Organizer: Truth in Accounting
Join Truth in Accounting for a live, virtual event on federal aid conditions for state and local governments. With special guests Jonathan Bydlak from R Street Institute and Adam Schuster from Illinois Policy Institute, we will discuss four principles that Congress should incorporate into any federal aid package for the states.
Hedtler-Gaudette is a policy analyst at the Project On Government Oversight, a nonpartisan group that investigates misconduct and conflicts of interest by federal officials. Dayton is a policy advocate at Protect Democracy, a nonprofit working "to prevent our democracy from declining into a more authoritarian form of government."
- Congress needs to reassert its authority - The Fulcrum ›
- President Trump, Congress and broken standards of democracy ... ›
- Will Congress Fight for Its Right to Govern? - The Fulcrum ›
Put your reformer knowledge to the test. If you know the difference between reapportionment and redistricting, this quiz is for you. Not sure what a bundler is? Feel free to study up before you get started by checking out our glossary.
This quiz is powered by CredSpark.
- 2020 is make-or-break time for democracy reform - The Fulcrum ›
- Coronavirus alters democracy reform world's priorities - The Fulcrum ›
- A democracy reform game plan for 2020 - The Fulcrum ›
Organizer: Cato Institute
Modern presidents wield a stunning array of unilateral powers: waging war at will, making law with the stroke of a pen, and routinely evading core constitutional constraints. "It wasn't meant to be this way," Saikrishna Prakash argues in "The Living Presidency": the Founders' vision of a law‐governed chief magistrate has been replaced by "a funhouse‐mirror version" of the original design.
What drove this transformation? In his important new book, Prakash implicates a surprising culprit: the progressive notion of a "living Constitution." The theory of a flexible national charter that can be adapted according to current needs is usually associated with an activist judiciary serving liberal policy goals. Though its proponents frequently decry the Imperial Presidency, what they fail to recognize, Prakash argues, is that "living constitutionalism systematically privileges the presidency" — the office with the greatest freedom of action to seize new constitutional territory and frame its transgressions as "precedent." The result is an executive increasingly liberated from the Constitution.
Despite originalism's association with conservative goals, an originalist vision of the office should appeal to the left and right alike, given Americans' increasing concerns about the unchecked expansion of presidential power. Accordingly, "The Living Presidency" proposes a series of reforms that, if enacted, could "recage the executive lion."