Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Understanding the 2024 Election: A Call to Action for Inclusive Democracy

Understanding the 2024 Election: A Call to Action for Inclusive Democracy
Charles F. Kettering Foundation

As a Black American woman and an educator, I am compelled to examine the forces that led to Donald Trump’s 2024 victory and its impact on our increasingly multiracial democracy. Democracy—derived from the Greek word demokratia, meaning “rule by the people”—is now under attack. With a deep sense of historical awareness, moral clarity, and an unwavering commitment to justice, I must underscore that democracy, as we have long understood it, is not just a system of governance. Democracy is a promise: a promise that every voice matters, that justice is not reserved for the “few” or the privileged, and that freedom is not a selective right. In this moment, the promise is being rewritten and redefined in ways that exclude rather than include and that silence rather than empower.

Attacks on Diversity and Inclusion


Much of what we are witnessing now was foreshadowed in the Heritage Foundation’s 900-page policy blueprint Project 2025, which aims to radically expand Trump’s presidential powers and reorganize the whole of the federal government. Many of Trump’s recent actions are reflecting Project 2025’s proposals. On his first day in office, he signed a record number of executive orders that target marginalized communities.

Among these executive orders was the elimination of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) and DEIA (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility) programs across the federal government. Federal agencies have already begun canceling DEIA-related contracts, scrubbing resources from their websites, and halting training sessions. The irony of Trump signing this order on Martin Luther King Jr. Day was not lost on those of us committed to a multiracial democracy.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Many of these executive orders target immigrants and immigrant communities. Mass deportations and raids are targeting schools, hospitals, and places of worship. He is attempting to dismantle the nation’s asylum system and end birthright citizenship.

In the realm of reproductive rights, Trump has signed executive orders prohibiting federal funds from supporting abortion services, both domestically and abroad. US foreign aid policy prohibits funding to overseas nongovernmental organizations that perform, refer, or discuss abortions, even if using their own money.

Trump’s executive actions have also attacked LGBTQ+ rights. On his first day as president, he ordered the removal of LGBTQ+-specific pages from government websites and rescinded a Biden-era policy allowing transgender people to openly serve in the military. During his inaugural address, he declared that there are “only two genders, male and female.”

The extremity of these policies prompted Bishop Mariann Budde to take the unprecedented step of directly addressing Trump from the pulpit of the National Cathedral. As she led the inaugural prayer service, she pleaded:

Mr. President, millions have put their trust in you. In the name of our God, I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now—gay, lesbian, and transgender children in families of all political beliefs who fear for their lives.

Beyond these extreme policies and orders, Trump’s administration is defined by its lack of diversity and extreme wealth concentration. His proposed cabinet is 81% White, making it the least diverse since Ronald Reagan. The wealth of the administration and its associates, like Elon Musk, exceeds $450 billion. This net worth concentration aligns with oligarchy, a system where the ultra-wealthy shape policies to benefit themselves.

Echoes of History

Trump’s rhetoric and policies may appear to be outliers in the post-civil-rights period of American history, herstory, and theirstory, but they fit within a familiar pattern from previous eras. Whenever marginalized communities have fought for constitutional rights, they have been met with legal, legislative, and social backlash, alongside efforts to suppress the discussion of their struggles.

A recurring false narrative accompanies this backlash: the idea that granting rights to marginalized groups somehow diminishes the rights of others. This belief has fueled opposition movements from enslavement to Reconstruction, from women’s suffrage to the Civil Rights Movement, and now in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights.

Education has long been weaponized to maintain social hierarchies. Enslaved people were forbidden from learning to read or write because literacy was a direct threat to the institution of slavery. Today, education is still being manipulated to change the narrative around equal rights and to limit discussions on race, gender, and other identities.

Over the past decade, local and state governments have passed laws that directly influence what can and cannot be taught and discussed in our schools. Teaching about race, gender identity, and sexual orientation has been restricted in many states. In my home state of Florida, according to curricula approved in 2023, Black people gained “personal benefit” from enslavement—a blatant distortion of history.

Democracy and education have a symbiotic relationship: one cannot exist without the other. A democratic society requires informed and open-minded citizens.

Four Steps to Preserve and Strengthen Democracy

In these challenging times, we must take four critical steps to preserve and strengthen American democracy:

1. Understand the Appeal of Trump’s Candidacy

Trump’s ability to attract key voter blocs—young people, people of color, women, and union workers—defied expectations given the extreme and, in many instances, anti-democratic nature of his rhetoric and politics.

Economic struggles rather than issues like democracy or reproductive rights were prioritized by many voters, especially younger Americans. Others may have voted with religion or cultural factors in mind while not considering the greater threats to democracy for all.

