Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Repealing Trump's National Energy Emergency

News

Congress Bill Spotlight: Repealing Trump's National Energy Emergency

White smoke pouring out of the chimneys of the power plant.

Getty Images, Eric Yang

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a weekly report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about, but that often don't get the right news coverage.

President Donald Trump has labeled everyone from Hillary Clinton to Jeb Bush as “low energy,” but what about his executive order on the subject?


The Bill

A new bill would repeal Trump’s executive order that declared a “national energy emergency,” which was crafted to primarily (or, perhaps, even exclusively) benefit fossil fuels like coal and oil.

The Senate joint resolution was introduced on February 3 by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA). The bill does not appear to have a title. No House companion version appears to have been introduced yet.

Context

The president has authority to declare a national emergency without congressional approval, which gives the president many increased powers. In theory, these emergencies are supposed to primarily be events like natural disasters, national security threats, or health crises, such as the COVID emergency in effect from March 2020 to April 2023.

Trump declared three national emergencies on his first day back in office: two about the U.S.-Mexico border, plus another about energy.

While Democrats disagree with most Trump border policies, many nonetheless acknowledge the current border situation indeed constitutes an “emergency.” Democrats say America’s energy situation is different, though. America’s current energy situation is not an “emergency” at all, they argue, but rather doing quite well.

Trump’s executive order allows suspensions of certain environmental considerations that are usually taken into account under the Endangered Species Act, plus faster federal approvals on certain energy projects.

Not for all energy projects, though. The executive order specifies several different types of energy including coal, oil, petroleum, and natural gas —but intentionally left out certain renewables like wind and solar.

What Supporters Say

Supporters argue the human-caused climate crisis is real, causing increasingly damaging natural disasters like Hurricane Helene in North Carolina and January’s California wildfires. They say lessening reliance on coal, oil, and natural gas is the best way to ameliorate such threats.

“The United States is producing more energy than at any other point in history,” Sen. Kaine said in a press release. “So why would Donald Trump spend his first day in office declaring a national energy emergency? … Because Trump will do anything for Big Oil. This sham emergency [is] nothing more than a shameless power grab to suspend environmental regulations and make it easier for massive fossil fuel corporations.”

What Opponents Say

Opponents counter that more energy is still needed for three main reasons:

A backstop against grid failures. For example, Texas experienced a February 2021 energy grid failure, losing power for millions of residents during an extreme winter storm. “The integrity… of our nation’s energy infrastructure, from coast to coast, is an immediate and pressing priority,” Trump’s executive order said.

Guarding against hacks or blackmail. For example, hackers in May 2021 seized control of Colonial Pipeline’s infrastructure and demanded $4.4 million in cryptocurrency. (The CEO agreed to pay the ransom, though the FBI later seized about half of the money back from the hackers.) “In an effort to harm the American people, hostile state and non-state foreign actors have targeted our domestic energy infrastructure,” Trump’s executive order said.

Accommodating growing new technologies. Artificial intelligence is such an energy-intensive service that its use is already straining many electric grids, a problem only expected to surge in the coming years. “The United States’ ability to remain at the forefront of technological innovation depends on a reliable supply of energy,” Trump’s executive order said.

Odds of Passage

The bill has attracted 11 cosponsors, all Democrats. It awaits a potential but unlikely vote in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, controlled by Republicans.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with the Fulcrum. Don’t miss his weekly report, Congress Bill Spotlight, every Friday on the Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: Panama Canal Repurchase Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Make Greenland Great Again Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: BIG OIL from the Cabinet Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: renaming Gulf of Mexico as “Gulf of America”

Congress Bill Spotlight: constitutional amendment letting Trump be elected to a third term

Congress Bill Spotlight: adding Donald Trump’s face to Mount Rushmore

Congress Bill Spotlight: BAD DOGE Act


Read More

A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Voter registration in Wisconsin

Michael Newman

A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Imagine there was a way to discourage states from passing photo voter ID laws, restricting early voting, purging voter registration rolls, or otherwise suppressing voter turnout. What if any state that did so risked losing seats in the House of Representatives?

Surprisingly, this is not merely an idle fantasy of voting rights activists, but an actual plan envisioned in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 – but never enforced.

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

View of the Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

Getty Images, Philippe Debled

The City Where Traffic Fatalities Vanished

A U.S. city of 60,000 people would typically see around six to eight traffic fatalities every year. But Hoboken, New Jersey? They haven’t had a single fatal crash for nine years — since January 17, 2017, to be exact.

Campaigns for seatbelts, lower speed limits and sober driving have brought national death tolls from car crashes down from a peak in the first half of the 20th century. However, many still assume some traffic deaths as an unavoidable cost of car culture.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Has Forgotten Its Oath — and the Nation Is Paying the Price

US Capitol

Congress Has Forgotten Its Oath — and the Nation Is Paying the Price

What has happened to the U.S. Congress? Once the anchor of American democracy, it now delivers chaos and a record of inaction that leaves millions of Americans vulnerable. A branch designed to defend the Constitution has instead drifted into paralysis — and the nation is paying the price. It must break its silence and reassert its constitutional role.

The Constitution created three coequal branches — legislative, executive, and judicial — each designed to balance and restrain the others. The Framers placed Congress first in Article I (U.S. Constitution) because they believed the people’s representatives should hold the greatest responsibility: to write laws, control spending, conduct oversight, and ensure that no president or agency escapes accountability. Congress was meant to be the branch closest to the people — the one that listens, deliberates, and acts on behalf of the nation.

Keep ReadingShow less