Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

From Normandy to Now: What D-Day Teaches About Strength in Unity

News

From Normandy to Now: What D-Day Teaches About Strength in Unity

Written in the sand the date of the landing of Normandy on the same beach where the troops landed on D-day.

Getty Images, Carmen Martínez Torrón

June 6 marks D-Day Proclamation Day, a time to solemnly commemorate the historic landings in Normandy, France, on June 6, 1944. On this day, we honor the extraordinary bravery and sacrifices of the Allied forces, whose decisive actions helped liberate Europe and turn the tide of World War II.

D-Day was a pivotal moment in history—the beginning of the Allied effort to reclaim Western Europe from Nazi control. Over 156,000 troops from the United States, Britain, Canada, and other nations stormed the beaches of Normandy in Operation Overlord, an unprecedented amphibious assault that ultimately shaped the course of the war. Though the battle came at a great cost, it remains a lasting symbol of courage, resilience, and the fight for freedom.


In 2019, the 75th anniversary of D-Day was officially recognized with a National Day of Remembrance, reinforcing the enduring significance of this historic operation. More than 80 years later, we continue to reflect on its lessons—particularly the power of strong alliances in confronting threats to democracy.

Echoes of History: Global Challenges Then and Now

As we remember D-Day, we must also recognize its relevance to the present. In 1941, America was still recovering from the Great Depression, and many questioned whether the war in Europe was our fight. Yet as Nazi Germany expanded its reach and Japan launched its infamous attack on Pearl Harbor, public sentiment shifted, and the U.S. entered World War II—a decision that changed the trajectory of history.

Today, historians and analysts draw comparisons between the geopolitical tensions of WWII and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Some view Putin’s annexation of Ukrainian territories as an unsettling echo of Hitler’s expansionist moves in Czechoslovakia and Poland, while others warn of the dangers of appeasement. The lesson remains clear: failing to confront aggression early on can lead to larger conflicts with devastating consequences.

The role of the United States is again being scrutinized, just as it was in the years leading up to WWII. While early hesitation characterized U.S. involvement, history proves that American leadership was decisive in securing victory. Many argue that America’s support for Ukraine is similarly vital—both to safeguard European stability and to deter future aggression.

A Reflection on Leadership and Isolationism

Throughout history, political leaders have grappled with the balance between global engagement and national interests. In today’s America, this debate continues as discussions about U.S. involvement in Ukraine remain divisive. While some advocate for increased military and economic support, others echo the isolationist stance that was prevalent before WWII, prioritizing domestic concerns over foreign intervention.

President Donald Trump has frequently expressed frustration with the ongoing conflict, downplaying Ukraine’s sovereignty in favor of reducing U.S. involvement. His insistence that the war must end quickly—regardless of battlefield conditions—has raised concerns among American allies, who fear that such an approach could undermine Ukraine’s long-term security and embolden Russian aggression. Critics liken this stance to pre-WWII isolationism, when some in the U.S. resisted engagement in global conflicts, failing to recognize the growing threats to democracy and freedom.

Honoring D-Day: A Call for Unity and Reflection

The legacy of D-Day extends beyond the battlefield. It is a powerful reminder that democracy prevails when nations stand together. As we commemorate D-Day Proclamation Day, we honor the thousands who gave their lives to defend freedom, recognizing that their sacrifices shaped the world we live in today.

In a time of deep political and social divisions, reflecting on the bravery and unity of those who fought on June 6, 1944, serves as common ground that transcends differences. Observing D-Day is not just about remembering history—it’s about applying its lessons to the challenges we face now.

Let this solemn day remind us that democracy triumphs over tyranny, that alliances matter, and that securing a just future requires vigilance, sacrifice, and unwavering commitment. As we honor those who gave everything for a better world, may we also reaffirm the values they fought to uphold.

David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

People waving US flags

A deep look at what “American values” truly mean, contrasting liberal, conservative, and MAGA interpretations through the lens of the Declaration and Constitution.

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

What Are American Values?

There are fundamental differences between liberals and conservatives—and certainly MAGA adherents—on what are “American values.”

But for both liberal and conservative pundits, the term connotes something larger than us, grounding, permanent—of lasting meaning. Because the values of people change as the times change, as the culture changes, and as the political temperament changes. The results of current polls are the values of the moment, not "American values."

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unfolding Democratic Insurgency

Zohran Mamdani’s stunning NYC win marks a turning point for the Democratic Party, revealing generational revolt, establishment decline, and a new progressive wave.

Getty Images, Michael M. Santiago

The Unfolding Democratic Insurgency

The Democratic Party stands at the precipice of a profound internal reckoning. For decades, it has balanced precariously between populist aspiration and corporate capture, a tension that has now reached its breaking point.

The election of Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York City has shattered the illusion of establishment inevitability. What once seemed impossible — a socialist, anti-corporate, anti-war, anti-Zionist candidate winning the largest city in America — has become real. The moral center of the party is shifting; it is now clear beyond debate, and those in power, from Jeffries to Schumer, appear increasingly tone-deaf to the political and generational currents transforming their base.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of a person reading a book in a bookstore.

Looking for meaningful holiday reads? New books by Jeffrey Rosen and Jill Lepore illuminate America’s founding ideals and the enduring power of the Constitution.

Getty Images, LAW Ho Ming

Best Holiday Books on Democracy and the Constitution

As we search for gift books to give this holiday season, our escapist summer reading lists may still appeal. But two new “serious” books offer positive, reflective relief.

Good history informs the present as well as describes the past, but great history also frames the future. That’s what Jeffrey Rosen and Jill Lepore accomplish in their respective gems, The Pursuit of Liberty and We The People. They animate our nation’s founding principles and the U.S. Constitution in ways that are encouraging and fascinating.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol.

As government shutdowns drag on, a novel idea emerges: use arbitration to break congressional gridlock and fix America’s broken budget process.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Arbitration Could Prevent Government Shutdowns

The way that Congress makes decisions seems almost designed to produce government shutdowns. Senate rules require a three-fifths supermajority to close debate on most bills. In practice, this means that senators from both parties must agree to advance legislation to a final vote. In such a polarized political environment, negotiating an agreement that both sides can accept is no easy task. When senators inevitably fail to agree on funding bills, the government shuts down, impacting services for millions of Americans.

Arbitration could offer us a way out of this mess. In arbitration, the parties to a dispute select a neutral third party to resolve their disagreement. While we probably would not want to give unelected arbitrators the power to make national policy decisions, arbitration could help resolve the much more modest question of whether an appropriations bill could advance to a final vote in the Senate. This process would allow the Senate to make appropriations decisions by a majority vote while still protecting the minority’s interests.

Keep ReadingShow less