Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Amid the rubble, shoots of democratic renewal

American flags on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.
Bloomberg Creative/Getty Images

In the most black-swan election of our lifetimes, the politics of resentment and strongman rule rose to the apex of American power. As a result, our democracy is in danger of being degraded to a flimsy veneer overlaying autocratic and kleptocratic rule. As President-elect Donald Trump said, the intent is to fix the system “ so good you're not going to have to vote.”

But if democratic backsliding is the political story of our time, it’s not the only story. Shoots of democratic renewal have been appearing amid the rubble of our broken norms, institutions and connections to one another. I think of them as “countertrends to the politics of resentment” and count five of them, though there are surely more beyond my scope of vision. Taken together, they offer hints of what a democracy can look like that better serves and more meaningfully engages the vast majority of Americans. More, they show where regenerative energy can be found.


First, consider the “left behind” communities that have been setting aside dysfunctional political scripts to rewrite their stories. James and Deborah Fallows have made this local renaissance their beat. They report on places like Columbus, Mississippi, which is reviving its economy through high-wage businesses development and innovative schools, and fostering a culture of equality through public art. Rather than looking toward a Great Leader to rescue them from phantasms of carnage, they tackle their real challenges. John Fetterman (D) rode this wave to his 2022 Senate victory, proclaiming, “Twenty years ago I came to Braddock [Pennsylvania] to start a GED program, and I’ve spent these last two decades fighting for these forgotten communities, because … every place matters.”

Second, there’s the steady spread of democratic innovations through which regular citizens gain a meaningful voice in public decisions while nurturing a healthier working relationship with officials. In New York City, for instance, participatory budgeting (a year-long process through which communities decide how a portion of public funds are invested) is at work in 29 of 51 city council districts and investing nearly $30 million annually. The results are updated libraries, upgraded playgrounds, better lit and safer streets, and engaged citizens willing to accept the defeat of their favored project because they experience the process as fair, which is what democracy requires. Meanwhile, citizens assemblies (random samples of citizens convened for extended influential deliberations on solutions to public problems) have gained more traction in other parts of the world. But there is growing interest in the U.S. and given they are close cousins to our New England town meetings, they are enough in our DNA to keep catching on.

Third, like antibodies to authoritarian infection, an ecosystem is emerging to help the nation address the toxic polarization and dysfunctional public discourse that has been dividing and conquering the people and strangling the democratic process. This includes the 500-plus organizations in the ListenFirst Coalition; the growing Solutions Journalism Network; applied research outfits like the nonpartisan More in Common, Berkeley’s Othering and Belonging Institute and Johns Hopkins’ Agora Institute; and a budding Tech for Social Cohesion coalition. The body politic is far from healthy but some treatment has begun.

Fourth, while several public opinion trends threaten to weaken democracy ( cratering public trust, deepening partisan animosity, wavering commitment among the young) there are some democracy- friendly ones as well. The Democracy Perception Index, for instance, found the number of Americans wanting more democracy increased from 36 percent in 2020 to 46 percent in 2023. A 2021 Pew study showed 79 percent favoring democracy-deepening innovations like citizen assemblies. And in a 2023 survey by More in Common, 72 percent agreed that Americans have a shared responsibility to “engage with people who are different from us.” That last finding may seem suspect based on social media behavior, but in focus groups with diverse members of the general public it becomes clear that people can still hear and learn from one another.

Finally, democratic “people power” has been gaining steam, as in the massive, multiracial protests of recent years and, especially, in ongoing and increasingly powerful community and movement organizing. Examples include the many successful Fight for Fifteen campaigns for a living wage; a revitalized union movement; the bipartisan struggle that restored voting rights to many of Florida’s formerly incarcerated; state referenda victories protecting women’s reproductive rights; the Rev/ William Barber’s reconstitution of MLK’s multi-racial Poor People's Campaign; and the Inter-Movement Impact Project.

One virtue of the countertrends is that they tend to strengthen each other. Fallows, for example, finds that democracy innovations like participatory budgeting can play an important role in the local revival he has been documenting. And Rahman and Gilman, in their excellent Civic Power, show how political movements and participatory innovations like citizens assemblies complement one another in “rebuilding American democracy in an era of crisis.”

Another became evident to me in focus groups I conducted in 2023 with cross-sections of politically fed-up Americans. I found that discussing the countertrends could spark people’s democratic imaginations. While no single one had much impact, discussing several had a cumulative effect — people became less cynical and more open to the possibility that our democracy might be fixable after all.

Still, a new anti-democratic elite of demagogues, billionaires and ideologues has amassed enormous power and the countertrends are the bare beginning of what will be required to overcome them. We’ll need more community organizing and national coalition building; more state and municipal policies that protect people’s rights and enact democracy reforms and innovations; and countless acts of civic courage, caring and reconstruction. Those are just a few of the avenues open to those who would help the nation fend off autocracy while building, brick by brick, a democracy that welcomes and works for all Americans who want to live in one.

Friedman is a political scientist, the former president of Public Agenda, and a democracy researcher, writer, and advocate. Follow him on Blueky at @willfriedman.bsky.social.


Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep ReadingShow less
A balance.

A retired New York judge criticizes President Trump’s actions on tariffs, judicial defiance, alleged corruption, and executive overreach, warning of threats to constitutional order and the rule of law in the United States.

Getty Images

A Pay‑to‑Play Presidency Testing the Limits of Our Institutions

Another day, another outrage, and another attack on the Constitution that this President has twice taken a vow to uphold. Instead of accepting the Supreme Court decision striking down his imposition of tariffs, the President is now imposing them by executive order and excoriating the Justices who ruled against him. His disrespect for the Constitution and the judiciary is boundless.

To this retired New York State judge, all hell seems to have broken loose in our federal government. Congress lies dormant when it is not enabling the chief executive’s misuse and personal acquisition of federal funds, and, notwithstanding its recent tariffs ruling, a majority of the Supreme Court generally rubber-stamps the administration’s actions through opaque “shadow docket” rulings. In doing so, SCOTUS abdicates its role as an independent check.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less