Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Amid the rubble, shoots of democratic renewal

American flags on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.
Bloomberg Creative/Getty Images

In the most black-swan election of our lifetimes, the politics of resentment and strongman rule rose to the apex of American power. As a result, our democracy is in danger of being degraded to a flimsy veneer overlaying autocratic and kleptocratic rule. As President-elect Donald Trump said, the intent is to fix the system “ so good you're not going to have to vote.”

But if democratic backsliding is the political story of our time, it’s not the only story. Shoots of democratic renewal have been appearing amid the rubble of our broken norms, institutions and connections to one another. I think of them as “countertrends to the politics of resentment” and count five of them, though there are surely more beyond my scope of vision. Taken together, they offer hints of what a democracy can look like that better serves and more meaningfully engages the vast majority of Americans. More, they show where regenerative energy can be found.


First, consider the “left behind” communities that have been setting aside dysfunctional political scripts to rewrite their stories. James and Deborah Fallows have made this local renaissance their beat. They report on places like Columbus, Mississippi, which is reviving its economy through high-wage businesses development and innovative schools, and fostering a culture of equality through public art. Rather than looking toward a Great Leader to rescue them from phantasms of carnage, they tackle their real challenges. John Fetterman (D) rode this wave to his 2022 Senate victory, proclaiming, “Twenty years ago I came to Braddock [Pennsylvania] to start a GED program, and I’ve spent these last two decades fighting for these forgotten communities, because … every place matters.”

Second, there’s the steady spread of democratic innovations through which regular citizens gain a meaningful voice in public decisions while nurturing a healthier working relationship with officials. In New York City, for instance, participatory budgeting (a year-long process through which communities decide how a portion of public funds are invested) is at work in 29 of 51 city council districts and investing nearly $30 million annually. The results are updated libraries, upgraded playgrounds, better lit and safer streets, and engaged citizens willing to accept the defeat of their favored project because they experience the process as fair, which is what democracy requires. Meanwhile, citizens assemblies (random samples of citizens convened for extended influential deliberations on solutions to public problems) have gained more traction in other parts of the world. But there is growing interest in the U.S. and given they are close cousins to our New England town meetings, they are enough in our DNA to keep catching on.

Third, like antibodies to authoritarian infection, an ecosystem is emerging to help the nation address the toxic polarization and dysfunctional public discourse that has been dividing and conquering the people and strangling the democratic process. This includes the 500-plus organizations in the ListenFirst Coalition; the growing Solutions Journalism Network; applied research outfits like the nonpartisan More in Common, Berkeley’s Othering and Belonging Institute and Johns Hopkins’ Agora Institute; and a budding Tech for Social Cohesion coalition. The body politic is far from healthy but some treatment has begun.

Fourth, while several public opinion trends threaten to weaken democracy ( cratering public trust, deepening partisan animosity, wavering commitment among the young) there are some democracy- friendly ones as well. The Democracy Perception Index, for instance, found the number of Americans wanting more democracy increased from 36 percent in 2020 to 46 percent in 2023. A 2021 Pew study showed 79 percent favoring democracy-deepening innovations like citizen assemblies. And in a 2023 survey by More in Common, 72 percent agreed that Americans have a shared responsibility to “engage with people who are different from us.” That last finding may seem suspect based on social media behavior, but in focus groups with diverse members of the general public it becomes clear that people can still hear and learn from one another.

Finally, democratic “people power” has been gaining steam, as in the massive, multiracial protests of recent years and, especially, in ongoing and increasingly powerful community and movement organizing. Examples include the many successful Fight for Fifteen campaigns for a living wage; a revitalized union movement; the bipartisan struggle that restored voting rights to many of Florida’s formerly incarcerated; state referenda victories protecting women’s reproductive rights; the Rev/ William Barber’s reconstitution of MLK’s multi-racial Poor People's Campaign; and the Inter-Movement Impact Project.

One virtue of the countertrends is that they tend to strengthen each other. Fallows, for example, finds that democracy innovations like participatory budgeting can play an important role in the local revival he has been documenting. And Rahman and Gilman, in their excellent Civic Power, show how political movements and participatory innovations like citizens assemblies complement one another in “rebuilding American democracy in an era of crisis.”

