Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

In swing states, R’s and D’s oppose big tariff increases

Majorities prefer keeping low tariffs with countries that abide by trade rules, while keeping them high for China

Road sign that says "Tariffs just ahead"
gguy44/Getty Images

Kull is program director of the Program for Public Consultation. Lewitus is a research analyst at Voice of the People.

As major proposals to change U.S. trade policy have come into the discourse, a new public consultation survey finds bipartisan majorities of Americans in six swing states, as well as nationally, support the United States maintaining low tariffs with other countries so long as they abide by agreed-upon rules. At the same time, bipartisan majorities approve of the increased tariffs that have been imposed on China in response to its alleged violations of international trade rules.


This survey is the eighth Swing Six Issue Survey, a series being conducted in the run-up to the November election in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and nationally, on major policy issues by the Program for Public Consultation at the University of Maryland.

Unlike standard polls, respondents in a public consultation survey go through an online “policymaking simulation” in which they are provided briefings and arguments for and against each policy. Content is reviewed by experts on different sides to ensure accuracy and balance. All Americans are invited to go through the same policymaking simulation as the survey sample.

While Americans do support the tariff increases targeted at China, bipartisan majorities oppose a tariff increase on imports from all countries. Large bipartisan majorities support the U.S. continuing to be part of the international agreements for low tariffs within a rules-based system.

Support for Continuing International Trade System of Low Tariffs

Respondents were informed that, since World War II, the United States has been actively working to promote international trade through a system in which countries negotiate to lower their tariffs on a mutual basis, provided each country abides by agreed-upon rules. The U.S. has such trade arrangements with almost all countries — through free trade agreements and the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs. As a result, average tariffs globally have decreased from about 22 percent in the 1940’s to about 2 percent today.

Bipartisan majorities in all swing states (80 percent to 85 percent) approve of the U.S. working with other countries to continue this system, including majorities of Republicans (73 percent to 78 percent) and Democrats (86 percent to 93 percent). Nationally, 81 percent approve (Republicans 74 percent, Democrats 88 percent).

Bar graph showing poll results on low tarrifspublicconsultation.org

Opposition to Across-the-Board Tariffs of 10 percent to 20 Percent

Respondents evaluated a proposal to impose tariffs of 10 percent to 20 percent on imports from all countries, including arguments that these higher tariffs would generate substantial government revenue and thus allow for reductions in taxes, as well as stimulate U.S. manufacturing and lead to better-paying jobs. They also evaluated arguments against, that raising all tariffs would violate U.S. trade agreements and likely cause the country’s biggest trading partners to retaliate with tariff increases, as well as raise consumer prices for everyone. Arguments on both sides were found convincing by bipartisan majorities.

Finally, asked which policy they prefer, less than half in all six swing states (28 percent to 35 percent) support the U.S. raising tariffs on imports from all countries to 10 percent to 20 percent, including just 34 percent to 42 percent of Republicans and 20 percent to 34 percent of Democrats. Instead, large majorities prefer the U.S. continuing to have low tariffs on a mutual basis with other countries, provided they abide by agreed-upon rules (64 percent to 71 percent), including majorities of Republicans (57 percent to 65 percent) and Democrats (66 percent to 77 percent). Nationally, 68 percent prefer continuing the current policy of low tariffs (Republicans 60 percent, Democrats 77 percent).

Support for High Tariffs on China

Respondents were informed that starting in 2018, in response to alleged violations of international trade rules by China, the United States increased tariffs on Chinese products to an average of about 20 percent, and that China retaliated with similarly high tariffs on the U.S. Bipartisan majorities in every swing state favor the U.S. continuing to impose such tariffs on Chinese imports (69 percent to 78 percent), including majorities of Republicans (75 percent to 78 percent) and Democrats (67 percent to 82 percent). Nationally, 71 percent are in favor, with no difference between Republicans (73 percent) and Democrats (72 percent).

Support for Labor and Environmental Standards in Trade Deals

The United States in its trade deal negotiations has been increasingly pushing for the inclusion of enforceable labor and environmental standards. Respondents evaluated arguments that such standards ensure that trade partners cannot get a competitive advantage by having significantly lower standards than the U.S. They also evaluated arguments against, including that the United States imposing standards on other countries and including too many provisions in trade deals will slow down international trade, which would hurt everyone.

