Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

This is not the Republican Party that made America great

This is not the Republican Party that made America great

"Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a fellow Republican, will not allow passage of any legislation that promotes transparency, election security, better government or the constitutional Article 1 obligation for congressional oversight of the executive branch," writes former Rep. Claudine Schneider, a Republican.

Schneider represented Rhode Island in the House of Representatives from 1981 to 1991 as a Republican.

In the 2016 election, Republicans took control of the White House, the United States Senate and the House of Representatives – effectively controlling all the levers of legislative power.

Do you remember the very first bill that the new Republican House introduced?

It was a bill to gut the House Ethics Committee – the "watchdog" committee responsible for investigating wrongdoing by members of Congress, such as harassment, campaign finance abuse and other violations of the public trust.

As a Republican former member of Congress, this was an alarming "ah ha" moment for me. I knew nothing good could come of that gambit and that it would portend similar Republican power grabs to come.

The new Republican congressional majority also made me realize I would have to pay even closer attention to the maneuverings of my own party!


Happily, in this instance there was such a public outcry about the neutering of the Ethics Committee that Republican leaders quickly reversed course and abandoned this blatant attempt to undermine congressional accountability. However, as we saw during 2017 and 2018, Republican House leaders still did everything they could to stymie good governance.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Fast forward two years later: The voters speak.

Democrats gain the House majority following a "wave" election. Voters around the country were fed up with the lack of ethics in Washington.

Do you remember the very first bill that the new Democratic House introduced after the 2018 election?

It was a bill to restore transparency, oversight, and ethics to congressional operations, by enhancing voting rights, enacting campaign finance reform and cracking down on lobbying abuses.

This bill, with the symbolically important designation of "HR 1," passed on a party-line vote and went to the Senate for consideration.

And then it went to the Senate. End of story.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a fellow Republican, will not allow passage of any legislation that promotes transparency, election security, better government or the constitutional Article 1 obligation for congressional oversight of the executive branch.

McConnell's proudest accomplishments have been to thwart President Obama's legislative goals and judicial appointments.

Remember Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland? McConnell made sure the Supreme Court was shorthanded for nearly a year by blocking Garland from a fair nomination hearing during the last year of Obama's presidency. Now in a miraculous change of heart, McConnell has promised a speedy hearing should any future vacancies occur during the Trump presidency, even during an election year (his original rationale for blocking Garland's nomination).

McConnell is a classic Republican "enabler" who will go down in history as Gravedigger of the Rule of Law.

Simply put, Mitch McConnell represents the modern Republican Party – a party that increasingly can win elections only by gerrymandering, restricting voting rights and gaming the campaign financing system.

I served in Congress as a Republican. I am still a Republican, but this is not the Republican Party that made America great.

To restore the Republican Party, we need to restore its founding principles of limited government, equal rights and freedom for all.

So how should we go about restoring these founding principles of the party?

It's really not difficult in practice: We begin by passing HR 1 in the Senate and sending it to the White House. Passing HR 1 into law would start the process of repairing America's constitutional paralysis, reinvigorate our system of checks and balances, and restore voter confidence in "the system" - which, under Republican sway, is being dismantled.

Once we start restoring the constitutional rule of law and repairing the damage caused by Republican misrule, our democratic institutions will regain legitimacy and will begin to function properly once again.

America has long stood as a beacon of fairness and justice but not under this "Republican" Party. My Republican colleagues and I always asked, "Is this bill in the best interest of the general public?" Clearly the current Republicans don't care. If they did, the Senate would vote on HR 1, rather than bury it.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less