2. Engage in the Democratic Process

Protecting democracy requires more than just voting in presidential elections. It demands consistent participation at state and local levels. Writing or calling representatives, attending town halls, and advocating for policy changes are crucial actions.

3. Defend the Integrity of Education

We must resist the political hijacking of education. The banning of books, the rewriting of history, and the silencing of marginalized voices all threaten the very foundation of democracy. Our engagement in local school boards and curriculum decisions is critical.

4. Fight Not Only for Your Rights, but Also for the Rights of All Americans

Justice is not selective. Our fight must be intersectional to defend the rights of immigrants, LGBTQ+ individuals, women, and all racial minorities. As Coretta Scott King said: “Freedom and justice cannot be parceled out in pieces to suit political convenience. You cannot stand for freedom for one group of people and deny it to others.”

Trump’s second presidency marks a pivotal moment in American democracy. The expansion of executive power, the rollback of the rights of marginalized communities, and the rise of oligarchy demand that we remain vigilant, engaged, and proactive! We must understand voter behavior, stay active in democratic processes, protect education, and advocate for the rights of all, so we can forge a future that truly reflects the ideals of equality, justice, and democracy.

Understanding the 2024 Election: A Call to Action for Inclusive Democracy was originally published by the Charles F. Kettering Foundation and is shared with permission. Johnnetta Betsch Cole is a noted anthropologist, educator, author, speaker, and consultant on diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion in workplaces. She is the former president of both Spelman College and Bennett College and currently is a Charles F. Kettering Foundation senior fellow.

Read More

Public Perspectives: Trump Presidency

U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to watch the Ultimate Fighting Championship at the Kaseya Center on April 12, 2025 in Miami, Florida.

(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Public Perspectives: Trump Presidency

Ahead of Election Day 2024, the Fulcrum launched We the People, a series elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials.

Now, we continue the series to learn if the Donald Trump administration is meeting the voters' motivations for voting in the 2024 presidential election.

Keep ReadingShow less
CO lawmakers work to protect voter rights after Trump elections order

More than 95% of all voters in the United States use paper ballots in elections.

Adobe Stock

CO lawmakers work to protect voter rights after Trump elections order

Some Colorado lawmakers are scrambling to protect voter rights after President Donald Trump issued an executive order to require proof of citizenship to register to vote. They say the requirement would disproportionately affect low-income voters and people of color.

David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, said the language in the U.S. Constitution is very clear that the authority to run elections is delegated to individual states.

"Everyone - Republican, Democrat, liberal, conservative - wants to keep ineligible voters off the list. And there's always some value in discussing how to do it better," he explained. "Unfortunately that's not what this executive order does. It's really a remarkable seizure of power from the states."

Trump has cast doubt on the integrity of American elections for years, despite evidence that fraud is extremely rare. The new order claims the nation has failed "to enforce basic and necessary election protections," and would allow the Department of Homeland Security and 'DOGE' to access state voter rolls. Colorado Senate Bill 1 - which would bar voter discrimination based on race, sexual orientation or gender identity - has cleared the state Senate and now moves to the House.

Becker noted that Congress does have constitutional authority to change election rules, and did so most notably after passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. And in 2021, he says House Democrats passed a sweeping set of election reforms that ended up dying in the Senate.

"But at least that was done through congressional action. What we have here is an executive power grab - an attempt by the President of the United States to dictate to states how they run elections, how they should exercise the power that is granted to them by the Constitution," he continued.

Becker noted the new order suggests serious misunderstandings, intentional or not, about the nation's election system, which he says is secure. It's already illegal for non-U.S. citizens to vote, and voter lists are as accurate as they've ever been. More than 95% of all U.S. voters use paper ballots, which are available in all states, and ballots are audited to confirm results.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pressing Issue of Distinction Overload

Multicolored megaphones.

Getty Images, MicroStockHub

The Pressing Issue of Distinction Overload

We live in a time of distinction overload, namely a proliferation of distinctions that are employed in all aspects of contemporary political, economic, and social life. Distinction Overload—let's name it—is overwhelming citizens who pay attention to workplace dynamics, politics, and family life. Distinction Overload is a relative of information overload, associated with the Information Age itself, which is a descendant of the information explosion that occurred during the Renaissance after Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press.

You can’t really talk or write, let alone think, without making distinctions, and the process of human development itself is very much about learning useful distinctions—me and you, left and right, good and evil, night and day, yes and no, mother and father, humans, fish and animals, and so on. Some distinctions reflect opposition; others divide reality or ethics into three or four or more categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just The Facts: Financial Facts on NATO and the U.S.

Different currencies.

Getty Images, bernardbodo

Just The Facts: Financial Facts on NATO and the U.S.

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

In early March, President Donald Trump once again called into question a fundamental principle of the NATO security alliance: that an attack on one member of NATO is an attack on all nations.

Keep ReadingShow less