Alabama's strict photo identification law is not racially discriminatory and can remain in force, a divided federal appeals court has ruled.
The decision is the latest courthouse development in a state with one of the highest volumes of voting rights disputes. The pace has accelerated because of the view that already restrictive election rules will amplify voter suppression during the coronavirus pandemic — concern that just this week prompted the Republican elections chief to allow anyone to vote by mail this fall.
The case, decided 2-1 on Tuesday by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, predates the arrival of Covid-19 but nonetheless reflects the currently familiar narrative: Civil rights groups challenge a law on the grounds it violates the electorate's political rights under the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution, and the state defends the statute as necessary to prevent election fraud.
- The 6 toughest states for voting during the pandemic - The Fulcrum ›
- Another voting options expansion push by Alabama Democrats ... ›
- League of Women voters sues Alabama over election rules - The ... ›
- Judge makes it easier for absentee voting in Alabama - The Fulcrum ›
- Alabama photo voter ID law one of more than a dozen in United States ›
- Seven Ways Alabama Has Made It Harder to Vote - The New York ... ›
- How to Get a Free Photo Voter ID Card | Alabama Secretary of State ›
- Voter suppression in Alabama: what's true and what's not - Vox ›
- Photo Voter ID | Alabama Secretary of State ›
A Montana judge has blocked new state restrictions on the collecting of others' ballots, a victory for Native American tribes that say their members rely on the help.
The law probably violates the tribal members' right to vote because it would make it especially difficult for them to make sure their own ballots got from reservations and other remote areas to election offices, District Judge Jessica Fehr of Yellowstone County said Tuesday in putting a hold on the requirements.
Her injunction, while not final, is nonetheless the latest voting rights victory for people in Indian Country, who say too many election rules disregard their special circumstances and amount to suppression. It's also the latest turn in the generally partisan battle over so-called ballot harvesting.
- South Dakota rejects tribal IDs for voter registration - The Fulcrum ›
- Tribes secure big voting rights win in North Dakota - The Fulcrum ›
- Poverty, isolation prevent Native Americans from voting - The Fulcrum ›
- Native Americans face many obstacles to voting, report finds - The ... ›
- One step closer to ending Native American voter suppression - The ... ›
- Montana will move toward a vote-by-mail November election - The Fulcrum ›
- Why no one is talking about the Native American vote in 2020 - Vox ›
- What keeps Native Americans from voting – and what could change ... ›
- The State of Native American Voting Rights | Brennan Center for ... ›
- For Some Native Americans, No Home Address Might Mean No Voting ›
- How the Native American Vote Continues to be Suppressed ›
When it comes to elections during the pandemic, Kentucky has stood apart in two ways. It instituted one of the nation's most restrictive voter identification laws just as the coronavirus was shutting government offices that issue ID cards, but its leaders also cut an unusual bipartisan deal resulting in one of the smoothest vote-by-mail primaries so far.
A civil rights group has now sued to make the state abandon that first move, but stick with the second, at least through the November election.
Filed Tuesday in state court, the lawsuit comes early in what's likely to become a flood of litigation to make voting for president easy and safe this fall. While most states have made accommodations for their primaries, they have not done so for the general election.
- Kentucky's primary going smoothly - The Fulcrum ›
- Beshear to restore felons' voting rights in Kentucky - The Fulcrum ›
- Kentucky latest to expand mail-in voting - The Fulcrum ›
- Rights groups sue Kentucky to expand voting rights - The Fulcrum ›
The partisan fight over how to maintain voter registration lists has delivered one victory for each side this week — both in Midwestern states central to the November election.
The top court in Wisconsin decided against fast-tracking a decision about removing from the rolls more than 100,000 people with potentially out of date registrations — a delay that benefits the cause of voting rights advocates. But in neighboring Michigan, a conservative group claimed victory and dropped its lawsuit against Detroit after the city took a group of dead people and duplicate names off the rolls.
The cases capture a debate that pitches those (mostly Democrats) who believe aggressive attempts to remove, or "purge," names from voter rolls are an attempt at voter suppression against those (mostly Republicans) who believe poorly maintained voter lists clogged with the names of the mortally or physically departed provide an opportunity for fraud.
- Conservatives say Wisconsin isn't purging voters fast enough - The ... ›
- Judicial Watch threatens lawsuits over voter rolls - The Fulcrum ›
- Wisconsin's top court to decide voter purge case - The Fulcrum ›
- Pa. home to latest fight over purging or cleaning voter rolls - The ... ›