Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s Deepfake Isn’t Just Offensive—It’s a Racist Distraction from Real Governance

Opinion

Trump’s Deepfake Isn’t Just Offensive—It’s a Racist Distraction from Real Governance

U.S. President Donald Trump during a news conference in the State Dining Room at the White House on September 29, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

As Congress scrambled to avoid a government shutdown, President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated deepfake video across his social media platforms—including X and Truth Social—that was widely condemned as racist, vulgar, and politically reckless.

The video featured mariachi music and depicted Democratic leaders with offensive cultural tropes. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries appeared with a superimposed sombrero and exaggerated handlebar mustache, while Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was portrayed with a fake audio track ranting about “free healthcare to illegal aliens” in a vulgar tirade. The video dropped just hours after Jeffries and Schumer had met with Trump to discuss the looming shutdown.


It was racial provocation disguised as digital “humor.”

Jeffries responded swiftly, calling the video “racist and fake” and posting on X, “Bigotry will get you nowhere.” In a press conference, he added, “Mr. President, the next time you have something to say about me, don’t cop out through a racist and fake AI video. Say it to my face.” He later told MSNBC, “We need from the president of the United States an individual who actually is focused on doing his job, as opposed to engaging in racist or bigoted stereotypes designed to try to distract or throw us off as Democrats from what we need to do on behalf of the American people.”

Schumer dismissed the video as a tantrum from a president unwilling to negotiate seriously.

But Trump doubled down. In a follow-up post, he shared another AI video—this time of himself with a mariachi band playing in the background—mocking Jeffries’ condemnation.

The backlash was swift and bipartisan in tone, if not in substance. Democratic Representative Madeleine Dean confronted House Speaker Mike Johnson, calling the post “disgraceful,” “bigoted,” and “racist.” Johnson replied that the video was “not my style,” but defended it as a “joke,” downplaying its impact. “Not your style? It’s disgraceful, it’s bigoted, it’s racist. You should call it out,” Dean said.

Beyond its racist caricatures, the deepfake video also traffics in blatant disinformation. It falsely implies that undocumented immigrants are receiving federal benefits and voting illegally—claims that have been repeatedly debunked.

According to the Pew Research Center, nearly half of all U.S. immigrants speak English proficiently, countering the video’s insinuation that immigrants are linguistically and culturally disconnected from American society. Moreover, immigrants in the U.S. without legal status are not eligible to vote in federal elections, and they are barred from receiving federally funded healthcare programs like Medicaid. These facts matter—not just because the video misrepresents them, but because it weaponizes those falsehoods to stoke fear and resentment.

Political communication experts were equally alarmed. Peter Loge, director of the Project on Ethics in Political Communication at George Washington University, stated: “Whether or not it’s satirical, it’s still racist. It used Mexican stereotypes with the hat and music, falsely equated every Mexican person with undocumented immigrants, and put down the intelligence of Black and Latino voters.” He added, “Nobody should be sharing that video. Certainly not the president of the United States, who represents all of the Americans, not just a small political base that supports him.”

Representative Grace Meng echoed the sentiment: “It’s childish behavior. I wouldn’t tolerate my kids doing something like that, much less the president of the United States.”

This isn’t just about one video. It’s about a pattern.

Trump has long trafficked in racially inflammatory rhetoric—from calling white supremacists in Charlottesville “very fine people” to telling four congresswomen of color to “go back” to their countries.

This latest stunt fits the pattern. It’s not just about discrediting Jeffries—it’s about mocking the very idea of Black leadership and Latino dignity. By digitally coercing Jeffries into praising him and then layering on racial caricature, Trump attempts to rewrite reality in a way that erases resistance and reasserts dominance.

As AI tools become more accessible, the weaponization of race through digital manipulation could become a new frontier in political disinformation. And when the target is a Black leader, the message isn’t just false—it’s historically familiar.

Trump’s post wasn’t just a lie. It was a reminder that in his political playbook, racism isn’t a bug—it’s a feature.

The deepfake was a calculated insult—an attempt to digitally humiliate Black and Latino leaders, marginalized communities, distract the public, and dominate the narrative. In Trump’s political playbook, racism isn’t a misstep. It’s a strategy.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network. Balta is the only person to serve twice as president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ).


Read More

Donald Trump, US President

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks briefly to the press as he arrives during the 81st United Nations General Assembly at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, on Sept. 22, 2026.

(Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images/TCA)

Trump will lose his war against the press

“To offend a strong man, tell him a lie. To offend a weak man, tell him the truth.”

That quote, often attributed to Marcus Aurelius, one of the great Stoics, perfectly encapsulates the very troubling and sad moment we’re in, and the very troubling and sad president we’re dealing with.

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

When Immigrants’ Rights Are Threatened, Democracy Is Too

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists.

We asked Abbey Osborn, a Fall Fulcrum Fellow, to share what democracy means to her and her view of its current health.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hasan Piker

Influencer and left-wing political commentator Hasan Piker is introduced during a campaign rally for Wisconsin Gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong on Aug. 2, 2026, in Milwaukee.

(Joshua Lott/Getty Images/TNS)

While the world is on fire, the media are still obsessed with Israel

No one likes to think they’re being hysterical. And nothing makes hysterical people angrier than being described as such. So, let me offer my apologies in advance for what follows.

Jeremy Musighi, an independent researcher, recently released a study analyzing 14.7 million news articles published across 65 languages over the last decade. He found that, in 2024, news outlets published “more than twice as many stories about Israel as about all 48 countries of sub-Saharan Africa combined.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Person using mobile smartphone chatting with AI chatbot, conversation assistant, customer support

New research shows AI beats elite debaters in persuasion — not through better arguments, but by out-pacing human reading and reply speed.

MUNTHITA LAMLUE/Getty Images

Political Chatbots Should Not Be Allowed To Set the Pace

A political chatbot can answer before a citizen has finished reading its previous message. It can add statistics, historical examples, causal claims and links at a rate no human campaign volunteer could match. That does not necessarily make its case wiser. It changes the contest by allowing one speaker to control the tempo.

A June 2026 preprint offers unusually direct evidence of this problem. Across four preregistered experiments involving 18,978 conversations from 6,923 people, frontier AI systems were more persuasive than laypeople, tournament winners, professional canvassers and elite competitive debaters. The human experts were not casual opponents: the study included world and continental champions, paid preparation, live practice and substantial performance incentives.

Keep ReadingShow less