Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s Deepfake Isn’t Just Offensive—It’s a Racist Distraction from Real Governance

Opinion

Trump’s Deepfake Isn’t Just Offensive—It’s a Racist Distraction from Real Governance

U.S. President Donald Trump during a news conference in the State Dining Room at the White House on September 29, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

As Congress scrambled to avoid a government shutdown, President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated deepfake video across his social media platforms—including X and Truth Social—that was widely condemned as racist, vulgar, and politically reckless.

The video featured mariachi music and depicted Democratic leaders with offensive cultural tropes. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries appeared with a superimposed sombrero and exaggerated handlebar mustache, while Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was portrayed with a fake audio track ranting about “free healthcare to illegal aliens” in a vulgar tirade. The video dropped just hours after Jeffries and Schumer had met with Trump to discuss the looming shutdown.


It was racial provocation disguised as digital “humor.”

Jeffries responded swiftly, calling the video “racist and fake” and posting on X, “Bigotry will get you nowhere.” In a press conference, he added, “Mr. President, the next time you have something to say about me, don’t cop out through a racist and fake AI video. Say it to my face.” He later told MSNBC, “We need from the president of the United States an individual who actually is focused on doing his job, as opposed to engaging in racist or bigoted stereotypes designed to try to distract or throw us off as Democrats from what we need to do on behalf of the American people.”

Schumer dismissed the video as a tantrum from a president unwilling to negotiate seriously.

But Trump doubled down. In a follow-up post, he shared another AI video—this time of himself with a mariachi band playing in the background—mocking Jeffries’ condemnation.

The backlash was swift and bipartisan in tone, if not in substance. Democratic Representative Madeleine Dean confronted House Speaker Mike Johnson, calling the post “disgraceful,” “bigoted,” and “racist.” Johnson replied that the video was “not my style,” but defended it as a “joke,” downplaying its impact. “Not your style? It’s disgraceful, it’s bigoted, it’s racist. You should call it out,” Dean said.

Beyond its racist caricatures, the deepfake video also traffics in blatant disinformation. It falsely implies that undocumented immigrants are receiving federal benefits and voting illegally—claims that have been repeatedly debunked.

According to the Pew Research Center, nearly half of all U.S. immigrants speak English proficiently, countering the video’s insinuation that immigrants are linguistically and culturally disconnected from American society. Moreover, immigrants in the U.S. without legal status are not eligible to vote in federal elections, and they are barred from receiving federally funded healthcare programs like Medicaid. These facts matter—not just because the video misrepresents them, but because it weaponizes those falsehoods to stoke fear and resentment.

Political communication experts were equally alarmed. Peter Loge, director of the Project on Ethics in Political Communication at George Washington University, stated: “Whether or not it’s satirical, it’s still racist. It used Mexican stereotypes with the hat and music, falsely equated every Mexican person with undocumented immigrants, and put down the intelligence of Black and Latino voters.” He added, “Nobody should be sharing that video. Certainly not the president of the United States, who represents all of the Americans, not just a small political base that supports him.”

Representative Grace Meng echoed the sentiment: “It’s childish behavior. I wouldn’t tolerate my kids doing something like that, much less the president of the United States.”

This isn’t just about one video. It’s about a pattern.

Trump has long trafficked in racially inflammatory rhetoric—from calling white supremacists in Charlottesville “very fine people” to telling four congresswomen of color to “go back” to their countries.

This latest stunt fits the pattern. It’s not just about discrediting Jeffries—it’s about mocking the very idea of Black leadership and Latino dignity. By digitally coercing Jeffries into praising him and then layering on racial caricature, Trump attempts to rewrite reality in a way that erases resistance and reasserts dominance.

As AI tools become more accessible, the weaponization of race through digital manipulation could become a new frontier in political disinformation. And when the target is a Black leader, the message isn’t just false—it’s historically familiar.

Trump’s post wasn’t just a lie. It was a reminder that in his political playbook, racism isn’t a bug—it’s a feature.

