Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Repealing Trump's National Energy Emergency

News

Congress Bill Spotlight: Repealing Trump's National Energy Emergency

White smoke pouring out of the chimneys of the power plant.

Getty Images, Eric Yang

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a weekly report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about, but that often don't get the right news coverage.

President Donald Trump has labeled everyone from Hillary Clinton to Jeb Bush as “low energy,” but what about his executive order on the subject?


The Bill

A new bill would repeal Trump’s executive order that declared a “national energy emergency,” which was crafted to primarily (or, perhaps, even exclusively) benefit fossil fuels like coal and oil.

The Senate joint resolution was introduced on February 3 by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA). The bill does not appear to have a title. No House companion version appears to have been introduced yet.

Context

The president has authority to declare a national emergency without congressional approval, which gives the president many increased powers. In theory, these emergencies are supposed to primarily be events like natural disasters, national security threats, or health crises, such as the COVID emergency in effect from March 2020 to April 2023.

Trump declared three national emergencies on his first day back in office: two about the U.S.-Mexico border, plus another about energy.

While Democrats disagree with most Trump border policies, many nonetheless acknowledge the current border situation indeed constitutes an “emergency.” Democrats say America’s energy situation is different, though. America’s current energy situation is not an “emergency” at all, they argue, but rather doing quite well.

Trump’s executive order allows suspensions of certain environmental considerations that are usually taken into account under the Endangered Species Act, plus faster federal approvals on certain energy projects.

Not for all energy projects, though. The executive order specifies several different types of energy including coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas —but intentionally left out certain renewables like wind and solar.

What Supporters Say

Supporters argue the human-caused climate crisis is real, causing increasingly damaging natural disasters like Hurricane Helene in North Carolina and January’s California wildfires. They say lessening reliance on coal, oil, and natural gas is the best way to ameliorate such threats.

“The United States is producing more energy than at any other point in history,” Sen. Kaine said in a press release. “So why would Donald Trump spend his first day in office declaring a national energy emergency? … Because Trump will do anything for Big Oil. This sham emergency [is] nothing more than a shameless power grab to suspend environmental regulations and make it easier for massive fossil fuel corporations.”

What Opponents Say

Opponents counter that more energy is still needed for three main reasons:

A backstop against grid failures. For example, Texas experienced a February 2021 energy grid failure, losing power for millions of residents during an extreme winter storm. “The integrity… of our nation’s energy infrastructure, from coast to coast, is an immediate and pressing priority,” Trump’s executive order said.

Guarding against hacks or blackmail. For example, hackers in May 2021 seized control of Colonial Pipeline’s infrastructure and demanded $4.4 million in cryptocurrency. (The CEO agreed to pay the ransom, though the FBI later seized about half of the money back from the hackers.) “In an effort to harm the American people, hostile state and non-state foreign actors have targeted our domestic energy infrastructure,” Trump’s executive order said.

Accommodating growing new technologies. Artificial intelligence is such an energy-intensive service that its use is already straining many electric grids, a problem only expected to surge in the coming years. “The United States’ ability to remain at the forefront of technological innovation depends on a reliable supply of energy,” Trump’s executive order said.

Odds of Passage

The bill has attracted 11 cosponsors, all Democrats. It awaits a potential but unlikely vote in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, controlled by Republicans.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with the Fulcrum. Don’t miss his weekly report, Congress Bill Spotlight, every Friday on the Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: Panama Canal Repurchase Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Make Greenland Great Again Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: BIG OIL from the Cabinet Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: renaming Gulf of Mexico as “Gulf of America”

Congress Bill Spotlight: constitutional amendment letting Trump be elected to a third term

Congress Bill Spotlight: adding Donald Trump’s face to Mount Rushmore

Congress Bill Spotlight: BAD DOGE Act

Read More

The Myth of Colorblind Fairness

U.S. Supreme Court

Photo by mana5280 on Unsplash

The Myth of Colorblind Fairness

Two years after the Supreme Court banned race-conscious college admissions in Students for Fair Admissions, universities are scrambling to maintain diversity through “race-neutral” alternatives they believe will be inherently fair. New economic research reveals that colorblind policies may systematically create inequality in ways more pervasive than even the notorious “old boy” network.

The “old boy” network, as its name suggests, is nothing new—evoking smoky cigar lounges or golf courses where business ties are formed, careers are launched, and those not invited are left behind. Opportunity reproduces itself, passed down like an inheritance if you belong to the “right” group. The old boy network is not the only example of how a social network can discriminate. In fact, my research shows it may not even be the best one. And how social networks discriminate completely changes the debate about diversity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rethinking Drug Policy: From Punishment to Empowerment
holding hands
Photo by Priscilla Du Preez 🇨🇦 on Unsplash

Rethinking Drug Policy: From Punishment to Empowerment

America’s drug policy is broken. For decades, we’ve focused primarily on the supply side—interdicting smugglers, prosecuting dealers, and escalating penalties while neglecting the demand side. Individuals who use drugs, more often than not, do so out of desperation, trauma, or addiction. This imbalance has cost lives, strained law enforcement, and failed to stem the tide of overdose deaths.

Fentanyl now kills an estimated 80,000 Americans annually. In response, some leaders have proposed extreme measures, including capital punishment for traffickers. But if we apply that logic consistently, what do we say about tobacco? Cigarette smoking and secondhand smoke kill nearly 480,000 Americans

Keep ReadingShow less
From Gerrymandering to Threats Faith in Democracy and Constitutional Erosion

U.S. Constitution

Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

From Gerrymandering to Threats Faith in Democracy and Constitutional Erosion

Many Americans have lost faith in the basic principles and form of the Constitutional Republic, as set forth by the Founders. People are abandoning Democratic ideals to create systems that multiply offenses against Constitutional safeguards, materializing in book banning, speech-restricting, and recent attempts to enact gerrymandering that dilutes the votes of “political opponents.” This represents Democratic erosion and a trend that endangers Constitutional checks and representative governance.

First, the recent gerrymandering, legal precedent, and founding principles should be reexamined, specifically, around the idea that our Founders did not predict this type of partisan map-drawing.

Keep ReadingShow less
People walking through the airport.

Passengers walk through the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on Nov. 7, 2025.

Getty Images, Anna Moneymaker

What To Know As Hundreds of Flights Are Grounded Across the U.S. – an Air Travel Expert Explains

Major airports across the United States were subject to a 4% reduction in flights on Nov. 7, 2025, as the government shutdown began to affect travelers.

The move by the Federal Aviation Administration is intended to ease pressure on air traffic controllers, many of whom have been working for weeks without pay after the government shut down on Oct. 1. While nonessential employees were furloughed, workers deemed essential, such as air traffic controllers, have continued to do their jobs.

Keep ReadingShow less