Another became evident to me in focus groups I conducted in 2023 with cross-sections of politically fed-up Americans. I found that discussing the countertrends could spark people’s democratic imaginations. While no single one had much impact, discussing several had a cumulative effect — people became less cynical and more open to the possibility that our democracy might be fixable after all.

Still, a new anti-democratic elite of demagogues, billionaires and ideologues has amassed enormous power and the countertrends are the bare beginning of what will be required to overcome them. We’ll need more community organizing and national coalition building; more state and municipal policies that protect people’s rights and enact democracy reforms and innovations; and countless acts of civic courage, caring and reconstruction. Those are just a few of the avenues open to those who would help the nation fend off autocracy while building, brick by brick, a democracy that welcomes and works for all Americans who want to live in one.

Friedman is a political scientist, the former president of Public Agenda, and a democracy researcher, writer, and advocate. Follow him on Blueky at @willfriedman.bsky.social.


Read More

U.S. Capitol.

Could Trump declare a national emergency to control voting in the 2026 midterms? An analysis of emergency powers, election law, and Congress’s role in protecting democracy.

Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

To Save Democracy, Congress Must Curtail the President’s Emergency Powers

On February 26, the Washington Post reported that allies of President Trump are urging him to declare a national emergency so that he can issue rules and regulations concerning voting in the 2026 election. The alleged emergency arises from the threat of foreign interference in our electoral process.

That threat is based on now fully debunked reports that China manipulated registration and voting in 2020. The National Intelligence Council explained that there were “no indications that any foreign actor attempted to alter any technical aspect of the voting process in the 2020 US elections, including voter registration, casting ballots, vote tabulation, or reporting results.”

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Constitution

As concerns grow about Project 2025 and a potential Article V Constitutional Convention, the #unifyUSA movement proposes Citizens’ Assemblies and a “Great American Rewrite” to renew the U.S. Constitution through a democratic, citizen-led process.

alancrosthwaite/Getty Images

The Great American Rewrite: Time to Hit Refresh on the U.S. Constitution

We are standing at the edge of a precipice—and the Constitution, once a beacon of hope, is being hijacked as a prop in an anti-constitutional power grab.

On June 14, 2025, I watched with a grief-stricken heart as tanks rolled down Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C. It was billed as a patriotic military parade. But behind the red, white, and blue spectacle lies a dark agenda: a coordinated effort to dismantle our democracy from within. At the heart of this effort is the Project 2025 movement—a sweeping agenda to concentrate power in the executive branch, erode the rule of law, curtail civil liberties, and roll back hard-fought rights. Now, there is growing momentum for a dark money-controlled Article V Constitutional Convention that could place our founding document into the hands of these partisan extremists and anti-democratic dark money interests.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gillespie County Republicans Scale Back Hand Count Amid Staffing Shortage

Election workers hand count ballots inside of The Edge in Fredericksburg on Mar. 5, 2024. Early voting ballots for the Republican primaries were counted here on Election Day.

Maria Crane / The Texas Tribune

Gillespie County Republicans Scale Back Hand Count Amid Staffing Shortage

Gillespie County Republicans have scrapped plans to hand count all of their 2026 primary ballots after failing to recruit enough workers — at least for early voting. The lack of manpower prompted party officials to vote last week to use the county’s voting equipment to tabulate thousands of ballots expected to be cast during the two weeks before Election Day on March 3.

However, Gillespie Republicans still plan to hand count ballots cast on Election Day, party officials told Votebeat.

Keep ReadingShow less
American flag

Analysis of concentrated power in the U.S. political economy, examining inequality, institutional trust, executive authority, and the need for equal access and competitive markets.

Chalermpon Poungpeth/EyeEm/Getty Images

America: What We Want, What We Have, What We Need

Equal Access in an Age of Concentrated Power

The American constitutional system was designed to restrain power, not to pursue a single national mission. Authority was divided across branches, diffused among states, and slowed by deliberate friction. As James Madison wrote in Federalist No. 51, ambition was meant to counteract ambition. The design assumed competing interests would prevent domination.

For more than two centuries, that architecture has endured. The United States remains the world’s largest economy by nominal GDP, according to the World Bank’s World Development Indicators, with deep capital markets and a formidable innovation system.

Keep ReadingShow less