Introduction
Israel is in the midst of an invasion of Gaza City, which is a high-density area of the Gaza Strip where 1.2 million people currently live. The civilian casualty rate will be enormous. The remaining Israeli hostages, who are thought to be there, will be at risk; Israeli soldiers will be at risk; and the diplomatic reputation of Israel will suffer, and they will lose allies. Yet, there is a way to stop this invasion in its tracks, even with the finish-Hamas-off demands of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Coalition.
Netanyahu was asked if Israel would still take over Gaza and eliminate the terrorists even if Hamas agrees to a deal.
To that question, Netanyahu answered, "Well, we're going to do that anyway. That was never a question, that we're not going to leave Hamas there. I've said that this war can end today. It can end if Hamas lays down its arms and releases the remaining 50 hostages, at least 20 of which are alive," he added. "That's our goal. To get all the hostages out, to disarm Hamas, demilitarize Gaza and give a different future for Gazans," he said. "My goal is not to occupy Gaza, it's to free Gaza."
Hamas has been badly weakened by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), and in the eyes of many Gazans, has seen over 60,000 Gazans needlessly killed in a war started by Hamas's brutal attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Still, many Gazans blame Israel and see their resistance as part of a Jihad (holy war) to get their entire (holy) land back, from the River to the Sea.
I have given up on assigning ultimate blame because it depends on what point in time one starts their causal analysis. But I do want to assign responsibility for bringing peace to that region.
I find it odd that a major party involved in sparking this conflagration is Iran; not by ordering the Oct. 7 attack but by funding and encouraging Hamas to act aggressively towards dismantling Israel. Yet, there is little mention on how Iran can reverse this, stop this war, and bring peace to this region; and at the same time, help their geopolitical aspirations and their own economy.
Hamas Out
Hamas can be demilitarized, and its political, military, and law enforcement leadership can be amicably expelled from Gaza to Iran. To facilitate an end to the Gaza war, seventeen countries, plus the European Union and Arab League, have been calling for the disarmament of Hamas. Disarmament is a welcome start, but a more sure path to peace is, in addition, to facilitate Hamas's political, military, and administrative leadership leaving Gaza to Iran, their main patron and sponsor.
An amicable removal of Hamas is necessary for Hamas to agree to a transfer from Gaza. “Amicable” includes Israeli abstention from revenge violence or incarceration directed at Hamas members, the inclusion of family members in resettlement, and a money stipend to assist with the costs of resettlement in Iran.
Of course, the remaining 50 hostages (20 live and 30 bodies) have to be released prior to or co-terminus with the cessation of warfare. I nominate the U.S., EU, and Abraham Accord countries to monitor Israeli compliance and Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Qatar to monitor Hamas compliance. Gaza needs to have a temporary peace-keeping and police presence in Gaza until there can be a transition to a peace-keeping police presence installed by a democratically elected government. One such organization has been recently created that could fulfill the first need and possibly also the second. That organization is the Gaza Transitional Service (GTS) in cooperation with a reformed Palestinian Authority (PA).
Iran Willingness
The rationale for Iran to accept Hamas members into their country is that they: (1) have some sympathy to stop the harm inflicted upon Gazans, (2) can place Hamas members into their military and propaganda infrastructures, and (3) can be economically rewarded through the removal of many of the sanctions placed upon them. For example, sanctions can be removed for purchasing or facilitating the delivery of Iranian oil, unfreezing Iranian governmental assets in the United States and overseas, and allowing the sale of U.S.- origin aircraft or related goods, technology, or services to be sold to Iranian civilian aviation companies. And, (4) perhaps most importantly, so they can be allowed to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes (with monitoring).
Mohammad Javad Zarif, former foreign minister of Iran, recently wrote: "Forging a different future requires vision, courage, and a conscious decision to break free from historical determinism. …The time for a paradigm shift is now."
Remaining Issues Easier to Address
Once Hamas is removed from Gaza to Iran and a transitional Palestinian peaceful governance is created, other issues can be more easily solved—such as the placement of Gazans in Gaza, in the West Bank, and elsewhere during the reconstruction of Gaza (with a right of return), the reduction and reconfiguration of settlements imposed in the West Bank (Iran can make settlement removal from the E1 section of the West Bank part of the Hamas withdrawal deal), and the creation of a Palestinian Province as part of a permanent or temporary Israel-Palestine Confederation (a three state solution). That Confederation would contain the following three provinces: Orthodox Jewish Eretz Yisrael, Traditional Muslim Falasteen, and a Liberal-Pluralistic Judaea-Palestina. All three would be bound by a constitution, which would include a Mideast version of Singapore's Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act.
Living in harmony and peace is an edifice that does not just happen. It must be thoughtfully constructed and nurtured.
Steven Balkin is a professor emeritus at Roosevelt University and a member of the Chicago Political Economy Group. His research focuses on violence prevention, international development, entrepreneurship and cultural preservation. Email: sbalkin@roosevelt.edu
Ben Droz
Ben Droz
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Pinnacle Bank Expo Center on the Nebraska State Fairgrounds on October 05, 2026 in Grand Island, Nebraska.
The President Invited Iran to Bomb My Home
I was driving home to San Diego from Los Angeles on Monday night when I heard that the President of the United States had offered both cities up to Iran as bomb targets. At a rally in Nebraska, defending his war, Trump told the crowd, “let [Iran] take out Los Angeles, let ‘em take out San Diego.” It was, he said, “a very small price to pay.”
