Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Open Primaries President: Voters Don't Trust Reformers Right Now; We Need to Earn That Trust

Open Primaries President: Voters Don't Trust Reformers Right Now; We Need to Earn That Trust

"Vote" imprinted on a sidewalk.

Photo by Phil Scroggs on Unsplash


- YouTubeyoutu.be


The nonprofit reform group Open Primaries hosted its first Primary Buzz Discussion of 2025 last week. But this conversation worked differently as Open Primaries President John Opdycke was the one being interviewed.

Opdycke was interviewed by Chloe Akers, the Founder and CEO of The Best of Tennessee about the state of primary reform, lessons learned in the 2024 elections, and what reformers should focus on going forward.

It wasn't a conversation of minced words. Opdycke was candid in his belief that the reform movement cannot move forward if it doesn't have one critical thing: Trust.

"The American people do not trust us," he said. "I don't think they should. I think we need to earn their trust."

He added that the absence of trust has nothing to do with open primary reform itself. When polled, most voters agree with the principle that every voter should have equal access to all stages of the taxpayer-funded elections process.

"The lack of trust has everything to do with the fact that we live in a country in which every grain of sand has been politicized -- everything is partisan," Opdycke explained.

In other words, the system has created a level of cynicism among voters. When reformers say to people, "We are about changing the system," the immediate reaction is: What's the real agenda? Which side are you really trying to help?

As the editor of IVN -- a role I have held for 13 years -- I have seen this firsthand. IVN is an open platform for independent-minded authors and readers, but the reaction we get to any article we publish is, "who are you really working for?"

We've been called closet Republicans and closet Democrats. We have been called every political label in the book depending on the perspective we publish, because people have lost trust that nothing is free of partisanship.

This is the consequence of living under a system in which everything has to exist in the context of Team Red vs Team Blue and who ultimately benefits from policy changes and reform -- and everyone is expected to pick a side.

Reformers like Opdycke know this all too well. He believes the response shouldn't be to skirt these questions because, in his words, this lack of trust is "a sign of how seriously the American people take democracy reform."

Watch the full conversation above.

Open Primaries President: Voters Don't Trust Reformers Right Now; We Need to Earn That Trust was first published by Independent Voters News and is shared with permission. Shawn Griffiths is an election reform expert and National Editor of IVN.us. He studied history and philosophy at the University of North Texas.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Political outrage is rising—but dismissing the other side’s anger deepens division. Learn why taking outrage seriously can bridge America’s partisan divide.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Taking Outrage Seriously: Understanding the Moral Signals Behind Political Anger

Over the last several weeks, the Trump administration has deployed the National Guard to the nation’s capital to crack down on crime. While those on the right have long been aghast by rioting and disorder in our cities, pressing for greater military intervention to curtail it, progressive residents of D.C. have tirelessly protested the recent militarization of the city.

This recent flashpoint is a microcosm of the reciprocal outrage at the heart of contemporary American public life. From social media posts to street protests to everyday conversations about "the other side," we're witnessing unprecedented levels of political outrage. And as polarization has increased, we’ve stopped even considering the other political party’s concerns, responding instead with amusement and delight. Schadenfreude, or pleasure at someone else’s pain, is now more common than solidarity or empathy across party lines.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less