Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Democracy reform coalition presses the presidential field for more attention

A coalition of more than 100 progressive advocacy groups on Wednesday urged all two-dozen announced major party presidential candidates to endorse a comprehensive democracy reform plan and declare that implementation would be a top priority for their administrations.

The group, called Declaration for American Democracy, said the best place for them to start would be embracing HR 1, the comprehensive campaign finance, election administration and government ethics package the House passed this spring with the votes of all the Democrats (but none of the Republicans). Every Democratic senator is co-sponsoring the companion measure even though it's a dead letter in the GOP-majority Senate.

That means half the Democratic field (the seven senators and four House members running) is already behind the package, and several of the others have also signaled their support – although none of them has yet sounded ready to make fixing government dysfunction a centerpiece of their platform. (The only declared HR 1 opponent among the candidates is President Trump, who's said he would veto the measure.)


"We encourage you to treat the policies included in these bills, and listed in the document below, as the foundation for your own democracy platform and that you explore additional new aspirational reform measures to revitalize our democracy," the group wrote in a letter to each candidate, attaching a manifesto which largely echoes the provisions in the House measure.

"We want to know how you'll champion these reforms on the campaign trail," they said, and "if elected, this platform's enactment must be your first priority in 2021."

The coalition includes prominent left-leaning government reform and campaign finance groups including End Citizens United, Public Citizen, People for the American Way and Common Cause; environmental organizations including Greenpeace and the League of Conservation Voters; civil rights groups including the NAACP and progressive membership organizations including MoveOn and the Working Families Party.

Most of the Democrats did commit this week, meanwhile, to one thing that might boost faith in democracy: Eight of them told Washington Post columnist Karen Tumulty they would reinstate the daily press briefings – she dubbed them"a ritualized means of holding power accountable" – that were a fixture at the White House for decades but have not been held in more than two months. Seven others committed to an on-the-record press secretary interaction with the press corps at least weekly.

Read More

Empty jury seats in a courtroom.

From courtrooms to redistricting, citizen panels prove impartial judgment is still possible in American democracy.

Getty Images, Mint Images

How Juries and Citizen Commissions Strengthen Democracy

In the ongoing attacks on democracy in 2025, juries and judges played a key role in maintaining normal standards of civil rights. As it turns out, they have something important to teach us about democracy reform as well.

The Power of Random Selection

Juries are an interesting feature of the American legal system. They are assemblies of men and women picked at random, who come together on a one-time basis to perform a key role: rendering an independent judgment in a trial or indictment proceeding. Once they're done, they are free to go home.

Keep ReadingShow less
Social Security card, treasury check and $100 bills
In swing states, both parties agree on ideas to save Social Security
JJ Gouin/Getty Images

Social Security Still Works, but Its Future Is Up to Us

Like many people over 60 and thinking seriously about retirement, I’ve been paying closer attention to Social Security, and recent changes have made me concerned.

Since its creation during the Great Depression, Social Security has been one of the most successful federal programs in U.S. history. It has survived wars, recessions, demographic change, and repeated ideological attacks, yet it continues to do what it was designed to do: provide a basic floor of income security for older Americans. Before Social Security, old age often meant poverty, dependence on family, or institutionalization. After its adoption, a decent retirement became achievable for millions.

Keep ReadingShow less