Introduction
Israel is in the midst of an invasion of Gaza City, which is a high-density area of the Gaza Strip where 1.2 million people currently live. The civilian casualty rate will be enormous. The remaining Israeli hostages, who are thought to be there, will be at risk; Israeli soldiers will be at risk; and the diplomatic reputation of Israel will suffer, and they will lose allies. Yet, there is a way to stop this invasion in its tracks, even with the finish-Hamas-off demands of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Coalition.
Netanyahu was asked if Israel would still take over Gaza and eliminate the terrorists even if Hamas agrees to a deal.
To that question, Netanyahu answered, "Well, we're going to do that anyway. That was never a question, that we're not going to leave Hamas there. I've said that this war can end today. It can end if Hamas lays down its arms and releases the remaining 50 hostages, at least 20 of which are alive," he added. "That's our goal. To get all the hostages out, to disarm Hamas, demilitarize Gaza and give a different future for Gazans," he said. "My goal is not to occupy Gaza, it's to free Gaza."
Hamas has been badly weakened by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), and in the eyes of many Gazans, has seen over 60,000 Gazans needlessly killed in a war started by Hamas's brutal attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Still, many Gazans blame Israel and see their resistance as part of a Jihad (holy war) to get their entire (holy) land back, from the River to the Sea.
I have given up on assigning ultimate blame because it depends on what point in time one starts their causal analysis. But I do want to assign responsibility for bringing peace to that region.
I find it odd that a major party involved in sparking this conflagration is Iran; not by ordering the Oct. 7 attack but by funding and encouraging Hamas to act aggressively towards dismantling Israel. Yet, there is little mention on how Iran can reverse this, stop this war, and bring peace to this region; and at the same time, help their geopolitical aspirations and their own economy.
Hamas Out
Hamas can be demilitarized, and its political, military, and law enforcement leadership can be amicably expelled from Gaza to Iran. To facilitate an end to the Gaza war, seventeen countries, plus the European Union and Arab League, have been calling for the disarmament of Hamas. Disarmament is a welcome start, but a more sure path to peace is, in addition, to facilitate Hamas's political, military, and administrative leadership leaving Gaza to Iran, their main patron and sponsor.
An amicable removal of Hamas is necessary for Hamas to agree to a transfer from Gaza. “Amicable” includes Israeli abstention from revenge violence or incarceration directed at Hamas members, the inclusion of family members in resettlement, and a money stipend to assist with the costs of resettlement in Iran.
Of course, the remaining 50 hostages (20 live and 30 bodies) have to be released prior to or co-terminus with the cessation of warfare. I nominate the U.S., EU, and Abraham Accord countries to monitor Israeli compliance and Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Qatar to monitor Hamas compliance. Gaza needs to have a temporary peace-keeping and police presence in Gaza until there can be a transition to a peace-keeping police presence installed by a democratically elected government. One such organization has been recently created that could fulfill the first need and possibly also the second. That organization is the Gaza Transitional Service (GTS) in cooperation with a reformed Palestinian Authority (PA).
Iran Willingness
The rationale for Iran to accept Hamas members into their country is that they: (1) have some sympathy to stop the harm inflicted upon Gazans, (2) can place Hamas members into their military and propaganda infrastructures, and (3) can be economically rewarded through the removal of many of the sanctions placed upon them. For example, sanctions can be removed for purchasing or facilitating the delivery of Iranian oil, unfreezing Iranian governmental assets in the United States and overseas, and allowing the sale of U.S.- origin aircraft or related goods, technology, or services to be sold to Iranian civilian aviation companies. And, (4) perhaps most importantly, so they can be allowed to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes (with monitoring).
Mohammad Javad Zarif, former foreign minister of Iran, recently wrote: "Forging a different future requires vision, courage, and a conscious decision to break free from historical determinism. …The time for a paradigm shift is now."
