Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Examining Why DEI Efforts Often Fall Short and How to Foster Effective Change

Examining Why DEI Efforts Often Fall Short and How to Foster Effective Change

Diversity illustration concept shows different ethnicity and style of people walking on the street, the contrast of people showing individuality characteristics.

Getty Images//Stock Photo

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” - Buckminster Fuller

What if I told you that most organizations’ DEI initiatives were doomed from the start? That their failure could have been predicted and even avoided?


Consider the difference between planting a seed in fertile, nutrient-rich soil and planting it in wet concrete. Which would you predict is most likely to grow? It’s pretty simple, right? And yet, this is what many organizations, institutions, and governments with DEI initiatives have done.

They planted seeds where they could not grow and then blamed the seed for not overcoming the sidewalk it was encased in. By doing so, they conveyed a false narrative that the very diversities that lead to flourishing in every other ecosystem in the world somehow don't work for humans. But often, when DEI efforts fail, it’s not because the seeds are faulty. It’s because the soil is. Until we face the fact that we have set these efforts up for failure and start giving these seeds what they truly need to thrive, we will never benefit from the promise of actualized relational potential across differences.

Unfortunately, most of us are too distracted by our own fears to see how DEI advocates and critics both perpetuate this cycle of ineffectiveness. Many of us who served in DEI-related roles, eager to accelerate social progress, were incapable of discerning what so-called opportunities were worth our time and sanity and which were not. Advocates fear the loss of progress, while critics fear the erosion of their identity status or the hopes that their investment in the status quo may someday work in their favor. But the reality is that fear cannot drive out fear; it only deepens divisions.

A skilled gardener knows that before planting, the weeds must be removed. Similarly, organizations must confront and clear away the root causes of resistance before expecting DEI initiatives to thrive. To ignore this is to engage in what Fuller calls “fighting the existing reality,” a strategy destined for failure.

The question then becomes: Why do so many organizations persist with approaches that don’t work?

In his work, The Denial of Death, psychologist Ernest Becker argues that much of human behavior is driven by the need to repress our awareness of mortality. In DEI contexts, this denial manifests as resistance to change, seeing diversity as a threat to identity, resources, or power. This is very evident in group dynamics, where people cling to their cultural or social identities like a life preserver, keeping them from drowning in this existential anxiety. And this fear is like a poison injected into the veins of most DEI efforts, rendering them incapacitated before they even started.

In essence, this means that for an organization to have a successful DEI initiative, it must be willing to face what will have to die in its previous expression for something greater to flourish. There is an old adage that says, “In order for the plant to grow, the seed must die.” This is a reality that innovative organizations not only accept but also embrace and strive to work with.

Regardless of whether you are focusing on technological innovation or relational innovation, to build a model that makes the existing one obsolete, organizations must confront these fears head-on. They must create environments where DEI efforts are nurtured by transparency, trust, and a willingness to engage in difficult conversations. In doing so, they not only create space for inclusion but also transform their culture into one capable of sustained, meaningful change.

In part two of this series, we will explore with more depth the resistance to this awareness as well as what possibilities exist for organizations that are willing to do the work to cultivate an environment that can truly realize the potential of DEI and its correlates.

This piece was inspired by a longer entry in the People Are Not Things Newsletter entitled, Deny Everything Infinitely (DEI) Part 1: The Very Predictable and Virtually Inevitable Fate of Most Corporate DEI Programs

Pedro Senhorinha (Sen-your-reen-ya) Silva has had a very storied career that expands from the United States Air Force where he served as a Satellite Communications Technician before cross-training to become a Chinese Linguist all the way to professional ministry serving with the progressive Christian denomination, the United Church of Christ. He has also served in a myriad of other capacities from corporate recruiter to Americorp Vista. And at the heart of every choice he has made, whether vocationally or educationally, is a deep desire to unite people.


Read More

Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses

This week, I joined a coalition of journalists in Washington, D.C., to speak directly with lawmakers about a crisis unfolding in plain sight: the rapid disappearance of local, community‑rooted journalism. The advocacy day, organized by the Hispanic Technology & Telecommunications Partnership (HTTP), brought together reporters and media leaders who understand that the future of local news is inseparable from the future of American democracy.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You

The brutality of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the related cohort of federal officers in Minneapolis spurred more than 30,000 stalwart Minnesotans to step forward in January and be trained as monitors. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demands to Minnesota’s Governor demonstrate that the ICE surge is linked to elections, and other ICE-related threats, including Steve Bannon calling for ICE agents deployment to polling stations, make clear that elections should be on the monitoring agenda in Minnesota and across the nation.

A recent exhortation by the New York Times Editorial Board underscores the need for citizen action to defend elections and outlines some steps. Additional avenues are also available. My three decades of experience with international and citizen election observation in numerous countries demonstrates that monitoring safeguards trustworthy elections and promotes public confidence in them - both of which are needed here and now in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less