Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Newark offers lessons for Chicago's efforts to replace lead lines

Newark offers lessons for Chicago's efforts to replace lead lines

A Newark Water Department model of the process for replacing lead-contaminated service lines.

Calvin Krippner

Krippner is a Chicago-based solutions and investigative journalist.

The prevalence of lead-contaminated drinking water remains an ongoing infrastructure issue in cities throughout the United States. Many of the contaminated water lines exist primarily in the Midwest, within homes that were built before 1960.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the Environmental Protection Agency estimated in 2023 that roughly 9.2 million lead service lines were still in use across the nation. Of these, it is estimated that roughly 400,000 exist in Chicago, a higher number than in any other city and around twice as many as in the second-highest city, Cleveland.


Prolonged lead exposure increases the risk of high blood pressure, heart disease, kidney disease and reduced fertility. However, it is most damaging for children because exposure can cause significant defects in neurological development.

Gina Ramirez is the midwest director of environmental health for the Natural Resources Defense Council and a resident of Chicago’s 10th ward. As a third-generation resident of her ward, Ramirez’s concern for lead exposure is directly tied to her love for her local community, which is one of the Chicago areas most exposed to lead water lines.

“If you go in my neighborhood, you're going to see everyone's shopping carts filled with bottled water,” said Ramirez. “It's this unspoken truth, no one in my neighborhood trusts their tap, but we don't talk about it, it's just this habit [we all have].”

Due to the high number of lead lines in the city, Chicago has become a central focus of media attention on this issue. According to an ABC 7 article, the city estimated last December that replacing all lead lines will take about 40 years to complete and cost $12 billion. Chicago’s Lead Service Line Replacement department estimates that each line costs between $16,000 and $30,000 to replace.

When taken at face value, the 40-year benchmark for completing this process may seem more understandable, considering the enormous cost to the city. However, when looking into the process of lead line replacement in other cities like Newark, N.J., this high cost begins to come into question.

In June 2018, the NRDC filed a lawsuit against the city of Newark after the city found evidence of high levels of lead, some reaching as high as 47 parts per billion, in the city’s drinking water. The EPA Lead and Copper Rule requires 15 parts per billion before action must be taken, but the agency admits that there are no safe levels of lead for children.

In 2018, the city of Newark was found to have 23,000 lead service lines; three years later, nearly every single line had been replaced. Since then, Newark has become the template for achieving full lead line replacement in American cities.

Mark Di Ionno was a columnist for the Star-Ledger, the largest paper in New Jersey, in 2018 when the NRDC lawsuit was first filed against the city. He recalls the city receiving particularly negative press about the process, which he deemed unfair.

“I actually wrote a column that was about what the city had done to notify the residents [of the issue],” said Di Ionno. “And that column was spiked by an editor, who said that it didn't conform with the rest of our reporting, which was just ridiculous.”

As a Pulitzer Prize finalist in news commentary, Di Ionno said he did not take kindly to how news organizations were covering the city’s handling of the problem, and he deemed the comparison of Newark’s problem to the Flint, Mich., water crisis to be blown out of proportion. So, he quit the paper and eventually found a job working for the city of Newark, changing the narrative around Newark’s lead line replacement program.

“There were huge differences between us and Flint,” said Di Ionno. “We never changed our water source, we never changed our chemical corrosion system to save money. What happened with our chemical corrosion system was the pH balance weakened it over time, and… nobody got sick.”

Nonetheless, Newark had 23,000 lead service lines still in use.

Di Ionno now works on the communications team for Newark and got to witness its handling of complete lead line replacement throughout the city. He credits the city’s success to Mayor Ras Baraka’s ability to work alongside lawmakers to ensure the process was done as cost- and time-effectively as possible.

In order to fast-track the process, Newark’s city council passed several measures that cut costs and time. First, they made the procedure mandatory and free for all residents with lead lines. Secondly, they required access to homes without the owner’s permission by designating it a public health emergency since roughly 74 percent of Newark’s residents are renters, allowing the city to go block by block replacing lines instead of having to do so sporadically throughout the city (as it is often done in Chicago). Thirdly, they streamlined the permitting and paperwork process to reduce costs and bureaucratic involvement and incentivized contractors to work quickly and efficiently to minimize street closures. Furthermore, the city generated apprenticeship programs so that residents could be employed in the process and simultaneously acquire skills for future employment, which Di Ionno credits for instilling a sense of community in the process.