Asked whether the U.S. should actively work to make agreements that include enforceable labor standards — including a prohibition on child labor and the right of workers to collectively bargain — bipartisan majorities are in favor in the swing states (81 percent to 87 percent) including Republicans (79 percent to 85 percent) and Democrats (89 percent to 93 percent). Nationally, 82 percent are in favor (Republicans 77 percent, Democrats 90 percent).

Bar graph on polling about trade agreements that require labor standardspublicconsultation.org

Asked whether the United States should actively work to make agreements that include enforceable environmental standards — which require countries to abide by environmental agreements they have signed, and not lower their standards to get a competitive edge — bipartisan majorities in the swing states are in favor (76 percent to 82 percent), including Republicans (70 percent to 76 percent) and Democrats (83 percent to 89 percent). Nationally, 78 percent are in favor (Republicans 72 percent, Democrats 86 percent).


Bar graph on polling about trade agreements that have environmental standardspublicconsultation.org

Read More

What if We Fired the Parties?

"They want us divided sign" that represents partisanship among democrats and republicans.

Getty Images, Jena Ardell

What if We Fired the Parties?

Like many Americans, I have been increasingly disappointed by the candidates promoted by political parties because they tend to back candidates who are ultimately focused on personal gain and/or only advancing issues predetermined by party priorities while moving further away from responding to the needs of their constituents. According to The Guardian, in the 2024 election, the number of eligible voters who did not cast their ballot is more than the total of those who voted for either of the party candidates. So, maybe the real issue is that our political party system just isn’t working for most Americans anymore. Assuming this is even partially true, what if, instead of just complaining about the parties or holding our noses and voting for the "lesser evil" every November, we actually fired the parties—took away their grip on our democracy and built something better.

For decades, we've been told we only have two choices. But more and more Americans don't feel truly represented by either major party. We're exhausted by the noise, the blame games, the endless culture wars that solve nothing and only serve to increasingly marginalize portions of our citizenry. Americans want real solutions on housing, healthcare, education, wages, and the future we're leaving for the next generation. And we're not getting them. So, maybe it's time to ask a radical but necessary question: What if the problem isn't just the candidates but the political party system that keeps producing them?

Keep ReadingShow less
A Stunning Verdict: A Shared Vision of Justice Unites Americans

A gavel and handcuffs.

Getty Images, -Oxford-

A Stunning Verdict: A Shared Vision of Justice Unites Americans

America’s political landscape is deeply divided. The shouting matches, the name-calling, the constant finger-pointing—it's easy to feel like unity is a pipe dream. But every so often, something remarkable happens. Something that cuts through the noise and reminds us that, despite our differences, we might still agree on some of the most important things.

That’s exactly what occurred when a group of unlikely allies—staunch conservatives and progressive advocates—came together to craft a new declaration of principles for criminal justice policy.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Veterans, Plane Travel, and Sausages Lead to Less Partisanship

The United States Capitol building.

Getty Images, bloodua

How Veterans, Plane Travel, and Sausages Lead to Less Partisanship

It’s no secret that partisanship is more intense than at any other time in recent history. And these intense political feelings don’t just play themselves out through gridlock in Congress. The threats of political violence have increased dramatically. Politics seeps into the workplace, resulting in coarse relations with colleagues (and, according to research, reduced productivity). And polls show that we’re just not “hanging out” with friends like we used to.

This makes it even more important to celebrate the discovery of examples of collaboration and strategies for improving our collective national character. One recent event revealed such examples. The nonprofit group Business for America recently held an event in Washington D.C., “ Across the Aisle: How Leaders Find Common Ground in a Divided Era.” The event featured elected officials and staff discussing the recurring factors in finding common ground in partisan times.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Could Help Save the Democratic Process

A dollar sign balloon.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Could Help Save the Democratic Process

After contributing more than a quarter of a billion dollars to elect Donald Trump, Elon Musk has now turned his attention to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, giving millions of dollars to support Judge Brad Schimel, the Republican candidate.

According to The Brennan Center, this race is the most expensive judicial race in U.S. history. If Musk is successful, it will tip the High Court’s balance to his political favor.

Keep ReadingShow less