Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Time Will Come When We’ll Be People Again


Opinion

The Time Will Come When We’ll Be People Again
File:Anne Frank lacht naar de schoolfotograaf (cropped).jpg ...

A visit to the Anne Frank exhibition led me from history to family memory to the words we hear now.

The Annex and the Weight of Silence


At the Anne Frank exhibition in New York, I stood in the narrow rooms of the Secret Annex at the back of the building where her father had worked and her family was hidden. Thin beds. Curtains drawn tight. A childhood arranged around quiet and fear. Anne and her family hid there beginning in July 1942, after her sister Margot was ordered to report for deportation under the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands. By then, Jews had been stripped of rights, barred from schools and public places, forced to wear the yellow star, and were being rounded up for transport to labor and extermination camps.

For more than two years, they lived there in constant danger, forced to walk softly, speak in whispers, and flush the toilet only at certain hours, their survival dependent on the protection of a few sympathetic non-Jews. Even the slightest noise at the wrong time could mean discovery.

Childhood in the Annex was measured in silence. Games, laughter, even footsteps had to be suppressed, for every sound carried danger. Life narrowed to waiting, and each day stretched under the weight of fear that discovery could come at any moment, ending their fragile safety.

The rooms were ordinary in their furnishings, yet they spoke of a world where ordinary life had been steadily closed off. That narrowing did not begin with violence. It began with language—words that marked Jews as outsiders, parasites, and threats to the nation. Those words spread until they felt ordinary, and once ordinary, they hardened quickly into laws, arrests, and violence.

On the audio tour, a line from Anne’s diary stopped me: “One day this terrible war will be over. The time will come when we’ll be people again and not just Jews!”


AA Full-Scale Recreation of Anne Frank’s hiding placeCredit: Anne Frank: The Exhibition

Echoes in My Family’s America

Her words took me back to my own family. My parents were born in the early 1920s in the United States, the children of Polish immigrants. They told me stories of their growing up in America. As children, they learned which neighborhoods did not rent to Jews. As teenagers, they knew which school dances and clubs would not admit them. As young adults, even after the war, they tried taking a vacation in the Berkshires and were turned away at a resort that openly excluded Jews.

My mother would sum it up with quiet resignation: “We knew where we weren’t wanted.”

My life in America was different. I did not face overt antisemitism. At times, it was so subtle I could never be sure—like being turned down as a roommate in graduate school and left wondering if my being Jewish was the reason.

Language, Targets, and Fragile Hope

I listen now to how those in power describe people: immigrants painted as “poisoning the blood of our country”, opponents reduced to “vermin”. We have heard this before. In Germany, Jews were cast as outsiders, and words quickly turned into action.

Today, the primary target is immigrants, often portrayed as “illegal” and especially Latin American. Hostility has also been directed at Jews, Muslims, and other marginalized groups. For Black Americans, the experience has been both blatant and subtle for centuries.

Anne Frank hoped for a day when people would be seen not as labels but as people first. Her hope remains fragile, as fragile as the line between belonging and exclusion, a line that words can erase in an instant.

Edward Saltzberg is the Executive Director of the Security and Sustainability Forum and writes The Stability Brief.

Read More

​DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly.

DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly speaks to the gathering at an adoption ceremony in Torrington.

Laura Tillman / CT Mirror

What’s Behind the Smiles on National Adoption Day

In the past 21 years, I’ve fostered and adopted children with complex medical and developmental needs. Last year, after a grueling 2,205 days navigating the DCF system, we adopted our 7yo daughter. This year, we were the last family on the docket for National Adoption Day after 589 days of suspense. While my 2 yo daughter’s adoption was a moment of triumph, the cold, empty courtroom symbolized the system’s detachment from the lived experiences of marginalized families.

National Adoption Day often serves as a time to highlight stories of joy and family unification. Yet, behind the scenes, the obstacles faced by children in foster care and the families that support them tell a more complex story—one that demands attention and action. For those of us who have navigated the foster care system as caregivers, the systemic indifference and disparities experienced by marginalized children and families, particularly within BIPOC and disability communities, remain glaringly unresolved.

Keep ReadingShow less
Framing "Freedom"

hands holding a sign that reads "FREEDOM"

Photo Credit: gpointstudio

Framing "Freedom"

The idea of “freedom” is important to Americans. It’s a value that resonates with a lot of people, and consistently ranks among the most important. It’s a uniquely powerful motivator, with broad appeal across the political spectrum. No wonder, then, that we as communicators often appeal to the value of freedom when making a case for change.

But too often, I see people understand values as magic words that can be dropped into our communications and work exactly the way we want them to. Don’t get me wrong: “freedom” is a powerful word. But simply mentioning freedom doesn’t automatically lead everyone to support the policies we want or behave the way we’d like.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands resting on another.

Amid headlines about Epstein, survivors’ voices remain overlooked. This piece explores how restorative justice offers CSA survivors healing and choice.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

What Do Epstein’s Victims Need?

Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news, along with anyone who may have known about, enabled, or participated in his systematic child sexual abuse. Yet there is significantly less information and coverage on the perspectives, stories and named needs of these survivors themselves. This is almost always the case for any type of coverage on incidences of sexual violence – we first ask “how should we punish the offender?”, before ever asking “what does the survivor want?” For way too long, survivors of sexual violence, particularly of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), have been cast to the wayside, treated like witnesses to crimes committed against the state, rather than the victims of individuals that have caused them enormous harm. This de-emphasis on direct survivors of CSA is often presented as a form of “protection” or “respect for their privacy” and while keeping survivors safe is of the utmost importance, so is the centering and meeting of their needs, even when doing so means going against the grain of what the general public or criminal legal system think are conventional or acceptable responses to violence. Restorative justice (RJ) is one of those “unconventional” responses to CSA and yet there is a growing number of survivors who are naming it as a form of meeting their needs for justice and accountability. But what is restorative justice and why would a CSA survivor ever want it?

“You’re the most powerful person I’ve ever known and you did not deserve what I did to you.” These words were spoken toward the end of a “victim offender dialogue”, a restorative justice process in which an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse had elected to meet face-to-face for a facilitated conversation with the person that had harmed her. This phrase was said by the man who had violently sexually abused her in her youth, as he sat directly across from her, now an adult woman. As these two people looked at each other at that moment, the shift in power became tangible, as did a dissolvement of shame in both parties. Despite having gone through a formal court process, this survivor needed more…more space to ask questions, to name the impacts this violence had and continues to have in her life, to speak her truth directly to the person that had harmed her more than anyone else, and to reclaim her power. We often talk about the effects of restorative justice in the abstract, generally ineffable and far too personal to be classifiable; but in that instant, it was a felt sense, it was a moment of undeniable healing for all those involved and a form of justice and accountability that this survivor had sought for a long time, yet had not received until that instance.

Keep ReadingShow less