Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?

Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?
white and black printer paper

President Donald Trump has implemented executive orders that some have perceived as targeting Hispanic, Latino communities, particularly in relation to immigration policies, which they argue have contributed to increased tensions and uncertainty among individuals and their families in the United States.

Historically, the Hispanic, Latino community has significant shaped the U.S. economy and culture. As political tensions have escalated in recent weeks, it has led to organized economic activism. One such effort, the Latino Freeze Movement (LFM), has directly responded to Trump’s policies and rhetoric toward the community.


Created by Dr. Michael Galvez, LFM calls on the Hispanic, Latino community to unite and create a collective impact. The movement encourages individuals to be more mindful of their spending habits, emphasizing where and how their money is used.

“The Latino Freeze Movement is a grassroots movement founded in 2025,” reads the Latino Freeze Movement website. “The movement is committed to showing the value that Latinos, other minorities, and allies have in the United States.”

The movement has garnered over 3,000 followers on Instagram and includes notable supporters such as actors George Lopez and John Leguizamo, journalist Maria Hinojosa, and labor leader Dolores Huerta.

In an interview about the power of boycotts, Huerta said, “If you don’t respect our community, then you shouldn’t have our dollars.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Leguizamo is pushing for a national freeze on all shopping on February 28, calling it an economic blackout.

While the movement has gained traction, do these boycotts truly work, or are they more symbolic than impactful?

The Economic Power of the U.S. Latino Community

Economic boycotts have long been used as a tool for social and political change. From the Montgomery Bus Boycott of the Civil Rights Movement to modern-day calls for corporate accountability, consumers have sought to wield their purchasing power to influence policies and practices.

Huerta dedicated years to organizing farm workers in California and advocating for boycotts to support their rights. During the Delano Grape Strike, she played a key role in coordinating strikes and boycotts to improve conditions for farm workers.

At the conclusion of the boycott, the lives of 10,000 farm workers were positively impacted when the companies signed new contracts with the newly unionized workers. These agreements introduced scheduled pay increases, health benefits, and other provisions to promote respectful and humane conditions for farm workers.

The Latino Freeze movement showcases the economic influence of the Hispanic, Latino community by encouraging individuals to save their money and refrain from spending at certain businesses that have cowered to Trump’s executive orders related to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), like Target, Walmart, and McDonald's.

This initiative highlights the collective financial power of the community and seeks to raise awareness about issues, including immigration policies impacting Latino individuals and families.

The economic influence of the US Hispanic, Latino community is undeniable. With a collective GDP of $3.7 trillion, Latinos contribute significantly to the nation’s financial strength. If the group were an independent economy, it would rank as the fifth largest in the world, surpassing the GDP of countries such as the United Kingdom and India. This economic clout is driven by a rapidly growing population, high workforce participation rates, and increasing levels of entrepreneurship.

"I've never seen anything on this scale. If you take 20% of our population, that all buys in, plus people that are supporting this movement. It could be much larger than 20%. Right? You may have up to like half of our population supporting this type of movement, you could have a very significant change in terms of how much spending is going on,” said Aaron Pankratz, Fresno City College economics instructor in an interview with ABC.

The latest U.S. Census data shows Hispanics, Latinos made up nearly 20% of our nation's population as of 2023.

Analyzing Their Impact and Effectiveness

There are notable instances where boycotts have worked. For example, the Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955–1956) led to the desegregation of public transportation in the US. Brands like Nike and Starbucks have recently altered policies after facing consumer backlash.

However, not all boycotts succeed. The 2017 boycott against Uber (#DeleteUber) over its response to an immigration ban saw temporary dips in usage, but the company recovered. Similarly, some large corporations have enough financial resilience to withstand short-term consumer action.

According to IPR associate Brayden King, a professor of management and organizations, activists who call for boycotts usually set out “to put financial pressure on a company” by convincing consumers to shop elsewhere.

In a 2017 interview with Northwestern, King explained, “But it turns out that’s not the way that boycotts usually work. The typical boycott doesn’t have much impact on sales revenue.”

One reason is consumers’ habitual nature. Even people who publicly denounce a company might still purchase that company’s products, according to the report.

The Latino Freeze Movement is a powerful demonstration of economic activism and collective resistance. Whether or not it achieves long-term policy change remains to be seen. Still, it highlights the growing influence of the Latino community in shaping political and economic discourse in the United States.

