Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Ukraine-Russia Ceasefire

News

Just the Facts: Ukraine-Russia Ceasefire

Ukraine map and Russian and Ukrainian flags

Getty Images/chibosaigon

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.


What is the status of the March 11, 2025 Ukraine-Russia ceasefire proposal?

As of March 11, 2025, Ukraine has officially accepted a U.S.-proposed, immediate 30-day ceasefire in its conflict with Russia, contingent upon Russia's reciprocal agreement. The United States has lifted previous restrictions on military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine that were imposed eight days ago.


This agreement, reached during talks in Saudi Arabia, is contingent on Russia's acceptance and includes provisions for halting hostilities and initiating negotiations for a lasting resolution.

Russian officials have not yet provided an official response to the ceasefire proposal. Some Russian officials and commentators have expressed skepticism, suggesting that the ceasefire could be a tactic for Ukraine to regroup and rearm.

The international community awaits Russia's response to the ceasefire proposal, which is seen as a critical step toward ending the ongoing conflict and establishing lasting peace in the region.


What details are available about specific provisions that may be part of the potential agreement?

The proposed Ukraine-Russia ceasefire includes several specific provisions designed to halt the ongoing conflict and pave the way for future negotiations. The key provisions, as currently outlined, are:

Military Measures

  • Immediate Halt to Fighting:
    Complete cessation of military operations, including artillery, missile, drone, and naval attacks across the entire frontline.
  • Withdrawal of Heavy Weapons:
    Mutual agreement to move heavy weapons away from frontline areas, establishing buffer zones to reduce accidental or deliberate provocations.

Humanitarian Measures

  • Prisoner Exchange:
    Exchange and release of prisoners of war and civilians detained during the conflict.
  • Return of Displaced Civilians:
    Facilitate the return of Ukrainian civilians forcibly relocated or displaced by the conflict, including thousands of Ukrainian children moved into Russian-held territory.

Diplomatic and Monitoring Measures

  • International Observers:
    Deployment of neutral international observers to ensure compliance with ceasefire terms and promptly investigate any violations.
  • Renewed Peace Negotiations:
    Immediate steps to resume comprehensive peace talks to address broader territorial, security, and diplomatic issues.

Economic Cooperation

  • Resource Management Discussions: Possible discussions on collaborative economic arrangements, including mineral rights, aimed at reducing economic tension and stabilizing both countries' economies.

Has there been a pause in hostilities while the ceasefire is being negotiated?

Despite Ukraine's acceptance of a U.S.-proposed 30-day ceasefire, hostilities have continued. Russian forces launched air attacks on Ukrainian cities, including Kyiv and Kharkiv, shortly after the announcement. Russian President Vladimir Putin has not agreed to the ceasefire and has continued missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities. The international community awaits Russia's official response to the ceasefire proposal, with further diplomatic engagements planned to involve significant global stakeholders.


What details are available about Russia returning territories it currently occupies in Ukraine?

As of March 11, 2025, the proposed 30-day ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia does not include provisions for Russia to return territories it currently occupies in Ukraine. Discussions about territorial control remain a significant point of contention in the peace negotiations.

Ukraine's Position:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has consistently maintained that any peace agreement must involve the restoration of Ukraine's territorial integrity, including the return of all occupied regions. In November 2022, Zelenskyy proposed a 10-point peace plan emphasizing the withdrawal of Russian forces from all occupied territories and the restoration of Ukraine's pre-2014 borders.

Russia's Position:

Russian President Vladimir Putin has firmly opposed relinquishing control over the occupied territories. In June 2024, Putin outlined Russia's terms for a ceasefire, demanding Ukraine recognize Russian sovereignty over the annexed regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia, including areas not fully controlled by Russian forces at that time. He also insisted that Ukraine abandon its aspirations to join NATO and adopt a neutral status.

International Perspectives:

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has suggested that Ukraine may need to make territorial concessions to achieve peace, acknowledging the improbability of Ukraine reclaiming all lost territories swiftly. This stance reflects a more stringent approach by the current U.S. administration compared to previous policies.

The ceasefire proposal focuses on halting active hostilities and initiating humanitarian measures, such as prisoner exchanges and the return of displaced civilians. However, the issue of territorial sovereignty remains unresolved, with both Ukraine and Russia holding firm to their respective positions. The international community continues to monitor the situation, advocating for negotiations that respect Ukraine's sovereignty while seeking a sustainable peace solution.


