Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?

Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?
white and black printer paper

President Donald Trump has implemented executive orders that some have perceived as targeting Hispanic, Latino communities, particularly in relation to immigration policies, which they argue have contributed to increased tensions and uncertainty among individuals and their families in the United States.

Historically, the Hispanic, Latino community has significant shaped the U.S. economy and culture. As political tensions have escalated in recent weeks, it has led to organized economic activism. One such effort, the Latino Freeze Movement (LFM), has directly responded to Trump’s policies and rhetoric toward the community.


Created by Dr. Michael Galvez, LFM calls on the Hispanic, Latino community to unite and create a collective impact. The movement encourages individuals to be more mindful of their spending habits, emphasizing where and how their money is used.

“The Latino Freeze Movement is a grassroots movement founded in 2025,” reads the Latino Freeze Movement website. “The movement is committed to showing the value that Latinos, other minorities, and allies have in the United States.”

The movement has garnered over 3,000 followers on Instagram and includes notable supporters such as actors George Lopez and John Leguizamo, journalist Maria Hinojosa, and labor leader Dolores Huerta.

In an interview about the power of boycotts, Huerta said, “If you don’t respect our community, then you shouldn’t have our dollars.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Leguizamo is pushing for a national freeze on all shopping on February 28, calling it an economic blackout.

While the movement has gained traction, do these boycotts truly work, or are they more symbolic than impactful?

The Economic Power of the U.S. Latino Community

Economic boycotts have long been used as a tool for social and political change. From the Montgomery Bus Boycott of the Civil Rights Movement to modern-day calls for corporate accountability, consumers have sought to wield their purchasing power to influence policies and practices.

Huerta dedicated years to organizing farm workers in California and advocating for boycotts to support their rights. During the Delano Grape Strike, she played a key role in coordinating strikes and boycotts to improve conditions for farm workers.

At the conclusion of the boycott, the lives of 10,000 farm workers were positively impacted when the companies signed new contracts with the newly unionized workers. These agreements introduced scheduled pay increases, health benefits, and other provisions to promote respectful and humane conditions for farm workers.

The Latino Freeze movement showcases the economic influence of the Hispanic, Latino community by encouraging individuals to save their money and refrain from spending at certain businesses that have cowered to Trump’s executive orders related to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), like Target, Walmart, and McDonald's.

This initiative highlights the collective financial power of the community and seeks to raise awareness about issues, including immigration policies impacting Latino individuals and families.

The economic influence of the US Hispanic, Latino community is undeniable. With a collective GDP of $3.7 trillion, Latinos contribute significantly to the nation’s financial strength. If the group were an independent economy, it would rank as the fifth largest in the world, surpassing the GDP of countries such as the United Kingdom and India. This economic clout is driven by a rapidly growing population, high workforce participation rates, and increasing levels of entrepreneurship.

"I've never seen anything on this scale. If you take 20% of our population, that all buys in, plus people that are supporting this movement. It could be much larger than 20%. Right? You may have up to like half of our population supporting this type of movement, you could have a very significant change in terms of how much spending is going on,” said Aaron Pankratz, Fresno City College economics instructor in an interview with ABC.

The latest U.S. Census data shows Hispanics, Latinos made up nearly 20% of our nation's population as of 2023.

Analyzing Their Impact and Effectiveness

There are notable instances where boycotts have worked. For example, the Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955–1956) led to the desegregation of public transportation in the US. Brands like Nike and Starbucks have recently altered policies after facing consumer backlash.

However, not all boycotts succeed. The 2017 boycott against Uber (#DeleteUber) over its response to an immigration ban saw temporary dips in usage, but the company recovered. Similarly, some large corporations have enough financial resilience to withstand short-term consumer action.

According to IPR associate Brayden King, a professor of management and organizations, activists who call for boycotts usually set out “to put financial pressure on a company” by convincing consumers to shop elsewhere.

In a 2017 interview with Northwestern, King explained, “But it turns out that’s not the way that boycotts usually work. The typical boycott doesn’t have much impact on sales revenue.”

