Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why Law Day 2025 Matters More Than Ever

Opinion

Hands raised in the air, holding each other.​

Hands raised in the air, holding each other.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

At a time when faith in our democratic institutions is under assault and polarization runs deep, Law Day 2025 arrives with a powerful message: Out of many, one.

Observed annually on May 1st, Law Day is a reminder that the rule of law—not political whims, not brute force—is what protects liberty, ensures justice, and binds us together as one people. Established by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1958, Law Day invites Americans to reflect on the vital role of law in safeguarding freedom and fostering unity. Across the country, bar associations, courts, schools, and civic groups host events designed to renew public understanding of legal principles and their enduring importance.


Each year, the American Bar Association (ABA) selects a Law Day theme that reflects the evolving legal landscape and the pressing issues of the time. Themes are chosen through careful review of current events, legal trends, historical milestones, and civic education needs, ensuring each year's message sparks meaningful dialogue across the country.

Many themes have proven timeless, especially those centered on democracy, justice, and the Constitution. "Liberty Under Law," highlighting the balance of governmental power, was used in both 2006 and 2007. "America’s Promise: Justice for All" appeared in 1995 and 1999. More recently, voting rights — a cornerstone of democracy — took center stage in 2014 and 2020.

This year's theme, "The Constitution’s Promise: Out of Many, One," could not be more timely. It reminds us that diversity is not a threat to democracy — it is its foundation. The Constitution's Preamble declares the intention to "form a more perfect Union," recognizing that unity amid diversity is essential to our national identity. From the ABA:

“The Preamble to the Constitution boldly asserts that the Framers established the Constitution as representatives of ‘We the People, in Order to Form a More Perfect Union.’ On this Law Day, we explore and renew our duties to one another under the Constitution and our democratic norms. The Constitution establishes a framework for government that unites us as one citizenry, through means such as our representative government, jury service, and a regular Census. And through this commitment to our Union, we each provide for the common good through government responses to national crises and natural disasters, and through community and advocacy programs for students and adults.”

Events nationwide will mark this Law Day with a spirit of action and reflection. The ABA kicked off the celebration on April 24 by hosting a joint program with the Law Library of Congress on Constitutions, Unity, and the Rule of Law as well as collaborating on a Civics 101 podcast on the rule of law. On May 1, they will host a virtual panel, featuring Justice Stephen Breyer, civic leaders, and legal scholars who will discuss the essential roles of judicial independence and democratic norms. Also on May 1, a National Law Day of Action demonstration at the Supreme Court will visually reaffirm the legal community’s commitment to defending due process, fundamental rights, and the independence of the judiciary.

The message of Law Day 2025 holds particular urgency. We are living through a period when efforts to limit diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are gaining momentum at the highest levels of government. Executive orders aimed at curbing DEI initiatives send a troubling signal: that difference is something to be feared rather than embraced. In this climate, the Law Day theme of unity through constitutional principles serves not only as a celebration but also as a defiant affirmation of our national ideals.

"E pluribus unum" — out of many, one — has been our country's motto since its founding. It symbolizes the audacious idea that a nation can draw strength from its differences, not despite them. Law Day 2025 challenges us to live up to that promise. It urges us to set aside political tribalism, to remember that the rule of law protects us all equally, and to recognize that our shared national identity transcends race, religion, ideology, and origin.

This Law Day, let us not simply honor the law with words but renew our commitment to its highest purpose. Let us reaffirm that "We the People" are stronger together — and that in defending the rule of law, we defend the soul of our democracy.


David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Kristina Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

​Christa Pike

Christa Pike in an undated photo.

(Tennessee Department of Correction/ZUMA Press/TNS)

How death penalty opponents share the blame for botched executions

“Botched” is a perfectly fine word for golf, cooking, or home repair. It seems inadequate for the taking of a life, even the life of Christa Pike, a heinous murderer.

In 1996, a jury found Pike guilty of the torture and murder of her Jobs Corps classmate, Colleen Slemmer. Pike was sentenced to death. In the 30 years since, her case has gone through at least seven major rounds of appeal and judicial review, including four petitions to the Supreme Court. All were rejected. This doesn’t even include the many more attempts to reopen or reverse her sentence that went nowhere. She is guilty, lawfully and rightly convicted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

President Donald Trump speaks before signing the Secure America Act in the Oval Office of the White House on June 10, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Federal Court Blocks Trump’s ‘Loyalty Question’ on Civil Service Job Applications

A court’s decision to block the Trump administration from including a “loyalty question” on federal job applications was a win not only for the nonpartisan civil service, but also for the communities public employees serve, said one labor leader whose union was among the plaintiffs in the case against the Office of Personnel Management.

Patrick Moran, president of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) union, said Friday that the loyalty questions the OPM placed on job applications for public servants were a “blatantly illegal attempt to hire partisan cronies who would endanger our communities by putting politics before people, rather than dedicated, qualified public service workers.”

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

Getty Images

Birthright Citizenship Explained: History, SCOTUS Rulings & Executive Orders

Birthright citizenship has been part of American law for more than 150 years. As the American public continues to see challenges against its constitutionality, brought on by the Trump administration, it is important to remember why.

After the Civil War, Congress adopted the 14th Amendment in 1868 to overturn Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had denied citizenship to Black Americans, dampening their federal protections. While the 13th amendment had abolished slavery a few years earlier, Free Black Americans were considered noncitizens by many, and thus had to work around a separate set of laws, meaning they could never be fully integrated as members of American society. In response to this issue, the 14th Amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scales of justice
a golden scale with an eagle on top of it

A Real Test for “Lawfare” Must Protect Allies and Enemies Alike

“Lawfare” is becoming a word that ends arguments instead of clarifying them. When Donald Trump or his allies are prosecuted, many on the right call the case political. When the Trump administration investigates critics, many on the left call it retaliation or “score-settling.” Sometimes those accusations are justified. Sometimes they are partisan reflexes. A label that changes with the identity of the defendant is not a rule of law.

The hard cases are not the ones with a public order to punish an enemy. They are cases with mixed facts: a real investigative predicate, a politically active target, disputed timing, later changes in treatment, and no contemporaneous record the public can inspect. Those cases require something better than “trust the prosecutors” or “trust the accused.” They require an auditable standard.

Keep ReadingShow less