The deepfake was a calculated insult—an attempt to digitally humiliate Black and Latino leaders, marginalized communities, distract the public, and dominate the narrative. In Trump’s political playbook, racism isn’t a misstep. It’s a strategy.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network. Balta is the only person to serve twice as president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ).

Read More

Battling Gentrification by Showcasing the Windy City’s Rich Puerto Rican Roots

Fluttering Puerto Rican flag marking the entrance to the Paseo (Stroll) Boricua at Humboldt Park.

Photo by Jesús J. Montero for palabra

Battling Gentrification by Showcasing the Windy City’s Rich Puerto Rican Roots

Known for its eclectic charm as an urban oasis and cultural vibrancy, Humboldt Park in Chicago is home to numerous ethnic restaurants, cultural centers, and art galleries. It's no wonder many flock here. As in other big cities across the country, the Windy City has for many years experienced the harmful impact of gentrification. While geographic location varies, the recipe remains identical: while developers purchase/remodel properties seeking skyrocketing rents, longtime residents are continuously displaced. Those negatively impacted are also usually the same: working-class Black and Brown communities.

But one creative entrepreneur is determined to keep the essence of his neighborhood alive and thriving. For over a decade, poet, gallerist, professional tour guide, and Chicago native Eduardo Arocho has been enthusiastically sharing with visitors and locals alike his unconditional love and commitment to his rich Puerto Rican roots. As owner and founder of Paseo Boricua Tour Company, his is more than a "stop-and-drop-names" excursion. Part of Paseo Boricua - the economic, political, and cultural capital of Chicago’s Puerto Rican community - the tour is a culturally immersive experience where participants get to feel the warmth and sabor (flavor) of Arocho and his friendly people - even having the option of adding lunch reservations to support one of the local restaurants featuring Puerto Rican cuisine.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people with two books, open in front of them.

At Expand Democracy, scholarship is a democratic tool. How research on elections, representation, and governance shapes reform.

Getty Images, Pichsakul Promrungsee

Why Academic Work Matters for a Movement

When I began publishing research on elections and representation, I always imagined the audience as primarily academic - political scientists, methodologists, perhaps a few practitioners who hunt for new data. But as my work with Expand Democracy deepens, I find myself reflecting on how scholarship shapes the public conversation and why academic writing is not necessarily a detour from democracy but can be a foundation for it.

This essay reflects on that specific interaction: how academic work contributes to our understanding of democratic institutions, why it remains essential for reform movements, and how my own research aligns with Expand Democracy’s evolving mission.

Keep ReadingShow less
child holding smartphone

As Australia bans social media for kids under 16, U.S. parents face a harder truth: online safety isn’t an individual choice; it’s a collective responsibility.

Getty Images/Keiko Iwabuchi

Parents Must Quit Infighting to Keep Kids Safe Online

Last week, Australia’s social media ban for children under age 16 officially took effect. It remains to be seen how this law will shape families' behavior; however, it’s at least a stand against the tech takeover of childhood. Here in the U.S., however, we're in a different boat — a consensus on what's best for kids feels much harder to come by among both lawmakers and parents.

In order to make true progress on this issue, we must resist the fallacy of parental individualism – that what you choose for your own child is up to you alone. That it’s a personal, or family, decision to allow smartphones, or certain apps, or social media. But it’s not a personal decision. The choice you make for your family and your kids affects them and their friends, their friends' siblings, their classmates, and so on. If there is no general consensus around parenting decisions when it comes to tech, all kids are affected.

Keep ReadingShow less
Planting Hope in a Hard Season
selective photo of petaled flower
Photo by raquel raq on Unsplash

Planting Hope in a Hard Season

In an Advent reflection penned several years ago, Anne Lamott wrote, “even as everything is dying and falling asleep…something brand new is coming. Hope is coming….swords will be beaten into plowshares, spears into pruning hooks.

“This is a little hard to buy,” she admitted, “with a world stage occupied by—well, I’m not going to name names. But setting aside one’s tiny tendency toward cynicism,…in Advent — we wait; and hope appears if we truly desire to see it….we find it where we can….”

Keep ReadingShow less