One reason is consumers’ habitual nature. Even people who publicly denounce a company might still purchase that company’s products, according to the report.

The Latino Freeze Movement is a powerful demonstration of economic activism and collective resistance. Whether or not it achieves long-term policy change remains to be seen. Still, it highlights the growing influence of the Latino community in shaping political and economic discourse in the United States.

“If the ultimate source of a boycott is constantly featured in the 24-hour news cycle — say, because he is president of the United States — and continues to engage in controversial and outrageous behavior, the boycott has an increased chance of living beyond its usual few days, wrote Americus Reed in 2017, in an Opinion-Editorial for the New York Times. If the boycott reflects a movement — rather than a moment — it can change the world around it.”

Click HERE to see the list of companies the Latino Freeze Movement recommends people support and the companies to avoid.

.Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

Just the Facts: 2025 Canada vs. United States Tariff War

Trucks head to the Ambassador Bridge between Windsor, Canada and Detroit, Michigan on the first day of President Donald Trump's new 25% tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico on March 4, 2025, in Windsor, Canada.

Getty Images, Bill Pugliano

Just the Facts: 2025 Canada vs. United States Tariff War

Our ongoing series, “Just the Facts,” strives to approach news stories with both an open mind and skepticism, so we may present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we look to remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces.

On Sunday, March 9th, The Fulcrum ran a story called “Just the Facts: Canadian Tariffs”. Since Sunday, there has been a mind-boggling flurry of activity in the ongoing trade battle between the United States and Canada.

Keep ReadingShow less
Welcome to the Musk era of unchecked conflicts

Elon Musk speaks during CPAC-DC at the Gaylord National Resort in Oxon Hill, M.D., on Feb. 20, 2025.

Dominic Gwinn/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

Welcome to the Musk era of unchecked conflicts

When the computers arrived at City Hall in January of 2002, they were the talk of the town.

Known as “The Bloomberg,” the system of flat-screen terminals used to crunch real-time market data made famous by their namesake mogul Mike Bloomberg, were sent to populate the new mayor of New York City’s wall-less office, known to his staffers as The Bullpen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Indian talents in the US: the brain drain dilemma
white microscope on top of black table
Photo by Ousa Chea on Unsplash

Indian talents in the US: the brain drain dilemma

As India marches towards its ambitious goal of becoming a “Viksit Bharat” by 2047, as proclaimed by Narendra Modi, a critical challenge threatens this vision: the ongoing exodus of its brightest minds. India aspires to become a global power, but its current development seems to rely more on its population size than on its achievements in science, technology, art, innovation, and the like. This strategic vacuum is particularly glaring in the discussion around the H-1B visa. The Indian government has always attached great importance to the US H-1B visa, regarding it as part of its national interest. However, what is more worth thinking about is: why does India actively support the outflow of outstanding talents from the country?

A report “The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2024” released by the US National Science Foundation shows that in 2021, foreign-born scientists and engineers accounted for about 19% of all science and engineering workers in the United States, and this proportion jumped to about 43% among scientists and engineers with doctoral degrees. Among them, India has become the largest source of foreign-born science and engineering workers, accounting for 29%. “Our dependence on foreign talent, especially our over-reliance on talent from strategic competitors such as India, is like a double-edged sword. It has promoted our scientific and technological progress, but it has also exposed our weaknesses,” in response to this phenomenon, Divyansh Kaushik of the Institute of the Federation of American Scientists, emphasized. Why can’t a country that can cultivate a large number of internationally competitive talents keep them in the country? According to statistics, 75% of H-1B visa holders in the United States are from India, which reflects the structural problems of India’s local job market.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Figurines of manual workers with stacks of coins

Getty Images/Glow Images

Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Among the international trade issues making headlines is President Trump’s recent announcement to abandon current U.S. law regarding small, low-value packages containing products purchased by Americans from overseas. The initial Executive Order was paused just days later. But the threat remains, making damaging economic repercussions imminent.

The process for such small-dollar shipments is de minimis entry. The term means “pertaining to tiny or trivial things,” emphasizing why its usage only applies to goods under a lower-priced threshold.

Keep ReadingShow less