Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Democracy reform coalition presses the presidential field for more attention

A coalition of more than 100 progressive advocacy groups on Wednesday urged all two-dozen announced major party presidential candidates to endorse a comprehensive democracy reform plan and declare that implementation would be a top priority for their administrations.

The group, called Declaration for American Democracy, said the best place for them to start would be embracing HR 1, the comprehensive campaign finance, election administration and government ethics package the House passed this spring with the votes of all the Democrats (but none of the Republicans). Every Democratic senator is co-sponsoring the companion measure even though it's a dead letter in the GOP-majority Senate.

That means half the Democratic field (the seven senators and four House members running) is already behind the package, and several of the others have also signaled their support – although none of them has yet sounded ready to make fixing government dysfunction a centerpiece of their platform. (The only declared HR 1 opponent among the candidates is President Trump, who's said he would veto the measure.)


"We encourage you to treat the policies included in these bills, and listed in the document below, as the foundation for your own democracy platform and that you explore additional new aspirational reform measures to revitalize our democracy," the group wrote in a letter to each candidate, attaching a manifesto which largely echoes the provisions in the House measure.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

"We want to know how you'll champion these reforms on the campaign trail," they said, and "if elected, this platform's enactment must be your first priority in 2021."

The coalition includes prominent left-leaning government reform and campaign finance groups including End Citizens United, Public Citizen, People for the American Way and Common Cause; environmental organizations including Greenpeace and the League of Conservation Voters; civil rights groups including the NAACP and progressive membership organizations including MoveOn and the Working Families Party.

Most of the Democrats did commit this week, meanwhile, to one thing that might boost faith in democracy: Eight of them told Washington Post columnist Karen Tumulty they would reinstate the daily press briefings – she dubbed them "a ritualized means of holding power accountable" – that were a fixture at the White House for decades but have not been held in more than two months. Seven others committed to an on-the-record press secretary interaction with the press corps at least weekly.

Read More

The DOGE and Executive Power

White House Senior Advisor, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk attends a Cabinet meeting at the White House on April 30, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The DOGE and Executive Power

The DOGE is not the first effort to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in government. It is the first to receive such vociferous disdain along what appears to be purely political lines. Most presidents have made efforts in these areas, some more substantial than others, with limited success. Here are some modern examples.

In 1982, President Reagan used an executive order to establish a private sector task force to identify inefficiencies in government spending (commonly called the Grace Commission). The final report included 2,478 recommendations to reduce wasteful government practices, estimated savings of $429 billion over the first three years and $6.8 trillion between 1985 and 2000. Most of the savings required legislative changes, and Congress ignored most of those proposals.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money in politics
Super PACs tied to major parties misled voters, complaint alleges
erhui1979/Getty Images

Is It Possible To Reverse Course on the Corruptive Influence of Money in American Politics?

A $288 Billion Dollar Proto-Presidency?

The 2024 presidential election saw Elon Musk spend over a quarter of a billion to elect President Trump, which is exactly $288 million according to The Washington Post report of the final tally of campaign spending on January 31, 2025. Did that staggering campaign contribution buy the billionaire the right to attend cabinet meetings and stand beside the President in the Oval Office and at other events? Did those millions buy a Proto-Presidency, complete with the opportunity to run a department aggressively dismantling government and radically changing what government does for ordinary Americans while personally benefiting from government contracts? Professor Lawrence Lessig argues that ‘Musk is the clearest example of the corrupting influence of money in politics.’ According to a recent PEW study, 72% of Americans agree that money is the number one corrupting influence in politics. So, what can be done? Are we too far down this road to make meaningful change, or are there options?

Keep ReadingShow less
Progressives Have Religious Freedom Too
person standing while reading ook

Progressives Have Religious Freedom Too

At the end of March, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case about religious freedom. In late April, it heard two more. By summer, the Court could decide to give religious employers another tax break, let religious parents excuse their children from classes that mention queer people, and give religious charter schools access to public funding.

Religious freedom in these cases is about conservatives’ religious right to be exempt from certain laws and taxes. They give a Supreme Court dominated by Republican appointees a chance to carve three new religion-shaped holes in American law.

Keep ReadingShow less