Growing a movement: Inter-movement convenings
Molineaux is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund. Christen is a lawyer, a senior officer in the Navy Reserve JAG Corps, a seminarian, and a member of an independent Critical Connections team catalyzing inter-movement community and capacity building among democracy and civic health-promoting organizations to achieve collective impact. All stated opinions are his own and do not represent the positions of the U.S. Navy.
Like the interstate highway system made travel by car easier across the United States, our democracy ecosystem needs inter-movement work to attract and retain more Americans dedicated to a new way of being citizens.
Who we know and who they know has more influence on – and is a better predictor of – our ability to innovate, what actions we decide to take, and our ultimate success than our own capabilities and attributes. When it comes to building a movement, many aligned and misaligned people and their organizations need deeper and broader relationships to bring the movement to fruition.
In this case, our shared movement goals are 1) to protect and upgrade democratic values and 2) promote civic health for the long term. The wonky term “inter-movement” is being used to describe this growing community of relational organizing amongst pro-democracy leaders from across the political spectrum. Before we had the interstate system, we had a disjointed collection of state highways and backroads to get across the country. While Route 66 is now iconic, it wasn’t efficient. In much the same way, the inter-movement approach to organizing this ecosystem seeks to meaningfully connect the matrix of intra-movement relationships together to maximize collective effectiveness and efficiency.
In recognition of the self-induced effectiveness cap that comes from siloed or limited relationships, many key actors in the “democracy ecosystem” are looking beyond their own focus areas to proactively seek out meaningful relationships with counterparts from across the ecosystem. This inter-movement approach to community building is becoming increasingly visible as more and more convenings are bringing together people and organizations from multiple fields to innovate solutions together.
One such inter-movement strategy meeting was convened on Sept. 12, featuring two dozen leaders representing the sub-groupings like the bridging the divides field, the structural reform field, colleagues focused on new narratives and solution voters, and inter-movement cross-pollinators and strategists. This convening featured a generative discussion about how the democracy ecosystem can optimally connect, align, and organize to be relevant and responsive to everyday Americans – in other words, how do we organize ourselves? The meeting highlighted numerous upcoming opportunities for cross-field participation and for incorporating these inter-movement topics into agendas and discussions to further organize and grow the movement.
Upcoming connected convenings
Here are a few significant upcoming events that will bring groups together:
- The National Association of Non-Partisan Reformers Annual Summit will be held Dec. 7-9, 2022 in San Diego. While primarily focused on structural reforms, NANR is inviting organizations in other fields to sponsor inter-movement conversations during the summit.
- The American Democracy Summit, the newest evolution of RepresentUs’ game-changing Non-Partisan Conference to Unrig the System, has been rescheduled for the spring of 2023. In the lead-up to the in-person summit, RepresentUs is also hosting the American Democracy Summit virtual series featuring a variety of structural reforms topics.
- As part of their “More Perfect” campaign, the Partnership for American Democracy and its partner organizations are hosting a series of "action-forcing" convenings, including upcoming events focused on service, bridging divides and trusted information.
- Introducing a novel form of cross-partisanship through an “open party” that welcomes anyone willing to put the needs of the country over partisanship, the Forward Party is hosting a flood of local and national events, including its national kickoff event in Austin, Texas, on Sept. 24, 2022. As the Forward Party has expressed a desire to support the efforts of the democracy ecosystem, these events may present opportunities to form valuable local and national connections between the party and the existing ecosystem.
As the size of the democracy ecosystem continues to rapidly expand, new organizational leaders’ ability to comprehend and find their place in the ecosystem becomes increasingly difficult. New leaders and citizens find themselves on the disjointed state highway systems without a map to get where they want to go.
People come to the democracy system following a moment of awakening – that call to become involved in shoring up our democratic values. Each of us knows what our moment was. What happens next will typically follow one of two paths. First is the researcher who begins the Google searches and 1-1 interviews to join the work. Second is the entrepreneur who starts their own solution to protect and strengthen democracy, then discovers the ecosystem and struggles to find their place in it. The Horizons Project has made a resource to help these newcomers make sense of the ecosystem.
Citizen Connect (like The Fulcrum, a project of the Bridge Alliance) was also launched in 2021 as a one-stop shop to help match newcomers to existing organizations. With nearly 600 organizations, their events, and their on-demand content available in one location, it is an invaluable pathway for organizations and everyday Americans to participate in movement efforts. For the researchers, it’s a treasure trove of information. For the entrepreneurs, it’s a place to join. Widespread promotion of the platform will help everyone find something of interest in one or two clicks.
Inter-movement community building is the first step towards the democracy ecosystem more effectively and collaboratively responding to our collective challenges. By connecting in-person at upcoming convenings, relational organizing will provide opportunities for collective impact. Preparing for collective impact will give the entire inter-movement community the tools necessary to be more effective, efficient, resilient, and responsive to whatever democracy needs today, tomorrow, and in the future. The remaining question then is what inter-movement conversations are not currently happening that you can host?
Ben Droz
Ben Droz
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Pinnacle Bank Expo Center on the Nebraska State Fairgrounds on October 05, 2026 in Grand Island, Nebraska.
The President Invited Iran to Bomb My Home
I was driving home to San Diego from Los Angeles on Monday night when I heard that the President of the United States had offered both cities up to Iran as bomb targets. At a rally in Nebraska, defending his war, Trump told the crowd, “let [Iran] take out Los Angeles, let ‘em take out San Diego.” It was, he said, “a very small price to pay.”