I was coming from a Bernie Sanders rally for Proposition 40, the one-time tax on California billionaires that would send 90% of its revenue to healthcare. We desperately need it to pass because, in order to give tax breaks to billionaires, Trump signed a law that will strip health coverage from 10 million Americans; this tax will make sure we can still cover Californians. Call me crazy, but I think taxing billionaires one time so we can make sure kids in California get to see a doctor is a very small price to pay. I also think that even if Trump were joking, it is indefensible to make jokes about the potential destruction of so many lives. Human life is never a small price to pay. Human life is priceless.
Plus, the reality is: here in San Diego, we’re already paying the price for Trump’s actions, and it’s not small at all. He has gutted FEMA, tried to kill climate resiliency programs, and destroyed public health standards, while his signature law is set to cut off health insurance and food support for hundreds of thousands of San Diegans. Like plenty of American cities, San Diego is already busy finding local solutions to respond to the problems this president has recklessly created.
Not to mention, at least 19 American service members have been killed in this war already. Human rights monitors have documented more than 3,600 dead in Iran by April alone. Here at home, gas is sitting just pennies below its all-time record. Taxpayers have already spent more than $45 billion on the war, while Trump’s oil and gas portfolio has grown by roughly $15.5 million this year alone. Of course anything is a “small price” to someone paying free.99 for this war, and profiting from it. Meanwhile, We the People are paying twice: first for the war, and then for the consequences of that war. But now he wants San Diego to pay a third time, flippantly offering us up to Iran.
It is worth noticing which cities he thought to name. Were San Diego and Los Angeles strategically chosen to signify something to his audience, or were they simply the first cities that came to mind as expendable places? Either way, the effect is to normalize—-and to gauge a crowd’s reaction to–the idea of massive violence in major California cities, suitable targets because of their perceived liberal lean. So what if Iran needs to bomb a little bit of America before the war can be over? Who cares, says Trump, if they target Los Angeles and San Diego?
By the way, why didn’t he offer up San Francisco, the free-love hippie-town MAGA loves to hate (and also my birthplace)? Could it be because that’s where the tech titans live? The same ones who joined Trump for Xi Jinping’s state dinner, a guest list worth a combined $2.4 trillion?
San Diego may have fewer billionaires, but it is home to more than 115,000 active-duty service members and 230,000 veterans. One in six active-duty sailors–in the entire Navy–is stationed here. So is one in four Marines. You cannot throw a rock in this county without hitting a military family: brats and spouses and veterans are among us. I got out of the Navy last year after ten years, and eight of those were here in San Diego. When Trump says “let ‘em take out San Diego,” he’s talking about the backbone of the United States military. He’s also talking about the people fighting his war.
San Diego has not been watching this war from the sidelines. Today, the USS Abraham Lincoln returns to North Island after an almost yearlong deployment to the Middle East that featured food shortages, broken toilets, and mold in the showers after 286 days at sea without a single port call. Eight sailors in the Lincoln’s strike group attempted suicide, but in August, when a reporter asked whether the deployment had gone on too long, Trump said “not nearly long enough.” Now he has told a crowd in Nebraska that we should let Iran take out the city those sailors call home. These are sociopathic sentiments.
Last week at Quantico, Pete Hegseth closed his address to the force by telling them, “President Trump has your back and so do I.” To the contrary, President Trump has put one of the biggest military towns in the country forward as a target for our adversaries. With friends like these, the “domestic” in “against all enemies, foreign and domestic” starts to sound a lot less hypothetical.
San Diego is home to Naval Air Station North Island, Naval Base San Diego, Naval Amphibious Base Coronado, the Point Loma submarine base, Camp Pendleton, and Miramar (and I have been permanently stationed at or trained at all of them). If Iran bombed San Diego and Los Angeles, aside from the devastating loss of life, it would cripple an immense share of our national security readiness.
And for what, exactly? Trump says the war is “essentially almost over with.” This is the same man who claimed in June 2025 that Iran’s nuclear program had been “obliterated,” then launched a war over it anyway on February 28. More than seven months later, he wants us to believe two things at once: that we’ve basically won, and that we might need to sacrifice an American city or two to finish winning. If the war is almost over, why does anybody need to take out San Diego?
I wonder if Trump’s endorsed candidate for California’s 48th District here in San Diego County will respond to these remarks. He recently said “no pain, no gain,” when referring to the gas prices San Diegans are paying. Jim Desmond, would you apply that same mindset if we were bombed? Or do you have the moral courage to stand up for the people you’re running to represent?
Last November, six Democratic members of Congress, all veterans, including Senator Mark Kelly, recorded a video reminding troops of their duty to disobey unlawful orders, restating the law that says so. Trump called it “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH,” and then his Justice Department went looking for an indictment, which a grand jury refused. The president treated reading the law out loud to the troops as a capital offense, but then he himself invited a foreign enemy to destroy two American cities, possibly as a punchline. Is anyone calling the latter sedition? Who is demanding accountability?
Calling our lives a small price to pay affirms a moral bankruptcy, as well as an obvious dereliction of duty to the office he holds. While we can’t impeach him or invoke the 25th Amendment ourselves, we must stop being so quiet about what we’re paying already. We can make our voices heard by calling our representatives, writing op-eds, knocking doors, phone banking, and voting in defiance of the man who threatens the safety of our city. Ballots are already arriving in mailboxes. Vote, and vote yes on 40 (and no on 41 and 42).
Trump has been harming our cities for a while, but now he is inviting our military adversaries to join him in the harm. If we have any self-respect as Americans, we must not tolerate our leaders disregarding the dignity of lives in this way. We must fight for our home.
Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.