Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Examining Why DEI Efforts Often Fall Short and How to Foster Effective Change

Examining Why DEI Efforts Often Fall Short and How to Foster Effective Change

Diversity illustration concept shows different ethnicity and style of people walking on the street, the contrast of people showing individuality characteristics.

Getty Images//Stock Photo

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” - Buckminster Fuller

What if I told you that most organizations’ DEI initiatives were doomed from the start? That their failure could have been predicted and even avoided?


Consider the difference between planting a seed in fertile, nutrient-rich soil and planting it in wet concrete. Which would you predict is most likely to grow? It’s pretty simple, right? And yet, this is what many organizations, institutions, and governments with DEI initiatives have done.

They planted seeds where they could not grow and then blamed the seed for not overcoming the sidewalk it was encased in. By doing so, they conveyed a false narrative that the very diversities that lead to flourishing in every other ecosystem in the world somehow don't work for humans. But often, when DEI efforts fail, it’s not because the seeds are faulty. It’s because the soil is. Until we face the fact that we have set these efforts up for failure and start giving these seeds what they truly need to thrive, we will never benefit from the promise of actualized relational potential across differences.

Unfortunately, most of us are too distracted by our own fears to see how DEI advocates and critics both perpetuate this cycle of ineffectiveness. Many of us who served in DEI-related roles, eager to accelerate social progress, were incapable of discerning what so-called opportunities were worth our time and sanity and which were not. Advocates fear the loss of progress, while critics fear the erosion of their identity status or the hopes that their investment in the status quo may someday work in their favor. But the reality is that fear cannot drive out fear; it only deepens divisions.

A skilled gardener knows that before planting, the weeds must be removed. Similarly, organizations must confront and clear away the root causes of resistance before expecting DEI initiatives to thrive. To ignore this is to engage in what Fuller calls “fighting the existing reality,” a strategy destined for failure.

The question then becomes: Why do so many organizations persist with approaches that don’t work?

In his work, The Denial of Death, psychologist Ernest Becker argues that much of human behavior is driven by the need to repress our awareness of mortality. In DEI contexts, this denial manifests as resistance to change, seeing diversity as a threat to identity, resources, or power. This is very evident in group dynamics, where people cling to their cultural or social identities like a life preserver, keeping them from drowning in this existential anxiety. And this fear is like a poison injected into the veins of most DEI efforts, rendering them incapacitated before they even started.

In essence, this means that for an organization to have a successful DEI initiative, it must be willing to face what will have to die in its previous expression for something greater to flourish. There is an old adage that says, “In order for the plant to grow, the seed must die.” This is a reality that innovative organizations not only accept but also embrace and strive to work with.

Regardless of whether you are focusing on technological innovation or relational innovation, to build a model that makes the existing one obsolete, organizations must confront these fears head-on. They must create environments where DEI efforts are nurtured by transparency, trust, and a willingness to engage in difficult conversations. In doing so, they not only create space for inclusion but also transform their culture into one capable of sustained, meaningful change.

In part two of this series, we will explore with more depth the resistance to this awareness as well as what possibilities exist for organizations that are willing to do the work to cultivate an environment that can truly realize the potential of DEI and its correlates.

This piece was inspired by a longer entry in the People Are Not Things Newsletter entitled, Deny Everything Infinitely (DEI) Part 1: The Very Predictable and Virtually Inevitable Fate of Most Corporate DEI Programs

Pedro Senhorinha (Sen-your-reen-ya) Silva has had a very storied career that expands from the United States Air Force where he served as a Satellite Communications Technician before cross-training to become a Chinese Linguist all the way to professional ministry serving with the progressive Christian denomination, the United Church of Christ. He has also served in a myriad of other capacities from corporate recruiter to Americorp Vista. And at the heart of every choice he has made, whether vocationally or educationally, is a deep desire to unite people.

Read More

Xavier Becerra Steps Back Into California Politics

Xavier Becerra

Xavier Becerra Steps Back Into California Politics

Xavier Becerra is once again stepping onto familiar ground. After serving in Congress, leading California’s Department of Justice, and joining President Joe Biden’s Cabinet as Secretary of Health and Human Services, he is now seeking the governorship of his home state. His campaign marks both a return to local politics and a renewed confrontation with Donald Trump, now back in the White House.

Becerra’s message combines pragmatism and resistance. “We’ll continue to be a leader, a fighter, and a vision of what can be in the United States,” he said in his recent interview with Latino News Network. He recalled his years as California’s attorney general, when he “had to take him on” to defend the state’s laws and families. Between 2017 and 2021, Becerra filed or joined more than 120 lawsuits against the Trump administration, covering immigration, environmental protection, civil rights, and healthcare. “We were able to defend California, its values and its people,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Voting booths in a high school.

During a recent visit to Indianapolis, VP JD Vance pressed Indiana Republicans to consider mid-decade redistricting ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Getty Images, mphillips007

JD Vance Presses Indiana GOP To Redraw Congressional Map

On October 10, Vice President JD Vance visited Indianapolis to meet with Republican lawmakers, urging them to consider redrawing Indiana’s congressional map ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The visit marked Vance’s third trip to the state in recent months, underscoring the Trump administration’s aggressive push to expand Republican control in Congress.

Vance’s meetings are part of a broader national strategy led by President Donald Trump to encourage GOP-led states to revise district boundaries mid-decade. States like Missouri and Texas have already passed new maps, while Indiana remains hesitant. Governor Mike Braun has met with Vance and other Republican leaders. Still, he has yet to commit to calling a special legislative session. Braun emphasized that any decision must ensure “fair representation for every Hoosier."

Keep ReadingShow less
A child looks into an empty fridge-freezer in a domestic kitchen.

The Trump administration’s suspension of the USDA’s Household Food Security Report halts decades of hunger data tracking.

Getty Images, Catherine Falls Commercial

Trump Gives Up the Fight Against Hunger

A Vanishing Measure of Hunger

Consider a hunger policy director at a state Department of Social Services studying food insecurity data across the state. For years, she has relied on the USDA’s annual Household Food Security Report to identify where hunger is rising, how many families are skipping meals, and how many children go to bed hungry. Those numbers help her target resources and advocate for stronger programs.

Now there is no new data. The survey has been “suspended for review,” officially to allow for a “methodological reassessment” and cost analysis. Critics say the timing and language suggest political motives. It is one of many federal data programs quietly dropped under a Trump executive order on so-called “nonessential statistics,” a phrase that almost parodies itself. Labeling hunger data “nonessential” is like turning off a fire alarm because it makes too much noise; it implies that acknowledging food insecurity is optional and reveals more about the administration’s priorities than reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Standing Up for Democracy Requires Giving the Other Side Credit When It Is Deserved

U.S. President Donald Trump poses with the signed agreement at a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war on October 13, 2025 in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt.

(Photo by Suzanne Plunkett - Pool / Getty Images)

Standing Up for Democracy Requires Giving the Other Side Credit When It Is Deserved

American political leaders have forgotten how to be gracious to their opponents when people on the other side do something for which they deserve credit. Our antagonisms have become so deep and bitter that we are reluctant to give an inch to our political adversaries.

This is not good for democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less