“If the ultimate source of a boycott is constantly featured in the 24-hour news cycle — say, because he is president of the United States — and continues to engage in controversial and outrageous behavior, the boycott has an increased chance of living beyond its usual few days, wrote Americus Reed in 2017, in an Opinion-Editorial for the New York Times. If the boycott reflects a movement — rather than a moment — it can change the world around it.”

Click HERE to see the list of companies the Latino Freeze Movement recommends people support and the companies to avoid.

.Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

Dictionary definition of tariff
Would replacing the income tax with higher tariffs help ‘struggling Americans’?
Devonyu/Getty Images

Could Trump’s tariffs have unintended consequences that hurt America?

The first few weeks of the Trump administration have been head-spinning. President Trump and his team were well-prepared to launch their policy agenda, signing over 50 executive orders, the most in a president's first month in more than 40 years. A major focus has been economic policy, first with immigration raids, which were quickly followed by announcements of tariffs on imports from America’s biggest trade partners.

The tariff announcements have followed a meandering and confusing course. President Trump announced the first tariffs on February 1, but within 24 hours, he suspended the tariffs on Mexico and Canada in favor of “negotiations.” Mexico and Canada agreed to enforce their borders better to stop migrants and fentanyl imports, which the Trump administration called a victory. Despite the triumphalist rhetoric, the enforcement measures were substantially the same as what both countries were already planning to do.

Keep ReadingShow less
From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

The flag of India.

Canva Images

From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

In the intricate landscape of global geopolitics, the ascendancy of Indian Americans stands as a quiet yet transformative force—a phenomenon that demands serious consideration. While traditional paradigms of power focus on military might or economic clout, the strategic leverage wielded by this diaspora is rewriting the rules of global influence. India’s economic trajectory reflects its ambitions on the global stage. Contributing 4% to global GDP today, the nation is poised to become the world’s third $10 trillion economy within two decades. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicts India will account for 18% of total global growth by decade’s end, a rise that challenges established economic hierarchies.

Trade data between India and the United States reflects the growing interdependence: In 2020, U.S. imports to India stood at $51.3 billion. This figure grew to $80.1 billion in 2024, alongside a trade deficit swelling from $24.2 billion to $41.5 billion. This trade expansion is mirrored by Indian-American professionals dominating key sectors of the U.S. economy. With a median household income of $119,000, Indian Americans outperform national averages and hold influential roles across corporate and governmental institutions. CEOs of global giants like Microsoft, Google, and Citibank exemplify this trend, along with leadership roles in companies like Apple, Intel, and Dell.

Keep ReadingShow less
Will Trump’s immigration crackdown be good or bad for the economy?

Roofers on an 8-12 pitch roof laying under-layment before installing roof tile. Roofer is throwing safety line out of the way.

Getty Images//TerryJ

Will Trump’s immigration crackdown be good or bad for the economy?

In his first days in office, President Donald Trump wasted no time showing he means business, announcing a crackdown on immigration. He declared a national emergency, signed a raft of executive orders, sent 1,500 active duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border, and his Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) has initiated raids on thousands of migrants across the nation.

The issue of immigration has always been multifaceted, impacting both the economy and human rights, not to mention the expensive logistical operation necessary to deport millions of people. But my discussion below is focused specifically on this question: what will happen to the economy if many of the immigrant workers (who are also consumers and taxpayers) who fill many jobs in the construction, restaurant, health care, agriculture, and elder care industries, suddenly are whisked away?

Keep ReadingShow less
Tariffs: Not a tax, and not free money

United States trade cargo container hanging against clouds background

Getty Images//Iskandar Zulkarnean

Tariffs: Not a tax, and not free money

During the recent election season, there was much talk of Trump’s plan to lay tariffs on the importation of foreign goods. Pundits, politicians, and journalists to the left of center consistently referred to them as a tax on the American people. Many of those to the right of center, especially those of the MAGA contingent, seemed to imply they are a pain-free way for the federal government to raise money.

Some correctly said that the country essentially ran on tariffs in its early history. Alexander Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary and arguably the godfather of our initial financial system, successfully proposed and implemented a tariff system with two goals in mind. Fund the young American government and protect young American businesses against competition from established foreign companies. The second bill signed by President George Washington was a broad tariff bill.

Keep ReadingShow less