Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump’s Rhetoric and Policies Spark National Crisis of Character

Trump’s actions defy the moral standards our founders saw as essential to national unity.


Opinion

Trump’s Rhetoric and Policies Spark National Crisis of Character

Mark Esper sitting next to Donald Trump

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

America is in the midst of a crisis of character with an assault on our shared values. Our nation’s leader is attacking our very Constitution as well as encouraging each of us to view each other as enemies.

America’s Founding Fathers recognized the trouble this could be for the success of our national experiment.


Going back to the beginning, in his first inaugural address, our first president, George Washington, understood the need for unity and that he served the people of this new nation. He described the “indissoluble union” between virtue and happiness, stating that a nation's prosperity depended on adhering to a set of principles.

In his first address to the nation, Washington shared: “In these honorable qualifications, I behold the surest pledges, that as on one side, no local prejudices, or attachments; no separate views, nor party animosities, will misdirect the comprehensive and equal eye which ought to watch over this great Assemblage of communities and interests: so, on another, that the foundations of our national policy, will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality; and the pre-eminence of free Government, be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its Citizens, and command the respect of the world.”

There have been 45 different presidents since the office was established in 1789 with Washington; what we are now witnessing when it comes to “immutable principles of private morality” from Washington's 44th successor is horrendous.

President Donald Trump’s character has been in question since he entered public life, with plenty of examples to point to of his crassness or cruelty. We all saw him make fun of the New York Times reporter with a disability. We heard him bragging that he could grab women by their private parts, as well as disparaging our war heroes.

But what makes this period more dangerous is the fact that Trump is using the full force of the executive branch and the bully pulpit to seek retribution and enact an agenda based on cruelty.

Here are just a few examples, in no particular order, of Trump’s actions or rhetoric in just the last couple of months:

Trump told mourners at Charlie Kirk’s memorial service, “I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them.”

During a Fox News interview, following the assassination of Kirk, Trump said that he “couldn't care less” about unifying the country.

While speaking at an Oval Office press conference on autism, Trump blamed mothers for their child’s autism and told women that they need to “tough it out.”

At the United Nations General Assembly, Trump told world leaders that their “countries are going to hell” if they do not follow his policies.

During an address to the U. S’s top generals and admirals, Trump suggested troops use cities as military “training grounds” and that “That’s a war too. It’s a war from within.”

Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison for conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors, was moved to a minimum-security facility shortly after meeting with Deputy Attorney General and former personal attorney to Trump, Todd Blanche.

Detaining U.S. citizens without due process, as well as sending immigrants to foreign gulags or countries outside their country of origin.

Trump directed the Department of Justice to pursue his perceived political enemies, like former FBI Director James Comey, as well as others, via a Truth Social post to “Pam” (Attorney General Pam Bondi).

Just a short time after meeting in the White House to discuss the government shutdown, Trump shared an AI-generated video on social media, depicting House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries wearing a sombrero and a mustache.

Every American should be asking themselves, do Trump’s ideals and actions, like some of the ones mentioned above, align with the core of our founding and those fundamental mores that

Washington encouraged all of us, but especially the President, to uphold.

Since voters do not generally vote on character and instead on things that matter more to them, like the cost of eggs or safety in their communities, we are left to confront the issue of shared values at a societal level, while at the same time holding our political parties responsible for not acting as guardrails.

Please make no mistake, the blame for the unbelievable fall from grace lies with the President of the United States and the Republican members of Congress who have abdicated their power to provide a check or to legislate.

However, the Democrats are not without fault in this regard. The Democratic Party appears unable to step up to meet this moment, as evidenced by its failure to recognize the threat and put forward a strong 2024 presidential nominee.

What Americans are living through now is not about left versus right, Democrats versus Republicans, or even liberal versus conservative—it is rejecting what is in front of us and recommitting to the values that we, as Americans, believe in and have based this fragile experiment upon.

Lynn Schmidt is a columnist and Editorial Board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. She holds a master's of science in political science as well as a bachelor's of science in nursing.


Read More

US President Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump arrives onstage for a campaign rally in the Mitchell Center at the University of South Alabama on Oct. 2, 2026, in Mobile, Alabama.

(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images/TCA)

Trump’s obsessions help bury GOP chances

Maine Sen. Susan Collins is facing one of the toughest reelection battles of her lifetime. And at Tuesday night’s debate, she was clearly on the defensive.

This race should not have been this competitive. Collins has held this seat for five terms. And while Maine has voted for the Democrat in every presidential election since 1992, it still has a fierce independent streak, and a healthy Republican base.

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building
white concrete building during daytime

Congress Broke the Constitutional Order — And Now They Want Voters to Forget

How can leaders who broke the constitutional order, ignored their oath, weakened rights, and harmed the people now ask Americans to forget — and reward them with reelection? The question is not abstract — it goes to the heart of what the Constitution demands from those who swear an oath to uphold it.

The constitutional order is the framework that protects the Republic: three branches, checks and balances, oversight, limits on executive power, and the oath every member of Congress swears — to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Yet in recent years, Congress has allowed that order to erode. Oversight collapsed. Guardrails bent. Silence replaced accountability. Loyalty to a president replaced loyalty to the Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Pool/Getty Images

How Presidential Primetime Addresses Shape Public Trust in Democratic Institutions

A question still being studied is the effects on public trust when the head of the Executive casts doubt on the institutions that run elections, enforce laws, and decide legal disputes. The President of the United States is arguably the most powerful man in the world. He is the commander in chief of a nation #1 in nominal gross domestic product as well as #1 in military power, budget, and spending as of 2026. The actions he takes spew ripple effects across the world and follow many generations. A way you can measure the executive's power can also be measured in how much influence his speeches have on the markets, opinions of the masses, news outlets, lawmakers, social media reactions, etc. His framing of an issue can shape the next day’s political conversation.

These conversations become extremely dangerous/consequential when discussing a principle as embedded in our country as Democracy. In his July primetime speech, Trump continued to pedal the claims about election security and argued for stricter voting rules. He continued to portray the country as facing a moment of corruption and uncertainty, followed by presenting himself as the one prepared to restore order. The address continued with repeated claims about his loss in the 2020 election that have not been supported by the evidence compiled over years of investigation by many parties. Professional reviews, audits, and courts have yet to find significant evidence of foul play substantial enough to influence the outcome of that election.

Keep ReadingShow less
unrecognizable businessman giving speech to professional audience

Brain science explains why voters reward charisma over results — and why the leaders who "fix" the most get credit for the least. A behavioral look at elections.

alvaro gonzalez/Getty Images

The Résumé Should Outvote the Smile

There's an old joke about a couple who finally solved years of arguing over decisions. "Since you're the man of the house," the wife said, "you handle the big things -- our stance on foreign wars, who we send to the Senate. I'll take care of the small stuff: groceries, the mortgage, where we live, what we eat." The husband agreed happily, certain he had won the better half of the deal. A few years later he realized the trade had gone entirely the other way. He held forth on geopolitics at dinner parties while his wife quietly ran every detail that actually touched his life: what he ate, where he lived, how his money was spent. What looked like ultimate authority was, in practice, near-total abdication over the things that shaped his days.

Voters make the same trade, and pay for it the same way. We keep hiring leaders for the qualities we would want in a spouse -- warmth, charm, a commanding voice, the sense that they see us -- instead of the qualities we would want in a mechanic: someone who can find what is broken and fix it before the whole system fails. We evaluate candidates the way we choose intimate partners, not the way we hire people to run complex, high-stakes systems.

Keep ReadingShow less