Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why Law Day 2025 Matters More Than Ever

Opinion

Hands raised in the air, holding each other.​

Hands raised in the air, holding each other.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

At a time when faith in our democratic institutions is under assault and polarization runs deep, Law Day 2025 arrives with a powerful message: Out of many, one.

Observed annually on May 1st, Law Day is a reminder that the rule of law—not political whims, not brute force—is what protects liberty, ensures justice, and binds us together as one people. Established by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1958, Law Day invites Americans to reflect on the vital role of law in safeguarding freedom and fostering unity. Across the country, bar associations, courts, schools, and civic groups host events designed to renew public understanding of legal principles and their enduring importance.


Each year, the American Bar Association (ABA) selects a Law Day theme that reflects the evolving legal landscape and the pressing issues of the time. Themes are chosen through careful review of current events, legal trends, historical milestones, and civic education needs, ensuring each year's message sparks meaningful dialogue across the country.

Many themes have proven timeless, especially those centered on democracy, justice, and the Constitution. "Liberty Under Law," highlighting the balance of governmental power, was used in both 2006 and 2007. "America’s Promise: Justice for All" appeared in 1995 and 1999. More recently, voting rights — a cornerstone of democracy — took center stage in 2014 and 2020.

This year's theme, "The Constitution’s Promise: Out of Many, One," could not be more timely. It reminds us that diversity is not a threat to democracy — it is its foundation. The Constitution's Preamble declares the intention to "form a more perfect Union," recognizing that unity amid diversity is essential to our national identity. From the ABA:

“The Preamble to the Constitution boldly asserts that the Framers established the Constitution as representatives of ‘We the People, in Order to Form a More Perfect Union.’ On this Law Day, we explore and renew our duties to one another under the Constitution and our democratic norms. The Constitution establishes a framework for government that unites us as one citizenry, through means such as our representative government, jury service, and a regular Census. And through this commitment to our Union, we each provide for the common good through government responses to national crises and natural disasters, and through community and advocacy programs for students and adults.”

Events nationwide will mark this Law Day with a spirit of action and reflection. The ABA kicked off the celebration on April 24 by hosting a joint program with the Law Library of Congress on Constitutions, Unity, and the Rule of Law as well as collaborating on a Civics 101 podcast on the rule of law. On May 1, they will host a virtual panel, featuring Justice Stephen Breyer, civic leaders, and legal scholars who will discuss the essential roles of judicial independence and democratic norms. Also on May 1, a National Law Day of Action demonstration at the Supreme Court will visually reaffirm the legal community’s commitment to defending due process, fundamental rights, and the independence of the judiciary.

The message of Law Day 2025 holds particular urgency. We are living through a period when efforts to limit diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are gaining momentum at the highest levels of government. Executive orders aimed at curbing DEI initiatives send a troubling signal: that difference is something to be feared rather than embraced. In this climate, the Law Day theme of unity through constitutional principles serves not only as a celebration but also as a defiant affirmation of our national ideals.

"E pluribus unum" — out of many, one — has been our country's motto since its founding. It symbolizes the audacious idea that a nation can draw strength from its differences, not despite them. Law Day 2025 challenges us to live up to that promise. It urges us to set aside political tribalism, to remember that the rule of law protects us all equally, and to recognize that our shared national identity transcends race, religion, ideology, and origin.

This Law Day, let us not simply honor the law with words but renew our commitment to its highest purpose. Let us reaffirm that "We the People" are stronger together — and that in defending the rule of law, we defend the soul of our democracy.


David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Kristina Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Donald Trump
Donald Trump
YouTube

When Belief Becomes Law: The Rise of Executive Rule and the Vanishing of Facts

During his successful defense of the British soldiers accused of killing Americans in the Boston Massacre of 1770, John Adams, the nation's second president, famously observed that "facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations or the dictates of passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."

Times have changed. When President Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, saying that the jobs numbers compiled by the agency's nonpartisan analysts and experts "were RIGGED” some pundits observed that you can fire the umpire, but you can’t change the score.

Keep ReadingShow less
Inside Courthouse Immigration Arrests: Controversy, Legal History, and Implications

People protest in Chicago as part of the No Kings Rallies at Daley Plaza on June 14, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.

Photo by Kamil Krzaczynski/Getty Images for No Kings

Inside Courthouse Immigration Arrests: Controversy, Legal History, and Implications

Background

On the campaign trail, Donald Trump promised voters, “One day, I will launch the largest deportation program of criminals in the history of America.” On his inauguration day, he published a directive for Immigration and Customs and Enforcement (ICE) officers to use their own discretion when conducting immigration arrests. Since then, ICE officers have arrested immigrants in or around courthouses in at least seven different states.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Policy Challenged in Court for Blocking Congressional Oversight of Detention Centers

Federal agents guard outside of a federal building and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center in downtown Los Angeles as demonstrations continue after a series of immigration raids began last Friday on June 13, 2025, in Los Angeles, California.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

ICE Policy Challenged in Court for Blocking Congressional Oversight of Detention Centers

In a constitutional democracy, congressional oversight is not a courtesy—it is a cornerstone of the separation of powers enshrined in our founding documents.

Lawyers Defending American Democracy (LDAD) has filed an amicus brief in Neguse v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, arguing that ICE’s policy restricting unannounced visits by members of Congress “directly violates federal law.” Twelve lawmakers brought this suit to challenge ICE’s new requirement that elected officials provide seven days’ notice before visiting detention facilities—an edict that undermines transparency and shields executive agencies from scrutiny.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person in a military uniform holding a gavel.

As the Trump administration redefines “Warrior Ethos,” U.S. military leaders face a crucial test: defend democracy or follow unlawful orders.

Getty Images, Liudmila Chernetska

Warrior Ethos or Rule of Law? The Military’s Defining Moment

Does Secretary Hegseth’s extraordinary summoning of hundreds of U.S. command generals and admirals to a Sept. 30 meeting and the repugnant reinstatement of Medals of Honor to 20 participants in the infamous 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre—in which 300 Lakota Sioux men, women, and children were killed—foreshadow the imposition of a twisted approach to U.S. “Warrior Ethos”? Should military leaders accept an ethos that ignores the rule of law?

Active duty and retired officers must trumpet a resounding: NO, that is not acceptable. And, we civilians must realize the stakes and join them.

Keep ReadingShow less