Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Bipartisan cooperation needed to navigate immigration's troubled waters

People wading into a river

Migrants cross the border between Mexico and the United States, near Ciudad Juarez, with the intention of seeking humanitarian asylum.

Christian Torres/Anadolu via Getty Images

Blockwood is executive vice president of the Partnership for Public Service, adjunct professor at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, and a fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration.

We are seeing increasing debate, court rulings and newly introduced legislation regarding the federal government’s responsibility to enforce immigration law. It is clear that to resolve swelling immigration issues, the White House, Congress and the states need to provide bipartisan commitment and leadership.


“Do not come.” Those are the words Vice President Kamala Harris said three years ago – clear, direct and delivered with underlying compassion to many would-be illegal immigrants along the southern border. Yet, these words have not been heeded, as if not said at all, with migrant arrivals and violent encounters with our border protection authorities rising to all-time highs. For many, this is not their maiden voyage, seriously signaling we are in deep water.

Migration, the movement of people from one country to another, shouldn’t be controversial. And, if managed appropriately it shouldn’t lead to a national crisis. In fact, immigration has long been a cherished part of shaping who we are as a nation. We are a nation founded on, and advanced by, a society of immigrants, who make up approximately 13 percent of the United States — home to more immigrants than any other country in the world.

The United States welcomes over a million people a year and naturalized almost 8 million in the last decade. But, roughly 10.5 million immigrants are unauthorized, and there is growing concern that this group doesn’t respect American traditions and customs, drains resources and services intended for citizens, takes jobs away from hard-working Americans, commits more crime and atrocities than those who were born here, present intelligence threats to our national security, and is part of a larger, sinister replacement theory.

Though not without flaws and hardship, by all accounts, we are a blessed nation with a strong-held belief to care for those unable to care for themselves. America represents a bastion of freedom and opportunity, but how can we sustain the American allure of promise, protect our people, and combat an open border, so we don’t lose the country we love?

Recognize our reach

The U.S. doesn’t receive nearly enough credit for the work it does overseas. We obligated more than $70 billion in foreign aid to more than 150 countries to primarily support economic development, humanitarian assistance, peace related activities and health. This is a substantial sum to spend abroad while nearly 40 million Americans struggle with poverty and our southern border has us over a barrel.

No, it’s not a competition to measure which country is the most generous, but recognition of our assistance to other nations would surely help alleviate the concern that America may not be living up to its humanitarian ethos or meeting its moral obligation.

Run a tight ship

Laws exist for a reason. The Department of Homeland Security, through component organizations — such as Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — plays an important role in keeping us safe and securing our border. We have an established visa application process, though perhaps in need of reform, to legally enter the United States, and we should reward those who use it rather than help those who undermine it.

We’re not a lawless nation. We must enforce our laws and hold accountable our government leaders who are failing or unwilling to do so. Our president and federal entities must address the rising immigration tsunami or expect that individual states or citizens will — potentially leading to infighting over federal and state rights and power.

Use an ‘all hands on deck’ approach

President Joe Biden said he would sign into law the “toughest and fairest” border reforms, recognizing we have an overwhelmed border amidst a crisis. Despite this pronouncement, the number of migrants illegally crossing continues to grow — in some cases by the thousands — every day. More (a whole of government approach) must be done to secure our border.

Let’s champion bipartisan efforts without fear of being labeled xenophobic or appearing to cede ground to one’s political base. Let’s unbundle unrelated issues in legislative proposals. Let’s not miss the opportunity for actual, meaningful reform because of bitterness, a partisan grudge or chance to show one side has been wrong on this issue all along.

It’s time to take a different tack and make way. Congress and the White House must work constructively to fund border security and immigration activities. We must lift any legislative or executive order restrictions, whether rationalized or real, regarding immigration enforcement. Limit and increase scrutiny for asylum seekers to thwart abuse of the system. Stop the antics of moving migrants around our country, which only shifts the problem elsewhere. Fund and equip law enforcement officials who are on board and ready to safeguard our national boundaries. Reinforce the border using traditional barriers coupled with advanced technology. Position the right leadership at agency, administration and state levels — leaders committed to solving the immigration issues battering our border.

Our country can and should offer legal pathways to citizenship, we can and should enforce our laws and impose consequences to those who try to circumvent them, and we can and should reinforce our commitment to keep U.S. citizens and communities safe. We must also safeguard our traditions while embracing our diversity as a nation — which together are what makes us strongest.

To help stem the tidal wave, let’s call for other nations to meet their responsibilities while we continue to be a role model by offering aid and technical assistance — but not at an unfair expense to Americans. Let’s use currently existing authorities to secure our border and pass additional bipartisan immigration legislation. We would be serving ourselves and our neighbors (adjacent and afar) well — providing the ballast we need, honoring America’s founding spirit, and protecting the American dream and the futures of our fellow countrymen.


Read More

Five men sitting on one side of a table, as a panel at an event.

Harvard's Guy-Uriel Charles (left) listens to David Walker, Chair of the Federal Fiscal Sustainability Foundation. Fellow panelists (L-R) are Michael Farris, Convention of States Project; Samuel Fieldman, Wolf Pack; and Jim Rubens, FFSA and American Promise.

Photo by Martha Stewart

Congressional Inaction Raises Constitutional Change Alternative

Voting is the anchor of democracy, as we are reminded every two years. But this anchor rests on unstable ground today, signaling that our political roots need examining too.

In the United States, the Constitution itself becomes the focus when serious problems prompt such foundational civic dives. Our current challenges may not be as severe as the Civil War or the excesses of the Gilded Age, which produced waves of amendments, but today’s erosion of our system of checks and balances requires us to revisit our constitutional underpinnings.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult man holds a microphone while asking a question during a town hall meeting.

Congress ignored 90% of public support for background checks. Learn how citizen assemblies and sortition helped Ireland break gridlock and could work in the US.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Consensus Without Power: How Sortition Could Break America's Legislative Gridlock

In April 2013, four months after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting killed twenty children, the US Senate voted on the Manchin-Toomey Act to expand background checks and to include gun-show and internet sales of firearms. Roughly nine in ten Americans, including a majority of gun owners, supported the bill—a figure that has held steady across more than a decade of polling. It fell short of the 60-vote threshold by six votes. This was not an outlier. On complex issues, representatives often fail to translate public consensus into reality. Research shows that legislators consistently vote in line with donor and interest group preferences over constituent opinion. Before the vote, the National Rifle Association (NRA) warned every senator it would “rate” their vote on its annual rating system, and a low NRA rating could cost senators their next primary. Consequently, the bill died 54-46, and the majority of Americans watched, powerless, as their consensus was overridden by self-interested representatives.

Liberal democracies need a method to bypass electoral incentives that run counter to public opinion. One already exists: Ireland faced the same stalemate on complex issues before it instituted a process called sortition. The beauty of sortition lies in its removal of the primary pressure that misaligns representatives’ interests from public interest: reelection. Much like jury duty, citizens are randomly drawn from the population. An independent body then stratifies the pool, so the final group mirrors the country by age, gender, geography, and income. The group meets over weeks or months, hearing from experts and the public, as well as debating frequently. At the end, it issues a recommendation that parliament may then put to a referendum or pass into law.

Keep ReadingShow less