Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Repealing Trump's National Energy Emergency

News

Congress Bill Spotlight: Repealing Trump's National Energy Emergency

White smoke pouring out of the chimneys of the power plant.

Getty Images, Eric Yang

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a weekly report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about, but that often don't get the right news coverage.

President Donald Trump has labeled everyone from Hillary Clinton to Jeb Bush as “low energy,” but what about his executive order on the subject?


The Bill

A new bill would repeal Trump’s executive order that declared a “national energy emergency,” which was crafted to primarily (or, perhaps, even exclusively) benefit fossil fuels like coal and oil.

The Senate joint resolution was introduced on February 3 by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA). The bill does not appear to have a title. No House companion version appears to have been introduced yet.

Context

The president has authority to declare a national emergency without congressional approval, which gives the president many increased powers. In theory, these emergencies are supposed to primarily be events like natural disasters, national security threats, or health crises, such as the COVID emergency in effect from March 2020 to April 2023.

Trump declared three national emergencies on his first day back in office: two about the U.S.-Mexico border, plus another about energy.

While Democrats disagree with most Trump border policies, many nonetheless acknowledge the current border situation indeed constitutes an “emergency.” Democrats say America’s energy situation is different, though. America’s current energy situation is not an “emergency” at all, they argue, but rather doing quite well.

Trump’s executive order allows suspensions of certain environmental considerations that are usually taken into account under the Endangered Species Act, plus faster federal approvals on certain energy projects.

Not for all energy projects, though. The executive order specifies several different types of energy including coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas —but intentionally left out certain renewables like wind and solar.

What Supporters Say

Supporters argue the human-caused climate crisis is real, causing increasingly damaging natural disasters like Hurricane Helene in North Carolina and January’s California wildfires. They say lessening reliance on coal, oil, and natural gas is the best way to ameliorate such threats.

“The United States is producing more energy than at any other point in history,” Sen. Kaine said in a press release. “So why would Donald Trump spend his first day in office declaring a national energy emergency? … Because Trump will do anything for Big Oil. This sham emergency [is] nothing more than a shameless power grab to suspend environmental regulations and make it easier for massive fossil fuel corporations.”

What Opponents Say

Opponents counter that more energy is still needed for three main reasons:

A backstop against grid failures. For example, Texas experienced a February 2021 energy grid failure, losing power for millions of residents during an extreme winter storm. “The integrity… of our nation’s energy infrastructure, from coast to coast, is an immediate and pressing priority,” Trump’s executive order said.

Guarding against hacks or blackmail. For example, hackers in May 2021 seized control of Colonial Pipeline’s infrastructure and demanded $4.4 million in cryptocurrency. (The CEO agreed to pay the ransom, though the FBI later seized about half of the money back from the hackers.) “In an effort to harm the American people, hostile state and non-state foreign actors have targeted our domestic energy infrastructure,” Trump’s executive order said.

Accommodating growing new technologies. Artificial intelligence is such an energy-intensive service that its use is already straining many electric grids, a problem only expected to surge in the coming years. “The United States’ ability to remain at the forefront of technological innovation depends on a reliable supply of energy,” Trump’s executive order said.

Odds of Passage

The bill has attracted 11 cosponsors, all Democrats. It awaits a potential but unlikely vote in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, controlled by Republicans.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with the Fulcrum. Don’t miss his weekly report, Congress Bill Spotlight, every Friday on the Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: Panama Canal Repurchase Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Make Greenland Great Again Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: BIG OIL from the Cabinet Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: renaming Gulf of Mexico as “Gulf of America”

Congress Bill Spotlight: constitutional amendment letting Trump be elected to a third term

Congress Bill Spotlight: adding Donald Trump’s face to Mount Rushmore

Congress Bill Spotlight: BAD DOGE Act


Read More

Tourists gather at Mather Point on the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, enjoying panoramic views of the iconic natural wonder

National Park Service budget cuts are reshaping America’s public lands through underfunding and neglect. Explore how declining park staffing, deferred maintenance, and political inaction threaten national parks, local economies, and public trust in government.

Getty Images, miroslav_1

They Won’t Close the Parks. They’ll Just Let Them Fail.

This summer, before dawn, the Liu family from Buffalo will load up their SUV, coffee in hand, bound for a long-planned trip out west. The Grand Canyon has been on their list for years, something to do before the kids get too old and schedules get too tight. They expect crowds. They expect long lines at the entrance. That is part of the deal. In recent years, national parks have drawn more than 325 million visits annually, near record highs.

What they do not expect are shuttered visitor centers and closed trails, not because of weather but because there are not enough staff to maintain them. What they do not see is the budget decision in Washington that made those trade-offs, quietly, indirectly, and without much debate.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War
Toy soldiers in a battle formation
Photo by Saifee Art on Unsplash

The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War

In the Rumble in the Jungle, George Foreman came in expecting to end the fight early.

At first, it looked that way. He was stronger, faster, and landing clean punches. I watched the 1974 championship on simulcast fifty-two years ago and remember how dominant he was in the opening rounds.

Keep ReadingShow less
Calling Wealthy Benefactors!
A rusty house figure stands over a city.
Photo by Katja Ano on Unsplash

Calling Wealthy Benefactors!

My housing has been conditional on circumstances beyond my control, and the time is up; the owner is selling.

Securing affordable housing is a stressor for much of the working class. According to recent data, nearly 50% of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they spend over 30% of their take-home income on housing costs. Rental prices in California are especially high, 35% higher than the national average. Renting is routinely insecure. The lords of land need to renovate, their kids need to move in. They need to sell.

Keep ReadingShow less
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less