Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The World’s Displaced Populations Are Being Displaced in Washington State

The World’s Displaced Populations Are Being Displaced in Washington State
people in street
Photo by Ra Dragon on Unsplash

Imagine being forced to leave your home overnight. Perhaps a new regime just classified you as an enemy of the state, or war and disaster left you no choice but to leave. You pack whatever you can carry, holding your family's hand tight, and step across borders, hoping someone on the other side will be there to help.

But what happens when that door to help is no longer there?


In January 2025, the U.S. State Department terminated over 10,000 foreign aid grants and contracts following an executive order signed by President Donald Trump, halting all refugee resettlement and humanitarian aid.

Within days, 10,000 vetted refugees who had already completed initial screening and were approved had their flights canceled. On January 24, Stop Work Orders (SWOs) were sent to local nonprofits, suspending core refugee reception and placement (R&P) operations.

By January 26, the processing of Afghan Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) for approximately 2,000 Afghan allies, including interpreters, medics, and engineers who long supported U.S. forces, was paused, leaving many stranded in third countries, notably Pakistan, despite holding legal authorization to resettle in safety.

Soon, the Biden-era CHNV humanitarian parole program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans was dismantled, rendering thousands newly undocumented overnight.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In less than a week, the Trump Administration's indefinite suspension of a decades-old "life-saving" system for protection collapsed. Displacing thousands of in-transit families and commitments of caseworkers, attorneys devoted their careers to helping the world's most vulnerable communities.

For years, Ochmaa Gantulga was among the first responders whom refugee families met upon their arrival in Seattle. As a frontline caseworker at theInternational Rescue Committee (IRC),she greeted families at SeaTac airport with hot meals, assisted with housing, enrolled kids in school, and picked up 10 PM phone calls from clients after years in refugee camps.

"My work has been, and always will be, my ikigai," Ochmaa Gantulga, intake coordinator at the IRC Seattle, said, "This is the purpose of my life."

Among hundreds of Refugee Resettlement Agencies (RRAs), the IRC has been at the frontline of humanitarian aid since its founding in 1933 with the support of Albert Einstein. The Seattle office has been the nation's busiest, resettling around 10,000 refugees annually through a federally mandated 90-day resettlement cycle.

During a three-month cycle, each family from war-torn zones typically receives a one-time grant, often less than $1,650, to cover medical, education, food, rent, and utilities, a setup designed towards self-sufficiency.

But following the January shutdown, the office has remained quiet amid a new wave of mass contract terminations, vanishing these safety nets.

Half of the IRC's Seattle staff were laid off, and case files for pregnant moms, trauma survivors, and unaccompanied minors were left incomplete. Placing primarily women-led households at risk of homelessness, disabling conditions, and barriers to public benefits.

"I remember the moments the cuts were officially made," Gantulga said. "The entire staff was speechless, devastated, heartbroken with concerns for clients and families."

On April 25, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals narrowed eligibility resettlement review to 12,000 refugees with verifiable travel plans, ordering 160 to be promptly admitted while the rest remain patient for case-by-case review by a court-appointed "special master."

A coalition of organizations, including Church World Service (CWS), the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), HIAS, and Lutheran Community Services Northwest (LCSNW), filed suit in Pacito v. Trump.

In Washington, the state responded with the $20 million Washington Migrants and Asylum-Seeker Support (WA MASS) Project, filling gaps for displaced families excluded from federal aid, often due to pending status.

Since mid-2024, about 50% of WA MASS funds have been allocated to emergency and transitional housing, prioritizing the most vulnerable families and pregnant moms. The rest cover urgent legal navigation and case management to reach self-sufficiency.

"IRC is at the center of this project, standing with 22 other local organizations," Ochmaa said. "We're all working on this project, and I'm glad to see a project like this is bringing hope and light to serve the most vulnerable families and children in Washington."

Still, it's not enough.

According to John Miller, Client Intake Interviewer at the IRC Seattle, the greatest fear among clients today is housing assistance.

"Families who were promised six months of housing assistance are now getting only two months," Miller said, "They don't know how they'll make rent, most of them are already at risk of eviction."

According to Somali Youth and Family Club and Muslim Housing Services, despite housing 134 new arrival families in 2019, the majority were ineligible for emergency local homelessness prevention services due to a lack of eviction records and inability to meet the landlord's strict documentation criteria.

In between systems, these families weren't eligible enough to be qualified as homeless, nor to stay in their homes, placing them in line for eviction when their lease expires.

The former IRC housing team suggests expanding flexible client assistance and offering credit-building and financial literacy workshops to prevent cascading evictions and long-term instability.