“About 70 percent of the money that we spent on the project stayed in the city,” said Di Ionno. “We hired Newark contractors, we had an apprentice program [that hired Newark residents].”

In total, Newark spent $190 million to replace all 23,000 lead lines, which comes out to about $8,200 per line, a number far lower than what the same process is projected to cost in Chicago. Furthermore, Di Ionno says much of that money went to taking steps to inform the public about the process and that it actually came out to about $6,000 per line.

Ramirez expressed frustration with both the lead line replacement process in Chicago and the city’s lack of transparency regarding other available safety measures.

Ramirez, whose mother went through the process of getting the lead pipes in her home replaced. says she witnessed why it is such a frustrating process for so many Chicago residents. A plan was drafted for her mom’s house; she was told it would take six weeks, but it ended up taking six months.

“There's just so many protocols and processes that the city has, but once everybody was there, it only took a day to replace the lines,” said Ramirez. “But it took about six months for them to actually get to that point. It took two years in total because they kept going back and forth saying, ‘you are missing papers,’ ‘you are missing water samples.’”

Ramirez’s advocacy work on this and other environmental issues enabled her to navigate the lead line replacement process for her mother. However, she admits that other residents are not offered the same access to knowledge about lead line replacement and other temporary solutions.

“Even aldermen aren’t talking about it a lot,” said Ramirez. “I go to events, and they [don’t advertise that] you could get your water tested. [They don’t say] there's this website where you can get a free water filter … it's not something as accessible as other programs in Chicago.”

Newark is a much smaller city than Chicago, boasting a population of about 300,000 in comparison to Chicago’s roughly 2.6 million people. However, if Chicago’s lead line replacement process replicated Newark’s, the total cost when using the $8,200 per line assessment would come out to roughly $3.2 billion, as opposed to the currently projected cost of $12 billion.

Furthermore, the city of Newark has a complicated terrain that makes construction especially difficult. Di Ionno credits the knowledge of Newark’s Water and Sewer Department director, Kareem Adeem, and his 30 years of experience in the department for his ability to navigate the construction project in the city's complicated geography.

“The city of Newark is on a downhill slope of a hilly terrain,” said Di Ionno. “And there’s part of the city that is on a river delta, and there’s parts up the cliff made up of clay and shale.”

Following Congress’ approval of the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in 2021, the Biden administration designated $15 billion to the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund for Lead Service Line Replacement. This money is designated to address all 9.2 million lead lines nationwide, so Chicago will only receive a portion of this money. However, if a significant decrease in the cost of replacement could be enacted in Chicago as it was in Newark, then that money could go much further in addressing this public health issue that leaves thousands of Chicago families who live primarily in underserved Black and Brown communities on the south and west sides searching for clean water.

“You know, because we have so many lines, they want to give us like 40 years [to replace them all],” said Ramirez. “So in my children's lifetime, they're still going to be drinking from a lead tap, which is completely unacceptable, and I feel [it] creates more inequities.”

Read More

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Health Care

U.S. President Donald Trump takes the stage during a reception for Republican members of the House of Representatives in the East Room of the White House on July 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump thanked GOP lawmakers for passing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

Just the Facts: Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Health Care

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What are the new Medicaid work requirements, and are they more lenient or more restrictive than what previously existed?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Constitution
Imagining constitutions
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

A Bold Civic Renaissance for America’s 250th

Every September 17, Americans mark Constitution Day—the anniversary of the signing of our nation’s foundational charter in 1787. The day is often commemorated with classroom lessons and speaking events, but it is more than a ceremonial anniversary. It is an invitation to ask: What does it mean to live under a constitution that was designed as a charge for each generation to study, debate, and uphold its principles? This year, as we look toward the semiquincentennial of our nation in 2026, the question feels especially urgent.

The decade between 1776 and 1787 was defined by a period of bold and intentional nation and national identity building. In that time, the United States declared independence, crafted its first national government, won a war to make their independence a reality, threw out the first government when it failed, and forged a new federal government to lead the nation. We stand at a similar inflection point. The coming decade, from the nation’s semiquincentennial in 2026 to the Constitution’s in 2037, offers a parallel opportunity to reimagine and reinvigorate our American civic culture. Amid the challenges we face today, there’s an opportunity to study, reflect, and prepare to write the next chapters in our American story—it is as much about the past 250 years, as it is about the next 250 years. It will require the same kind of audacious commitment to building for the future that was present at the nation’s outset.

Keep ReadingShow less