This month we kicked off our Democracy Madness competition with the Voting "region," which ranked-choice voting won by rolling over competing proposals for bettering democracy by altering voting rules. Now we're one to the second region: Elections.
The aim here is to have some good-natured competitive fun — and also learning what readers think are the best ideas for reforming our governing systems and putting voters back at the center of things.
By the end of our 64-idea tournament in a few weeks, you will have told us what you think would be the single most transformational change.
Similar to the NCAA's March Madness, not every "team" fits the regional description perfectly.
But most of these 16 contenders are related to structural aspects of local, state and federal elections. The top seed is both a popular cause and a long-shot to actually happen — eliminating the Electoral College in favor of electing presidents by simple popular vote. You'll also find a couple of alternative ways to weaken the Electoral College without having to amend the Constitution.
The No. 2 seed is using independent commissions to draw electoral districts. This way of combating partisan gerrymandering comes into the tournament on a roll, having just won a big court victory in Michigan and going before Virginia's voters this fall after approval by the General Assembly.
The third seed is making primaries open to all voters ( a big issue in Florida right now). In the No. 4 slot is giving third-party and independent candidates a real shot at being in the fall presidential debates.
First-round voting closes Wednesday night, with an Elite Eight round kicking off Thursday morning.
You can click the matchups, then each label, for more about the proposals. Click the Vote Now button to get started.
- Winner-take-all electoral vote system is constitutional, appeals court ... ›
- Video: The Future of the Electoral College - The Fulcrum ›
- Four arguments defending the Electoral College are all wrong - The ... ›
- The Electoral College will never make everyone happy ›
Legislators in Massachusetts are considering two measures Wednesday that would permit municipalities to lower the voting age in local elections.
Enacting the legislation would push the state to the forefront of the growing national movement to extend the franchise to teenagers in the name of boosting civic engagement. Opponents say young people do not merit so much responsibility.
The fact that the legislation has even been put on the state House docket is evidence of solid support among its overwhelmingly Democratic membership. The party also controls the state Senate, but Gov. Charlie Baker is a Republican and he's expressed skepticism about the idea.
The main bill facing a committee vote would not apply to state or federal elections but would give cities and towns the ability to lower the voting age for local contests to 16 -- without state government approval. Another bill would grant that permission to the Boston suburb of Somerville, which a year ago asked the legislature for permission to become the first city in Massachusetts to make such a move.
"I did raise three teenagers, and based on that I'd be pretty dubious about lowering it to 16," the governor said at the time.
Teens may already pre-register across the state when they are that old, which is also when they can get learner's permits – and more than 61,000 are already on the rolls waiting for their 18th birthdays. Advocates say giving them some voting rights sooner would get them hooked on engaging with the political process and that it's appropriate to extend the franchise to all people old enough to drive and pay taxes.
The Somerville City Council unanimously voted to lower the voting age in May on the recommendation of a task force of citizens, who were asked to propose ways to "ensure fair, equitable, and open elections that inspire greater participation both by voters and candidates." The task force also recommended extending local voting rights to non-citizens, but that has not advanced.
Concord, another Boston suburb, is considering letting 17-year-olds vote in local contests.
The longshot effort to lower the voting age to 16 nationwide, including for federal elections, is being championed by Somerville's first-term House member, Democrat Ayanna Pressley. And when she proposed a constitutional amendment at the start of her time in Congress a year ago, the idea was excoriated by Republicans
The chairman of the state GOP, Jim Lyons, told the Boston Herald that "almost all 16-year-olds I know I don't believe should have the privilege or the authority to vote. They simply haven't matured to the level that they can make those types of decisions."
- Many Parkland survivors' ballots went uncounted in 2018 - The ... ›
- Oregon, Boston suburb move toward teen voting - The Fulcrum ›
- Push starts in Mass. to extend 2020's easier voting rules - The Fulcrum ›
- Movement to allow teens to vote appears to stall - The Fulcrum ›