Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?

Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?
white and black printer paper

President Donald Trump has implemented executive orders that some have perceived as targeting Hispanic, Latino communities, particularly in relation to immigration policies, which they argue have contributed to increased tensions and uncertainty among individuals and their families in the United States.

Historically, the Hispanic, Latino community has significant shaped the U.S. economy and culture. As political tensions have escalated in recent weeks, it has led to organized economic activism. One such effort, the Latino Freeze Movement (LFM), has directly responded to Trump’s policies and rhetoric toward the community.


Created by Dr. Michael Galvez, LFM calls on the Hispanic, Latino community to unite and create a collective impact. The movement encourages individuals to be more mindful of their spending habits, emphasizing where and how their money is used.

“The Latino Freeze Movement is a grassroots movement founded in 2025,” reads the Latino Freeze Movement website. “The movement is committed to showing the value that Latinos, other minorities, and allies have in the United States.”

The movement has garnered over 3,000 followers on Instagram and includes notable supporters such as actors George Lopez and John Leguizamo, journalist Maria Hinojosa, and labor leader Dolores Huerta.

In an interview about the power of boycotts, Huerta said, “If you don’t respect our community, then you shouldn’t have our dollars.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Leguizamo is pushing for a national freeze on all shopping on February 28, calling it an economic blackout.

While the movement has gained traction, do these boycotts truly work, or are they more symbolic than impactful?

The Economic Power of the U.S. Latino Community

Economic boycotts have long been used as a tool for social and political change. From the Montgomery Bus Boycott of the Civil Rights Movement to modern-day calls for corporate accountability, consumers have sought to wield their purchasing power to influence policies and practices.

Huerta dedicated years to organizing farm workers in California and advocating for boycotts to support their rights. During the Delano Grape Strike, she played a key role in coordinating strikes and boycotts to improve conditions for farm workers.

At the conclusion of the boycott, the lives of 10,000 farm workers were positively impacted when the companies signed new contracts with the newly unionized workers. These agreements introduced scheduled pay increases, health benefits, and other provisions to promote respectful and humane conditions for farm workers.

The Latino Freeze movement showcases the economic influence of the Hispanic, Latino community by encouraging individuals to save their money and refrain from spending at certain businesses that have cowered to Trump’s executive orders related to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), like Target, Walmart, and McDonald's.

This initiative highlights the collective financial power of the community and seeks to raise awareness about issues, including immigration policies impacting Latino individuals and families.

The economic influence of the US Hispanic, Latino community is undeniable. With a collective GDP of $3.7 trillion, Latinos contribute significantly to the nation’s financial strength. If the group were an independent economy, it would rank as the fifth largest in the world, surpassing the GDP of countries such as the United Kingdom and India. This economic clout is driven by a rapidly growing population, high workforce participation rates, and increasing levels of entrepreneurship.

"I've never seen anything on this scale. If you take 20% of our population, that all buys in, plus people that are supporting this movement. It could be much larger than 20%. Right? You may have up to like half of our population supporting this type of movement, you could have a very significant change in terms of how much spending is going on,” said Aaron Pankratz, Fresno City College economics instructor in an interview with ABC.

The latest U.S. Census data shows Hispanics, Latinos made up nearly 20% of our nation's population as of 2023.

Analyzing Their Impact and Effectiveness

There are notable instances where boycotts have worked. For example, the Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955–1956) led to the desegregation of public transportation in the US. Brands like Nike and Starbucks have recently altered policies after facing consumer backlash.

However, not all boycotts succeed. The 2017 boycott against Uber (#DeleteUber) over its response to an immigration ban saw temporary dips in usage, but the company recovered. Similarly, some large corporations have enough financial resilience to withstand short-term consumer action.

According to IPR associate Brayden King, a professor of management and organizations, activists who call for boycotts usually set out “to put financial pressure on a company” by convincing consumers to shop elsewhere.

In a 2017 interview with Northwestern, King explained, “But it turns out that’s not the way that boycotts usually work. The typical boycott doesn’t have much impact on sales revenue.”

One reason is consumers’ habitual nature. Even people who publicly denounce a company might still purchase that company’s products, according to the report.

The Latino Freeze Movement is a powerful demonstration of economic activism and collective resistance. Whether or not it achieves long-term policy change remains to be seen. Still, it highlights the growing influence of the Latino community in shaping political and economic discourse in the United States.

“If the ultimate source of a boycott is constantly featured in the 24-hour news cycle — say, because he is president of the United States — and continues to engage in controversial and outrageous behavior, the boycott has an increased chance of living beyond its usual few days, wrote Americus Reed in 2017, in an Opinion-Editorial for the New York Times. If the boycott reflects a movement — rather than a moment — it can change the world around it.”

Click HERE to see the list of companies the Latino Freeze Movement recommends people support and the companies to avoid.

.Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

Could Splits Within the GOP Over Economic Policy Hurt the Trump Administration?

With Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) by his side President Donald Trump speaks to the press following a House Republican meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Tasos Katopodis

Could Splits Within the GOP Over Economic Policy Hurt the Trump Administration?

Republican U.S. Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri is an unusual combo of right and left politics—kind of like an elephant combined with a donkey combined with a polar bear. And, yet, his views may augur the future of the Republican Party.

Many people view the Republican and Democratic parties as ideological monoliths, run by hardcore partisans and implacably positioned against each other. But, in fact, both parties have their internal divisions, influenced by various outside organizations. In the GOP, an intra-party battle is brewing between an economic populist wing with its more pro-labor positions and a traditional libertarian wing with its pro-free market stances.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: Trump’s Middle East Trip

U.S. President Donald J. Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman a signing ceremony at the Saudi Royal Court on May 13, 2025, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Getty Images, Win McNamee

Just the Facts: Trump’s Middle East Trip

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

Are pro-Israel supporters of Donald Trump concerned about his recent trip to the Middle East?

Keep ReadingShow less
Man looking at stocks on his phone. Stock market.

As Trump pushes disruption, the markets push back.

Getty Images, Alistair Berg

The Markets Strike Back: Why Trump’s Economic Fantasies Keep Crashing into Reality

Trump may have won the election, but he’s losing the markets. In just 100 days, Wall Street has erased nearly $6 trillion in global equity value, according to Bloomberg data cited in The Guardian. The S&P 500 has logged one of its worst openings to a presidential term since the Nixon years. And fund managers—the real-world referees of economic confidence—are sending a message Congress seems unwilling to deliver: enough.

While Trump’s second term has been marked by a tsunami of executive orders, tariff threats, and regulatory purges, the financial markets are refusing to play along. From panicked sell-offs to jittery consumer sentiment and retreating business investment, U.S. capital is staging its own quiet rebellion. Consumer confidence has dropped to its lowest level since 2020, with Americans’ outlook on jobs, income, and business conditions sinking to a 13-year low, according to The Conference Board.

Keep ReadingShow less
Business professional watching stocks go down.
Getty Images, Bartolome Ozonas

The White House Is Booming, the Boardroom Is Panicking

The Confidence Collapse

Consumer confidence is plummeting—and that was before the latest Wall Street selloffs.

Keep ReadingShow less