According to Building Changes, the Washington Youth & Families Fund awarded each grantee agency $400,000 in system innovation grant funding and $30,000 in flexible client assistance annually, stabilizing high-risk households in Washington state. This proves that small, targeted investments can prevent homelessness and sustain public dollars over time.

But now the question is, who will remain to do this work when the infrastructure is left permanently "out of service"

Globally, humanitarian aid agencies like IRC have been responding to the worst humanitarian crisis, aiding 34.5 million displaced individuals, treating 721,000 children for malnutrition, and enrolling over 1.5 million in schools, responding to disasters in Sudan, Pakistan, and Syria within 72 hours.

However, given the damage done in Washington, the uncertainties over crisis aid resources will remain for years to come.

Lindsay Kim is an administrative officer, caseworker, legislative & research assistant, and freelance student journalist studying at the University of Washington.

Read More

The Hidden Moral Cost of America’s Tariff Crisis

Small business owner attaching permanent close sign on the shop door.

Getty Images, Kannika Paison

The Hidden Moral Cost of America’s Tariff Crisis

In the spring of 2025, as American families struggle with unprecedented consumer costs, we find ourselves at a point of "moral reckoning." The latest data from the Yale Budget Lab reveals that tariff policies have driven consumer prices up by 2.9% in the short term. In comparison, the Penn Wharton Budget Model projects a staggering 6% reduction in long-term GDP and a 5% decline in wages. But these numbers, stark as they are, tell only part of the story.

The actual narrative is one of moral choice and democratic values. Eddie Glaude describes this way in his book “Democracy in Black”: Our economic policies must be viewed through the lens of ethical significance—not just market efficiency. When we examine the tariff regime's impact on American communities, we see economic data points and a fundamental challenge to our democratic principles of equity and justice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Bill Spotlight: No Invading Allies Act

United States Capitol building in Washington, D.C.

Getty Images, dcsliminky

Congress Bill Spotlight: No Invading Allies Act

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a weekly report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about, but that often don't get the right news coverage.

In response to Trump’s takeover threats, Canadian coffee shops and cafés are rebranding the Americano beverage as the “Canadiano.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Raising Taxes or Cutting Spending: House Budget Committee Argues Over Debt Crisis Fix

Republican and Democratic representatives discussed the fiscal state of the United State in a House Budget hearing on May 7, 2025

Huiyan Li | Medill News Service

Raising Taxes or Cutting Spending: House Budget Committee Argues Over Debt Crisis Fix

WASHINGTON –– Republicans and Democrats clashed on May 7 at a House Budget Committee hearing over how to address the nation’s mounting federal debt—whether to raise revenue through tax increases or cut spending on federal programs such as Medicaid.

Both parties agreed that the United States was on an unsustainable fiscal path and that urgent action is needed to prevent a debt crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less
Taxing the Rich To Pay for Trump Priorities Wouldn’t Slow Economic Growth

Under Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower, people who earned more than $400,000 a year paid a top tax rate of 92%. Today's top rate is 37%.

Adobe Stock

Taxing the Rich To Pay for Trump Priorities Wouldn’t Slow Economic Growth

Reports of the Trump administration considering taxing wealthy Americans to pay for mass deportations and other priorities come on the heels of a new study showing how the move could generate significant revenues without slowing economic growth.

Mary Eschelbach Hansen, associate professor of economics at American University and the report's co-author, said raising tax rates for people who earn more than $609,000 a year to 44% would add 3% to the nation's tax coffers, enough to stave off cuts to popular programs serving low-income Coloradans.

"In current budget proportions, that's about enough to pay for some of the biggest, most important programs like food stamps SNAP, Children's Health Insurance Program, and also Temporary Assistance for Needy Families," Eschelbach Hansen outlined.

While 44% may seem high compared to today's top rate of 37%, it is a lot less than the 92% paid by people who earned more than $400,000 a year under Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Republicans have long argued tax cuts create economic benefits for all, and leaders in Congress, including Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., the House Speaker, have said they would oppose any tax hikes.

Eschelbach Hansen argued raising the top tax rate would also increase how much of the national income pie most Americans get to keep, compared to how much the wealthiest get, by about 2%. She added years of trickle-down economics have shown only the wealthy benefit from low tax rates.

"If lowering top tax rates was going to trickle down, then you and I would be much richer than we are now," Eschelbach Hansen pointed out. "Because we have had an era of low top tax rates for decades."

Eschelbach Hansen stressed higher personal tax rates have virtually no impact on long-term economic growth, and lower personal tax rates lead to less economic growth, because people tend to take advantage of the lower rate by moving their income.

"Instead of reinvesting it in your business, where it will grow your business and grow the economy, you'll be more likely to just take it as personal income, which is not going to stimulate growth," Eschelbach Hansen explained.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less