving a nation still reeling from the aftershocks of a deeply divisive campaign season. Regardless of party affiliation, Americans from all walks of life are grappling with the weight of uncertainty. Anxiety, fear and a sense of unease linger in the air, a potent mix of emotions that threatens to fracture our already polarized society further.

Yet, even amidst the turmoil, there lies an opportunity to put aside partisan differences, channel our collective nervous energy into positive action and reaffirm the shared humanity that binds us as one people.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump speaking on a crowded stage

President-elect Donald Trump speaks in West Palm Beach, Fla., on election night.

Brendan Gutenschwager/Anadolu via Getty Images

Once again I ask: Do presidential elections really matter?

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

In October 2012, I published an op-ed in the Huffington Post asking, “Do Presidential Elections Really Matter?” In May 2023 I wrote a similar column in The Fulcrum asking the question once again.

Unfortunately, in the 12 years since my first writing little has changed. Both Democrats and Republicans believe if their nominee gets elected, the serious problems our country faces will be tackled with a new vigor, and real change will actually occur. But is this really what history suggests will generally be the case?

Keep ReadingShow less