Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Open Primaries President: Voters Don't Trust Reformers Right Now; We Need to Earn That Trust

Open Primaries President: Voters Don't Trust Reformers Right Now; We Need to Earn That Trust

"Vote" imprinted on a sidewalk.

Photo by Phil Scroggs on Unsplash


- YouTubeyoutu.be


The nonprofit reform group Open Primaries hosted its first Primary Buzz Discussion of 2025 last week. But this conversation worked differently as Open Primaries President John Opdycke was the one being interviewed.

Opdycke was interviewed by Chloe Akers, the Founder and CEO of The Best of Tennessee about the state of primary reform, lessons learned in the 2024 elections, and what reformers should focus on going forward.

It wasn't a conversation of minced words. Opdycke was candid in his belief that the reform movement cannot move forward if it doesn't have one critical thing: Trust.

"The American people do not trust us," he said. "I don't think they should. I think we need to earn their trust."

He added that the absence of trust has nothing to do with open primary reform itself. When polled, most voters agree with the principle that every voter should have equal access to all stages of the taxpayer-funded elections process.

"The lack of trust has everything to do with the fact that we live in a country in which every grain of sand has been politicized -- everything is partisan," Opdycke explained.

In other words, the system has created a level of cynicism among voters. When reformers say to people, "We are about changing the system," the immediate reaction is: What's the real agenda? Which side are you really trying to help?

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

As the editor of IVN -- a role I have held for 13 years -- I have seen this firsthand. IVN is an open platform for independent-minded authors and readers, but the reaction we get to any article we publish is, "who are you really working for?"

We've been called closet Republicans and closet Democrats. We have been called every political label in the book depending on the perspective we publish, because people have lost trust that nothing is free of partisanship.

This is the consequence of living under a system in which everything has to exist in the context of Team Red vs Team Blue and who ultimately benefits from policy changes and reform -- and everyone is expected to pick a side.

Reformers like Opdycke know this all too well. He believes the response shouldn't be to skirt these questions because, in his words, this lack of trust is "a sign of how seriously the American people take democracy reform."

Watch the full conversation above.

Open Primaries President: Voters Don't Trust Reformers Right Now; We Need to Earn That Trust was first published by Independent Voters News and is shared with permission. Shawn Griffiths is an election reform expert and National Editor of IVN.us. He studied history and philosophy at the University of North Texas.

Read More

Crowd Surfing Through Revolution
silhouette photo of man jumped off on top of people inside party hall
Photo by Zach Lucero on Unsplash

Crowd Surfing Through Revolution

Picture this: A person launches themselves into a crowd at a concert, and for a moment, everything hangs in the balance. Will they fall? Will they float? It all depends on countless hands moving in coordination, strangers united in a common purpose. Some push up while others stabilize, creating a dynamic, living system that defies gravity.

At this moment, we are all suspended between falling and flying, carried by a wave of global resistance that nobody controls but all can help shape. Think about what makes crowd surfing work. It's not just about the individual being carried – it's about the collective choreography happening beneath. With too much force in one direction, you fall. Not enough support in another, you crash. The magic happens in the balance.

Keep ReadingShow less
Threat Minimizes Compassion
Polarization and the politics of love
Polarization and the politics of love

Threat Minimizes Compassion

Threat minimizes compassion. This connection helps to explain two seemingly unrelated questions: Why do those who voted for President Trump seem not to publicly express much concern for the thousands of government workers fired since Inauguration Day? And why do liberals often seem not to talk as much about drug deaths as other issues like gun deaths?

The answers are multi-faceted, of course. This article will focus on one of many reasons: the potential victims of these actions and situations (government workers and drug users) are often directly or indirectly seen as threats by the other side, and it is hard to feel the pain of those who seem to threaten us. Institutions can also be threatening, based on the actions taken by people within those institutions.

Keep ReadingShow less