Remaining Issues Easier to Address
Once Hamas is removed from Gaza to Iran and a transitional Palestinian peaceful governance is created, other issues can be more easily solved—such as the placement of Gazans in Gaza, in the West Bank, and elsewhere during the reconstruction of Gaza (with a right of return), the reduction and reconfiguration of settlements imposed in the West Bank (Iran can make settlement removal from the E1 section of the West Bank part of the Hamas withdrawal deal), and the creation of a Palestinian Province as part of a permanent or temporary Israel-Palestine Confederation (a three state solution). That Confederation would contain the following three provinces: Orthodox Jewish Eretz Yisrael, Traditional Muslim Falasteen, and a Liberal-Pluralistic Judaea-Palestina. All three would be bound by a constitution, which would include a Mideast version of Singapore's Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act.
Living in harmony and peace is an edifice that does not just happen. It must be thoughtfully constructed and nurtured.
Steven Balkin is a professor emeritus at Roosevelt University and a member of the Chicago Political Economy Group. His research focuses on violence prevention, international development, entrepreneurship and cultural preservation. Email: sbalkin@roosevelt.edu
A view of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 25, 2026. President Donald Trump jolted Republicans during a fiery appearance at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, scrapping a housing bill signing ceremony and clashing behind closed doors with a party rebel who challenged him over the Iran war. Trump had been expected to sign the bipartisan housing.
Only Trump doesn’t care about housing
It was August 15, 2024. Then candidate Donald Trump stepped out of his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club’s columned clubhouse to a gaggle of reporters. He was flanked by tables of groceries and signs showing the rising cost of food. Also on one of the tables was a dollhouse, meant to represent the equally alarming rise in housing prices.
It was a speech about the economy, the single most important issue of the 2024 election cycle, full of promises that went right to the heart of Americans’ anxieties. While former President Joe Biden and then Vice President Kamala Harris were contorting themselves to posture a good economy that just needed more time to recover from the pandemic, Trump was preying on voters’ very real fears of unaffordable gas, groceries, and homes. It was obviously a winning message.
In that speech, Trump promised, “We’re going to open up tracts of federal land for housing construction. We desperately need housing for people who can’t afford what’s going on now.”
As of mid-2023, there had been a housing shortage of nearly four million homes, according to the National Association of Realtors. Americans all over the country were either priced out of buying new homes due to low inventory, trapped in their existing homes by sky-high mortgage rates, or facing exorbitant rent hikes thanks to corporate investors buying up rental properties. Americans needed help, and Trump promised it.
Cut to March of 2026, when Trump reportedly told House Speaker Mike Johnson, “No one gives a sh*t about housing.”
That kind of thinking may explain why Trump this week suddenly announced he was canceling a signing ceremony for the bipartisan “21st Century ROAD to Housing Act,” a housing bill co-sponsored by Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Tim Scott that passed the House 358-32 and was approved in the Senate on Monday.
Trump instead demanded Congress pass the SAVE America Act, his controversial election grievance bill that doesn’t have enough Republican support to get passed in the Senate.
It’s just the latest in a line of policy self-owns where Trump has seemingly intentionally made life more difficult for Republicans hoping to keep their majority. Despite midterm elections occurring in the midst of a blistering economy and an unpopular war, they were surely hoping the housing bill would give them something — anything — to brag about when they returned home to their districts.
And very much to the contrary, Americans do give a sh*t about housing. According to a recent survey by the Bipartisan Policy Center, a whopping 79% say the cost of housing is extremely or very important to them. Eighty-three percent say Congress should take action on the issue — like it just did. Eighty-nine percent say the House and Senate need to work together to pass affordable housing legislation — like they just did. And 63% say they would be more likely to vote for a lawmaker if they helped pass legislation to build more affordable homes and lower housing costs — like they just did.
There aren’t many issues that unite Americans like housing does, and very few bipartisan policy wins Congress can point to, and yet, Trump is holding that bill hostage in order to get his pet project — which doesn’t even have the support of his own party — pushed through.
If you’re trying to make sense of something so nonsensical, as I’m sure many Republican lawmakers are, it’s certainly sad but not actually all that complicated. Trump said what he needed to get reelected and then promptly abandoned his promises in order to pursue his own self-interests, even if those interests are bad for Republicans and bad for voters.
That’s just the kind of guy he is.
S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.