I was coming from a Bernie Sanders rally for Proposition 40, the one-time tax on California billionaires that would send 90% of its revenue to healthcare. We desperately need it to pass because, in order to give tax breaks to billionaires, Trump signed a law that will strip health coverage from 10 million Americans; this tax will make sure we can still cover Californians. Call me crazy, but I think taxing billionaires one time so we can make sure kids in California get to see a doctor is a very small price to pay. I also think that even if Trump were joking, it is indefensible to make jokes about the potential destruction of so many lives. Human life is never a small price to pay. Human life is priceless.
Plus, the reality is: here in San Diego, we’re already paying the price for Trump’s actions, and it’s not small at all. He has gutted FEMA, tried to kill climate resiliency programs, and destroyed public health standards, while his signature law is set to cut off health insurance and food support for hundreds of thousands of San Diegans. Like plenty of American cities, San Diego is already busy finding local solutions to respond to the problems this president has recklessly created.
Not to mention, at least 19 American service members have been killed in this war already. Human rights monitors have documented more than 3,600 dead in Iran by April alone. Here at home, gas is sitting just pennies below its all-time record. Taxpayers have already spent more than $45 billion on the war, while Trump’s oil and gas portfolio has grown by roughly $15.5 million this year alone. Of course anything is a “small price” to someone paying free.99 for this war, and profiting from it. Meanwhile, We the People are paying twice: first for the war, and then for the consequences of that war. But now he wants San Diego to pay a third time, flippantly offering us up to Iran.
It is worth noticing which cities he thought to name. Were San Diego and Los Angeles strategically chosen to signify something to his audience, or were they simply the first cities that came to mind as expendable places? Either way, the effect is to normalize—-and to gauge a crowd’s reaction to–the idea of massive violence in major California cities, suitable targets because of their perceived liberal lean. So what if Iran needs to bomb a little bit of America before the war can be over? Who cares, says Trump, if they target Los Angeles and San Diego?
By the way, why didn’t he offer up San Francisco, the free-love hippie-town MAGA loves to hate (and also my birthplace)? Could it be because that’s where the tech titans live? The same ones who joined Trump for Xi Jinping’s state dinner, a guest list worth a combined $2.4 trillion?
San Diego may have fewer billionaires, but it is home to more than 115,000 active-duty service members and 230,000 veterans. One in six active-duty sailors–in the entire Navy–is stationed here. So is one in four Marines. You cannot throw a rock in this county without hitting a military family: brats and spouses and veterans are among us. I got out of the Navy last year after ten years, and eight of those were here in San Diego. When Trump says “let ‘em take out San Diego,” he’s talking about the backbone of the United States military. He’s also talking about the people fighting his war.
San Diego has not been watching this war from the sidelines. Today, the USS Abraham Lincoln returns to North Island after an almost yearlong deployment to the Middle East that featured food shortages, broken toilets, and mold in the showers after 286 days at sea without a single port call. Eight sailors in the Lincoln’s strike group attempted suicide, but in August, when a reporter asked whether the deployment had gone on too long, Trump said “not nearly long enough.” Now he has told a crowd in Nebraska that we should let Iran take out the city those sailors call home. These are sociopathic sentiments.
Last week at Quantico, Pete Hegseth closed his address to the force by telling them, “President Trump has your back and so do I.” To the contrary, President Trump has put one of the biggest military towns in the country forward as a target for our adversaries. With friends like these, the “domestic” in “against all enemies, foreign and domestic” starts to sound a lot less hypothetical.
San Diego is home to Naval Air Station North Island, Naval Base San Diego, Naval Amphibious Base Coronado, the Point Loma submarine base, Camp Pendleton, and Miramar (and I have been permanently stationed at or trained at all of them). If Iran bombed San Diego and Los Angeles, aside from the devastating loss of life, it would cripple an immense share of our national security readiness.
And for what, exactly? Trump says the war is “essentially almost over with.” This is the same man who claimed in June 2025 that Iran’s nuclear program had been “obliterated,” then launched a war over it anyway on February 28. More than seven months later, he wants us to believe two things at once: that we’ve basically won, and that we might need to sacrifice an American city or two to finish winning. If the war is almost over, why does anybody need to take out San Diego?
I wonder if Trump’s endorsed candidate for California’s 48th District here in San Diego County will respond to these remarks. He recently said “no pain, no gain,” when referring to the gas prices San Diegans are paying. Jim Desmond, would you apply that same mindset if we were bombed? Or do you have the moral courage to stand up for the people you’re running to represent?
Last November, six Democratic members of Congress, all veterans, including Senator Mark Kelly, recorded a video reminding troops of their duty to disobey unlawful orders, restating the law that says so. Trump called it “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH,” and then his Justice Department went looking for an indictment, which a grand jury refused. The president treated reading the law out loud to the troops as a capital offense, but then he himself invited a foreign enemy to destroy two American cities, possibly as a punchline. Is anyone calling the latter sedition? Who is demanding accountability?
Calling our lives a small price to pay affirms a moral bankruptcy, as well as an obvious dereliction of duty to the office he holds. While we can’t impeach him or invoke the 25th Amendment ourselves, we must stop being so quiet about what we’re paying already. We can make our voices heard by calling our representatives, writing op-eds, knocking doors, phone banking, and voting in defiance of the man who threatens the safety of our city. Ballots are already arriving in mailboxes. Vote, and vote yes on 40 (and no on 41 and 42).
Trump has been harming our cities for a while, but now he is inviting our military adversaries to join him in the harm. If we have any self-respect as Americans, we must not tolerate our leaders disregarding the dignity of lives in this way. We must fight for our home.
Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.