Kristina Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and Executive Director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


SUGGESTION:

Just the Facts: Canadian Tariffs

Just the Facts: Medicaid

Just the Facts: Trade Deficits

Just the Facts: DEI

Just the Facts: The Deficit


Read More

Social media apps on a phone

A Pentagon watchdog confirms senior officials shared sensitive military plans on Signal, risking U.S. troops. A veteran argues accountability is long overdue.

Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto via Getty Images

There’s No Excuse for Signalgate

The Defense Department Inspector General just announced that information shared by Defense Secretary Hegseth in a Signal chat this spring could have indeed put U.S. troops, their mission, and national security in great peril. To recap, in an unforced error, our Defense Secretary, National Security Advisor, and Vice President conducted detailed discussions about an imminent military operation against Houthi targets in Yemen over Signal, a hackable commercial messaging app (that also does not comply with public record laws). These “professionals” accidentally added a journalist to the group chat, which meant the Editor-in-Chief of the Atlantic received real-time intelligence about a pending U.S. military strike, including exactly when bombs would begin falling on Yemeni targets. Had Houthi militants gotten their hands on this information, it would have been enough to help them better defend their positions if not actively shoot down the American pilots. This was a catastrophic breakdown in the most basic protocols governing sensitive information and technology. Nine months later, are we any safer?

As a veteran, I take their cavalier attitude towards national security personally. I got out of the Navy as a Lieutenant Commander after ten years as an aviator, a role that required survival, evasion, resistance, and escape training before ever deploying, in case I should ever get shot down. To think that the Defense Secretary, National Security Advisor, and Vice President could have so carelessly put these pilots in danger betrays the trust troops place in their Chain of Command while putting their lives on the line in the service of this country.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democrat's Plan for Ending the War in Gaza
An Israeli airstrike hit Deir al-Balah in central Gaza on Jan. 1, 2024.
Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A Democrat's Plan for Ending the War in Gaza

Trump's 21-point peace plan for Gaza has not and will not go anywhere, despite its adoption by the UN Security Council. There are two reasons. One is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ultra-orthodox nationalist allies will not agree to an eventual Palestinian state in the occupied territories. The other is that Hamas will not stand down and give up its arms; its main interest is the destruction of Israel, not the creation of a home for the Palestinian people.

Democrats should operate as the "loyal opposition" and propose a different path to end the "war" and establish peace. So far, they have merely followed the failed policies of the Biden administration.

Keep ReadingShow less
How the Unprecedented Redistricting War Is Harming Election Officials, Politicians, and Voters

The Indiana State House is the site of the latest political fight over new congressional maps for the 2026 election.

Lee Klafczynski for Chalkbeat

How the Unprecedented Redistricting War Is Harming Election Officials, Politicians, and Voters

The redrawing of states’ congressional districts typically happens only once per decade, following the release of new U.S. Census data. But we’re now up to six states that have enacted new congressional maps for the 2026 midterms; that’s more than in any election cycle not immediately following a census since 1983-84. Even more are expected to join the fray before voters head to the polls next year. Ultimately, more than a third of districts nationwide could be redrawn, threatening to confuse and disenfranchise voters.

The truly unusual thing, though, is that four of those states passed new maps totally voluntarily. Texas, Missouri, and North Carolina all redrew their districts after President Donald Trump urged them to create more safe seats for Republicans to help the GOP maintain control of the House of Representatives next year, and California did so in order to push back against Trump and create more safe seats for Democrats. (The other two states redrew for more anodyne reasons: Utah’s old map was thrown out in court, and Ohio’s was always set to expire after the 2024 election.) To put that in perspective, only two states voluntarily redistricted in total in the 52 years from 1973 to 2024, according to the Pew Research Center.

Keep ReadingShow less
Crowd waving flags
Crowd waving flags
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

For the People, By the People

Democracy was once America’s proudest legacy — the last best hope on earth, a torch that lit the path for nations worldwide. Today, dysfunction grips all three branches of government: Congress abandons its duty to the people, the President exploits power for retribution, and the Supreme Court fails to enforce accountability. This betrayal of trust places our republic at risk. Americans must reclaim democracy from dysfunction and abuse of power.

The United States is both a participatory democracy — by the people, for the people — and a constitutional republic. Power lies with the people, and elected officials are entrusted to serve them. The President enforces the laws, Congress checks executive power, and the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. These checks and balances are designed to prevent abuse of power, yet Congress and the Court have abandoned their duty (U.S. Constitution).

Keep ReadingShow less